Abstract
Current findings support the conceptual framework that OSA promotes systemic senescence that is reversible with treatment, and that elucidation of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved may underpin unique personalised therapeutic opportunities https://bit.ly/32bhPq8
To the Editor:
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) leads to activation and propagation of oxidative stress and systemic inflammatory pathways, essentially mimicking accelerated biological ageing (senescence) [1–3]. Biological ageing is a complex and time-dependent deterioration of physiological processes with attendant morbidity and mortality. During ageing there is continuous and accelerated accumulation of epigenetic changes manifesting either systemically or restricted to a specific tissue/cell type. Epigenetic clocks, or DNA methylation clocks, have emerged as valuable biological age prediction tools [4]. By regressing DNA methylation age on chronological age, epigenetic clocks can determine whether biological age acceleration occurs in certain diseases or in response to environmental factors [4]. Using this approach, age acceleration measurements in blood were abnormally high in the context of common conditions such as obesity, neurological diseases and cigarette smoking [5].
We hypothesised that patients with OSA will present systemic epigenetic age acceleration compared to controls. We further posited that treatment of OSA with adherent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) would lead to deceleration of the epigenetically based biological ageing, whereas no changes in baseline measurements would occur in untreated controls.
We studied a set of individuals enrolled in the EPIOSA study (NCT02131610). Details on patient recruitment are reported elsewhere [6]. Age range of participants was 28–58 years, all individuals were non-smokers, and underwent an overnight in-laboratory polysomnographic evaluation. Patients with polysomnographically diagnosed OSA at baseline and after 12 months of adherent CPAP treatment were selected (n=16). The adequate adherence criterion to CPAP was >4 h per night. Matched non-snoring controls, whose overnight polysomnography (PSG) was normal (apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) <5 events per h sleep), were enrolled and re-evaluated after 12 months (n=8). Data from all sleep studies were scored using American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines by trained personnel who were blinded to the aims or nature of the study. Adherence to CPAP therapy was measured using the machines’ internal timers. Each participant was evaluated during the initial visit (V1) and 1 year later (V2), during which fasting blood samples after overnight PSG were collected and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were separated and stored at −80°C until use. Laboratory analyses (e.g. C-reactive protein (CRP), total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL)) were conducted as described elsewhere [6]. DNA methylation profiles were analysed using Illumina's Infinium Human Methylation 450 BeadChip assay (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The dataset is available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository (GSE190164). All data analyses were conducted using the R environment version 4.1.0. Microarray data was processed using the minfi package version 1.38.0. DNA methylation clocks were derived according to the method developed by Hannum et al. [7]. Principal component analysis (PCA) and variable plots were conducted using the factoextra package version 1.0.7.
OSA and control groups were matched by ethnicity, chronological age and sex, had similar blood pressure, and slight differences in body mass index (BMI), with OSA subjects displaying significantly higher AHI and high-sensitivity CRP levels (figure 1a). All OSA patients were treated with CPAP and displayed excellent adherence (average CPAP use: 6.03±0.81 h per night). Blood cell composition inferred from the DNA methylation profiles was not significantly different between OSA and control individuals at V1 and V2 nor between V1 and V2 for OSA and control individuals (p>0.05; t-test).
Epigenetic clocks were determined from the DNA methylation profiles of PBMC from OSA subjects and controls. Epigenetic age variation from the chronological age was assessed for each study participant at V1 and V2 (figure 1b). PCA (figure 1c) showed that OSA patients clustered separately from controls. In turn, post-CPAP (V2) samples for OSA patients migrated and clustered closer to the controls, while no changes occurred over time in controls. Graph of variables (figure 1d) revealed the differential acceleration residuals between visits V1 and V2 (AccResV2.V1) was the variable dragging the sample distribution towards the control samples. Conversely, increases in parameters related to poor cardiovascular outcome (i.e. intimal medial thickness, plaques, systolic blood pressure (SDP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP)) and OSA-related risk factors (i.e. AHI and BMI) dragged sample distribution towards the position of OSA samples. AccResV2.V1 was the output of the epigenetic clocks that best discriminated between OSA and controls (figure 1e). In contrast, estimates of DNA methylation age (DNAmAge) and chronological age discriminated the groups to a much lesser extent. Notably, similar PCA results were obtained when a different epigenetic clock estimate, i.e. DNAmGrimAge [8], was applied (data not shown).
