Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Comparison of gaseous emissions of conventional and heated tobacco products

Efthimios Zervas, Saida Mukhanova, Niki Matsouki, Emmanouil Konstantinidis, Alma Shopabayeva, Talgat Nurgozhin, Stavros Poulopoulos, Paraskevi Katsaounou
European Respiratory Journal 2021 58: OA2578; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.OA2578
Efthimios Zervas
1Hellenic Open University, Patra, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: zervas@eap.gr
Saida Mukhanova
2Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niki Matsouki
1Hellenic Open University, Patra, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emmanouil Konstantinidis
1Hellenic Open University, Patra, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alma Shopabayeva
2Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Talgat Nurgozhin
2Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stavros Poulopoulos
3Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paraskevi Katsaounou
4University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco products emit different compounds and there is a need to record them to effectively evaluate their toxicology.

Methods: Smoke of four different tobacco products, two conventional (Parliament and LM) and two heated (GLO and iQOS) cigarettes (HTP) was analyzed qualitatively. Each product is connected to a 20mL vial with a pump. The smoke of each product was collected for 30s in this vial and analysed using solid-phase microextraction–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Each test is replicated three times.

Results: Table 1 shows the number of compounds detected in the smoke of each product.

ParliamentLMGLOiQOS
Alkanes4031
Alkenes2110
Alkadienes5422
Aromatic Hydrocarbons45361721
Alcohols4477
Aldehydes6357
Ketones11989
Acids3322
Esters0128
Terpenes7463

Conventional cigarettes smoke contain higher number of Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Alkadienes and Terpenes compared to HTP, while it contains less Alcohols and Esters.

Seven of the seventeen Aromatic compounds, all Alkadienes and five Ketones in GLO emissions are not present in the emissions of the two conventional cigarettes while only one Alcohol, one Alkane, one Ester, two Aldehydes and one Terpene is in common. iQOS emissions compared to the conventional cigarettes have different seven Aromatic Hydrocarbons, seven Alcohols, one Acid, four Ketones, all the Alkadienes and the Esters, all except two Aldehydes and all except one Terpene.

Conclusions: Conventional cigarettes and heated products differ significantly in the chemical composition of their emissions. A wide variety of compounds present in heated products emissions is not detected in conventional cigarettes emissions and vise versa.

  • Air pollution
  • Environment
  • Smoking

Footnotes

Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2021; 58: Suppl. 65, OA2578.

This abstract was presented at the 2021 ERS International Congress, in session “Prediction of exacerbations in patients with COPD”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2021
Previous
Back to top
Vol 58 Issue suppl 65 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of gaseous emissions of conventional and heated tobacco products
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of gaseous emissions of conventional and heated tobacco products
Efthimios Zervas, Saida Mukhanova, Niki Matsouki, Emmanouil Konstantinidis, Alma Shopabayeva, Talgat Nurgozhin, Stavros Poulopoulos, Paraskevi Katsaounou
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2021, 58 (suppl 65) OA2578; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.OA2578

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparison of gaseous emissions of conventional and heated tobacco products
Efthimios Zervas, Saida Mukhanova, Niki Matsouki, Emmanouil Konstantinidis, Alma Shopabayeva, Talgat Nurgozhin, Stavros Poulopoulos, Paraskevi Katsaounou
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2021, 58 (suppl 65) OA2578; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.OA2578
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Point of Sale Display of Plain Cigarette Packages : Finger prints of the industry
  • Tobacco products exposure status of students
  • Relationship between tobacco and COVID-19
Show more Tobacco, smoking control and health education

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society