Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Rothia mucilaginosa is an anti-inflammatory bacterium in the respiratory tract of patients with chronic lung disease

Charlotte Rigauts, Juliana Aizawa, Steven L. Taylor, Geraint B. Rogers, Matthias Govaerts, Paul Cos, Lisa Ostyn, Sarah Sims, Eva Vandeplassche, Mozes Sze, Yves Dondelinger, Lars Vereecke, Heleen Van Acker, Jodie L. Simpson, Lucy Burr, Anne Willems, Michael M. Tunney, Cristina Cigana, Alessandra Bragonzi, Tom Coenye, Aurélie Crabbé
European Respiratory Journal 2022 59: 2101293; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01293-2021
Charlotte Rigauts
1Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juliana Aizawa
2Laboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven L. Taylor
3Microbiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
4The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steven L. Taylor
Geraint B. Rogers
3Microbiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
4The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Geraint B. Rogers
Matthias Govaerts
2Laboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthias Govaerts
Paul Cos
2Laboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Ostyn
1Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Sims
3Microbiome and Host Health Programme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
4The SAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Vandeplassche
1Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mozes Sze
5VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium
6Dept of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yves Dondelinger
5VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium
6Dept of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Vereecke
5VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium
7Dept of Rheumatology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heleen Van Acker
1Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jodie L. Simpson
8Faculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy Burr
9Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Australia
10Mater Research, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Willems
11Laboratory of Microbiology, Dept of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael M. Tunney
12School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Cigana
13Infections and Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cristina Cigana
Alessandra Bragonzi
13Infections and Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Coenye
1Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tom Coenye
Aurélie Crabbé
1Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aurélie Crabbé
  • For correspondence: aurelie.crabbe@ugent.be
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Chronic airway inflammation is the main driver of pathogenesis in respiratory diseases such as severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis (CF) and bronchiectasis. While the role of common pathogens in airway inflammation is widely recognised, the influence of other microbiota members is still poorly understood.

Methods We hypothesised that the lung microbiota contains bacteria with immunomodulatory activity which modulate net levels of immune activation by key respiratory pathogens. Therefore, we assessed the immunomodulatory effect of several members of the lung microbiota frequently reported as present in CF lower respiratory tract samples.

Results We show that Rothia mucilaginosa, a common resident of the oral cavity that is also often detectable in the lower airways in chronic disease, has an inhibitory effect on pathogen- or lipopolysaccharide-induced pro-inflammatory responses, in vitro (three-dimensional cell culture model) and in vivo (mouse model). Furthermore, in a cohort of adults with bronchiectasis, the abundance of Rothia species was negatively correlated with pro-inflammatory markers (interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-1β) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-8 and MMP-9 in sputum. Mechanistic studies revealed that R. mucilaginosa inhibits NF-κB pathway activation by reducing the phosphorylation of IκBα and consequently the expression of NF-κB target genes.

Conclusions These findings indicate that the presence of R. mucilaginosa in the lower airways potentially mitigates inflammation, which could in turn influence the severity and progression of chronic respiratory disorders.

Abstract

A commensal bacterium of the lower airways, Rothia mucilaginosa, inhibits inflammation by NF-κB pathway inactivation. R. mucilaginosa abundance inversely correlates with sputum pro-inflammatory markers in chronic lung disease, indicating a beneficial role. https://bit.ly/3lNT9th

Introduction

Persistent or dysregulated lung inflammation is a hallmark of chronic respiratory diseases such as severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF) and bronchiectasis [1–9]. In patients with chronic airway disease, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by cells of the lung mucosa in response to external triggers (pathogenic microorganisms, cigarette smoke, pollutants or allergens) typically leads to infiltration of innate immune cells such as neutrophils or eosinophils that further exacerbate lung inflammation [5–7, 10, 11]. Persistent inflammation and associated tissue damage impairs lung clearance and facilitates the accumulation of microbes in the lower airways. These microbes represent both recognised respiratory pathogens and oropharyngeal commensal taxa that originate in the upper airways [12].

Colonisation of the lower airways by specific bacterial and fungal species contributes directly to inflammation, tissue damage and lung disease progression [13–15]. These species include Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in patients with CF [16–18], Haemophilus influenzae and P. aeruginosa in patients with bronchiectasis [19], H. influenzae in patients with neutrophilic asthma [20], and Moraxella catarrhalis in patients with COPD [21]. The presence and abundance of these pathogens is largely viewed as the sole microbial determinant of airway disease. However, in addition to these pathogens, the lower airways of patients with chronic lung disease are also colonised by a much wider microbiota that includes many bacterial taxa not considered to contribute directly to pathogenesis [12, 14, 22–24].

The composition of this wider airway microbiota differs with disease characteristics, severity and patient age [25–27]. However, the potential of microbiota members to influence disease by mediating or moderating the impact of pro-inflammatory external triggers, including airway pathogens, is little understood [28–30].

We hypothesised that the lung microbiota contains bacteria with immunomodulatory activity which modulate net levels of immune activation by key respiratory pathogens, such as P. aeruginosa. Therefore, we assessed the immunomodulatory effect of several members of the lung microbiota frequently reported as present in CF lower respiratory tract samples [21, 31, 32]. These species represented recognised pathogens (S. aureus), less frequently recovered pathogens (Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Streptococcus anginosus) and upper respiratory tract commensals thought to be broadly nonpathogenic in this context (Rothia mucilaginosa and Gemella haemolysans). The latter includes the Gram-positive coccus R. mucilaginosa, a common commensal of the oral cavity that is frequently detected in the lungs of patients with chronic lung disease [23, 33–36], and has been shown to be metabolically active and adapted to the CF lung environment [37]. We found that R. mucilaginosa exhibits anti-inflammatory activity in vitro. We subsequently validated our findings in an animal model of lung inflammation and in a cohort of patients with neutrophilic airways disease. Finally, we identified the host pathway that R. mucilaginosa interferes with to exert its anti-inflammatory effect.

Methods

Bacterial species and culturing conditions

Six bacterial species (table 1) commonly isolated from the CF lung were selected for this study, including two pathogens (P. aeruginosa and S. aureus), two less frequently recovered pathogens (S. anginosus and A. xylosoxidans) and two bacteria that are not typically considered as pathogens (R. mucilaginosa and G. haemolysans). Selective media for these species were previously developed [38, 39]. For select experiments we also included additional Rothia species, i.e. Rothia dentocariosa, Rothia terrae, Rothia amarae and Rothia aeria. All isolates were cultured at 37°C under constant shaking conditions (250 rpm) in Brain Heart Infusion broth (Lab M, Bury, UK) until stationary phase. Most isolates were cultured in aerobic conditions except for S. anginosus and G. haemolysans, which were cultured in microaerobic conditions (<1% O2) (Oxoid CampyGen Compact; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Overview of strains used in this study

Three-dimensional lung epithelial cell culture models

A549 cell line

A previously developed organotypic three-dimensional (3D) cell culture model was used to study the immune response to pro-inflammatory stimuli [40–43]. 3D in vivo-like lung epithelial cell culture model systems reflect key aspects of the parental tissue, including 3D architecture, barrier function, apical–basolateral polarity and multicellular complexity [40, 42]. It has been demonstrated that P. aeruginosa adhesion, as well as host-secreted cytokine profiles, in 3D cell culture models of lung epithelial cells are more similar to the in vivo situation than cells grown as a monolayer on plastic [41]. A 3D model of the human adenocarcinoma alveolar lung epithelial cell line A549 (ATCC CCL-185) was generated in GTSF-2 medium (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 1.5 g·L−1 sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 2.5 mg·L−1 insulin transferrin sodium selenite (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies) at 37°C under 5% CO2. 3D A549 cells were cultured for 11–14 days and were transferred to 48-well plates at a concentration of 2.5×105 cells per well containing fresh serum-free GTSF-2 medium on the day of the infection.

