Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Mycobacterium avium complex genomics and transmission in a London hospital

Andries J. van Tonder, Huw C. Ellis, Colin P. Churchward, Kartik Kumar, Newara Ramadan, Susan Benson, Julian Parkhill, Miriam F. Moffatt, Michael R. Loebinger, William O.C. Cookson
European Respiratory Journal 2023 61: 2201237; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01237-2022
Andries J. van Tonder
1Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andries J. van Tonder
Huw C. Ellis
2Host Defence Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
3National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin P. Churchward
3National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kartik Kumar
2Host Defence Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
3National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kartik Kumar
Newara Ramadan
4Department of Microbiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Newara Ramadan
Susan Benson
4Department of Microbiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian Parkhill
1Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jp369@cam.ac.uk
Miriam F. Moffatt
3National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
5These three authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Loebinger
2Host Defence Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
3National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
5These three authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William O.C. Cookson
2Host Defence Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
3National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
5These three authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are environmental microorganisms and opportunistic pathogens in individuals with pre-existing lung conditions such as cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis. While recent studies of Mycobacterium abscessus have identified transmission within single CF centres as well as nationally and globally, transmission of other NTM species is less well studied.

Methods To investigate the potential for transmission of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) we sequenced 996 isolates from 354 CF and non-CF patients at the Royal Brompton Hospital (London, UK; collected 2013–2016) and analysed them in a global context. Epidemiological links were identified from patient records. Previously published genomes were used to characterise global population structures.

Results We identified putative transmission clusters in three MAC species, although few epidemiological links could be identified. For M. avium, lineages were largely limited to single countries, while for Mycobacterium chimaera, global transmission clusters previously associated with heater-cooler units (HCUs) were found. However, the immediate ancestor of the lineage causing the major HCU-associated outbreak was a lineage already circulating in patients.

Conclusions CF and non-CF patients shared transmission chains, although the lack of epidemiological links suggested that most transmission is indirect and may involve environmental intermediates or asymptomatic carriage in the wider population.

Abstract

Transmission of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) species is indirect and may involve environmental intermediates or asymptomatic carriage in the wider population https://bit.ly/3FQWqnF

Introduction

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous environmental microorganisms found in soil and water, and are considered opportunistic pathogens in humans. Individuals with pre-existing genetic or acquired lung diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF), non-CF bronchiectasis and COPD are more prone to NTM disease, although individuals with no known immune dysfunction can also present with NTM infections [1–3]. Globally, disease due to NTM infections is increasing in prevalence; the estimated prevalence of NTM disease in the USA rose from 2.4 per 100 000 in the early 1980s to 15.2 per 100 000 in 2013 [4]. NTM infections may be progressive and treatment requires prolonged multidrug therapy [5]. Treatment is often unsuccessful due to an absence of antimicrobial agents with low toxicity and effective in vivo activity against NTM species [1].

A number of NTM species including Mycobacterium abscessus and members of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), notably M. avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare, have emerged as major respiratory pathogens in the past three decades [6–8]. Another member of the MAC, Mycobacterium chimaera, has also been implicated in numerous global infections associated with cardiothoracic surgery, with the source of infections linked to LivaNova heater-cooler units (HCUs) contaminated during their manufacture [9–11].

Until recently the prevailing hypothesis was that NTM infections were due to independent acquisitions from environmental sources such as soil, contaminated drinking water distribution systems and household plumbing [12, 13]. Recent studies of M. abscessus in CF patients have, however, identified indirect patient–patient transmission within a single CF centre as well as the presence of globally circulating clones of M. abscessus among CF patients worldwide [14–18]. An observational study of M. abscessus across England showed that these dominant clones are also found in patients with other chronic respiratory diseases, but was unable to identify epidemiological links for most closely related isolates, suggesting environmental acquisition [19]. However, a wider analysis demonstrated that transmission networks involve both people with CF and those without, and that these networks are global. It is therefore likely that transmission is complex, involving multiple patient cadres as well as environmental intermediates [20]. In the case of M. chimaera, a global genetic analysis of 250 isolates from patients, HCUs and the factory of origin suggested a point-source contamination during manufacture causing global distribution followed by localised transmission [11].

While transmission of MAC between CF patients in the USA has been investigated [21], little work has been done to examine whether transmission of MAC occurs between patients with CF, non-CF bronchiectasis or other chronic respiratory diseases. Using a large collection of longitudinal isolates collected from patients attending the Royal Brompton Hospital (London, UK), the aims of this study were to characterise the population structure of MAC, to identify potential transmission chains involving patients with CF and other non-CF lung conditions, and to place the Royal Brompton Hospital isolates in a global context.

