Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Bronchodilator response in healthy subjects

Matthew Hegewald, Robert Jensen
European Respiratory Journal 2020 56: 3207; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.3207
Matthew Hegewald
Intermountain Medical Center and the University of Utah, Murray, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: matt.hegewald@imail.org
Robert Jensen
Intermountain Medical Center and the University of Utah, Murray, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: The ATS/ERS Task Force (Eur Respir J 2005; 26:948-968) recommends an increase of both 12% and 200 mL in FEV1 or FVC to define a positive bronchodilator (+BD) response. These criteria are based largely on expert opinion. We aimed to describe the BD response response characteristics of the COPDGene non-smoking, healthy cohort.

Methods: We evaluated 422 non-smoking, healthy adult patients with acceptable and repeatable spirograms obtained before and after (pre- and post-BD) two inhalations of albuterol (200 mcg) at 21 COPDGene sites. The same equipment (ndd, Zucih, Switzerland) and methodologies were used at each site. We determeined the mean, SD and 95th percentile for absolute (mL) and percent (%) differences between pre-BD and post-BD for FEV1, FVC and FEV6. We also determined the number of subjects that met current ATS/ERS Task Force recommendations for +BD response.

Results: The mean, SD and 95th percentile for absolute and percent differences between pre-BD and post-BD mean are shown (Table). The percent of subjects that met ATS/ERS Task Force recommendations for +BD response for FEV1 was 5.7% and for FVC was 5.2%.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that in a healthy adult population, a significant BD response for FEV1 is approximately 200 mL and 9%; corresponding values for FVC are 200 mL and 6%. Our results are in agreement with the ATS/ERS Task Force recommendation for an absolute increase in FEV1 and FVC (200 mL) to define a +BD response but suggest that the 12% increase criteria for FEV1 and FVC is too large.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Spirometry
  • Physiological diagnostic services
  • Bronchodilators

Footnotes

Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2020; 56: Suppl. 64, 3207.

This abstract was presented at the 2020 ERS International Congress, in session “Respiratory viruses in the "pre COVID-19" era”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2020
Previous
Back to top
Vol 56 Issue suppl 64 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bronchodilator response in healthy subjects
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bronchodilator response in healthy subjects
Matthew Hegewald, Robert Jensen
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (suppl 64) 3207; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.3207

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bronchodilator response in healthy subjects
Matthew Hegewald, Robert Jensen
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (suppl 64) 3207; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.3207
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Early effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure therapy on Right Ventricular Function in patients with newly diagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
  • Quality Improvement in a Sleep Clinic: To increase the capacity and reduce the time to treatment for patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
  • Deep learning automates complete quality control of spirometric manoeuvre
Show more Respiratory function technologists/scient.

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society