IB-3 and S9 cell lines

The aforementioned 3D cell culture model was optimised for use with IB-3 and S9 cell lines [44]. The IB-3 cell line is a bronchial epithelial cell line heterogeneous for F508del (F508del/W1282X). The S9 cell line originates from the IB-3 cell line and is stably transduced with wild-type CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). LHC-8 medium without gentamicin (Life Technologies) supplemented with 5% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin was used to culture both cell lines. The 3D models of IB-3 and S9 cells were generated as described for the 3D A549 model, except that a cell:bead ratio of 4:1 was used (compared with 2:1 for the 3D A549 model).

In vitro infection studies

Prior to infection, bacterial cultures were centrifuged and resuspended in serum-free host cell culture medium. Cells were infected with single bacterial cultures for 4 h at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1, unless otherwise indicated. Additionally, cells were infected with P. aeruginosa together with each one of the CF lung microbiota members for 4 h at a 10:1 ratio, resulting in an MOI of 20:1. When indicated, 3D cell aggregates were exposed to other pro-inflammatory stimuli, i.e. S. aureus (MOI 10:1), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (100 µg·mL−1) (Sigma-Aldrich), rhamnolipid (100 µg·mL−1) (Sigma-Aldrich) and H2O2 (1 mM), together with R. mucilaginosa for 4 h. For longer term experiments, 3D cell aggregates were exposed to 100 µg·mL−1 LPS alone or in combination with R. mucilaginosa for 24 h at an MOI of 1:1. For experiments with cell-free supernatant of R. mucilaginosa, cultures were centrifuged and filtered through a 0.22 μm PET filter membrane (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). To obtain lysed cell suspension, R. mucilaginosa cultures were subjected to a cold/heat cycle twice (i.e. 5 min ice followed by 5 min at 85°C). Viability of lysed cells was checked by plating on nutrient agar, confirming no culturable bacteria. 3D A549 cells were exposed for 4 h to P. aeruginosa PAO1 (MOI 10:1) with or without R. mucilaginosa supernatant (100 µL cell-free supernatant and 150 µL GTSF-2 cell culture medium without FBS), lysed cells (100 µL lysed cell suspension initially containing 2.5×106 cells, which is equivalent to an MOI of 10:1 and 150 µL cell culture medium) or live cells as described earlier (MOI 10:1).

Cytotoxicity assays

After infection of the 3D cells with various bacteria or exposure to other pro-inflammatory stimuli (LPS, rhamnolipid and H2O2), cell viability was assessed using the annexin V/propidium iodide (Life Technologies) and lactate dehydrogenase (Sigma-Aldrich) assays, according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Bacterial cell adherence analysis

Bacterial adherence to the host cells was determined as described previously [42]. Previously developed selective media were used when host cells were co-exposed to P. aeruginosa and R. mucilaginosa, i.e. Luria–Bertani agar supplemented with 1.25 mg·mL−1 triclosan to select for P. aeruginosa, and nutrient agar supplemented with 5 mg·mL−1 mupirocin and 10 mg·mL−1 colistin sulfate to select for R. mucilaginosa [38].

Evaluation of interleukin-8 degradation

Recombinant interleukin (IL)-8 standard (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) at a concentration of 125 pg·mL−1 was added to R. mucilaginosa culture in GTSF-2 medium without serum (5×107 CFU·mL−1 corresponding to an MOI of 10:1) or to control medium. The IL-8 concentration was measured after 0, 15, 30, 60 and 90 min using ELISA as described in the section on inflammatory marker quantification.

In vivo mouse model

12-week-old female BALB/c ByJRj mice (Janvier Labs, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) were managed in accordance with the guidelines provided by the European Directive for Laboratory Animal Care (Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament). The laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp (Antwerp, Belgium) authorised and approved all animal experiments in this study (file 2019-90). Intratracheal administration of R. mucilaginosa embedded in alginate beads in the presence or absence of LPS was done using a protocol described by Moser et al. [45], with adaptations described in the supplementary material. Embedding bacteria in alginate is a technique developed to retain a sufficient microbial load in the lungs over an extended period of time without immunosuppression [46]. In a preliminary experiment using R. mucilaginosa cell suspension for intratracheal administration, consistent colonisation could not be obtained (supplementary material). Moreover, for R. mucilaginosa, the method used to prepare alginate beads removed bacterial clumps >0.25 mm, thereby limiting the risk of blocking the airways of the mice. Hence, embedding of R. mucilaginosa in alginate beads was used for all experiments. For preparation of the R. mucilaginosa-containing alginate beads, three independent cultures were pooled. Mice were instilled with 10 µg per 50 µL LPS with or without R. mucilaginosa (either R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 or the CF isolate R. mucilaginosa B03V1S1C at the maximal dose that could be obtained in the alginate beads, i.e. ∼1×105 CFU per mouse) embedded in alginate beads for 48 h. Mice were observed during this 48 h for fur quality, posture, state of activity and respiratory symptoms, and were weighed every 24 h. Mice were euthanised by cervical dislocation 48 h post-infection. The left lung was homogenised and used for determination of the microbial load (by plate counting) as well as for cytokine quantification. The spleen and medial lobe of the liver were collected and homogenised to check for dissemination of the instilled bacteria (by plate counting). The right lung was collected in 1 mL of 4% PFA for histological analysis. Sections for histological analysis stained by haematoxylin/eosin were examined blindly and scored as previously described using an EVOS FL Auto microscope (Life Technologies) [47].

Quantification of Rothia species in respiratory samples

Archived, induced sputum samples were obtained from 85 adults with confirmed bronchiectasis and with a history of two or more infective exacerbations (associated with bacterial infection based on the requirement for supplemental systemic antibiotic therapy) in the preceding year, recruited as part of the BLESS randomised controlled trial [48]. Information on the patient cohort (including inclusion/exclusion criteria and sputum induction procedure) is provided in the supplementary methods. The study was approved by the Mater Health Service (South Brisbane, Australia) Human Research Ethics Committee and informed consent was obtained for all participants. Induced sputum was collected at baseline, prior to any intervention, and all patients had a sputum neutrophil abundance of ≥70% (as a percentage of total sputum cells). All patients had a chronic lower airway infection. The relative abundance of Rothia species was measured in 79 out of 85 samples using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing as described previously [49] and as detailed in the supplementary methods. Sequence data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive with accession number SRA128000. R. mucilaginosa absolute abundance was measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in 82 out of 85 samples using the Qiagen Microbial DNA qPCR Assay for R. mucilaginosa (BPID00297A; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Gene copy numbers were determined by comparing with a standard curve as described previously [50].

Inflammatory marker quantification

For in vitro experiments, IL-8 secretion was measured in the cell culture supernatant by a Human IL-8 ELISA MAX Standard assay (BioLegend). For in vivo animal experiments, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 secretion was measured in lung homogenate by a MIP-2 Mouse ELISA kit (LabNed, Amstelveen, The Netherlands). All other cytokines for in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal experiments were quantified by Bioplex Multiplex assays (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Inflammatory markers were measured in the sputum of bronchiectasis patients using ELISA (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for IL-8 and IL-1β, and using Magnetic Luminex Performance Assay multiplex kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-8 and MMP-9 as described previously [51].

Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR

3D A549 cells were infected with P. aeruginosa PAO1 or a combination of P. aeruginosa PAO1 and R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 as described earlier. After 4 h of infection, 3D A549 cells were washed three times with Hank's Balanced Salt Solution and RNAprotect Reagent (Qiagen) was added. Total cellular RNA was extracted using the Aurum Total RNA Mini Kit (Bio-Rad) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the iScript advanced cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). The expression of various genes involved in inflammation was quantified using the “Bacterial infections in normal airways” PrimePCR panel (Bio-Rad) and SsoAdvanced SYBR Green supermix (Bio-Rad). qPCR experiments were performed on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System C1000 Thermal Cycler. TBP, GAPDH and HPRT1 were used as reference genes. Genes with an insufficient expression level were excluded from further analysis.

Analysis of NF-κB activation

A 3D epithelial cell model of NF-κB–luciferase-transfected A549 cells (BPS Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) was developed as described for the 3D A549 model. Cells were exposed for 4 h to single or co-cultures of P. aeruginosa and R. mucilaginosa (or its cell-free supernatant) as described earlier. Likewise, screening of NF-κB activation by LPS (100 µg·mL−1) with or without 36 isolates representing five different Rothia species (table 1) was performed. When indicated, the effect of Rothia species (R. mucilaginosa DSM20146, R. dentocariosa HVOC18-02, R. aeria HVOC13-01 and R. terrae HVOC29-01) on NF-κB pathway activation by LPS (100 µg·mL−1) was evaluated under microaerobic conditions (3% O2, 5% CO2 and 92% N2) in a BACTROX-2 Hypoxia Chamber (SHEL LAB, Cornelius, OR, USA). The One-Step Luciferase Assay System (BPS Bioscience) was used to quantify NF-κB pathway activation and luminescence was measured by an EnVision luminometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

Western blot analysis

The Western blot experiments were done as described previously [52]. Mouse monoclonal antibodies, at concentrations recommended by the manufacturer, were used to detect A20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), NF-κB p65 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and phosphorylated (p)-IκBα (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and a goat polyclonal antibody was used to detect IκBα (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). As secondary antibody, an anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-goat IgG HRP-linked antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used.

Statistical analysis

All in vitro experiments were carried out at least in biological triplicates (n≥3). In vitro infection experiments contained two technical replicates for assessment of the viability, quantification of CFU by plating and quantification of cytokines. For animal experiments, MIP-2, CFU, disease symptoms in the animals, colonisation and dissemination were determined for two independent experiments with R. mucilaginosa DSM20746. Validation of the in vivo data with another R. mucilaginosa strain (B03V1S1C) and quantification of additional cytokines as well as histological analysis were done for one experiment for both strains.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was applied to evaluate normality of the data. For normally distributed data, differences between the means were assessed by an independent samples t-test or ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc analysis. Nonnormally distributed data were further analysed by a Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test or Mann–Whitney test. Statistical significance is assumed at p<0.05. For correlation analysis, between Rothia species abundance (relative or absolute) and cytokine/MMP concentrations, correlation coefficients and p-values were determined by either Pearson's test (r) for parametric distributions or Spearman's test (rs) for nonparametric distributions.

Results

R. mucilaginosa inhibits the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by lung epithelial cells in vitro

Exposure of an in vivo-like 3D alveolar epithelial model to P. aeruginosa PAO1 (MOI 30:1) induced high IL-8 production, while low or moderate IL-8 production was observed following exposure to S. aureus SP123, S. anginosus LMG14696, A. xylosoxidans LMG26680, G. haemolysans LMG18984 and Rothia mucilaginosa DSM20746 (figure 1a). When 3D A549 cells were co-exposed to P. aeruginosa and one of each of the five other bacterial species, R. mucilaginosa completely abolished the P. aeruginosa-induced IL-8 response (figure 1b). R. mucilaginosa exposure also lowered the IL-8 response induced by P. aeruginosa at an MOI of 100:1 and 10:1 (supplementary figure S1a). The effect of R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 on P. aeruginosa-induced IL-8 production was confirmed with two other strains of R. mucilaginosa (ATCC 49042 and a CF sputum isolate B03V1S1C) (supplementary figure S1b). The three R. mucilaginosa strains also reduced the IL-8 response induced by various P. aeruginosa CF sputum isolates (supplementary figure S1b). Reduction in IL-8 response by R. mucilaginosa was confirmed using LPS (100 µg·mL−1) as the pro-inflammatory stimulus, both for short-term (4 h) and long-term (24 h) exposure (figure 1c). Under the experimental conditions tested, a similar number of R. mucilaginosa CFU was observed between the initial inoculum (0 h) and the total CFU that associated with the host cells and was present in the surrounding liquid at 4 and 24 h, indicating that bacteria remained viable throughout the experiment (supplementary figure S1c). After 4 h, a slight increase in total R. mucilaginosa CFU was observed compared with the inoculum (supplementary figure S1c).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Three-dimensional (3D) lung epithelial responses to pro-inflammatory stimuli in the presence and absence of members of the lung microbiota: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (Pa), Rothia mucilaginosa DSM20746 (Rm), Staphylococcus aureus SP123 (S), Streptococcus anginosus LMG14696 (St), Achromobacter xylosoxidans LMG26680 (A) and Gemella haemolysans LMG18984 (G). a, b) Interleukin (IL)-8 production by 3D A549 cells after 4 h exposure to a) single bacterial cultures or b) co-cultures of various lung microbiota members with P. aeruginosa PAO1 at an MOI of 30:1. c) IL-8 production by 3D A549 cells after 4 or 24 h exposure to 100 μg·mL−1 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone or in co-culture with R. mucilaginosa at an MOI 10:1 (4 h) or 1:1 (24 h). d) IL-6, IL-8, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 production of 3D A549 cells after 4 h exposure to P. aeruginosa alone or in co-culture with R. mucilaginosa at an MOI of 10:1. NC: negative control (uninfected 3D epithelial cells in serum-free medium). Data represent mean±sem or mean, n≥3. *: p<0.05; **: p<0.001.

R. mucilaginosa also significantly reduced IL-8 levels promoted by the Gram-positive pathogen S. aureus (MOI 10:1) in 3D A549 cells (supplementary figure S1d). The anti-inflammatory effect of R. mucilaginosa was confirmed in a 3D model of CF bronchial epithelial cells (IB-3 cell line) and in the CFTR corrected control (S9 cell line) (supplementary figure S1e and f).

In addition, R. mucilaginosa reduced levels of other P. aeruginosa-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1) (figure 1d). Exposure to P. aeruginosa, R. mucilaginosa or the combination showed normal morphology based on microscopic analysis and cells retained >80% viability after infection (supplementary figure S2).

