Supplementary Material
Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.
Supplementary Table S1. Types of malignancies in the NLST cohort and distribution across the Brock and BRODERS classification. ERJ-02485-2020.Table_S1
Supplementary Table S2. Types of malignancies in the Vanderbilt cohort and distribution across the Brock and BRODERS classification. ERJ-02485-2020.Table_S2
Supplementary Table S3. Effect of different Brock cutoffs the intermediate probability group on BRODERS diagnostic performance in the NLST cohort. ERJ-02485-2020.Table_S3
Supplementary Table S4. Effect of different Brock cutoffs the intermediate probability group on BRODERS diagnostic performance in the Vanderbilt University cohort. ERJ-02485-2020.Table_S4
Supplementary Figure S1. Flow diagram for the patient selection from the NLST (a) and Vanderbilt University (b.) databases. ERJ-02485-2020.Figure_S1
Supplementary Figure S2. Comparison of nodule diameter between malignant and benign nodules in the Vanderbilt University Cohort. ERJ-02485-2020.Figure_S2
Supplementary Figure S3. 2×2 contingency table with the axial scout images for the NLST cohort comparing the clinical/histological ground truth and the BRODERS radiomics prediction. ERJ-02485-2020.Figure_S3
Supplementary Figure S4. 2×2 contingency table with the axial scout images for the Vanderbilt cohort comparing the clinical/histological ground truth and the BRODERS radiomics prediction. ERJ-02485-2020.Figure_S4
Supplementary Figure S5. Comparison between Brock Model and BRODERS classifier for the Vanderbilt University cohort. ERJ-02485-2020.Figure_S5