Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Can the interrupter resistance be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test as a substitute for FEV1?

Laura Schellekens, Jan Fijn, Sjaak Dijkman, Hugo Spruijt, Ivo Van Der Lee
European Respiratory Journal 2021 58: PA3232; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.PA3232
Laura Schellekens
1Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: L.I.A.Schellekens@student.tudelft.nl
Jan Fijn
1Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sjaak Dijkman
1Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hugo Spruijt
1Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivo Van Der Lee
1Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Introduction: The gold standard outcome measure of airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test (MCT) is the provocation dose causing a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥ 20%. It is not always feasible for patients to be able to perform acceptable and repeatable FEV1 manoeuvres, implying the need for an easy to perform outcome measure during MCT. Interrupter resistance (Rint) during MCT in children seems to have insufficient capacity to diagnose individual patients[1]. In adults Rint during MCT is less well evaluated.

Methods: FEV1 is assessed in adults referred for MCT at baseline and after inhalation of doubling methacholine concentrations according to the guidelines from the European respiratory society. Rint is measured (Geratherm Respiratory Diffustik) two times: at baseline and after the last dose of methacholine administered. Rint is measured after FEV1.

Results: 28 patients are included of which 11 had a fall in FEV1 ≥ 20% and 17 did not, 60.7% are female and mean age was 49 (range 26-79). There was no significant association between changes from baseline in Rint and FEV1 (rs= -0,04, P= 0,83). The AUC of the ROC curve of Rint versus FEV1 was 0.49.

Conclusions: Rint in adults patients seems to have insufficient capacity to measure airway obstruction during MCT.

Reference

[1] Koopman, M., Brackel, H., Vaessen-Verberne, A., Hop, W., & van der Ent, C. (2010). Evaluation of interrupter resistance in methacholine challenge testing in children. Pediatric Pulmonology, 46(3), 266-271. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21362

  • Asthma - diagnosis

Footnotes

Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2021; 58: Suppl. 65, PA3232.

This abstract was presented at the 2021 ERS International Congress, in session “Prediction of exacerbations in patients with COPD”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2021
Previous
Back to top
Vol 58 Issue suppl 65 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can the interrupter resistance be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test as a substitute for FEV1?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Can the interrupter resistance be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test as a substitute for FEV1?
Laura Schellekens, Jan Fijn, Sjaak Dijkman, Hugo Spruijt, Ivo Van Der Lee
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2021, 58 (suppl 65) PA3232; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.PA3232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Can the interrupter resistance be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test as a substitute for FEV1?
Laura Schellekens, Jan Fijn, Sjaak Dijkman, Hugo Spruijt, Ivo Van Der Lee
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2021, 58 (suppl 65) PA3232; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.PA3232
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Validation of a new portable system containing both FeNO analysis and spirometry measurement
  • Validation of a new modified 6-minute walk test (6MWT)
  • Association between the first ventilatory threshold and the lean mass
Show more Clinical respiratory physiology, exercise and functional imaging

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society