R. mucilaginosa lowers the LPS-induced pro-inflammatory response in an in vivo mouse model

Next, we evaluated the in vivo anti-inflammatory effect of R. mucilaginosa by measuring mouse lung inflammatory cytokine levels following LPS instillation or LPS and R. mucilaginosa (either DSM20746 and B03V1S1C strains) co-exposure (figure 2a). After 48 h of co-exposure, LPS-induced MIP-2 (homologue for human IL-8) was reduced by 40% by strain DSM20746 (figure 2b). The results obtained were validated using another R. mucilaginosa strain (B03V1S1C), which demonstrated a reduction of LPS-induced MIP-2 production of 70% (figure 2b). Levels of other cytokines (MCP-1, IL-6, IL-1α, IL-5, IL-10 and GM-CSF) were also significantly lower in mice exposed to LPS and R. mucilaginosa B03V1S1C compared with LPS alone (supplementary figure S3). The lungs of R. mucilaginosa-infected mice contained a similar number of bacteria (CFU·mL−1) in the presence and absence of LPS (figure 2c). No bacteria were detected in the liver and spleen, suggesting no dissemination, and mice showed an overall normal fur quality, posture, body weight and no respiratory symptoms in all test conditions. Haematoxylin/eosin-stained lung sections of LPS-instilled mice showed significantly more pronounced tissue damage compared with lung sections of mice co-exposed to LPS and R. mucilaginosa B03V1S1C, and the same trend for R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 was observed (figure 2d and e).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Influence of Rothia mucilaginosa (Rm) on the in vivo responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). a) Timeline of animal infection and necropsy, b) macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 concentration (measured by ELISA), and c) number of CFU·mL−1 in mice lung homogenates after 48 h exposure to vehicle (n=7), LPS (n=18), R. mucilaginosa suspension (n=9 for R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 and n=3 for R. mucilaginosa B03V1S1C) or a combination of LPS+R. mucilaginosa (n=18 for R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 and n=3 for R. mucilaginosa B03V1S1C). d) Lung histopathological score on haematoxylin/eosin-stained sections of the right lung. e) Lung haematoxylin/eosin-stained sections of vehicle, LPS, R. mucilaginosa B03V1S1C and LPS+R. mucilaginosa B03V1S1C instilled mice. Scale bar: 200 μm. Vehicle: sterile alginate beads; LPS: 10 μg per 50 μL. The data presented is from two independent animal experiments for strain DSM20746 and one experiment for strain B03V1S1C. Data represent mean±sem, n≥3. *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01.

Rothia species inhibit NF-κB activation in epithelial cells

To decipher the mode of action of R. mucilaginosa, the expression of genes that are part of major pro-inflammatory pathways was evaluated in 3D A549 cells exposed to P. aeruginosa or co-exposed to P. aeruginosa and R. mucilaginosa. R. mucilaginosa co-exposure significantly downregulated the expression of genes encoding IL-8 (IL8), IL-6 (IL6) and pro-IL-1β (IL1B) (figure 3) caused by P. aeruginosa. In addition, R. mucilaginosa significantly downregulated NFKB1 expression (figure 3). Regulation of NFKBIA, NFKBIE and REL genes showed a downward trend that further indicates an effect of R. mucilaginosa on the NF-κB pathway.

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Differential expression of genes involved in inflammation by three-dimensional (3D) A549 alveolar epithelial cells exposed to Pseudomonas aeruginosa versus P. aeruginosa in combination with Rothia mucilaginosa. Quantitative PCR analysis showing average fold changes in mRNA levels of 3D A549 cells stimulated by P. aeruginosa PAO1 versus a co-culture of P. aeruginosa and R. mucilaginosa. n=3. *: statistically significant (p<0.05) fold change.

The influence of R. mucilaginosa on activation of the NF-κB pathway was confirmed in a NF-κB–luciferase reporter 3D A549 cell model, showing a significant reduction of NF-κB activity by co-culturing R. mucilaginosa with P. aeruginosa compared with P. aeruginosa single exposure (figure 4a). The inhibition of the NF-κB pathway by R. mucilaginosa was also shown using LPS as a pro-inflammatory stimulus and was observed for 36 isolates representing five different Rothia species from clinical and environmental sources (supplementary figure S4a and b). The anti-inflammatory effect of different Rothia species on NF-κB pathway activation by LPS was also observed under microaerobic conditions (supplementary figure S4c), which can be encountered by microorganisms in the mucus of patients with chronic lung disease such as CF [53]. The minimal effective dose of R. mucilaginosa to inhibit P. aeruginosa-induced inflammation was an MOI of at least 5:1 for all doses of P. aeruginosa tested (up to MOI 100:1) (supplementary figure S5a). We also tested higher doses of R. mucilaginosa (MOI 100:1 and 1000:1) and the anti-inflammatory effect was confirmed (supplementary figure S5b).

FIGURE 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4

Effect of Rothia mucilaginosa (Rm) on NF-κB pathway activation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa). a) Activation of the NF-κB pathway measured via luminescence of three-dimensional (3D) NF-κB reporter A549 cells. 3D cells were exposed for 4 h to P. aeruginosa PAO1 alone or in co-culture with R. mucilaginosa DSM20746. b) Semiquantitative determination (by Western blotting) of proteins (i.e. A20, IκBα, p65 and phosphorylated (p)-IκBα) produced by 3D A549 cells stimulated with P. aeruginosa PAO1 with or without R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 for 15 min (15′), 30 min (30′), 1 h and 4 h. c) Band intensity (normalised to β-actin) of Western blot at 4 h of 3D A549 cells stimulated with P. aeruginosa PAO1 with or without R. mucilaginosa DSM20746. RLU: relative light units; NC: negative control (uninfected 3D NF-κB reporter A549 cells in serum-free GTSF-2 medium). Data represent mean±sem, n=3. *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001.

We subsequently performed Western blot analysis to investigate at which stage R. mucilaginosa affects NF-κB signalling. After 4 h co-culture of P. aeruginosa and R. mucilaginosa, R. mucilaginosa prevented P. aeruginosa-induced IκBα phosphorylation (figure 4b and c). This suggests that R. mucilaginosa affects NF-κB signalling upstream or at the level of the IκBα kinase complex (IKK). In line with this, the expression of both IκBα and A20, two NF-κB target genes, was greatly reduced in the co-culture samples (figure 4c).

Finally, we excluded degradation of IL-8 or inhibition of P. aeruginosa adhesion to 3D A549 epithelial cells by R. mucilaginosa as alternative explanations for the observed anti-inflammatory effect (supplementary figure S6).

R. mucilaginosa supernatant inhibits IL-8 production and NF-κB pathway activation in response to pro-inflammatory stimuli in 3D lung epithelial cells

Exposure of 3D A549 cells to P. aeruginosa PAO1 (MOI 10:1) in the presence of R. mucilaginosa cell-free supernatant, but not lysed cells, strongly reduced IL-8 production (figure 5a). We confirmed that R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 cell-free supernatant fully abolished LPS-stimulated NF-κB pathway activation (figure 5b).

FIGURE 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5

The anti-inflammatory effect of Rothia mucilaginosa (Rm) is mediated by its cell-free supernatant. a) Interleukin (IL)-8 production by three-dimensional (3D) A549 epithelial cells after exposure to P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Pa) for 4 h, with or without R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 live cells, lysed cells or cell-free supernatant. b) Quantification of NF-κB pathway activation after 4 h exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (100 μg·mL−1) with or without R. mucilaginosa DSM20746 cell-free supernatant. The multiplicity of infection was 10:1 in all experiments. RLU: relative light units; NC: negative control (uninfected 3D epithelial cells). Data represent mean±sem, n≥3. ***: p<0.001.

Inverse relationship between airway inflammation and Rothia species in patients with neutrophilic airways disease

Two culture-independent approaches were applied to measure Rothia species in induced sputum samples from patients with bronchiectasis, a neutrophilic airways disease. The first approach (measuring R. mucilaginosa absolute load) indicated that R. mucilaginosa load significantly inversely correlated with levels of IL-8 (figure 6a) and IL-1β (figure 6b), as well as with those of MMP-1 (figure 6c) and MMP-8 (figure 6d). There were no significant correlations between R. mucilaginosa and MMP-9 (figure 6e) or neutrophil percentage in sputum (figure 6f). In the second approach, we determined the relative abundance of Rothia and found it also inversely correlated with levels of IL-8, IL-1β, MMP-1 and MMP-8. The correlation between Rothia relative abundance and MMP-9 was also significant. There was again no correlation between Rothia abundance and neutrophil percentage (supplementary figure S7).

