Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

COVID-19 pneumonia and the pulmonary vasculature: a marriage made in hell

Peter M. George, Sujal R. Desai
European Respiratory Journal 2021 58: 2100811; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00811-2021
Peter M. George
1The Interstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
2National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: p.george@rbht.nhs.uk
Sujal R. Desai
2National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
3Dept of Radiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Quantitative CT of the pulmonary vasculature is potentially important in COVID-19 associated pneumonia https://bit.ly/3vUTTRM

Automated analysis of medical images is not new [1–3]. Researchers in the respiratory sciences and, particularly, the field of interstitial lung diseases, have long enthused about the potential for computers to analyse medical images thereby revealing “signals” hitherto invisible to the human eye: an enthusiasm only enhanced by recent developments in machine learning and artificial intelligence [4–6]. By leveraging the central importance of computed tomography (CT) scanning for diagnosis, treatment decisions and prognostication, a key aim is to identify imaging biomarkers to more accurately phenotype disease and, in so doing, move a step closer to truly patient-centric medicine. Another goal is to apply novel imaging analyses to pathogenesis, disease “behaviour” and prognostication in the hope that this might unlock new therapeutic approaches. Given the digital nature of the data and the potentially myriad imaging patterns, frequently compounded by patient, therapeutic and disease-based factors, lung imaging is ideally suited to more sophisticated analytic approaches.

In this edition of the European Respiratory Journal, Morris et al. [7] retrospectively explore the utility of automated analyses, and specifically the quantification of small blood vessels in thoracic CT scans from hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and a control cohort of COVID-19-negative patients. This approach has previously been used to study changes in the pulmonary vasculature in COPD [8] and sickle cell disease [9], to name but two clinical settings. That said, it is logical to study the small vessels in COVID-19 in view of the mounting evidence of the vasculocentric nature of this disease [10, 11]. In the reported study, the authors adopt a two-pronged approach comprising semi-quantitative visual scoring of disease extent and quantitative CT to score the proportion of blood volume in vessels of three different calibre clusters: 1.25–5 mm2 (BV5%), 5–10 mm2 (BV5–10%) and >10 mm2 (BV10%). Based on previous work from the group showing that patients with COVID-19 have a decrease in the smallest blood vessels, the BV5% [12], the authors hypothesise that a BV5% reduction may be prognostic.

In line with their hypothesis, the authors report that in over 300 patients with COVID-19 from across multiple institutions in the USA, the vast majority of whom had CT appearances consistent with pneumonia, a low BV5% was associated with increased risk of mechanical ventilation or death. The authors found that a BV5% threshold of 25% conferred an odds ratio of 5.58 for mortality and 2.54 for the composite of intubation or death. The BV5% threshold of 25% remained prognostic when the visual severity score was added to the multivariate regression analysis but, interestingly, the severity score when added to age had an area under the curve of 0.87, slightly outperforming BV5% and age at 0.85 for the same composite end-point. In the control cohort of COVID-19-negative patients, the commonest imaging abnormalities were atypical/COVID-19 pneumonia (32%), non-COVID pneumonia (14%), pleural effusion (7%) and pulmonary embolism (6%). 25% of the CT scans in this group were reported as normal. BV5% was significantly lower in patients who were COVID-19-positive than the heterogenous group of COVID-19-negative patients. The authors conclude that BV5% is a novel CT biomarker which has prognostic value, provides mechanistic insights and might stratify patients in whom anticoagulation might be beneficial.

The authors are to be congratulated for their quantitative approach which provides further support for the importance of pulmonary vascular dysfunction in severe COVID-19; an area, surely, where more knowledge is urgently required. The strengths of the study include the multicentre nature, which testifies to the generalisability of the automated analysis software across different CT scanning machines and protocols, and the large, well-phenotyped cohort of patients. As is to be expected, the study raises further questions which, at this time, remain unanswered but will hopefully provide the impetus for future work. The visually assessed severity score correlated with BV5% not only in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, but also in the 27 patients in the control cohort with non-COVID-19-related pneumonia, and there was no significant difference in BV5% in patients with pneumonia irrespective of COVID-19 status. Furthermore, in COVID-19-negative patients with pneumonia, BV5% as a continuous variable was significantly associated with the composite of intubation or death. The implication being, therefore, that BV5% is a surrogate of disease extent and that the small blood vessels are attenuated in patients with pneumonia of any aetiology. Perhaps this might not be a COVID-19-specific finding but simply a reflection of vascular shunting away from regionally diseased, consolidated lung. Another potentially intriguing issue is whether the reduction in BV5% drives more severe disease or is simply a consequence of it. Finally, the finding that the visually assigned severity score is at least as effective at predicting outcomes as BV5% may prompt the cynic to ask why a quantitative approach is required at all. The authors infer that patients with limited disease on CT but a low BV5% may benefit from anticoagulation and that a low BV5% may be a prognostic marker in this setting. Clearly, the suggestion that anticoagulation may be of benefit in this group needs formal study in a controlled setting and cannot be recommended at this stage. An additional tantalising theory is that a low BV5% in early COVID-19 may predict those who will progress to develop severe and more extensive disease: if this is proven, such patients might be stratified for interventions and monitored for complications more closely. Possible associations with circulating markers of inflammation or thrombosis (such as D-dimer) are not explored by the authors and this might be an interesting follow-on study.