Methods

Bacterial isolates and study period

Isolates were collected from 363 patients attending the respiratory inpatient and outpatient clinics of the Royal Brompton Hospital between January 2013 and April 2016. DNA extractions were performed on confirmed MAC cultures and the Illumina Hiseq X10 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to generate 2×150 bp paired-end reads (supplementary text S1). Sequencing reads were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under project PRJEB21813 (supplementary file S2).

Whole-genome sequencing and data analysis

Following sample quality control, whole-species maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were built with IQ-TREE version 1.6.5 using a previously described pipeline [22] (supplementary text S1), including published sequences for context (supplementary file S3). Pairwise single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distances for within-patient longitudinal isolates for each species in the Royal Brompton Hospital datasets were used to calculate thresholds for defining transmission clusters (supplementary text S1).

Results

Patient demographics

In total, 354 patients were included in the study. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population are shown in table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient clinical and demographic data: all patients (n=354)

Species distribution

996 isolates from 354 patients from nine MAC species were sequenced (table 2). Three species accounted for 926 of the 996 of MAC isolates (93.0%): M. avium (M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. hominissuis), M. chimaera and M. intracellulare. Most patients were infected with only a single species during the collection period. However, 45 of the 354 patients (12.7%) were infected with two or more species (figure 1a). In this group, most of the isolates collected were typically from a single species, with other species observed more infrequently (figure 1b). Subsequent analyses in this study will focus on the three predominant species in the dataset: M. intracellulare, M. avium (M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. hominissuis) and M. chimaera.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Mycobacterium avium complex species identified in the Royal Brompton Hospital collection

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Patients infected by more than one Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) species. a) Histogram showing the number of MAC species identified in each patient. b) Timeline of patients infected by more than one MAC species. Each point represents an isolate and is coloured according to the species identified. Isolates from the species in a patient are linked together. Patients with one isolate or multiple isolates from a single species were excluded.

M. intracellulare

162 genomes from 37 patients were identified as M. intracellulare (figure 2a). 11 patients had CF, 17 had non-CF bronchiectasis and seven had other lung conditions (COPD n=3; interstitial lung disease (ILD) n=3; asthma n=1; congenital pulmonary airway malformation n=1). Disease metadata were missing for two patients. Genomic clustering with fastBAPs identified nine lineages, with three of these having more than 10 genomes (figure 2a). Following remapping to local references for the three largest lineages, three putative transmission clusters were identified, with the largest, Mi_FB3_1, composed of 16 patients (figure 2b and supplementary table S2). Of these 16 patients, eight had non-CF bronchiectasis, seven had CF and one had ILD. During the sampling period, four patients were treated with antibiotics, with successful outcomes in three patients. No epidemiological links were identified between patients in the year prior to isolate collection. Comparison with 77 previously published M. intracellulare isolates showed that the most closely related contextual isolate was collected in the UK in 2015/2016 [23] and formed part of a clade containing isolates from the Mi_FB3_1 cluster (figure 2c).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Population structure and transmission of Mycobacterium intracellulare. a) Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for M. intracellulare isolates collected at the Royal Brompton Hospital (n=162). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. The disease status of the patients (that isolates were collected from) for cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis is represented by red bars for “Yes” and white bars for “No”, with missing patient data shown by grey bars. Scale bar shown in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) per site. b) M. intracellulare Mi_FB3_1 transmission cluster. Each node represents an isolate or isolates identical (0 SNPs) to each other and the size of the node is proportional to the number of identical isolates. Nodes are coloured and labelled by patient ID. The outer ring of each node is coloured according to the disease status of the patient. The edges represent the pairwise SNP distance between the isolate(s). c) Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for global M. intracellulare isolates (n=114). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. fastBAPS lineage, source of isolate, country of collection and study are shown as datastrips to the right of the phylogenies. Isolates from the Royal Brompton Hospital are highlighted in salmon colour. Scale bar shown in SNPs per site. Details of the study datasets are provided in supplementary text S1 and supplementary file S3.

M. avium

405 sequenced isolates collected from 176 patients were identified as M. avium. Sequence data for all M. avium isolates were mapped to a single reference (M. avium subsp. avium 104; NC008595.1) and a phylogenetic tree constructed with M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (DRR263663) as an outgroup (supplementary figure S2). The structure of this phylogeny showed that there were two major clades which corresponded to the two subspecies M. avium subsp. avium (n=207) and M. avium subsp. hominissuis (n=198). Each of these subspecies was analysed separately.

