Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

What do people with asthma think about switching to a more environmentally friendly inhaler?

G d'Ancona, K Sethi, N Holman, M Morgan, L Renwick, A Cumella, S Walker, J Weinman
European Respiratory Journal 2022 60: 3143; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.3143
G d'Ancona
1Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K Sethi
2King's College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N Holman
1Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Morgan
2King's College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Renwick
3Asthma UK and BLF, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Cumella
3Asthma UK and BLF, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Walker
3Asthma UK and BLF, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Weinman
2King's College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

70% of inhalers used in the UK are Metered Dose inhalers (MDI) and account for 4% of the entire National Health Service (NHS) carbon footprint. Dry powder inhalers (DPI) have a substantially lower global warming potential (GWP), so the NHS is advocating changing therapy, where appropriate, to DPI delivery. We sought patient opinion on this change.

In summer 2020, people with asthma were asked ‘Do you have any further thoughts about potentially switching your inhaler and the impacts of inhalers on the environment?’ via the annual asthma UK survey. Using thematic analysis of a random sample from 1012/4800 replies, free text responses were coded and grouped into three key themes (Table 1).

People were at different stages of readiness to change. Over a third of responses identified uncertainty, but with a desire to discuss further. The most common reason for reluctance were doubts about the efficacy of a DPI and concerns that asthma control could be lost. Clinician opinion was identified as a key influence. Patients also expressed an interest in addressing other environmental issues (e.g. inhaler recycling). For clinicians to support the transition of patients to lower GWP inhalers effectively, they must acknowledge individual patient choice and their concerns regarding the efficacy of the new inhaler on their asthma control.

Table 1: Classification of patient responses on switching inhalers and impact on the environment

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

  • Asthma - management
  • Personalised medicine
  • Environment

Footnotes

Cite this article as Eur Respir J 2022; 60: Suppl. 66, 3143.

This article was presented at the 2022 ERS International Congress, in session “-”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2022
Previous
Back to top
Vol 60 Issue suppl 66 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What do people with asthma think about switching to a more environmentally friendly inhaler?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What do people with asthma think about switching to a more environmentally friendly inhaler?
G d'Ancona, K Sethi, N Holman, M Morgan, L Renwick, A Cumella, S Walker, J Weinman
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2022, 60 (suppl 66) 3143; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.3143

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
What do people with asthma think about switching to a more environmentally friendly inhaler?
G d'Ancona, K Sethi, N Holman, M Morgan, L Renwick, A Cumella, S Walker, J Weinman
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2022, 60 (suppl 66) 3143; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.3143
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Psychological affectation in surviving patients of COVID-19, consideration of the use of invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Cognitive impairment as a sequel to SARS-CoV-2 infection
  • Pain, fatigue and psychological sequelae in patients surviving COVID-19: results from a prospective observational controlled study
Show more 09.04 - Psychologists and behavioural scientists

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society