Abstract
Pirfenidone and Nintedanib are both available in the UK for patients who have an ILD MDT confirmed diagnosis of IPF and have an FVC 50-80% of their predicted value. The evidence to date shows that the efficacy of the two available drugs are equivalent but mode of action, metabolism and side effects differ. If there is no medical contraindication to one of the drugs, we provide the drug information leaflets provided by Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. At the next clinic visit 4 weeks later, we ask the patient to choose treatment (or no antifibrotic treatment). We then ask them to complete a short questionnaire asking them who influenced the decision and why they have made their choice. The results are shown in the tables 1-2.
Who influenced treatment choice
What influenced treatment choice
Conclusions: The main factor influencing patient choice was the importance of diarrhoea or photosensitivity. The tablet count favoured Nintedanib. The number of clinic visits and blood test influenced the choice for no treatment. The patients believed that their doctors were more influential than the doctors believed themselves.
Footnotes
Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2020; 56: Suppl. 64, 590.
This abstract was presented at the 2020 ERS International Congress, in session “Respiratory viruses in the "pre COVID-19" era”.
This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).
- Copyright ©the authors 2020