Extract
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) are very useful tools for evaluating the status of research on a given topic in medical sciences [1, 2]. Although SRMAs are primarily used in clinical investigation, the methodologies underlying SRMAs can also be readily used to assess extant data focused on research in animal models of disease [3].
Abstract
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from research data in animal models of disease are useful for translational medicine https://bit.ly/3kOvVUN
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None declared.
- Received September 8, 2021.
- Accepted September 18, 2021.
- Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org
LIBRARY USERS
Log in through your institution
If your library has a subscription, you may already be logged in via your IP address. Otherwise you may be able to log in via one of the following routes.
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
If you think you should have access, please contact your librarian or email journals@ersnet.org
Purchase access
You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
Vol 59 Issue 3
Table of Contents
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in animal model research: as necessary, and with similar pros and cons, as in patient research
