Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Health risks related to polyurethane foam degradation in CPAP devices used for sleep apnoea treatment

Andreas Palm, Ludger Grote, Magnus Ekström, Mirjam Ljunggren
European Respiratory Journal 2022 59: 2200237; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00237-2022
Andreas Palm
1Dept of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
2Centre for Research and Development, Region of Gävleborg/Uppsala University, Gävle Hospital, Gävle, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andreas Palm
  • For correspondence: andreas.palm@medsci.uu.se
Ludger Grote
3Sleep Disorders Centre, Pulmonary Dept, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
4Centre for Sleep and Wake Disorders, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ludger Grote
Magnus Ekström
5Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Magnus Ekström
Mirjam Ljunggren
1Dept of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Patients with PUF-CPAP and especially those with pre-existing obstructive lung disease had increased use of anti-obstructive medication but there were no differences in hospitalisations and mortality, and data on cancer were inconclusive https://bit.ly/3uVIzXG

To the Editor:

A recent medical device recall notification from Philips Respironics reported on risk for degradation of polyurethane foam (PUF) in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices used for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) treatment [1]. The degraded foam particles may cause airway irritation, and the volatile gas products (diethylene glycol, toluene di-isocyanate isomers, toluene diamine isomers) released during the degradation process may also have cyto- and genotoxic effects [1]. Kendzerska et al. [2] reported no increase in cancer incidence in 1220 patients using PUF devices over a mean observation time of 7.5 years. However, studies assessing airway symptoms and health outcomes other than cancer are lacking. Airway irritation from degraded foam particles may be particularly harmful for patients with pre-existing obstructive lung disease (OLD). This study aimed to evaluate the association between PUF-CPAP use and adverse health outcomes in OSA patients with/without comorbid OLD.

This was a longitudinal analysis of the national, population-based DISCOVERY cohort of OSA patients aged ≥16 years starting CPAP treatment from July 2010 to March 2018 in Sweden [3]. The brands of CPAP devices included in the recent medical device recall notification were defined as PUF-CPAP and CPAP devices of other brands were defined as non-PUF-CPAP. Counties prescribing PUF-CPAP (≥80% PUF-CPAP prescribed) and non-PUF-CPAP (<10% PUF-CPAP) could be identified. Remaining counties (10% to <80% PUF-CPAP) were excluded from subsequent analyses. Data were crosslinked with mandatory governmental registries, as follows. 1) The Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry using anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) codes) [4]. Comorbid OLD was defined as at least two collections of anti-obstructive medication (ATC code R03) during the 12 months before baseline; deteriorated airway obstruction was defined as collection of ≥3 short-acting β-agonists (SABA; R03AC02) or oral corticosteroids (OCS; H02AB) during the first year or during any 1-year timespan of the study. Incident OLD after starting CPAP was defined as collection of two or more anti-obstructive medications within a window of consecutive 365 days after starting CPAP in patients without OLD at baseline. 2) The National Patient Register for hospitalisations using ICD-10 codes [5] for defining comorbid heart failure (ICD-10 codes I11, I42 and I50) and ischaemic heart disease (I20–25) 5 years before CPAP start and for identifying hospitalisation due to OLD during follow-up (primary diagnosis J44–46). 3) The National Cancer Registry [6]. 4) The Cause of Death Registry [7]. Patients with PUF-CPAP versus non-PUF-CPAP were compared using propensity score matching, accounting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), apnoea–hypopnoea index, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, and study observation time. Sensitivity analyses were performed: 1) excluding the county of Skåne, a county known for a slightly high smoking rate [8]; 2) clustering the regression models by county; and 3) adjusted for anthropometric data and comorbidities instead of propensity score matching using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models. Analyses were conducted using Stata version 16.0 (StataCorp LP; College Station, TX, USA). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Medical Faculty, Lund University, log number 2018/51 (amendments 2020-02721, 2021-04984).

We included 18 561 individuals in four PUF-CPAP dominated counties (27.2% females, mean±sd age 57.8±12.4 years, median (interquartile range (IQR)) BMI 31 (28–35) kg·m−2, OLD at baseline 13.4%, mean±sd nocturnal CPAP use 6.0±1.6 h, median (IQR) observation time 2.6 (1.1–4.7) years), and 29 830 individuals from 10 non-PUF-CPAP counties (30.2% females, mean±sd age 56.9±12.6 years, median (IQR) BMI 31 (28–36) kg·m−2, OLD at baseline 12.2%, mean±sd nocturnal CPAP use 5.6±2.0 h, median (IQR) observation time 2.3 (0.9–4.6) years). The cohort was followed for a total of 139 056 person-years. Deteriorated airway obstruction in the first year after CPAP initiation was more frequent in the PUF-CPAP group (table 1). Deteriorated airway obstruction anytime during follow-up was also more frequent in the PUF-CPAP group (SABA use 9.4% versus 8.8%, p=0.047; and OCS use 19.7% versus 17.3%, p<0.001) in matched groups (table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Outcomes in all patients and in patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD)