M. avium subsp. avium

Of the 76 patients infected with M. avium subsp. avium, 15 had CF, 39 had non-CF bronchiectasis and 16 had other lung conditions (COPD n=10; ILD n=3; allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) n=3; asthma n=6), while three patients, including one smoker, had no pre-existing respiratory disease (metadata were unavailable for three patients) (figure 3a). Clustering of the 207 M. avium subsp. avium genomes identified 18 fastBAPS lineages (figure 3a). Remapping of the four largest lineages allowed the identification of seven putative transmission clusters comprising between two and 10 patients (supplementary table S3), with the largest cluster of 10 isolates comprised of patients with CF (n=2), non-CF bronchiectasis (n=6) and asthma or COPD (n=2) (figure 3b).

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Population structure and transmission of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium. a) Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for M. avium subsp. avium isolates collected at the Royal Brompton Hospital (n=207). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. The disease status of the patients (that isolates were collected from) for cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis is represented by red bars for “Yes” and white bars for No, with missing patient data shown by grey bars. Scale bar shown in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) per site. b) Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium MAA_FB5_1 transmission cluster. Each node represents an isolate or isolates identical (0 SNPs) to each other and the size of the node is proportional to the number of identical isolates. Nodes are coloured and labelled by patient ID. The outer ring of each node is coloured according to the disease status of the patient. The edges represent the pairwise SNP distance between the isolate(s). c) Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for global M. avium subsp. avium isolates (n=344). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. fastBAPS lineage, source of isolate, country of collection and study are shown as datastrips to the right of the phylogenies. Isolates from the Royal Brompton Hospital are highlighted in salmon colour. Scale bar shown in SNPs per site. Details of the study datasets are provided in supplementary text S1 and supplementary file S3. NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information.

21 fastBAPS lineages were defined in the global phylogeny (figure 3c). Examination of the distribution of pairwise SNP distances for each lineage containing at least 10 genomes revealed that there were two lineages, MAA_FB10 and MAA_FB15, containing Royal Brompton Hospital isolates with lower median pairwise SNP distances (figure 3c and supplementary figure S3b). The 23 genomes in FB10 were collected in the UK between 2013 and 2016, with most coming from the National Mycobacterial Reference Service which characterises mycobacterial cultures from across the Midlands and North of England (figure 4a) [23]. If the SNP threshold used to calculate putative transmission clusters circulating in the Royal Brompton Hospital was applied, then one isolate from the Royal Brompton Hospital (40-1) formed part of a cluster comprised of isolates from Quan et al. [23]. The majority (35 out of 46) of the isolates forming MAA_FB15 were collected in the USA, with most from a study investigating M. avium in the community and household water in Philadelphia (figure 4b) [24]. The pairwise distances between two of the Royal Brompton Hospital isolates and other UK isolates and isolates from the USA in MAA_FB15 were under our threshold, suggesting potential cross-Atlantic transmission (supplementary figure S4a).

FIGURE 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4

Mycobacterium avium global fastBAPS phylogenies. Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees for a) M. avium subsp. avium FB10, b) M. avium subsp. avium FB15, c) M. avium subsp. hominissuis FB6 and d) M. avium subsp. hominissuis FB11. The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. The source of isolate, country of collection and study are shown as datastrips to the right of the phylogenies. Isolates from the Royal Brompton Hospital are shown in red colour. Scale bars shown in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) per site. Details of the study datasets are provided in supplementary text S1 and supplementary file S3.

M. avium subsp. hominissuis

198 genomes from 106 patients were characterised as M. avium subsp. hominissuis (figure 5a). 33 patients had CF, 43 had non-CF bronchiectasis and 21 had other lung conditions (COPD n=14; ILD n=1; ABPA n=5; sarcoidosis n=1; asthma n=11). Four patients had no pre-existing respiratory disease. Disease metadata were unavailable for the remaining five patients. Genomic clustering identified 17 lineages and seven putative transmission clusters containing between two and 16 patients (supplementary table S4). The largest cluster of 16 isolates is shown in figure 5b, and comprised patients with CF (n=4), non-CF bronchiectasis (n=7), COPD (n=3) and a single patient with no pre-existing lung condition (metadata were unavailable for one patient). Two pairs of patients in each of the clusters, MAH_FB8_1 and MAH_FB14_9, were found to have epidemiological links.

