Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Comparison of oxygen uptake during a conventional treadmill test and the shuttle walking test in chronic airflow limitation

SJ Singh, MD Morgan, AE Hardman, C Rowe, PA Bardsley
European Respiratory Journal 1994 7: 2016-2020; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.94.07112016
SJ Singh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MD Morgan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AE Hardman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Rowe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PA Bardsley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between performance on the shuttle walking test and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) during a conventional treadmill test in patients with chronic airflow limitation. Two different techniques were used to measure oxygen consumption, i.e. conventional Douglas bag techniques (treadmill test) and a portable oxygen consumption meter (shuttle test). Initially, 19 patients performed a shuttle walking test (after one practice walk) and a maximal treadmill walking test, in a randomized, balanced design. Subsequently, 10 patients, (after one practice) completed an unencumbered shuttle walking test and one supporting the portable oxygen consumption meter, in random order. The results of the first experiment revealed a strong relationship between performance during the shuttle walking test and VO2max during the treadmill walking test (r = 0.88). The results of the second experiment consistently demonstrated an incremental increase in oxygen consumption and ventilation in response to the increasing intensity of the shuttle walking test. Again, a strong relationship between VO2max and performance on the shuttle test was demonstrated (r = 0.81). We concluded that the shuttle walking test is a valid field exercise test of functional capacity. Performance on the test relates strongly to VO2max, the traditional indicator of cardiorespiratory capacity.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 7 Issue 11 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of oxygen uptake during a conventional treadmill test and the shuttle walking test in chronic airflow limitation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of oxygen uptake during a conventional treadmill test and the shuttle walking test in chronic airflow limitation
SJ Singh, MD Morgan, AE Hardman, C Rowe, PA Bardsley
European Respiratory Journal Nov 1994, 7 (11) 2016-2020; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.94.07112016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparison of oxygen uptake during a conventional treadmill test and the shuttle walking test in chronic airflow limitation
SJ Singh, MD Morgan, AE Hardman, C Rowe, PA Bardsley
European Respiratory Journal Nov 1994, 7 (11) 2016-2020; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.94.07112016
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Inhaled isotonic alkaline versus saline solution and radioaerosol clearance in chronic cough
  • Lung volume reduction surgery versus conservative treatment in severe emphysema
  • Effect of moderate alcohol upon obstructive sleep apnoea
Show more Clinical Trial

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society