FIGURE 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6

Correlation of absolute load of Rothia mucilaginosa with pro-inflammatory parameters in induced sputum samples from bronchiectasis patients: a) interleukin (IL)-8, b) IL-1β, c) matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, d) MMP-8, e) MMP-9 and f) neutrophils. Data points represent individual induced sputum samples. Correlation coefficients and p-values were calculated on ranked values when Spearman's test was used (rs).

Discussion

We report that common members of the lung microbiota belonging to the genus Rothia exert anti-inflammatory properties in vitro and that for at least one (R. mucilaginosa) this effect is also apparent in vivo. Being frequently part of the oral microbiota and only rarely causing lung infection [54, 55], R. mucilaginosa is often considered part of salivary contamination of samples from the lower airways. However, comparison of the microbiome of the oral cavity with the lung microbiome suggests that R. mucilaginosa is not a contaminant [37, 56, 57]. The core lung microbiome varies interindividually, yet Rothia species are detected in COPD and asthmatic patients, in paediatric and adult individuals with CF [23, 33, 35, 36, 58], and also in the lower airways of healthy individuals [59]. Nevertheless, little is known about its role in chronic lung disease [24, 60].

The presence of bacteria in the lower airways in chronic lung disease is conventionally considered as a contributor to the pathophysiology [13–15]. Results obtained in the present study strongly suggest that the presence of R. mucilaginosa in the airways is beneficial as it not only inhibited the production of P. aeruginosa-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines, it also showed an inhibitory effect on the IL-8 response induced by LPS and by another important respiratory pathogen, S. aureus. The anti-inflammatory effect was confirmed for a large collection of Rothia species and was also observed under microaerobic conditions. Since Rothia species are facultative anaerobes, it is likely that these microorganisms will colonise niches with low oxygen levels found in the lung mucus of patients with chronic lung disease [53]. Nevertheless, a minimal dose of Rothia was needed to obtain an anti-inflammatory effect in vitro for all doses of P. aeruginosa tested, suggesting a dose-dependent effect. The dose used most frequently throughout our study (MOI 10:1) is justified as a model for patients with chronic lung disease since a total bacterial MOI of ∼100:1 has been reported for CF patients [61], and the relative abundance of Rothia varies between 1% and 40% [62, 63]. Also, in the BLESS cohort that was analysed in our study, the mean relative abundance of Rothia was 9%, supporting the physiological relevance of the dose used. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out that at some point, high loads of Rothia may result in a net pro-inflammatory effect in the lung environment, regardless of its anti-inflammatory properties. Very high doses of R. mucilaginosa (up to MOI 1000:1) still exerted an anti-inflammatory effect in vitro; therefore, further research is needed to evaluate the load of Rothia that can be tolerated in vivo without causing adverse effects.

R. mucilaginosa was also able to reduce the LPS-triggered production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in lung homogenates of mice, using an alginate bead model. The levels of several cytokines in mice exposed to empty alginate beads were similar to those of LPS-treated mice, which is in agreement with a previous study reporting inflammatory responses in mouse lungs after instillation with sterile alginate beads [64]. Nevertheless, R. mucilaginosa caused a clear decline in the inflammatory response of lung tissue regardless of the stimulus and the degree of the anti-inflammatory effect was strain dependent.

Interestingly, previous studies have shown a negative correlation between the relative abundance of Rothia species and sputum inflammatory markers such as neutrophil elastase, IL-8 and IL-1β in CF patients [65, 66]. A recent report found the relative abundance of the genus Rothia in expectorated sputum to be a positive predictor of lung function in patients with CF [67]. Not only were we able to confirm a negative correlation between Rothia species and inflammation for the BLESS cohort at the relative abundance level, but we also showed that the absolute abundance of R. mucilaginosa was negatively correlated with inflammatory markers (based on IL-8 and IL-1β levels) and mediators of airway remodelling (MMP-1 and MMP-8 levels). Levels of MMP-1, MMP-8 and MMP-9, which degrade extracellular matrix proteins [68], are increased in the airways of patients with neutrophilic airways disease, are inversely correlated with lung function [51] and contribute to irreversible airway damage [68]. We did not find an association between Rothia and neutrophil abundance. This is potentially attributable to relatively low levels of variation in neutrophil percentages between patients (all ≥70%). Assessment of Rothia abundance in other cohorts of neutrophilic airways disease is needed to confirm a possible anti-inflammatory effect of Rothia species in patients and to determine the extent to which this might impair the progression of structural lung disease.

While several studies have associated an increased abundance of Rothia with positive health outcomes, it was recently demonstrated that the relative abundance of Rothia species was higher in a cohort of patients with a range of chronic lung diseases (severe asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis) [69] and in patients with tuberculosis compared with healthy individuals [70]. It remains to be determined whether the increased Rothia relative abundance also implies an actual change in the absolute microbial load of that species or merely reflects a decreased abundance of other (more dominant) species. Nevertheless, the study of Hong et al. [70] indicated that R. mucilaginosa may serve as an anchor species for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 20 other taxa. It is possible that metabolic cross-feeding could alter the co-occurrence of other pathogenic or nonpathogenic species in the lung environment. For R. mucilaginosa, it was demonstrated that its metabolic products can cross-feed P. aeruginosa [71]. While we did not observe R. mucilaginosa-induced growth of P. aeruginosa in our study, long-term interspecies interactions are worth exploring further to evaluate whether commensal species such as R. mucilaginosa may influence overall community composition, in addition to exerting an anti-inflammatory activity. Furthermore, whether an altered Rothia abundance in the described and present studies is a driver of disease/disease markers or a consequence of an altered lung physiology (e.g. due to altered airway clearance or differential levels of reactive oxygen species, pro-inflammatory cytokines or mucins) remains a question to be fully addressed. The obtained data in animals suggest that supplementation of Rothia in the lungs may diminish the pro-inflammatory response to external stimuli, yet further exploration of the causal relation between Rothia abundance and inflammation in patients is needed.

The discovery of Rothia as an anti-inflammatory genus in the lung microbiota raises the question whether other nonpathogenic commensals in the respiratory tract, in particular originating from the oral cavity, may have immunomodulatory properties. Recent studies in animals [72] or in vitro [73] support this hypothesis. For example, pulmonary aspiration of oral human commensals (Prevotella melaninogenica, Veillonella parvula and Streptococcus mitis) in mice induces a T-helper cell type 17 inflammatory phenotype that diminishes susceptibility to Streptococcus pneumoniae. Our data on cytokine production and on NF-κB activation indicate that R. mucilaginosa prevents NF-κB signalling, probably at the level of IKK activation. Indeed, IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α are regulated by NF-κB through binding of pathogen-associated molecular patterns to Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [74]. This is of particular interest since the NF-κB pathway mediates the elevated innate immune response in patients with chronic lung diseases [75–84]. Cell-free supernatant exhibited anti-inflammatory activity, indicating that R. mucilaginosa secretes (an) anti-inflammatory mediator(s) that directly interferes with the NF-κB pathway or induces host mediators that resolve inflammation. Since the anti-inflammatory activity was observed using both the pure TLR4 ligand LPS as well as different microbial species as the pro-inflammatory trigger, we can exclude that antimicrobial activity of R. mucilaginosa is causing the effect. Research to identify the immunomodulatory mediator(s) will be necessary to further understand how Rothia species modulate the pro-inflammatory response.

Understanding the contribution of potentially beneficial species to net inflammation could enable us to better understand variation in disease severity and progression between patients with chronic lung disease. Prospective studies to assess the clinical utility of R. mucilaginosa as a marker of airway inflammation, and the extent to which it may provide a basis for the development of novel therapeutic interventions, are now required.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary material ERJ-01293-2021.Supplement

Shareable PDF

Supplementary Material

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-01293-2021.Shareable

Acknowledgements

We thank Catherine Greene (Respiratory Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland) for providing the CF cell lines, Matthew Parsek (Dept of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA) and Boo Tseng (School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA) for providing P. aeruginosa CF127, and Joana Doci (Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium) for help with the experiments.