FIGURE 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5

Population structure and transmission of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis. a) Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates collected at the Royal Brompton Hospital (n=198). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. The disease status of the patients (that isolates were collected from) for cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis is represented by red bars for “Yes” and white bars for “No”, with missing patient data shown by grey bars. Scale bar shown in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) per site. b) M. avium subsp. hominissuis MAH_FB8_1 transmission cluster. Each node represents an isolate or isolates identical (0 SNPs) to each other and the size of the node is proportional to the number of identical isolates. Nodes are coloured and labelled by patient ID. The outer ring of each node is coloured according to the disease status of the patient. The edges represent the pairwise SNP distance between the isolate(s). c) Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for global M. avium subsp. hominissuis isolates (n=236). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. fastBAPS lineage, source of isolate, country of collection and study are shown as datastrips to the right of the phylogenies. Isolates from the Royal Brompton Hospital are highlighted in salmon colour. Scale bar shown in SNPs per site. Details of the study datasets are provided in supplementary text S1 and supplementary file S3. NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Of the 20 defined fastBAPS lineages in the global collection, MAH_FB6 and MAH_FB11 had lower median pairwise SNP distances and contained Royal Brompton Hospital isolates (figure 5c and supplementary figure S3c). Both lineages were composed completely or near-completely of isolates collected in the UK (figure 4c and d). The star-like structure of the FB6 phylogeny is suggestive of a point-source outbreak, and applying a transmission SNP threshold of 16 SNPs showed that 41 out of 45 of the isolates in FB6 would have formed a transmission cluster that included both isolates from this study and isolates from other UK studies (supplementary figure S4b) [23, 25]. Two small transmission clusters, containing Royal Brompton Hospital and other UK isolates, were also identified in FB11.

M. chimaera

359 sequenced isolates collected from 155 patients were identified as M. chimaera; 37 of the patients had CF, 60 had non-CF bronchiectasis and 50 patients had other lung conditions (COPD n=24; ILD n=10; ABPA n=11; pleural thickening with enfolded lung n=1; lung non-mucinous adenocarcinoma n=1; granulomatosis with polyangiitis n=1; M. tuberculosis in lymph nodes during same endoscopy procedure n=1; primary ciliary dyskinesia n=1; asthma n=17). There were five patients with no pre-existing respiratory disease and metadata were unavailable for a further nine patients. A single lineage, Mc_FB3, corresponding to the previously characterised Group 1 accounted for 332 out of 359 (92.5%) of the sequenced isolates, with most of the remaining isolates (25 out of 359 (7.0%)) forming a second main lineage, Mc_FB4, corresponding to Group 2 (figure 6a). 13 putative transmission clusters containing between two and 106 patients were identified (supplementary table S5). 12 potential epidemiological links between 15 different patients were found in transmission cluster Mc_FB3_1, the largest transmission cluster of 106 patients (figure 6b, and supplementary tables S5 and S6). Of the patients in this cluster, 43 had non-CF bronchiectasis, 24 had CF, 13 had COPD, 14 had asthma, seven had ILD, two had ABPA, one had pleural thickening with enfolded lung, one had lung non-mucinous adenocarcinoma and one had primary ciliary dyskinesia. Three patients had no pre-existing lung condition and disease status was missing for five patients. 15 patients underwent antibiotic treatment during the study period.

FIGURE 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6

Population structure and transmission of Mycobacterium chimaera. a) Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for M. chimaera isolates collected at the Royal Brompton Hospital (n=359). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. The disease status of the patients (that isolates were collected from) for cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis is represented by red bars for “Yes” and white bars for “No”, with missing patient data shown by grey bars. Scale bar shown in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) per site. b) M. chimaera Mc_FB3_1 transmission cluster. Each node represents an isolate or isolates identical (0 SNPs) to each other and the size of the node is proportional to the number of identical isolates. Nodes are coloured according to patient disease status and labelled by patient ID. The edges represent the pairwise SNP distance between the isolate(s). c) Rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree for global M. chimaera isolates (n=826). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. fastBAPS lineage, source of isolate, country of collection and study are shown as datastrips to the right of the phylogenies. Isolates from the Royal Brompton Hospital are highlighted in salmon colour. Scale bar shown in SNPs per site. Details of the study datasets are provided in supplementary text S1 and supplementary file S3. HCU: heater-cooler unit; NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information.

