Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Concurrent use of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea

Yong-Soo Kwon, Doosoo Jeon, Hyungseok Kang, Jae-Joon Yim, Tae Sun Shim
European Respiratory Journal 2021 57: 2003026; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03026-2020
Yong-Soo Kwon
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yong-Soo Kwon
Doosoo Jeon
2Dept of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hyungseok Kang
3Dept of Chest Medicine, Masan National Tuberculosis Hospital, Masan, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jae-Joon Yim
4Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tae Sun Shim
5Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shimts@amc.seoul.kr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Concurrent use of bedaquiline and delamanid is safe and effective for the treatment of high-level resistant tuberculosis https://bit.ly/2T0ckC8

To the Editor:

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), a major global health concern, requires long-term treatment with multiple drugs, which can cause many side-effects [1]. Therefore, an effective regimen with a minimum number of drugs is essential to control this disease. Bedaquiline (Bdq) and delamanid (Dlm) are new drugs that exhibit good efficacy and safety for MDR-TB treatment [1]. However, adding only one of the new drugs to a regimen may be insufficient to cure this disease when the infecting strain has a high level of drug resistance, such as fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB or extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) [1–3]. Therefore, the concurrent use of Bdq and Dlm can effectively strengthen the treatment regimen if the best practices in “off-label” use are followed [4–10]. This study analysed the efficacy and safety of concurrent use of Bdq and Dlm in patients with MDR-TB and XDR-TB treated under a programmatic condition.

This retrospective cohort study included patients with pulmonary MDR-TB treated between September 2016 and December 2019 at tertiary referral and TB-specific hospitals in South Korea. The National TB Expert Review Committee (NTBERC) of the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was responsible for reviewing Bdq and Dlm approval from September 2016. In this study, we used the NTBERC database [8]. The process of submitting cases and obtaining permission to report cases has been described in a previous report [8]. Accompanying drugs were used according to NTBERC recommendation, which was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [11].

MDR-TB was defined as TB resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin, while XDR-TB was defined as TB with additional resistance to any of the fluoroquinolones and to at least one of the three injectable second-line drugs (amikacin, capreomycin or kanamycin).

Although the decision to initiate treatment with both new TB drugs was made by the attending physicians, these new TB drugs were prescribed only when an effective treatment regimen could not be provided because of drug resistance, adverse drug reactions, poor tolerance or contraindication to any component of the combination regimen. All enrolled patients were monitored for drug compliance and adverse drug reactions during treatment by specially trained nurses who participated in the Public-Private Mix project for TB control in South Korea [5].

We analysed the patients’ baseline clinical characteristics, including treatment duration of new drugs, adverse drug reactions (including QT interval prolongation), sputum culture results at baseline and sputum culture conversion. The QT interval was corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Significant QTcF prolongation was defined as any absolute QTcF value ≤500 ms or any increase in QTcF value >60 ms from baseline. The interim treatment outcomes at 12 months, as of 1 August, 2020, were analysed. Interim treatment outcomes were deemed favourable or unfavourable. Favourable outcomes included cure, treatment completion, and culture conversion and maintenance of culture conversion on treatment. Unfavourable outcomes included death, loss to follow-up, and treatment failure, including failed culture conversion. Culture conversion was defined as two consecutive negative results obtained at least 30 days apart in a patient with positive sputum culture results at baseline. The day of sputum collection for the first of the two consecutive negative results was defined as the date of culture conversion.

28 patients with MDR-TB were treated concurrently with Bdq and Dlm. Their median age was 49.5 years and most were male (table 1). All the patients had fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB and 18 (64.3%) patients had XDR-TB. None of the patients tested positive for HIV. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) duration of the concurrent treatment was 167 (146–168) days. The treatment duration in three patients was >24 weeks (197, 230 and 334 days), whereas that in 22 patients was 24 weeks. However, the remaining three patients were treated for <24 weeks. Of them, one patient died due to bacterial pneumonia after taking 3 days of concurrent treatment. In another patient, Dlm was discontinued after 3 days of concurrent treatment owing to severe gastrointestinal side-effects, including nausea and vomiting. In the last patient, although both drugs were administered for 24 weeks, concurrent treatment with both drugs was administered for only 3 weeks. During concurrent treatment, 25 (89.3%) patients received linezolid; however, three patients did not receive linezolid due to adverse drug reactions induced by previous linezolid therapy. Common accompanying drugs, other than linezolid, included clofazimine (n=20, 71.4%), meropenem–clavulanate (n=19, 67.8%), cycloserine (n=14, 50.0%), para-aminosalicylic acid (n=8, 28.6%) and amikacin (n=7, 25.0%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Baseline clinical demographics, treatment outcomes, and adverse drug reactions in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treated concurrently with bedaquiline and delamanid

