Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Bronchodilation test: Salbutamol or Ipratropium Bromide?

Liliana Raposo, Raquel Barros, Ana Sofia Oliveira, João Valença, Cristina Bárbara
European Respiratory Journal 2020 56: 2648; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2648
Liliana Raposo
1Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte; Escola Superior de Saúde da Cruz Vermelha Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lraposo@esscvp.eu
Raquel Barros
1Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte; Escola Superior de Saúde da Cruz Vermelha Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Sofia Oliveira
2Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João Valença
2Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Bárbara
3Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte; Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of the response to bronchodilator in pulmonary obstructive pathologies is crucial for the diagnosis and clinical follow-up of the individuals. β-adrenergic agonists and anticholinergics are the most frequently used.

Objectives: To characterize the response of bronchodilation according to the drug used; to identify differences in response of bronchodilation according to the pathology; to determine the agreement of the response to bronchodilator considering Salbutamol (Sb) or Ipratropium Bromide (IB).

Methodology: Cross-sectional study. 141 individuals with airway obstruction were included (39 asthmatics and 102 COPD) and underwent two spirometry tests with an 8-day interval. In half of the sample Sb was used on the first visit and IB on the second, and in the other half the order was reversed. An increase of ≥12% and ≥200mL in FVC and/or FEV1 was considered a positive bronchodilation.

Results: The analysis of the means of study variables didn’t revealed significant differences (p>0.05) between Sb and IB. The average of the differences between the parameters was 60mL and 1.92% for FVC and 40mL and 1.53% for FEV1. Bronchodilation was positive in 17.7% of the sample (Sb), 19.1% (IB) and 26.2% (Sb+IB). In COPD group, a positive response was observed in 15.7% (Sb), 18.6% (IB) and 30.4% (Sb+IB) and in the asthma group 23.1% (Sb), 20.6% (IB) and 15.4% (Sb+IB). The Kappa agreement coefficient revealed that the response to bronchodilator is different depending of the used drug (Kappa=0.254; p=0.003).

Conclusion: The characterization of the response to the bronchodilator showed to be different according to the drug used, and it was found that asthmatic individuals respond mostly to Sb and COPD to the IB.

  • COPD - management
  • Asthma - management
  • Bronchodilators

Footnotes

Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2020; 56: Suppl. 64, 2648.

This abstract was presented at the 2020 ERS International Congress, in session “Respiratory viruses in the "pre COVID-19" era”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2020
Previous
Back to top
Vol 56 Issue suppl 64 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bronchodilation test: Salbutamol or Ipratropium Bromide?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bronchodilation test: Salbutamol or Ipratropium Bromide?
Liliana Raposo, Raquel Barros, Ana Sofia Oliveira, João Valença, Cristina Bárbara
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (suppl 64) 2648; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2648

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bronchodilation test: Salbutamol or Ipratropium Bromide?
Liliana Raposo, Raquel Barros, Ana Sofia Oliveira, João Valença, Cristina Bárbara
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (suppl 64) 2648; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2648
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Asthma management - opinion of family doctors and patient’s view
  • Acute exacerbation phenotypes of asthma and COPD: impact on clinical outcomes
  • Eosinophilic phenotype classification of patients with asthma and/or COPD in NOVELTY
Show more Monitoring airway disease

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society