The global phylogenetic tree containing 155 isolates from Royal Brompton Hospital and 671 previously published isolates was topologically similar to the tree built using only the isolates from the Royal Brompton Hospital with a single major clade with low genetic diversity present, Mc_FB6 (Group 1) (figure 6c). Isolates from the two clusters with more than 10 representatives, Mc_FB5 (Group 2) and Mc_FB6, were remapped to local references and new phylogenetic trees constructed (figure 7a and b). Most isolates in Mc_FB5 were collected from patients with respiratory conditions or patients with infections following cardiac surgeries. There was, however, a distinct subclade rooting within this diversity containing only isolates from HCUs or hospital water supplies (figure 7a). Within Mc_FB6 a more deeply rooting (ancestral) diverse clade contained mainly human isolates and the larger shallower clade rooting within this contained most of the HCU isolates interspersed with human isolates (figure 7b and c). Due to the large number of isolates assigned to Mc_FB6 (n=765), further genomic lineage assignment was performed using fastBAPS to identify five sublineages within Mc_FB6 (figure 7b and c). New mapping was performed for the three lineages with more than 10 isolates (figure 8a–c). Two of these lineages, Mc_FB6_FB2 and Mc_FB6_FB4, were completely or nearly completely composed of patient isolates (figure 8b and c). Most of the isolates collected from HCUs or water supplies made up the bulk of Mc_FB6_FB1, although human isolates were distributed throughout the tree (figure 8a). Putative transmission clusters were calculated for all five lineages using a pairwise SNP threshold of 30 SNPs (supplementary table S7). Transmission clusters containing Royal Brompton Hospital isolates were found in each of the lineages, with the largest found in Mc_FB6_FB1, comprising 258 HCU isolates, 230 patient isolates and a single isolate from a water supply (supplementary table S7).

FIGURE 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7

Mycobacterium chimaera global fastBAPS cluster phylogenies. Rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees for a) M. chimaera FB5 (n=45), b) M. chimaera FB6 (n=765) and c) M. chimaera FB6 with major clades collapsed (pie charts are shown for each major clade showing the distribution of sources for that clade). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. The source of isolate, country of collection and study are shown as datastrips to the right of the phylogenies. Isolates from the Royal Brompton Hospital are shown in red colour. Scale bars shown in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) per site. Details of the study datasets are provided in supplementary text S1 and supplementary file S3. HCU: heater-cooler unit; NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information.

FIGURE 8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 8

Mycobacterium chimaera fastBAPS cluster FB6 phylogenies. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees for a) FB6_FB1 (n=540), b) FB6_FB2 (n=186) and c) FB6_FB4 (n=34). The taxa are clustered according to their sequence similarities. The lengths of the branches are scaled in nucleotide substitutions per site. The source of isolate, country of collection and study are shown as datastrips to the right of the phylogenies. Isolates from the Royal Brompton Hospital are shown in red colour. Scale bars shown in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) per site. Details of the study datasets are provided in supplementary text S1 and supplementary file S3. HCU: heater-cooler unit; NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Discussion

The aims of this study were to characterise the population structure of MAC isolates collected in a London hospital, and to identify potential transmission between CF and non-CF patients. During the sampling period we identified 45 patients infected with more than one species or lineage. This suggests that many of the patients had polymicrobial infections and that certain lineages were preferentially sampled at different times. This has been observed previously in other longitudinal samples of patients with MAC lung disease [26] and suggests that single colonies from sputum swabs may be underrepresenting the underlying diversity of MAC species in patients. Therefore, to better understand the ecology and transmission of MAC species in the lung, a deep-sequencing approach in which plate sweeps from swabs or mycobacteria growth indicator tube cultures are utilised should be considered for future studies.

Previous studies have used thresholds of 15–25 SNPs to identify putative transmission clusters in NTM species [14, 19, 24]. Rather than using a previously applied or arbitrary threshold, we used a method developed to define SNP thresholds in Staphylococcus aureus [27]. This allowed us to calculate a threshold for each species using the longitudinal isolates collected in the Royal Brompton Hospital. The thresholds calculated for M. intracellulare and M. avium subsp. hominissuis of 16 SNPs were similar to those previously applied [24]. While we obtained higher thresholds of 30 and 58 SNPs for M. chimaera and M. avium subsp. avium, respectively, this did not result in an inflated number of transmission clusters, as applying a threshold of 16 SNPs to the M. avium subsp. avium dataset would have resulted in only two fewer clusters. These larger values were predominantly due to high levels of within-host diversity observed in patients with both M. avium subsp. avium and M. chimaera.

Using these SNP thresholds, we were able to identify putative transmission clusters among all four of the MAC species/subspecies investigated. Broadly, two different patterns of infection were observed. Among M. intracellulare and the two M. avium subspecies, our results suggested that there have been multiple independent introductions into the human population followed by onward transmission. Our analysis of M. chimaera, however, identified a single large transmission cluster which linked 106 out of 155 (68.4%) of our patients infected with this species. Most of these transmission clusters contained both CF and non-CF patients, and a small number also contained patients with no pre-existing lung conditions.