The above questions notwithstanding, Morris et al. [7] provide further evidence for the concept that the pulmonary vasculature not only bears much of the brunt of COVID-19 but also closely interacts with surrounding structures of the lung, potentially exerting pathogenic influences [13]. They also demonstrate that, despite the undeniable complexity, quantitative lung imaging is feasible, generalisable and of potential prognostic value. There are potential parallels here with the “progressive fibrotic phenotype” [14] in which predictive imaging biomarkers may be able to identify those at risk of progression; a priority research area [15]. Time will tell whether quantitative CT analyses (including artificial intelligence and machine learning), can or indeed should be integrated into routine respiratory practice. The present study represents definite progress, building on a steadily growing body of work suggesting that that this time may be approaching.

Shareable PDF

Supplementary Material

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-00811-2021.Shareable

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: P.M. George reports grants and personal fees for consultancy from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche Pharmaceuticals, honoraria and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Cippla, Teva and Brainomix, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: S.R. Desai reports honoraria and consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Sensyne Health Group Ltd, outside the submitted work.

  • Received March 18, 2021.
  • Accepted March 22, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2021.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Müller NL,
    2. Staples CA,
    3. Miller RR, et al.
    “Density mask”. An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. Chest 1988; 94: 782–787. doi:10.1378/chest.94.4.782
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Best AC,
    2. Lynch AM,
    3. Bozic CM, et al.
    Quantitative CT indexes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: relationship with physiologic impairment. Radiology 2003; 228: 407–414. doi:10.1148/radiol.2282020274
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Copley SJ,
    2. Giannarou S,
    3. Schmid VJ, et al.
    Effect of aging on lung structure in vivo: assessment with densitometric and fractal analysis of high-resolution computed tomography data. J Thorac Imaging 2012; 27: 366–371. doi:10.1097/RTI.0b013e31825148c9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Walsh SLF,
    2. Calandriello L,
    3. Silva M, et al.
    Deep learning for classifying fibrotic lung disease on high-resolution computed tomography: a case-cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 6: 837–845. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30286-8
    OpenUrl
    1. Jacob J,
    2. Bartholmai BJ,
    3. van Moorsel CHM, et al.
    Longitudinal prediction of outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using automated CT analysis. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: 1802341. doi:10.1183/13993003.02341-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. McLellan T,
    2. George PM,
    3. Ford P, et al.
    Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: airway volume measurement identifies progressive disease on computed tomography scans. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6: 00290-2019. doi:10.1183/23120541.00290-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Morris MF,
    2. Pershad Y,
    3. Kang P, et al.
    Altered pulmonary blood volume distribution as a biomarker for predicting outcomes in COVID-19 disease. Eur Respir J 2021; 58: 2004133. doi:10.1183/13993003.04133-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Matsuoka S,
    2. Washko GR,
    3. Dransfield MT, et al.
    Quantitative CT measurement of cross-sectional area of small pulmonary vessel in COPD: correlations with emphysema and airflow limitation. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 93–99. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.07.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Lunt A,
    2. Desai SR,
    3. Wells AU, et al.
    Pulmonary function, CT and echocardiographic abnormalities in sickle cell disease. Thorax 2014; 69: 746–751. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204809
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Ackermann M,
    2. Verleden SE,
    3. Kuehnel M, et al.
    Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 120–128. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2015432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Patel BV,
    2. Arachchillage DJ,
    3. Ridge CA, et al.
    Pulmonary angiopathy in severe COVID-19: physiologic, imaging, and hematologic observations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202: 690–699. doi:10.1164/rccm.202004-1412OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Thillai M,
    2. Patvardhan C,
    3. Swietlik EM, et al.
    Functional respiratory imaging identifies redistribution of pulmonary blood flow in patients with COVID-19. Thorax 2021; 76: 182–184. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215395
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. George PM,
    2. Mitchell JA
    . Defining a pathological role for the vasculature in the development of fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension in interstitial lung disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2019; 317: L431–L433. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00330.2019
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Flaherty KR,
    2. Wells AU,
    3. Cottin V, et al.
    Nintedanib in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 1718–1727. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1908681
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. George PM,
    2. Spagnolo P,
    3. Kreuter M, et al.
    Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease: clinical uncertainties, consensus recommendations, and research priorities. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 925–934. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30355-6
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 58 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 58 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
COVID-19 pneumonia and the pulmonary vasculature: a marriage made in hell
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
COVID-19 pneumonia and the pulmonary vasculature: a marriage made in hell
Peter M. George, Sujal R. Desai
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2021, 58 (3) 2100811; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00811-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
COVID-19 pneumonia and the pulmonary vasculature: a marriage made in hell
Peter M. George, Sujal R. Desai
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2021, 58 (3) 2100811; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00811-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Shareable PDF
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Towards a better mucolytic
  • Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary fibrosis
  • Artificial intelligence: do we need it for lung function interpretation?
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society