Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Could staple-line reinforcement on video-assisted thoracoscopic blebectomy prevent postoperative recurrent pneumothorax?

Masao Naruke
European Respiratory Journal 2020 56: 1726; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.1726
Masao Naruke
International Goodwill Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: masao.naruke@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Aim: Various kinds of additional procedures have become widely used in the spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) operation to prevent recurrence due to new bleb formation near the staple-line. We investigated our experiences on the effectiveness of staple-line reinforcement following blebectomy.

Methods: We reviewed the outcome of 62 thoracoscopic blebectomy for primary SP, performed on patients under 45 years old between 2008 and 2019. The blebectomy were performed by endoscopic automatic stapling devices under the 30-degree rigid thoracoscope view, every instrument managed through 1 to 3 access ports. Reinforcing with either an absorbable polyglycolic acid sheet or an absorbable oxidized cellulose mesh on the staple-line was up to the surgeon’s preference. The follow-up period ranged 2 to 153 months (median, 85 months).

Results: This study consisted of blebectomy with reinforcement in 38 cases and 24 cases without reinforcement. The postoperative pneumothorax recurrence rate was higher in the no-reinforced group than in the reinforced group (16.7% vs. 5.3%) and was higher in blebectomy for one location in the peripheral lung area than blebectomy for multiple sites (11.4% vs. 5.6%), although there were no statistically significant differences between them respectively. During the reoperation for the patient had a recurrence on the 9th postoperative day, a leaking bleb that was an oversight at the initial operation was found.

Conclusion: Staple-line reinforcement following thoracoscopic blebectomy tends to decrease postoperative recurrence, however it is not useful for recurrences caused by an oversight of blebs, an important cause that can be overlooked.

  • Treatments
  • Pleura

Footnotes

Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2020; 56: Suppl. 64, 1726.

This abstract was presented at the 2020 ERS International Congress, in session “Respiratory viruses in the "pre COVID-19" era”.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2020
Previous
Back to top
Vol 56 Issue suppl 64 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Could staple-line reinforcement on video-assisted thoracoscopic blebectomy prevent postoperative recurrent pneumothorax?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Could staple-line reinforcement on video-assisted thoracoscopic blebectomy prevent postoperative recurrent pneumothorax?
Masao Naruke
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (suppl 64) 1726; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.1726

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Could staple-line reinforcement on video-assisted thoracoscopic blebectomy prevent postoperative recurrent pneumothorax?
Masao Naruke
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (suppl 64) 1726; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.1726
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Secondary bronchogenic pulmonary hydatidosis: a rare entity
  • Middle lobe syndrome: Twenty years’ surgical experience
  • Diagnosis and management of thoracic cystic lymphangioma
Show more Thoracic Surgery

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society