Sputum culture conversion was achieved in 18 of 19 (94.7%) patients who had positive culture results at the time of concurrent treatment initiation. The median (IQR) time from the initiation of the concurrent treatment to culture conversion was 32.5 (17.0–51.3) days. Of the 28 patients who had 12-month interim outcomes of MDR-TB treatment available, 23 (82.1%) patients showed favourable outcomes (cure, n=15; complete, n=2; maintenance of culture conversion on treatment, n=6) and five (17.9%) patients showed unfavourable outcomes (failure, n=2; deaths, n=1; lost to follow-up, n=2). One death was not related to TB (bacterial pneumonia). Among the 22 (78.6%) patients who completed MDR-TB treatment, the median (IQR) duration of the treatment was 624 (508–741) days. 18 (64.3%) patients were treated successfully (cure, n=16; treatment completion, n=2); treatment failure (n=1), death (n=1) and lost to follow-up (n=2) were reported for the remaining four (14.3%) patients.

Significant QTcF prolongation and QTcF >500 ms were observed in 15 (53.6%) and two (7.1%) patients, respectively. However, there were no clinically significant cardiac events, and the new drugs were used without a permanent discontinuance. Of the two patients with QTcF >500 ms, one patient who had 504 ms of a maximum QTcF without symptoms recovered to 466 ms without discontinuing the new TB drugs. The other patient who had a maximum QTcF of 518 ms without symptoms was managed by discontinuing the two new TB drugs for 20 days, followed by successful reintroduction.

Regarding the other adverse drug reactions aside from QTcF prolongation, one patient experienced severe nausea and vomiting, resulting in discontinuation of Dlm.

This cohort study revealed that concurrent use of Bdq and Dlm in combination with the WHO-recommended regimens showed good efficacy and safety. Fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB and XDR-TB have poor treatment outcomes [2, 3]. However, in this study, 95% patients achieved culture conversion during concurrent treatment with the two new TB drugs and 82% patients achieved favourable outcomes at the 12-month interim analysis, despite fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB in all patients and XDR-TB in 64% of patients. Therefore, this study emphasises the effectiveness of treatment in patients with MDR-TB who have limited treatment options, including those with fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB or XDR-TB. Drug-induced QTcF prolongation is an important safety issue associated with the new TB drugs, especially under conditions that require additional TB drugs to magnify QTcF prolongation [12, 13]. Additional information regarding the cardiac safety of this treatment in combination with various regimens that may potentiate the side-effects is required. In this study, although more than half of patients experienced significant QTcF prolongation, none of the drugs were discontinued. These results are consistent with those of previous studies, including a phase 2 randomised study (DELIBERATE trial) showing the efficacy and safety of sequential and concurrent therapy with the new anti-TB drugs [4–8, 14, 15].

The study limitations include the retrospective study design, and lack of a control arm, information on long-term treatment outcomes and data on drug resistance against Bdq and Dlm.

In conclusion, the concurrent use of Bdq and Dlm is effective and well-tolerated in MDR-TB patients with fluoroquinolone resistance. This treatment represents an attractive option for patients with fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB or XDR-TB.

Shareable PDF

Supplementary Material

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-03026-2020.Shareable

Footnotes

  • Author contributions: Y-S. Kwon and T.S. Shim were the lead researchers and were responsible for the study design, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. All authors have contributed to data generation and analysis and writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Conflict of interest: Y-S. Kwon has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Jeon has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: H. Kang has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: J-J. Yim received donations of linezolid from Pfizer Inc. and delamanid from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. for clinical trials.

  • Conflict of interest: T.S. Shim has nothing to disclose.