In patients with OLD at baseline, use of PUF-CPAP devices was associated with increased SABA use (22.4% versus 18.2%, p<0.001) and OCS use (26.0% versus 23.2%, p=0.027) during the first year after CPAP initiation. For the entire observation period, a total of 2797 OLD patients (38.5%) collected OCS, and PUF-CPAP was associated with an increased risk of OCS collection (41.7% versus 36.8%, p<0.001). SABA use for the entire observation period was comparable in the PUF-CPAP (47.0%) and non-PUF-CPAP groups (44.6%).

All-cause cancer and lung cancer incidence was higher in the PUF-CPAP group (4.5% versus 4.1%, p=0.045; and 0.3% versus 0.1%, p<0.001, respectively). However, in the sensitivity analysis excluding the county Skåne with known higher smoking rates [8], the associations between PUF-CPAP exposure and incident cancer disappeared (cancer: 3.6% in PUF-CPAP versus 4.0% in non-PUF-CPAP, p=0.29; lung cancer: 0.21% in PUF-CPAP versus 0.15% in non-PUF-CPAP, p=0.491). Hospitalisation due to OLD and mortality did not differ between groups (table 1). The results from the adjusted logistic and Cox regression models did not differ significantly from the propensity score matched analyses (data not shown).

In this nationwide study of patients with OSA, PUF-CPAP use was associated with mild deterioration of OLD control during a median follow-up of 2.4 years. However, severe OLD exacerbations requiring hospitalisation or increased OLD incidence were not observed. Further, we identified signals of increased lung cancer incidence in the PUF-CPAP group, but this finding needs further confirmation in other studies, as it was not robust in sensitivity analyses and may be related to regional differences in lung cancer risk factors.

Hazardous effects of PUF-CPAP devices have only recently been reported [1]. Experimental data simulating the 6–8 h daily PUF-CPAP user pattern of OSA patients do not exist yet. The lack of a firm association between use of PUF-CPAP devices and overall cancer incidence is consistent with a recent report [2]. Strengths of the present study include the unselected national cohort of OSA patients, which increases precision, validity and generalisability of results, and permits identification of rare outcomes [9]. No patients were lost to follow-up due to cross-linkage with mandatory national registries. A key advantage of the design is that the choice of CPAP device (and hence PUF-CPAP exposure) was made centrally on the sleep unit level and was not based on individual patient characteristics or preferences. This could be considered to approach an “instrumental variable” or “quasi-randomised” design, as suggested by the fact that characteristics were similar between the treatment groups. Several limitations need to be acknowledged. PUF-CPAF use was categorised retrospectively by the responsible staff for each sleep unit. To limit misclassification, only counties with very high (≥80%) or very low (<10%) PUF-CPAF prescription were compared. This design still enabled us to include most CPAP patients in Sweden in the analyses (74.4% of Swedevox patients). It cannot be excluded that some individuals changed the device category during follow-up. However, this misclassification would align the treatment groups and, if anything, underestimate any influence of PUF-CPAP on patient outcomes. Data were lacking on smoking, but this is unlikely to bias the findings as PUF-CPAP use was decided at the county level independent of smoking status. Finally, mean exposure time of PUF-CPAP was rather short to evaluate any risk estimate on cancer incidence.

In conclusion, PUF-CPAP associates with increased use of anti-obstructive medication after CPAP initiation, particularly in people with underlying OLD. PUF in CPAP may contribute to increased airway symptoms and OLD exacerbations. For cancer incidence the results were less conclusive and further studies are urgently needed.

Shareable PDF

Supplementary Material

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-00237-2022.Shareable

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Krister Ågren, Gävle University for statistical support. The authors would also like to acknowledge all centres in Sweden reporting data to the Swedevox registry and all patients letting themselves be reported. We would also like to thank the Swedish Heart and Lung Association for their commitment in the Swedevox registry's steering committee. Neither patients nor public were involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of the research.

Footnotes

  • Data availability statement: The steering committee of the Swedevox quality registry will consider reasonable requests for the sharing of deidentified patient level data. Requests should be made to the corresponding author.

  • Author contributions: A. Palm, L. Grote, M. Ekström and M. Ljunggren contributed to the conception and design of the study. A. Palm performed statistical analyses and all authors verified the underlying data. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors participated in data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, and final approval for submission.

