Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Is the oral microbiota representative for the healthy bronchial microbiota?

S Tangedal, R Nielsen, M Aanerud, H Wiker, C Drengenes, G Husebø, K Knutsen, S Lehmann, T Eagan
European Respiratory Journal 2022 60: 614; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.614
S Tangedal
1Dept. of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Nielsen
1Dept. of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Aanerud
1Dept. of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H Wiker
2Dept. of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Drengenes
2Dept. of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Husebø
1Dept. of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K Knutsen
1Dept. of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Lehmann
1Dept. of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T Eagan
1Dept. of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: A bacterial community (microbiota) inhabiting the bronchi could result from micro aspiration from the upper airways. Comparisons of oral- and bronchial microbiota have rendered inconsistent results.

Aim: To investigate if oral wash (OW) is an alternative to protected bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and protected specimen brushes (PSB) when studying bronchial microbiota in lung-healthy participants.

Methods: Participants were included from the MicroCOPD study if they had at least one bronchial sample to compare with OW. DNA extraction preceded amplicon- and index-PCR (16S rRNA gene) and paired-end sequencing of the V3-V4 region using the Illumina Miseq System. Bioinformatics and analyzes were performed in QIIME-2 and R.

Results: Alpha diversity was significantly higher in OW (Fig.1A), while beta-diversity did not differ between sample types (not shown). Differential abundant taxa (ANCOM2) were found when comparing OW and bronchoscopic samples, but not between BAL and PSB (not shown). We found that the relative abundances of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) unique to the sampling modality were significantly higher in OW compared to the bronchial samples (Fig. 1B).

Conclusion: OW should not be used as an alternative to BAL or PSB when studying bronchial microbiota in lung-healthy participants.

  • Mirobiome/Microbiota
  • Experimental approaches
  • Bronchoalveolar lavage

Footnotes

Cite this article as Eur Respir J 2022; 60: Suppl. 66, 614.

This article was presented at the 2022 ERS International Congress, in session “-”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2022
Previous
Back to top
Vol 60 Issue suppl 66 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is the oral microbiota representative for the healthy bronchial microbiota?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is the oral microbiota representative for the healthy bronchial microbiota?
S Tangedal, R Nielsen, M Aanerud, H Wiker, C Drengenes, G Husebø, K Knutsen, S Lehmann, T Eagan
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2022, 60 (suppl 66) 614; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.614

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Is the oral microbiota representative for the healthy bronchial microbiota?
S Tangedal, R Nielsen, M Aanerud, H Wiker, C Drengenes, G Husebø, K Knutsen, S Lehmann, T Eagan
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2022, 60 (suppl 66) 614; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.614
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • α1-Antitrypsin deficiency associated with increased risk of heart failure in two large populations
  • COVID-19 infection in children through lung radiographic imaging changes
  • Race/ethnic, social, environmental, and genetic correlates to lung function decline: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Lung Study
Show more 06.01 - Epidemiology

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society