Whereas controls retained increased epigenetic age acceleration in the year between the first and second visits (mean AccResV2.V1 1.41±1.96) (figure 1f), OSA patients showed a significant reduction in the epigenetic acceleration metric between the two visits (mean AccResV2.V1 −1.03±0.48; OSA versus controls: p=5.5×10−4; F-test). Furthermore, the percentages of variation in the mean AccResV2.V1 were 62% and 5% in the control and OSA groups, respectively (figure 1g). Epigenetic age deceleration observed in OSA patients may be ascribed to CPAP treatment. Notably, second visit samples are more closely clustered with controls in OSA patients with lower CRP levels (0.02–0.28 mg·dL−1) than in patients with higher CRP levels (0.4–0.94 mg·dL−1) (figure 1h), suggesting that deceleration in epigenetic ageing observed in OSA patients receiving CPAP treatment is attenuated in those patients with increased inflammation. None of the other clinical variables registered in these individuals (i.e. BMI, SBP, DBP and cholesterol, HDL, and LDL levels) significantly correlated with the acceleration of epigenetic age (p>0.05, Pearson's correlation test).
In summary, OSA patients displayed a higher acceleration of the systemic epigenetic age compared with controls, and adherent treatment with CPAP for 12 months using therapeutic pressures that normalise respiratory and sleep patterns resulted in a deceleration of the epigenetic age, whereas epigenetic age acceleration trends remained unaltered in the control subjects. A previous work reported that severe SDB was associated with epigenetic age acceleration [9], yet the impact of CPAP therapy on ageing and cellular senescence has been scarcely investigated. Yagihara et al. [10] reported that patients with severe OSA had a younger appearance following a month of CPAP treatment compared with those receiving placebo. However, the perceived age in this correlation study was arbitrarily determined, with no precise assessments of biological age. On the other hand, it has been shown that CPAP treatment improves markers of age-associated OSA morbidities [1, 2], such as cognitive impairment, vascular dysfunction, nocturnal polyuria, elevated SBP and DBP, and gait impairment. Remarkably, CPAP treatment increases the blood concentration and activity of Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), a histone/protein deacetylase with reduced expression in ageing and cellular senescence [11]. CPAP-treated OSA patients also showed increased levels of nitric oxide derivatives, which are products of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, a SIRT1-regulated enzyme [11]. In earlier studies, we uncovered initial evidence of accelerated vascular senescence and cellular ageing induced by OSA [12], which may be initiated or exacerbated either directly or indirectly via exosomes [13].
Our results suggest that OSA-induced perturbations promote biological age acceleration, and that such processes are at least partially reversible when adherent and effective treatment of OSA is implemented. Although the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the accelerated biological senescence are still unclear, our study provides a novel framework for the management of adult OSA and its associated morbidities, whereby evaluation of patient variability in epigenetic age acceleration may open new opportunities for molecular diagnostics and personalising clinical management.
Shareable PDF
Supplementary Material
This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.
Shareable PDF ERJ-03042-2021.Shareable
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Support statement: This work was partially supported by a Leda Sears Grant to R. Cortese. D. Gozal is supported by NIH grants AG061824 and HL140548, and by Tier 2 and TRIUMPH grants from the University of Missouri. J.M. Marin was supported by PI12/01275, PI15/01940 and PI18/01524 grants from the IISAragon and Carlos III – FEDER grant from the Ministry of Health in Spain. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.
- Received September 9, 2021.
- Accepted January 5, 2022.
- Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org