Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Effects of lung volume and thoracic gas compression on maximal and partial flow-volume curves

R Pellegrino, P Confessore, A Bianco, V Brusasco
European Respiratory Journal 1996 9: 2168-2173; DOI:
R Pellegrino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Confessore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Bianco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V Brusasco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Comparing isovolume flows, measured at the mouth during forced expiratory manoeuvres as started from maximal or partial lung inflation, is a means of assessing the effects of deep inhalation on airway calibre. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the assessment of the effect of deep inhalation during induced bronchoconstriction is influenced by the lung volume at which it is determined and by volume differences due to thoracic gas compression that occur during forced expiratory manoeuvres. Four healthy subjects and six subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma subjects performed partial and maximal forced expiratory manoeuvres in a flow-type body plethysmograph at control and during a methacholine (MCh) inhalation challenge. Mouth flow (V1) was plotted against both the expired volume (Vmo) and the simultaneous thoracic volume measured by plethysmography (Vpl) changes (V1-Vmo loop and V1-Vpl loop, respectively). The effects of deep inhalation were quantified by determining 1) the ration of maximal to partial expiratory flows (M/P) at 30, 40 and 50% of control forced vital capacity (FVC) both on V1-Vmo loops (M/Pmo) and V1-Vpl loops (M/Ppl) at control and at MCh end-point; and 2) the slope of the linear regression of maximal vs partial expiratory flows at 30, 40 and 50% of control FVC both on V1-Vmo loops (MPst,mo) and V1-Vpl loops (MPsl,pl) over the entire challenge. At control, M/Pmo and M/Ppl were similar. At MCh end-point, M/Pmo and M/Ppl increased more than twofold (p < 0.002), with M/Pmo consistently exceeding M/Ppl (p < 0.001). In addition, both M/Pmo and M/Ppl varied inversely with lung volume (p < 0.001). By contrast, MPsl,mo and MPsl,pl were not significantly different from each other (p = 0.8), and were also similar at the different lung volumes (p = 0.6). We conclude that during induced bronchoconstriction, the bronchodilation following a deep inhalation, expressed as maximal to partial flow ratio is dependent both on lung volume and volume differences due to thoracic gas compression. The use of expired flow and volume measurements may lead to a small but systematic overestimation of the bronchodilator effect of a deep inhalation. On the contrary, maximal to partial flow slope is insensitive either to lung volume or volume differences due to thoracic gas compression and can, therefore, be fairly determined from expired flow-volume loops.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 10 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of lung volume and thoracic gas compression on maximal and partial flow-volume curves
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Effects of lung volume and thoracic gas compression on maximal and partial flow-volume curves
R Pellegrino, P Confessore, A Bianco, V Brusasco
European Respiratory Journal Oct 1996, 9 (10) 2168-2173;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Effects of lung volume and thoracic gas compression on maximal and partial flow-volume curves
R Pellegrino, P Confessore, A Bianco, V Brusasco
European Respiratory Journal Oct 1996, 9 (10) 2168-2173;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • The impact of COVID-19 on patients with asthma
  • FEV1 decline and cardiovascular disease in COPD
  • HIF2α-ARNT hetero-dimerisation as a therapeutic strategy for PAH
Show more Original Articles

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society