Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Comparison of a 22G crown-cut needle with a conventional 22G needle with EBUS guidance in diagnosis of sarcoidosis

Erik Büscher, Kaid Darwiche, Francesco Bonella, Rüdiger Karpf-Wissel, Ulrich Costabel, Dirk Theegarten, Johannes Wienker, Julia Wälscher
European Respiratory Journal 2021 58: PA2454; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.PA2454
Erik Büscher
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Erik.Buescher@gmx.net
Kaid Darwiche
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Bonella
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rüdiger Karpf-Wissel
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Costabel
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dirk Theegarten
2Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Wienker
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Wälscher
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a standard procedure in cases of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. Recently, new tools were developed aiming to improve the diagnostic yield. A novel crown-cut needle is considered to obtain a tissue core which can be beneficial for the evaluation of the pathologist.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the novel 22G crown-cut needle with a conventional 22G needle with EBUS guidance in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Methods: We designed a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial between March 2020 and January 2021 with 30 patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and suspected sarcoidosis.

Results: 24 patients (mean age 49.5 vs 54.1, mean FVC 73.7% vs 86.7%, mean DLCO 72.4% vs 72.5% for crown-cut needle vs conventional needle, respectively) were diagnosed with sarcoidosis. For the remaining six patients sarcoidosis was excluded. One had a final diagnosis of anthracosilicosis. Diagnostic accuracy was 77% (10/13) with the crown-cut needle vs 82% (9/11) with the conventional needle (p=1.00). Four of seven examiners experienced difficulties passing through the bronchial wall with the crown-cut needle and one unusual bleeding occurred in this group which made the following interventions necessary: suction, application of sympathomimetic and compression with a swab.

Conclusions: The study showed that the needles were similiar in terms of diagnostic accuracy. However, there were hints that the crown-cut needle can lead to examination difficulties probably due to the lack of sharpness.

  • Bronchoscopy
  • Diagnosis
  • Sarcoidosis

Footnotes

Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2021; 58: Suppl. 65, PA2454.

This abstract was presented at the 2021 ERS International Congress, in session “Prediction of exacerbations in patients with COPD”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2021
Previous
Back to top
Vol 58 Issue suppl 65 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of a 22G crown-cut needle with a conventional 22G needle with EBUS guidance in diagnosis of sarcoidosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of a 22G crown-cut needle with a conventional 22G needle with EBUS guidance in diagnosis of sarcoidosis
Erik Büscher, Kaid Darwiche, Francesco Bonella, Rüdiger Karpf-Wissel, Ulrich Costabel, Dirk Theegarten, Johannes Wienker, Julia Wälscher
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2021, 58 (suppl 65) PA2454; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.PA2454

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparison of a 22G crown-cut needle with a conventional 22G needle with EBUS guidance in diagnosis of sarcoidosis
Erik Büscher, Kaid Darwiche, Francesco Bonella, Rüdiger Karpf-Wissel, Ulrich Costabel, Dirk Theegarten, Johannes Wienker, Julia Wälscher
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2021, 58 (suppl 65) PA2454; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.PA2454
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of pneumothorax as complication of endobronchial valve treatment on patient-reported outcomes
  • Late Breaking Abstract - The role of High Flow Nasal Cannula in reducing hypoxemic events during bronchoscopic procedures compared to Low Flow Nasal Cannula: a metanalysis
  • Ambulatory Management of Pneumonthorax in a District General Hospital
Show more Interventional pulmonology

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society