Using our criteria, we were unable to identify potential epidemiological links for most patients included in the transmission clusters. The exception to this was the largest M. chimaera transmission cluster where we found 12 potential epidemiological links up to 1 year before sampling began. The tight infection control surrounding patients with CF, which prioritises preventing cross-infection through hygiene and segregation, means that they are unlikely to have interacted with patients with other lung conditions while in hospital. Outpatient clinics are organised so that patients are seen individually and, during inpatient care, CF patients are given individual rooms with en suite facilities. This implies that transmission is likely occurring via other pathways, such as through environmental intermediates or through a reservoir of healthy, asymptomatic carriers in the wider population. This observation is not unique and there has been considerable debate whether NTM transmission between patients is occurring, even when transmission is strongly supported by genome-based analysis [14, 19, 28]. The limited evidence of epidemiological links between patients in transmission clusters as well as the ubiquitous presence of NTM species in the environment, especially water supplies, has led some researchers to suggest that the dissemination of NTM lineages at a national level is associated with exposure to contaminated water supplies [19]. While there is certainly strong evidence for the same lineages being isolated from water supplies and patients in the same location [24], the absence of a single national water supply in even a comparatively small country like the UK would suggest that closely related isolates collected from different geographical locations are unlikely to be due to a single contaminated water supply. It is, however, possible that transmission networks may include local water supplies as intermediates. The alternative hypothesis that NTM populations are being maintained in apparently healthy individuals with no symptoms of NTM lung disease is equally worthy of consideration. This would explain the presence of local and long-distance transmission clusters in the absence of direct epidemiological links as well as the presence of phylogeographical structure in NTM trees. To better address how NTM species are being transmitted, future studies should focus on collecting isolates from the environment as well as from the general population, perhaps focusing on smokers where there is some evidence that they may provide a reservoir for NTM species and other opportunistic pathogens [20].

The inclusion of published genomes alongside the Royal Brompton Hospital isolates allowed us to use our defined pairwise SNP thresholds to identify putative MAC lineages circulating in the UK and globally. Apart from the M. chimaera lineages that were known to be associated with HCUs, we were unable to identify large globally circulating lineages like those observed in M. abscessus. This potentially suggests different evolutionary dynamics among the MAC species or, in the case of M. intracellulare, may simply reflect a lack of comprehensive sampling. We were only able to identify a single lineage containing Royal Brompton Hospital isolates among the two M. avium subspecies that included isolates from outside the UK. This cluster comprised most of the isolates in MAA_FB15 (figure 4b). Given that most M. avium genomes have been collected in the UK or USA, a more comprehensive global sampling strategy could potentially reveal the existence of additional globally circulating clones.

When we calculated global transmission clusters for M. chimaera using a pairwise SNP threshold of 30 SNPs (supplementary table S7), we found that most clusters either consisted of isolates from across Europe or included isolates from other parts of the world such as Australia. Notably, we identified a single large transmission cluster containing 489 isolates from 12 countries that included most of the HCU-associated isolates. Previous work investigating the global population structure of M. chimaera suggested that the majority of M. chimaera transmission globally was associated with point-source contamination of HCUs during manufacturing which then led to direct infection of patients undergoing cardiac surgery [11]. Our study included isolates collected from HCUs and cardiac patients as well as patients with lung conditions such as CF and non-CF bronchiectasis. This enabled us to investigate the global population structure of M. chimaera in more detail than has previously been possible [11, 29]. Strikingly, we discovered clear evidence for distinct lineages within the global phylogeny that were almost exclusively associated with patient isolates, indicating considerable onward transmission. In addition, most of the HCU-associated isolates were clustered together in a single lineage that was derived from the lineages containing only human isolates (figure 6b). This was also true of a second, smaller, lineage that contained only HCU and environmental isolates. The results suggest that the predominant HCU-associated lineage is descended from a M. chimaera population already circulating among patients with respiratory diseases, and that a similar derivation has happened on at least one other occasion.

Potential limitations of this study are the lack of environmental samples as well as the distinct bias with respect to country of isolation in the contextual dataset. Given the lack of direct patient–patient contact and epidemiological links, inclusion of samples collected from wards and hospital water supplies could potentially have revealed additional vectors of transmission. Assembling useful contextual datasets is reliant on what is available in the public domain, and the geographical bias towards the USA and UK in these datasets is not confined to this study.