  • Conflict of interest: No conflicts of interest exist for the authors regarding the submitted manuscript. Outside the submitted work L. Grote reports non-financial research support from Itamar Medical, Resmed, research grant and clinical trial support from Desitin, speaker bureau activities for Itamar Medical, Resmed, Philips, AstraZeneca and Breas. In addition, L. Grote reports ownership in a patent on sleep apnoea therapy licensed. All remaining authors did not report any conflicts of interest.

  • Support statement: A. Palm was supported by the Swedish Society for Sleep Research and Sleep Medicine, Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council (log number RFR-931234), Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg (log number CFUG-925881), Bror Hjerpstedt's Foundation, Uppsala County Association against Heart and Lung Diseases, and the Fagerström foundation. L. Grote was supported by the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (number 20210529) and the agreement concerning research and education of doctors (ALFGBG-966283). M. Ekström was supported by unrestricted grants from the Swedish Society for Medical Research and the Swedish Research Council (log number 2019-02081). The sponsors had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received December 14, 2021.
  • Accepted February 4, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Philips. Philips Field Safety Announcement
    . www.philips.com/a-w/about/news/archive/standard/news/press/2021/20210614-philips-issues-recall-notification-to-mitigate-potential-health-risks-related-to-the-sound-abatement-foam-component-in-certain-sleep-and-respiratory-care-devices.html (Date last updated: 14 June 2021; date last accessed: 14 December 2021.)
  2. ↵
    1. Kendzerska T,
    2. Leung RS,
    3. Boulos MI, et al.
    An association between positive airway pressure device manufacturer and incident cancer? A secondary data analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021: 204: 1484–1488. doi:10.1164/rccm.202107-1734LE
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Palm A,
    2. Agren K,
    3. Grote L, et al.
    Course of DISease In patients reported to the Swedish CPAP Oxygen and VEntilator RegistrY (DISCOVERY) with population-based controls. BMJ Open 2020: 10: e040396. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040396
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Wallerstedt SM,
    2. Wettermark B,
    3. Hoffmann M
    . The first decade with the Swedish prescribed drug register – a systematic review of the output in the scientific literature. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2016: 119: 464–469. doi:10.1111/bcpt.12613
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ludvigsson JF,
    2. Andersson E,
    3. Ekbom A, et al.
    External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health 2011: 11: 450. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-450
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Barlow L,
    2. Westergren K,
    3. Holmberg L, et al.
    The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) 2009: 48: 27–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Brooke HL,
    2. Talback M,
    3. Hornblad J, et al.
    The Swedish cause of death register. Eur J Epidemiol 2017: 32: 765–773. doi:10.1007/s10654-017-0316-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Folkhälsomyndigheten. Public Health Data. Tobacco Consumption by Region, Sex and Year
    . http://fohm-app.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/Folkhalsodata/pxweb/sv/B_HLV/B_HLV__aLevvanor__aagLevvanortobak/hlv1tobxreg.px/table/tableViewLayout1/?rxid=19215807-23cd-44cf-8f63-b1eed980d297 (Date last accessed: 14 December 2021.)
  9. ↵
    1. Ekström M,
    2. Albrecht D,
    3. Andersson S, et al.
    Validation of the Swedevox registry of continuous positive airway pressure, long-term mechanical ventilator and long-term oxygen therapy. ERJ Open Res 2021: 7: 00340-2020. doi:10.1183/23120541.00340-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 59 Issue 5 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 59 (5)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Health risks related to polyurethane foam degradation in CPAP devices used for sleep apnoea treatment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Health risks related to polyurethane foam degradation in CPAP devices used for sleep apnoea treatment
Andreas Palm, Ludger Grote, Magnus Ekström, Mirjam Ljunggren
European Respiratory Journal May 2022, 59 (5) 2200237; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00237-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Health risks related to polyurethane foam degradation in CPAP devices used for sleep apnoea treatment
Andreas Palm, Ludger Grote, Magnus Ekström, Mirjam Ljunggren
European Respiratory Journal May 2022, 59 (5) 2200237; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00237-2022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Shareable PDF
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • NTM-PD incidence among elderly patients with bronchiectasis
  • Inaccuracy of pulse oximetry in darker skinned patients unchanged across 32 years
  • Reply: Inaccuracy of pulse oximetry in darker skinned patients unchanged across 32 years
Show more Agora

Research letters

  • Dupilumab in patients with asthma and blood eosinophils ≥500 cells·µL−1
  • NTM-PD incidence among elderly patients with bronchiectasis
  • G-protein coupled receptor 87 as a basal cell marker in IPF
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society