  • Support statement: This work was supported by the Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (grant: 2019-E3101-00). Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received August 5, 2020.
  • Accepted October 11, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2021
https://www.ersjournals.com/user-licence

References

  1. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Drug-resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2019. WHO/CDS/TB/2019.7. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311389/9789241550529-eng.pdf Date last accessed: 2 Aug 2020.
  2. ↵
    1. Kim DH,
    2. Kim HJ,
    3. Park SK, et al.
    Treatment outcomes and long-term survival in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: 1075–1082. doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-132OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Kwak N,
    2. Kim HR,
    3. Yoo CG, et al.
    Changes in treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015; 19: 525–530. doi:10.5588/ijtld.14.0739
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Hafkin J,
    2. Hittel N,
    3. Martin A, et al.
    Compassionate use of delamanid in combination with bedaquiline for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1801154. doi:10.1183/13993003.01154-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Kim CT,
    2. Kim TO,
    3. Shin HJ, et al.
    Bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicentre cohort study in Korea. Eur Respir J 2018; 51: 1702467. doi:10.1183/13993003.02467-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Olayanju O,
    2. Esmail A,
    3. Limberis J, et al.
    A regimen containing bedaquiline and delamanid compared to bedaquiline in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 1901181. doi:10.1183/13993003.01181-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pontali E,
    2. Sotgiu G,
    3. Tiberi S, et al.
    Combined treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis with bedaquiline and delamanid: a systematic review. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1800934. doi:10.1183/13993003.00934-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Kang H,
    2. Jo KW,
    3. Jeon D, et al.
    Interim treatment outcomes in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis using bedaquiline and/or delamanid in South Korea. Respir Med 2020; 167: 105956. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105956
    OpenUrl
    1. World Health Organization
    . WHO Best-practice Statement on the Off-label use of Bedaquiline and Delamanid for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2017. WHO/HTM/TB/2017.20. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/258941/1/WHO-HTM-TB-2017.20-eng.pdf Date last accessed: 2 Aug 2020.
  7. ↵
    1. Ferlazzo G,
    2. Mohr E,
    3. Laxmeshwar C, et al.
    Early safety and efficacy of the combination of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Armenia, India, and South Africa: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18: 536–544. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30100-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug Resistant Tuberculosis: 2016 Update. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2016. WHO/HTM/TB/2016.4. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250125/9789241549639-eng.pdf Date last accessed: 2 Aug 2020.
  9. ↵
    1. Pontali E,
    2. Sotgiu G,
    3. Tiberi S, et al.
    Cardiac safety of bedaquiline: a systematic and critical analysis of the evidence. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1701462. doi:10.1183/13993003.01462-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Borisov S,
    2. Danila E,
    3. Maryandyshev A, et al.
    Surveillance of adverse events in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: first global report. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: 1901522. doi:10.1183/13993003.01522-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Dooley KE,
    2. Rosenkranz SL,
    3. Conradie F, et al.
    QT Effects of Bedaquiline, Delamanid or both in MDR-TB Patients: the Deliberate Trial. Presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI). March 4–7, 2019, Seattle, WA, USA. Abstract 84. Available from: www.croiconference.org/abstract/qt-effects-bedaquiline-delamanid-or-both-mdr-tb-patients-deliberate-trial/
  12. ↵
    1. Guglielmetti L,
    2. Tiberi S,
    3. Burman M, et al.
    QT prolongation and cardiac toxicity of new tuberculosis drugs in Europe: a Tuberculosis Network European Trialsgroup (TBnet) study. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1800537. doi:10.1183/13993003.00537-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 57 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 57 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Concurrent use of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Concurrent use of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea
Yong-Soo Kwon, Doosoo Jeon, Hyungseok Kang, Jae-Joon Yim, Tae Sun Shim
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2021, 57 (3) 2003026; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03026-2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Concurrent use of bedaquiline and delamanid for the treatment of fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea
Yong-Soo Kwon, Doosoo Jeon, Hyungseok Kang, Jae-Joon Yim, Tae Sun Shim
European Respiratory Journal Mar 2021, 57 (3) 2003026; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03026-2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Shareable PDF
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Airway immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in COPD patients
  • Wider access to rifapentine-based regimens is needed for TB care globally
  • Association between immunosuppressants and outcomes of COVID-19
Show more Agora

Research letters

  • Morphine to treat breathlessness in ILD
  • Translated impact on carbon footprint from choice of inhaled therapy
  • Radiographic score in TB and relationship to therapy and bacillary load
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society