Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Hypoxic Challenge Testing in Infants; who is recommended in-flight oxygen?

Emma Fettes, Mollie Riley, Aidan Laverty, Paul Aurora
European Respiratory Journal 2020 56: 2156; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2156
Emma Fettes
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Emma.Fettes@gosh.nhs.uk
Mollie Riley
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aidan Laverty
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Aurora
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Introduction: BTS recommend infants with a history of neonatal chronic respiratory problems have hypoxic challenge testing (HCT) before air travel. SpO2 <85% during HCT is recommended as a threshold below which in-flight oxygen is required and “paediatrician discretion should be used when SpO2 between 85-90% and, where there is doubt, the doctor should err on the side of caution.” (BTS Thorax 2011;66 (suppl 1))

Aim: To establish which infants were recommended to fly +/- supplemental oxygen (suppO2) following HCT.

Methods: During infant HCT SpO2 is monitored in 15% FiO2 within a body plethysmograph and suppO2 administered if SpO2 < 85%. If after 20 mins SpO2 has remained >85% but <90% then suppO2 is titrated to provide additional information. We reviewed data from infants (aged < 1 year) whom had HCT between March 2017-January 2020.

Results: Data collected from 65 infants, median age 27.6 weeks (range 5 to 51.6), 37 (57%) male. All had baseline SpO2 ≥96% in room air.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

SuppO2 corrected SpO2 in all to baseline. Of the 9 infants with SpO2 85-90% during HCT; 7 ex-preterm, 1 thymus transplant, 1 pulmonary hypertension with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. 8/9 infants had a flight recommendation post HCT. All 8 were advised by their clinician to use suppO2 for air travel. The flight times in this subgroup ranged from 90 to 450 minutes.

Conclusion: Infants with baseline SpO2 ≥96% may still exhibit SpO2 desaturation during HCT. We found all paediatricians recommended in-flight oxygen for infants with HCT SpO2 <90%. In the SpO2=85-90% group, flight duration did not appear to affect the recommendation made.

  • Hypoxia
  • Physiological diagnostic services
  • Infants

Footnotes

Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2020; 56: Suppl. 64, 2156.

This abstract was presented at the 2020 ERS International Congress, in session “Respiratory viruses in the "pre COVID-19" era”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2020
Previous
Back to top
Vol 56 Issue suppl 64 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hypoxic Challenge Testing in Infants; who is recommended in-flight oxygen?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Hypoxic Challenge Testing in Infants; who is recommended in-flight oxygen?
Emma Fettes, Mollie Riley, Aidan Laverty, Paul Aurora
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (suppl 64) 2156; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2156

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Hypoxic Challenge Testing in Infants; who is recommended in-flight oxygen?
Emma Fettes, Mollie Riley, Aidan Laverty, Paul Aurora
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (suppl 64) 2156; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.2156
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Early effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure therapy on Right Ventricular Function in patients with newly diagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
  • Quality Improvement in a Sleep Clinic: To increase the capacity and reduce the time to treatment for patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
  • Deep learning automates complete quality control of spirometric manoeuvre
Show more Respiratory function technologists/scient.

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society