Footnotes

  • Author contributions: A. Crabbé conceptualised the study. A. Crabbé, C. Rigauts and T. Coenye are responsible for the overall study design. J. Aizawa, C. Rigauts, M. Govaerts and L. Ostyn performed the animal experiments. S.L. Taylor and S. Sims performed DNA sequencing, qPCR experiments and data analysis. C. Rigauts and L. Ostyn performed the in vitro experiments, and C. Rigauts analysed the data. L. Burr and J.L. Simpson were responsible for clinical sampling. G.B. Rogers, P. Cos, Y. Dondelinger, M. Sze, L. Vereecke, A. Bragonzi, C. Cigana, H. Van Acker and E. Vandeplassche provided critical guidance in the experimental set-up, analysis and/or interpretation of results. C. Rigauts, A. Willems, M.M. Tunney, G.B. Rogers and S.L. Taylor isolated bacterial strains used in this study. C. Rigauts, A. Crabbé, G.B. Rogers, S.L. Taylor and J. Aizawa wrote the manuscript. T. Coenye, P. Cos, M.M. Tunney, A. Willems, Y. Dondelinger, L. Vereecke and C. Cigana revised the manuscript.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Rigauts declares a patent application related to this work.

  • Conflict of interest: J. Aizawa has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: S.L. Taylor has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: G.B. Rogers has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Govaerts has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Cos has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Ostyn has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: S. Sims has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: E. Vandeplassche has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Sze has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: Y. Dondelinger has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Vereecke has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: H. Van Acker has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: J.L. Simpson has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Burr has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Willems has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M.M. Tunney has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Cigana has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Bragonzi has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: T. Coenye declares a patent application related to this work.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Crabbé declares a patent application related to this work.