Our results showed that polymicrobial infections by different MAC species are not uncommon and that transmission is occurring between CF and non-CF patients even in the presence of strict infection controls. This suggests that all of the species and subspecies within the MAC, like M. abscessus, are capable of generating lineages that can sustain transmission within the human population, albeit to different extents. We also provided evidence that the lineage responsible for the HCU-vectored M. chimaera outbreak was derived from an existing lineage which was already circulating among patients with pre-existing lung conditions, indicating that this is also true of M. chimaera, even after excluding the extensive HCU-vectored outbreak event. To better understand the transmission dynamics and to prevent continuing circulation of MAC and other NTM species, future studies should include sampling of environmental reservoirs and potential asymptomatic carriers.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary text S1, supplementary tables 1-7, supplementary figures 1-4 erj-01237-2022.supplement1

Supplementary file 2 erj-01237-2022.supplement2

Supplementary file 3 erj-01237-2022.supplement3

Shareable PDF

Supplementary Material

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-01237-2022.Shareable

Footnotes

  • Sequencing reads have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under project PRJEB21813 (supplementary file S2).

  • This article has an editorial commentary: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00308-2023

  • Conflict of interest: J. Parkhill received consulting fees from and holds stock in Next Gen Diagnostics LLC. M.R. Loebinger received consulting fees from Savara, AstraZeneca, Insmed, Grifols, Zambon, Armarta and 30T, and received honoraria from Insmed and Grifols. No other authors have potential competing interests.

