Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Has the pandemic changed the test quality of the pulmonary function test laboratory?

D Rama Esendagli, E Gul, A Ozsancak, S Akcay, G Ulubay
European Respiratory Journal 2022 60: 2727; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.2727
D Rama Esendagli
1Baskent University Chest Diseases Department, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Gul
2Baskent University Biostatistics Department, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Ozsancak
1Baskent University Chest Diseases Department, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Akcay
1Baskent University Chest Diseases Department, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Ulubay
1Baskent University Chest Diseases Department, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Pulmonary function tests are used in the evaluation of the respiratory system. Maneuvers during spirometry can create aerosols and cause the spread of microbiological agents such as SARS-CoV-2 virus. The measures taken due to the pandemic can negatively affect both the number and the quality of the spirometry. There are no comparative studies on this subject.

Methods: The tests conducted in the spirometry laboratory of Baskent University Hospital during November 2019 and November 2021 were evaluated and compared by 2 chest specialists.

Results: A total of 440 patients were included in the study. 50.5% of patients were male and the average age was 61.8±16.5 years. The age, gender, height and weight of the patients were similar. 75.2% (331) of the tests were evaluated as successful. The most common errors in tests evaluated as erroneous were early termination (84.1%), uncooperative patients (29%) and poor effort (22.4%). The median number of tests performed for each patient was 6. Test numbers were 262 and 178 for 2019 and 2021 (p=0.011), but test success remained unchanged over the years (p=0.513). The type of errors were not different between the two periods. There was no significant difference between the 3 operators who conducted the tests and the test success (p=0.909), which was similar for both periods. However, the number of tests performed between the two periods until the successful maneuver varied significantly (p=0.009) and fewer maneuvers were required in 2021.

Conclusion: As a result, the spirometry quality did not change with the measures of pandemic,but the decrease in number of patients significantly reduced the number of tests performed until the successful maneuver.

  • Covid-19
  • Spirometry
  • Measurement properties

Footnotes

Cite this article as Eur Respir J 2022; 60: Suppl. 66, 2727.

This article was presented at the 2022 ERS International Congress, in session “-”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2022
Previous
Back to top
Vol 60 Issue suppl 66 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Has the pandemic changed the test quality of the pulmonary function test laboratory?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Has the pandemic changed the test quality of the pulmonary function test laboratory?
D Rama Esendagli, E Gul, A Ozsancak, S Akcay, G Ulubay
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2022, 60 (suppl 66) 2727; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.2727

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Has the pandemic changed the test quality of the pulmonary function test laboratory?
D Rama Esendagli, E Gul, A Ozsancak, S Akcay, G Ulubay
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2022, 60 (suppl 66) 2727; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.2727
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Evolution of the Use of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease
  • The evaluation of Exercise Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO) performed by inexperienced physicians
  • Efficacy of Breathox® device inhalation on acute symptoms associated with COVID-19 (BREATH study)
Show more 01.01 - Clinical problems - no related to asthma or COPD

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society