  • Support statement: This work was funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO). C. Rigauts is a recipient of an FWO-Strategic Basic Research (SB) fellowship (1S23117N). A. Crabbé is a recipient of an FWO Odysseus grant (G.0.E53.14N), and P. Cos, T. Coenye and A. Crabbé received an FWO research grant (G010119N). J. Aizawa received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant (722467 Print-Aid consortium). G.B. Rogers is supported by a Matthew Flinders Research Fellowship and a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship. Y. Dondelinger is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the FWO (12T9118N). Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received May 5, 2021.
  • Accepted September 10, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Tsikrika S,
    2. Dimakou K,
    3. Papaioannou A, et al.
    Non-invasive evaluation of airway inflammation in non-CF bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2016; 48: Suppl. 60, PA2556. doi:10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA2556
    OpenUrl
    1. Quinn TM,
    2. Hill AT
    . Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in the elderly: current perspectives. Clin Interv 2018; 13: 1649–1656. doi:10.2147/CIA.S143139
    OpenUrl
    1. Dente FL,
    2. Bilotta M,
    3. Bartoli ML, et al.
    Neutrophilic bronchial inflammation correlates with clinical and functional findings in patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Mediators Inflamm 2015; 2015: 642503. doi:10.1155/2015/642503
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Murdoch JR,
    2. Lloyd CM
    . Chronic inflammation and asthma. Mutat Res 2010; 690: 24–39. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.09.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ishmael FT
    . The inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of asthma. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2011; 111: 11 Suppl. 7, S11–S17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. King PT
    . Inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its role in cardiovascular disease and lung cancer. Clin Transl Med 2015; 4: 26. doi:10.1186/s40169-015-0068-z
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Rovina N,
    2. Koutsoukou A,
    3. Koulouris NG
    . Inflammation and immune response in COPD: where do we stand? Mediators Inflamm 2013; 2013: 413735. doi:10.1155/2013/413735
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Dhooghe B,
    2. Noël S,
    3. Huaux F, et al.
    Lung inflammation in cystic fibrosis: pathogenesis and novel therapies. Clin Biochem 2014; 47: 539–546. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.12.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Cantin AM,
    2. Hartl D,
    3. Konstan MW, et al.
    Inflammation in cystic fibrosis lung disease: pathogenesis and therapy. J Cyst Fibros 2015; 14: 419–430. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2015.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ind PW
    . COPD disease progression and airway inflammation: uncoupled by smoking cessation. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 764–766. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00102805
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Simmons MS,
    2. Connett JE,
    3. Nides MA, et al.
    Smoking reduction and the rate of decline in FEV1: results from the Lung Health Study. Eur Respir J 2005; 25: 1011–1017. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00086804
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Venkataraman A,
    2. Bassis CM,
    3. Beck JM, et al.
    Application of a neutral community model to assess structuring of the human lung microbiome. mBio 2015; 6: e02284-14. doi:10.1128/mBio.02284-14
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Budden KF,
    2. Shukla SD,
    3. Rehman SF, et al.
    Functional effects of the microbiota in chronic respiratory disease. Lancet Respir Med 2019; 7: 907–920. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30510-1
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Earl CS,
    2. An S,
    3. Ryan RP
    . The changing face of asthma and its relation with microbes. Trends Microbiol 2015; 23: 408–418. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.03.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cope EK
    . Host–microbe interactions in airway disease: toward disease mechanisms and novel therapeutic strategies. mSystems 2018; 3: e00158-17. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00158-17
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Filkins LM,
    2. O'Toole GA
    . Cystic fibrosis lung infections: polymicrobial, complex, and hard to treat. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11: e1005258. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005258
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Filkins LM,
    2. Graber JA,
    3. Olson DG, et al.
    Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa drives S. aureus towards fermentative metabolism and reduced viability in a cystic fibrosis model. J Bacteriol 2015; 197: 2252–2264. doi:10.1128/JB.00059-15
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Rada B
    . Interactions between neutrophils and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. Pathogens 2017; 6: 10. doi:10.3390/pathogens6010010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Martínez-García MA,
    2. Soler-Cataluña JJ,
    3. Perpiñá-Tordera M, et al.
    Factors associated with lung function decline in adult patients with stable non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Chest 2007; 132: 1565–1572. doi:10.1378/chest.07-0490
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Yang X,
    2. Li H,
    3. Ma Q, et al.
    Neutrophilic asthma is associated with increased airway bacterial burden and disordered community composition. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 9230234. doi:10.1155/2018/9230234
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Beasley V,
    2. Joshi PV,
    3. Singanayagam A, et al.
    Lung microbiology and exacerbations in COPD. Int J COPD 2012; 7: 555–569. doi:10.2147/COPD.S28286
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Huffnagle GB,
    2. Dickson RP
    . The bacterial microbiota in inflammatory lung diseases. Clin Immunol 2015; 159: 177–182. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2015.05.022
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Coburn B,
    2. Wang PW,
    3. Diaz Caballero J, et al.
    Lung microbiota across age and disease stage in cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 10241. doi:10.1038/srep10241
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Tunney MM,
    2. Field TR,
    3. Moriarty TF, et al.
    Detection of anaerobic bacteria in high numbers in sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 995–1001. doi:10.1164/rccm.200708-1151OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Dickson RP,
    2. Huffnagle GB
    . The lung microbiome: new principles for respiratory bacteriology in health and disease. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11: e1004923. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004923
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Moffatt MF,
    2. Cookson WO
    . The lung microbiome in health and disease. Clin Med 2017; 17: 525–529. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.17-6-525
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Huang YJ,
    2. Charlson ES,
    3. Collman RG, et al.
    The role of the lung microbiome in health and disease. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 1382–1387. doi:10.1164/rccm.201303-0488WS
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Lobionda S,
    2. Sittipo P,
    3. Kwon Y, et al.
    The role of gut microbiota in intestinal inflammation with respect to diet and extrinsic stressors. Microorganisms 2019; 7: 271. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7080271
    OpenUrl
    1. Viennois E,
    2. Gewirtz AT,
    3. Chassaing B
    . Chronic inflammatory diseases: are we ready for microbiota-based dietary intervention? Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 8: 61–71. doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.02.008
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Ferreira CM,
    2. Vieira AT,
    3. Vinolo MAR, et al.
    The central role of the gut microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases. J Immunol Res 2014; 2014: 689492. doi:10.1155/2014/689492
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Zhao J,
    2. Schloss PD,
    3. Kalikin LM, et al.
    Decade-long bacterial community dynamics in cystic fibrosis airways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 5809–5814. doi:10.1073/pnas.1120577109
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Surette MG
    . The cystic fibrosis lung microbiome. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11: Suppl. 1, S61–S65. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-159MG
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Arrieta M-C,
    2. Stiemsma LT,
    3. Dimitriu PA, et al.
    Early infancy microbial and metabolic alterations affect risk of childhood asthma. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7: 307ra152. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aab2271
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Muhlebach MS,
    2. Zorn BT,
    3. Esther CR, et al.
    Initial acquisition and succession of the cystic fibrosis lung microbiome is associated with disease progression in infants and preschool children. PLoS Pathog 2018; 14: e1006798. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006798
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Sokolowska M,
    2. Frei R,
    3. Lunjani N, et al.
    Microbiome and asthma. Asthma Res Pract 2018; 4: 1. doi:10.1186/s40733-017-0037-y
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Bafadhel M,
    3. Haldar K, et al.
    Lung microbiome dynamics in COPD exacerbations. Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1082–1092. doi:10.1183/13993003.01406-2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Lim YW,
    2. Schmieder R,
    3. Haynes M, et al.
    Mechanistic model of Rothia mucilaginosa adaptation toward persistence in the CF lung, based on a genome reconstructed from metagenomic data. PLoS One 2013; 8: e64285. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Vandeplassche E,
    2. Coenye T,
    3. Crabbé A
    . Developing selective media for quantification of multispecies biofilms following antibiotic treatment. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0187540. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187540
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Vandeplassche E,
    2. Sass A,
    3. Lemarcq A, et al.
    In vitro evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa AA2 biofilms in the presence of cystic fibrosis lung microbiome members. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 12859. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49371-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Barrila J,
    2. Radtke AL,
    3. Crabbé A, et al.
    Organotypic 3D cell culture models: using the rotating wall vessel to study host–pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010; 8: 791–801. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2423
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Carterson AJ,
    2. Bentrup KH,
    3. Ott CM, et al.
    A549 lung epithelial cells grown as three-dimensional aggregates: alternative tissue culture model for Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis. Infect Immun 2005; 73: 1129–1140. doi:10.1128/IAI.73.2.1129-1140.2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Crabbé A,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Matthijs N, et al.
    Antimicrobial efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation in a three-dimensional lung epithelial model and the influence of fetal bovine serum. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 43321. doi:10.1038/srep43321
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Crabbé A,
    2. Sarker SF,
    3. van Houdt R, et al.
    Alveolar epithelium protects macrophages from quorum sensing-induced cytotoxicity in a three-dimensional co-culture model. Cell Microbiol 2011; 13: 469–481. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01548.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Gruenert DC,
    2. Willems M,
    3. Cassiman JJ, et al.
    Established cell lines used in cystic fibrosis research. J Cyst Fibros 2004; 3: 191–196. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2004.05.040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Moser C,
    2. Van Gennip M,
    3. Bjarnsholt T, et al.
    Novel experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection model mimicking long-term host–pathogen interactions in cystic fibrosis. APMIS 2009; 117: 95–107. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.00018.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Sønderholm M,
    2. Kragh KN,
    3. Koren K, et al.
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregate formation in an alginate bead model system exhibits in vivo-like characteristics. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017; 83: e00113-17. doi:10.1128/AEM.00113-17
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Cigana C,
    2. Lorè NI,
    3. Riva C, et al.
    Tracking the immunopathological response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa during respiratory infections. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 21465. doi:10.1038/srep21465
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Serisier DJ,
    2. Martin ML,
    3. McGuckin MA, et al.