  • Support statement: This project was supported by the Asmarley Trust, the Wellcome Trust and the NIHR Respiratory Disease Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Imperial College London. H.C. Ellis’ CRF was funded by a grant from the Welton Foundation. K. Kumar's Clinical PhD was supported by a Lee Family Endowment. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received June 22, 2022.
  • Accepted October 23, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2023.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Griffith DE,
    2. Aksamit T,
    3. Brown-Elliott BA, et al.
    An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175: 367–416. doi:10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Chan ED,
    2. Bai X,
    3. Kartalija M, et al.
    Host immune response to rapidly growing mycobacteria, an emerging cause of chronic lung disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2010; 43: 387–393. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2009-0276TR
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Iseman MD,
    2. Marras TK
    . The importance of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: 999–1000. doi:10.1164/rccm.200808-1258ED
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Donohue MJ,
    2. Wymer L
    . Increasing prevalence rate of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections in five states, 2008–2013. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016; 13: 2143–2150. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-353OC
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Philley JV,
    2. Griffith DE
    . Treatment of slowly growing mycobacteria. Clin Chest Med 2015; 36: 79–90. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2014.10.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Adjemian J,
    2. Olivier KN,
    3. Prevots DR
    . Epidemiology of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial sputum positivity in patients with cystic fibrosis in the United States, 2010–2014. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018; 15: 817–826. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201709-727OC
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Hoefsloot W,
    2. van Ingen J,
    3. Andrejak C, et al.
    The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1604–1613. doi:10.1183/09031936.00149212
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Olivier KN,
    2. Weber DJ,
    3. Wallace RJ, et al.
    Nontuberculous mycobacteria. I: multicenter prevalence study in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 828–834. doi:10.1164/rccm.200207-678OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Achermann Y,
    2. Rössle M,
    3. Hoffmann M, et al.
    Prosthetic valve endocarditis and bloodstream infection due to Mycobacterium chimaera. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51: 1769–1773. doi:10.1128/JCM.00435-13
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sax H,
    2. Bloemberg G,
    3. Hasse B, et al.
    Prolonged outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera infection after open-chest heart surgery. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61: 67–75. doi:10.1093/cid/civ198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. van Ingen J,
    2. Kohl TA,
    3. Kranzer K, et al.
    Global outbreak of severe Mycobacterium chimaera disease after cardiac surgery: a molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 1033–1041. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30324-9
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Falkinham JO
    . Nontuberculous mycobacteria in the environment. Clin Chest Med 2002; 23: 529–551. doi:10.1016/S0272-5231(02)00014-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Falkinham JO
    . Nontuberculous mycobacteria from household plumbing of patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria disease. Emerg Infect Dis 2011; 17: 419–424. doi:10.3201/eid1703.101510
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bryant JM,
    2. Grogono DM,
    3. Greaves D, et al.
    Whole-genome sequencing to identify transmission of Mycobacterium abscessus between patients with cystic fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2013; 381: 1551–1560. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60632-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bryant JM,
    2. Grogono DM,
    3. Rodriguez-Rincon D, et al.
    Emergence and spread of a human-transmissible multidrug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium. Science 2016; 354: 751–757. doi:10.1126/science.aaf8156
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Everall I,
    2. Nogueira CL,
    3. Bryant JM, et al.
    Genomic epidemiology of a national outbreak of post-surgical Mycobacterium abscessus wound infections in Brazil. Microb Genomics 2017; 3: e000111. doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000111
    OpenUrl
    1. Aitken ML,
    2. Limaye A,
    3. Pottinger P, et al.
    Respiratory outbreak of Mycobacterium abscessus subspecies massiliense in a lung transplant and cystic fibrosis center. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185: 231–232. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.185.2.231
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Davidson RM,
    2. Hasan NA,
    3. Epperson LE, et al.
    Population genomics of Mycobacterium abscessus from U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Care Centers. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18: 1960–1969. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1214OC
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Lipworth S,
    2. Hough N,
    3. Weston N, et al.
    Epidemiology of Mycobacterium abscessus in England: an observational study. Lancet Microbe; 2021; 2: e498–e507. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00128-2
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Ruis C,
    2. Bryant JM,
    3. Bell SC, et al.
    Dissemination of Mycobacterium abscessus via global transmission networks. Nat Microbiol 2021; 6: 1279–1288. doi:10.1038/s41564-021-00963-3
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Hasan NA,
    2. Davidson RM,
    3. Epperson LE, et al.
    Population genomics and inference of Mycobacterium avium complex clusters in cystic fibrosis care centers, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 27: 2836–2846. doi:10.3201/eid2711.210124
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Harris SR,
    2. Feil EJ,
    3. Holden MTG, et al.
    Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 2010; 27: 469–474. doi:10.1126/science.1182395
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Quan TP,
    2. Bawa Z,
    3. Foster D, et al.
    Evaluation of whole-genome sequencing for mycobacterial species identification and drug susceptibility testing in a clinical setting: a large-scale prospective assessment of performance against line probe assays and phenotyping. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56: e01480-17. doi:10.1128/JCM.01480-17
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Lande L,
    2. Alexander DC,
    3. Wallace RJ, et al.
    Mycobacterium avium in community and household water, suburban Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2010–2012. Emerg Infect Dis 2019; 25: 473–481. doi:10.3201/eid2503.180336
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Votintseva AA,
    2. Pankhurst LJ,
    3. Anson LW, et al.
    Mycobacterial DNA extraction for whole-genome sequencing from early positive liquid (MGIT) cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53: 1137–1143. doi:10.1128/JCM.03073-14
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Operario DJ,
    2. Pholwat S,
    3. Koeppel AF, et al.
    Mycobacterium avium complex diversity within lung disease, as revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: 393–396. doi:10.1164/rccm.201903-0669LE
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Coll F,
    2. Raven KE,
    3. Knight GM, et al.
    Definition of a genetic relatedness cutoff to exclude recent transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a genomic epidemiology analysis. Lancet Microbe 2020; 1: e328–e335. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30149-X
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Bronson RA,
    2. Gupta C,
    3. Manson AL, et al.
    Global phylogenomic analyses of Mycobacterium abscessus provide context for non cystic fibrosis infections and the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 5145. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25484-9
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Schreiber PW,
    2. Kohl TA,
    3. Kuster SP, et al.
    The global outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera infections in cardiac surgery – a systematic review of whole-genome sequencing studies and joint analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27: 1613–1620. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.07.017
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 61 Issue 4 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 61 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mycobacterium avium complex genomics and transmission in a London hospital
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Mycobacterium avium complex genomics and transmission in a London hospital
Andries J. van Tonder, Huw C. Ellis, Colin P. Churchward, Kartik Kumar, Newara Ramadan, Susan Benson, Julian Parkhill, Miriam F. Moffatt, Michael R. Loebinger, William O.C. Cookson
European Respiratory Journal Apr 2023, 61 (4) 2201237; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01237-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Mycobacterium avium complex genomics and transmission in a London hospital
Andries J. van Tonder, Huw C. Ellis, Colin P. Churchward, Kartik Kumar, Newara Ramadan, Susan Benson, Julian Parkhill, Miriam F. Moffatt, Michael R. Loebinger, William O.C. Cookson
European Respiratory Journal Apr 2023, 61 (4) 2201237; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01237-2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Supplementary material
    • Shareable PDF
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Research Articles

  • Effectiveness of airway clearance techniques in CF
  • Severe asddddddddddddddddddddddarasthma trajectories in adults: NORDSTAR cohort
  • High-dose versus low-dose prednisolone for treating sarcoidosis
Show more Original Research Articles

Respiratory infections

  • Role of non-pharmaceutical interventions in bronchiolitis outbreaks
  • In critically ill patients, anti-anaerobic antibiotics increase risk of adverse outcomes
Show more Respiratory infections

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society