Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Proadrenomedullin and copeptin are more sensitive and specific biomarkers for the prediction of mortality in stable COPD than fibrinogen: An analysis of the COSYCONET study

S Fähndrich, S Teuteberg, C Herr, H Watz, B Waschki, F C Trudzinski, A Omlor, P Alter, F Seiler, F Biertz, T Welte, H Kauczor, R A Jörres, C F Vogelmeier, R Bals, D Stolz
European Respiratory Journal 2022 60: 4292; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.4292
S Fähndrich
1Department of Pneumology, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Teuteberg
2Department of Pneumology, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Herr
3Department of Internal Medicine V (Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine), Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H Watz
4LungenClinic Grosshansorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Großhansdorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B Waschki
4LungenClinic Grosshansorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Großhansdorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F C Trudzinski
5Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik University of Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Omlor
3Department of Internal Medicine V (Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine), Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Alter
6Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F Seiler
3Department of Internal Medicine V (Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine), Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F Biertz
7Institute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T Welte
8Clinic for Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H Kauczor
9Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R A Jörres
10Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C F Vogelmeier
6Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL, Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Bals
3Department of Internal Medicine V (Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine), Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Stolz
2Department of Pneumology, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Rationale: Chronic obstructive disease (COPD) is one of the most common respiratory diseases caused by exogenous noxae. Multiple comorbidities are characteristic of this chronic systemic disease. The FDA-approved biomarker for predicting disease prognosis competes with other (not approved) biomarkers such as proadrenomedullin and copeptin.

Methods: We compared sensitivity and specificity of these biomarkers using the data from the German COSYCONET (COPD and Systemic Consequences - Comorbidities Network) cohort study. We analyzed the suitability of the biomarkers for the prediction of mortality in a multiple COX regression analysis. We considered as confounder: Age, sex, numerous confounders for COPD, cardiovascular risk factors, and manifest cardiovascular diseases.

Results: Plasma samples were measured of more than thousand patients with stable COPD (GOLD 0-4, GOLD A-D) from the German COPD cohort study COSYCONET.

In Cox regression analyses including adjustments for COPD assessments, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases proadrenomedullin and copeptin predict significantly all-cause mortality in contrast to fibrinogen. The ROC analysis showed a more favorable AUC for the biomarkers adrenomedullin (AUC 0.664) and copeptin (0.632) compared to fibrinogen (0.537). The combination of quality of life scores CAT and MRC did not result in a marked increase in sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions: Proadrenomedullin and copeptin are better predictors for all-cause mortality in stable COPD than fibrinogen.

  • COPD
  • Biomarkers
  • Comorbidities

Footnotes

Cite this article as Eur Respir J 2022; 60: Suppl. 66, 4292.

This article was presented at the 2022 ERS International Congress, in session “-”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2022
Previous
Back to top
Vol 60 Issue suppl 66 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proadrenomedullin and copeptin are more sensitive and specific biomarkers for the prediction of mortality in stable COPD than fibrinogen: An analysis of the COSYCONET study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Proadrenomedullin and copeptin are more sensitive and specific biomarkers for the prediction of mortality in stable COPD than fibrinogen: An analysis of the COSYCONET study
S Fähndrich, S Teuteberg, C Herr, H Watz, B Waschki, F C Trudzinski, A Omlor, P Alter, F Seiler, F Biertz, T Welte, H Kauczor, R A Jörres, C F Vogelmeier, R Bals, D Stolz
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2022, 60 (suppl 66) 4292; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.4292

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Proadrenomedullin and copeptin are more sensitive and specific biomarkers for the prediction of mortality in stable COPD than fibrinogen: An analysis of the COSYCONET study
S Fähndrich, S Teuteberg, C Herr, H Watz, B Waschki, F C Trudzinski, A Omlor, P Alter, F Seiler, F Biertz, T Welte, H Kauczor, R A Jörres, C F Vogelmeier, R Bals, D Stolz
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2022, 60 (suppl 66) 4292; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.4292
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Evolution of the Use of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease
  • The evaluation of Exercise Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO) performed by inexperienced physicians
  • Efficacy of Breathox® device inhalation on acute symptoms associated with COVID-19 (BREATH study)
Show more 01.01 - Clinical problems - no related to asthma or COPD

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society