    Effect of long-term, low-dose erythromycin on pulmonary exacerbations among patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: the BLESS randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2013; 309: 1260–1267. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.2290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Rogers GB,
    2. Zain NMM,
    3. Bruce KD, et al.
    A novel microbiota stratification system predicts future exacerbations in bronchiectasis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11: 496–503. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201310-335OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Taylor SL,
    2. Leong LEX,
    3. Mobegi FM, et al.
    Long-term azithromycin reduces Haemophilus influenzae and increases antibiotic resistance in severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: 309–317. doi:10.1164/rccm.201809-1739OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Taylor SL,
    2. Rogers GB,
    3. Chen ACH, et al.
    Matrix metalloproteinases vary with airway microbiota composition and lung function in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 701–707. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-513OC
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Takahashi N,
    2. Vereecke L,
    3. Bertrand MJM, et al.
    RIPK1 ensures intestinal homeostasis by protecting the epithelium against apoptosis. Nature 2014; 513: 95–99. doi:10.1038/nature13706
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Worlitzsch D,
    2. Tarran R,
    3. Ulrich M, et al.
    Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Invest 2002; 109: 317–325. doi:10.1172/JCI0213870
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Willner S,
    2. Imam Z,
    3. Hader I
    . Rothia dentocariosa endocarditis in an unsuspecting host: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Cardiol 2019; 2019: 7464251. 10.1155/2019/7464251
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Maraki S,
    2. Papadakis IS
    . Rothia mucilaginosa pneumonia: a literature review. Infect Dis 2015; 47: 125–129. doi:10.3109/00365548.2014.980843
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Sverrild A,
    2. Kiilerich P,
    3. Brejnrod A, et al.
    Eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatic patients is associated with an altered airway microbiome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 140: 407–417. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.046
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Tsuzukibashi O,
    2. Uchibori S,
    3. Kobayashi T, et al.
    Isolation and identification methods of Rothia species in oral cavities. J Microbiol Methods 2017; 134: 21–26. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2017.01.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Muhlebach MS,
    2. Hatch JE,
    3. Einarsson GG, et al.
    Anaerobic bacteria cultured from CF airways correlate to milder disease – a multisite study. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1800242. doi:10.1183/13993003.00242-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Einarsson GG,
    2. Comer DM,
    3. McIlreavey L, et al.
    Community dynamics and the lower airway microbiota in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smokers and healthy non-smokers. Thorax 2016; 71: 795–803. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207235
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Laguna TA,
    2. Wagner BD,
    3. Williams CB, et al.
    Airway microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from clinically well infants with cystic fibrosis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0167649. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167649
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    1. Sze MA,
    2. Dimitriu PA,
    3. Hayashi S, et al.
    The lung tissue microbiome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185: 1073–1080. doi:10.1164/rccm.201111-2075OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Cuthbertson L,
    2. Walker AW,
    3. Oliver AE, et al.
    Lung function and microbiota diversity in cystic fibrosis. Microbiome 2020; 8: 45. doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00810-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Frayman KB,
    2. Armstrong DS,
    3. Carzino R, et al.
    The lower airway microbiota in early cystic fibrosis lung disease: a longitudinal analysis. Thorax 2017; 72: 1104–1112. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209279
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Bielen K,
    2. ‘s Jongers B,
    3. Malhotra-Kumar S, et al.
    Animal models of hospital-acquired pneumonia: current practices and future perspectives. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5: 132. doi:10.21037/atm.2017.03.72
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Zemanick ET,
    2. Wagner BD,
    3. Robertson CE, et al.
    Assessment of airway microbiota and inflammation in cystic fibrosis using multiple sampling methods. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 221–229. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201407-310OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Zemanick ET,
    2. Harris JK,
    3. Wagner BD, et al.
    Inflammation and airway microbiota during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations. PLoS One 2013; 8: e62917. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062917
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Zhao CY,
    2. Hao Y,
    3. Wang Y, et al.
    Microbiome data enhances predictive models of lung function in people with cystic fibrosis. J Infect Dis 2021; 223: 12 Suppl. 2, S246–S256. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa655
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Vandenbroucke RE,
    2. Dejonckheere E,
    3. Libert C
    . A therapeutic role for matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in lung diseases? Eur Respir J 2011; 38: 1200–1214. doi:10.1183/09031936.00027411
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Mac Aogáin M,
    2. Lau KJX,
    3. Cai Z, et al.
    Metagenomics reveals a core macrolide resistome related to microbiota in chronic respiratory disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202: 433–447. doi:10.1164/rccm.201911-2202OC
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Hong BY,
    2. Paulson JN,
    3. Stine OC, et al.
    Meta-analysis of the lung microbiota in pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 2018; 109: 102–108. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2018.02.006
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Gao B,
    2. Gallagher T,
    3. Zhang Y, et al.
    Tracking polymicrobial metabolism in cystic fibrosis airways: Pseudomonas aeruginosa metabolism and physiology are influenced by Rothia mucilaginosa-derived metabolites. mSphere 2018; 3: e00151-18. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00151-18
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Wu BG,
    2. Sulaiman I,
    3. Tsay JCJ, et al.
    Episodic aspiration with oral commensals induces a MyD88-dependent, pulmonary T-helper cell type 17 response that mitigates susceptibility to Streptococcus pneumoniae. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203: 1099–1111. doi:10.1164/rccm.202005-1596OC
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Dickson RP,
    2. Erb-Downward JR,
    3. Falkowski NR, et al.
    The lung microbiota of healthy mice are highly variable, cluster by environment, and reflect variation in baseline lung innate immunity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 198: 497–508. doi:10.1164/rccm.201711-2180OC
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. ↵
    1. Kawai T,
    2. Akira S
    . Signaling to NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptors. Trends Mol Med 2007; 13: 460–469. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.09.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Bodas M,
    2. Vij N
    . The NF-kappaB signaling in cystic fibrosis lung disease: pathophysiology and therapeutic potential. Discov Med 2010; 9: 346–356.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Alvira CM
    . Nuclear factor-kappa-B signaling in lung development and disease: one pathway, numerous functions. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2014; 100: 202–216. doi:10.1002/bdra.23233
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jacquot J,
    2. Tabary O,
    3. Le Rouzic P, et al.
    Airway epithelial cell inflammatory signalling in cystic fibrosis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008; 40: 1703–1715. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2008.02.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Chung K
    . Cytokines as targets in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Drug Targets 2006; 7: 675–681. doi:10.2174/138945006777435263
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Schuliga M
    . NF-kappaB signaling in chronic inflammatory airway disease. Biomolecules 2015; 5: 1266–1283. doi:10.3390/biom5031266
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Barnes PJ,
    2. Adcock IM
    . NF-κB: a pivotal role in asthma and a new target for therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1997; 18: 46–50. doi:10.1016/s0165-6147(97)89796-9
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hart LA,
    2. Krishnan VL,
    3. Adcock IM, et al.
    Activation and localization of transcription factor, nuclear factor-κB, in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1585–1592. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9706116
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gagliardo R,
    2. Chanez P,
    3. Mathieu M, et al.
    Persistent activation of nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway in severe uncontrolled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168: 1190–1198. doi:10.1164/rccm.200205-479OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pantano C,
    2. Ather JL,
    3. Alcorn JF, et al.
    Nuclear factor-κB activation in airway epithelium induces inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 959–969. doi:10.1164/rccm.200707-1096OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Belchamber KBR,
    2. Donnelly LE
    . Targeting defective pulmonary innate immunity – a new therapeutic option? Pharmacol Ther 2020; 209: 107500. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107500
    OpenUrl
    1. De Soyza A,
    2. Hall AJ,
    3. Mahenthiralingam E, et al.
    Developing an international Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference panel on behalf of EU FP7 funded COST Action BM1003 “Cell surface virulence determinants of cystic fibrosis pathogens”. Microbiologyopen 2013; 2: 1010–1023. doi:10.1002/mbo3.141
    OpenUrl
    1. Colvin KM,
    2. Irie Y,
    3. Tart CS, et al.
    The Pel and Psl polysaccharides provide Pseudomonas aeruginosa structural redundancy within the biofilm matrix. Environ Microbiol 2012; 14: 1913–1928. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02657.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Vandecandelaere I,
    2. Matthijs N,
    3. Van Nieuwerburgh F, et al.
    Assessment of microbial diversity in biofilms recovered from endotracheal tubes using culture dependent and independent approaches. PLoS One 2012; 7: e38401. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038401
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Peeters K,
    2. Verleyen E,
    3. Hodgson DA, et al.
    Heterotrophic bacterial diversity in aquatic microbial mat communities from Antarctica. Polar Biol 2012; 35: 543–554. doi:10.1007/s00300-011-1100-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 59 Issue 5 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 59 (5)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rothia mucilaginosa is an anti-inflammatory bacterium in the respiratory tract of patients with chronic lung disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Rothia mucilaginosa is an anti-inflammatory bacterium in the respiratory tract of patients with chronic lung disease
Charlotte Rigauts, Juliana Aizawa, Steven L. Taylor, Geraint B. Rogers, Matthias Govaerts, Paul Cos, Lisa Ostyn, Sarah Sims, Eva Vandeplassche, Mozes Sze, Yves Dondelinger, Lars Vereecke, Heleen Van Acker, Jodie L. Simpson, Lucy Burr, Anne Willems, Michael M. Tunney, Cristina Cigana, Alessandra Bragonzi, Tom Coenye, Aurélie Crabbé
European Respiratory Journal May 2022, 59 (5) 2101293; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01293-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Rothia mucilaginosa is an anti-inflammatory bacterium in the respiratory tract of patients with chronic lung disease
Charlotte Rigauts, Juliana Aizawa, Steven L. Taylor, Geraint B. Rogers, Matthias Govaerts, Paul Cos, Lisa Ostyn, Sarah Sims, Eva Vandeplassche, Mozes Sze, Yves Dondelinger, Lars Vereecke, Heleen Van Acker, Jodie L. Simpson, Lucy Burr, Anne Willems, Michael M. Tunney, Cristina Cigana, Alessandra Bragonzi, Tom Coenye, Aurélie Crabbé
European Respiratory Journal May 2022, 59 (5) 2101293; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01293-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Supplementary material
    • Shareable PDF
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Research Articles

  • Novel mucolytic for treating muco-obstructive lung disease
  • Relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and IPF
  • AI and pulmonologist collaboration for pulmonary function test interpretation
Show more Original Research Articles

Respiratory infections

  • M. avium complex genomics and transmission in a London hospital
  • Role of non-pharmaceutical interventions in bronchiolitis outbreaks
  • In critically ill patients, anti-anaerobic antibiotics increase risk of adverse outcomes
Show more Respiratory infections

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society