Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Comparison of two epidemiological protocols for measuring airway responsiveness and allergic sensitivity in adults

BG Toelle, JK Peat, CM Salome, J Crane, D McMillan, J Dermand, W D'Souza, AJ Woolcock
European Respiratory Journal 1994 7: 1798-1804; DOI:
BG Toelle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JK Peat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CM Salome
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Crane
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D McMillan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Dermand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W D'Souza
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AJ Woolcock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In recent years, airway responsiveness has commonly been measured in epidemiological studies using one of two methods. In one method, histamine is administered via a handheld DeVilbiss nebulizer and in the other, methacholine is administered via a dosimeter. Allergic sensitivity has commonly been measured by either the allergen droplet method or by Phazet. We wanted to assess the comparability of airway responsiveness and of allergic sensitivity measured by both methods. A total of 48 volunteers, including normal and asthmatic subjects, participated in the study. Subjects first underwent one of the two tests of airway responsiveness and allergic sensitivity, and then returned within 10 days to undergo tests using the second protocol. Commencement protocol was allocated in random order. There was good agreement between both methods for assessing airway responsiveness and for assessing allergic sensitivity. The difference for dose response ratio (DRR) between histamine and methacholine was a 1.19 (95% (CI) 0.78, 1.82) fold changes, which was not statistically significant. Agreement between allergic sensitivity methods was perfect for Alternaria tenuis, good for rye-grass (kappa = 0.71) and moderate for cat and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (kappa approximately 0.5). It is possible to compare data from epidemiological studies which use these methods.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 7 Issue 10 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of two epidemiological protocols for measuring airway responsiveness and allergic sensitivity in adults
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of two epidemiological protocols for measuring airway responsiveness and allergic sensitivity in adults
BG Toelle, JK Peat, CM Salome, J Crane, D McMillan, J Dermand, W D'Souza, AJ Woolcock
European Respiratory Journal Oct 1994, 7 (10) 1798-1804;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparison of two epidemiological protocols for measuring airway responsiveness and allergic sensitivity in adults
BG Toelle, JK Peat, CM Salome, J Crane, D McMillan, J Dermand, W D'Souza, AJ Woolcock
European Respiratory Journal Oct 1994, 7 (10) 1798-1804;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Inhaled isotonic alkaline versus saline solution and radioaerosol clearance in chronic cough
  • Lung volume reduction surgery versus conservative treatment in severe emphysema
  • Effect of moderate alcohol upon obstructive sleep apnoea
Show more Clinical Trial

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society