Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Late-onset “acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia” impairs long-term lung allograft function and survival

Arno Vanstapel, Stijn E. Verleden, Birgit Weynand, Eric Verbeken, Laurens De Sadeleer, Bart M. Vanaudenaerde, Geert M. Verleden, Robin Vos the Leuven Lung Transplant Group
European Respiratory Journal 2020 56: 1902292; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02292-2019
Arno Vanstapel
1Dept of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, BREATHE, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2Dept of Pathology, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stijn E. Verleden
1Dept of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, BREATHE, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Birgit Weynand
2Dept of Pathology, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Birgit Weynand
Eric Verbeken
2Dept of Pathology, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurens De Sadeleer
1Dept of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, BREATHE, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laurens De Sadeleer
Bart M. Vanaudenaerde
1Dept of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, BREATHE, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geert M. Verleden
1Dept of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, BREATHE, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Lung Transplantation Unit, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin Vos
1Dept of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, BREATHE, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Lung Transplantation Unit, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robin Vos
  • For correspondence: robin.vos@uzleuven.be
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia (AFOP) after lung transplantation is associated with a rapid decline in pulmonary function. However, the relation with chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains unclear. We investigated the association between detection of AFOP in lung allograft biopsies with clinically important endpoints.

We reviewed lung allograft biopsies from 468 patients who underwent lung transplantation at the University Hospitals Leuven (2011–2017). AFOP was categorised as early new-onset (≤90 days post-transplant) or late new-onset (>90 days post-transplant); and associated with CLAD-free survival, graft survival, donor-specific antibodies, airway and blood eosinophilia.

Early and late AFOP was detected in 24 (5%) and 30 (6%) patients, respectively. CLAD-free survival was significantly lower in patients with late AFOP (median survival 2.42 years; p<0.0001) compared with patients with early or without AFOP and specifically associated with development of restrictive allograft syndrome (OR 28.57, 95% CI 11.34–67.88; p<0.0001). Similarly, graft survival was significantly lower in patients with late AFOP (median survival 4.39 years; p<0.0001) compared with patients with early AFOP or without AFOP. Late AFOP was furthermore associated with detection of circulating donor-specific antibodies (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.17–10.60; p=0.0004) compared with patients with early or without AFOP, and elevated airway and blood eosinophilia (p=0.043 and p=0.045, respectively) compared with early AFOP patients.

Late new-onset AFOP is associated with a worse prognosis and high risk of CLAD development, specifically restrictive allograft syndrome. Our findings indicate that late new-onset AFOP might play a role in the early pathogenesis of restrictive allograft syndrome.

Abstract

This study links acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia with poor outcome after lung transplantation. These findings indicate that acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia plays a role in the pathogenesis of restrictive allograft syndrome. https://bit.ly/3aof9n9

Introduction

Lung transplantation is an accepted treatment for patients with various chronic end-stage lung diseases. However, long-term outcome after lung transplantation is still hampered by development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in approximately 50% of patients 5 years after lung transplantation [1]. CLAD patients represent a heterogeneous population: clinically, radiologically and based on histopathological findings. In general, two main clinical phenotypes of CLAD have been defined: bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) [2, 3]. The first is defined by a progressive and irreversible obstructive pulmonary function defect, the latter by a restrictive pulmonary function defect, characterised by persistent pleuroparenchymal opacities on computed tomography scan and portending a poor outcome [3, 4].

Acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia (AFOP) was initially described in 2002 by Beasley et al. [5] as a distinct histological pattern associated with acute lung injury. It is characterised by the presence of prominent intra-alveolar fibrin deposition and organising pneumonia, different from other histological patterns, such as diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) or eosinophilic pneumonia. Two distinct forms of disease progression and clinical outcome were described: a fulminant form with rapid disease progression leading to death and a subacute form with a better prognosis [5].

In 2013, Paraskeva et al. [6] identified AFOP as a novel entity in 22 out of 194 (11%) lung transplant recipients, invariably associated with a rapid decline in respiratory function and death after a median time of 101 days. The subacute form described by Beasley et al. [5] was not seen in any of these patients. In addition, Paraskeva et al. [6] did not detect histological evidence of AFOP in patients diagnosed with a “RAS-like” syndrome, whereas histopathological analysis of explant lungs recently revealed presence of AFOP in approximately 50% of clinically defined end-stage RAS patients [7]. Therefore, the clinical behaviour of AFOP and its relation to RAS in lung transplant recipients remains to be elucidated.

In addition, the importance of the time-of-onset of AFOP on outcome has not been assessed. For other injury patterns, such as DAD and organising pneumonia, an important time-dependent effect of the time-of-onset of injury on CLAD-free and graft survival was observed [8, 9]. Specifically, late new-onset DAD (>3 months after transplantation) has been associated with an increased risk of subsequent RAS development, whereas early DAD was associated with early mortality and BOS [8].

The purpose of this study is therefore to investigate the relationship between AFOP in lung allograft biopsies on the one hand and functionally and clinically relevant outcomes on the other hand. We hypothesised that late new-onset AFOP may be associated with development of RAS and worse graft survival.

Materials and methods

Patient selection, histopathological and radiological assessment

The study included all patients who underwent lung transplantation at the University Hospitals Leuven (Leuven, Belgium) between January 2011 and December 2017. Retransplantation was considered as a separate event in our analysis. Follow-up was censored on September 1, 2018. All diagnostic biopsies (transbronchial biopsies (TBB), computed-tomography guided biopsies and surgical biopsies) were initially evaluated by a single experienced lung pathologist who formed a systematic and detailed descriptive pathology report. For the current study, the pathology reports of all diagnostic biopsies, both surveillance and indication biopsies (e.g. suspicion of infection or rejection), were reviewed. Haematoxylin–eosin-stained slides and staining's for micro-organisms from all initial reports consistent with AFOP were re-evaluated by two experienced lung pathologists blinded for all patient data, until consensus was reached. If multiple positive biopsies were available for a single patient, the first biopsy displaying AFOP was considered as the time of new-onset AFOP. Based on the date of new-onset AFOP, early (≤ 90 days post lung transplantation (post-Ltx)) versus late new-onset (>90 days post-LTx) AFOP was defined, by applying the same cut-off of 90 days previously used to investigate the importance of the time of onset of histological injury on outcome (figure 1) [8]. If available, explant lung biopsies (obtained at autopsy or retransplantation) from patients with graft loss were also re-evaluated. AFOP was diagnosed according to the criteria proposed by Beasley et al. [5] with presence of at least two major features (i.e. prominent intra-alveolar fibrin, organising pneumonia and patchy distribution), without evidence of hyaline membranes, eosinophilic infiltration or granulomatous inflammation [5]. Chest computed tomography imaging at diagnosis of AFOP was reviewed by an experienced thoracic radiologist, blinded for the study design. The transplant monitoring schedule, histopathological and radiological assessment are described in detail in the supplementary material.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Flowchart of patient selection. AFOP: acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia.

Laboratory results

Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) was routinely performed during bronchoscopy by instillation of 2×50 mL of saline, as previously described [10]. Similarly, peripheral blood samples were collected at time of bronchoscopy. Total and differential white blood cell (WBC) counts, C-reactive protein (CRP), and presence of persistent de novo anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were assessed, as previously reported [11].

Graft loss and CLAD diagnosis

Graft loss was defined as death (i.e. all-cause mortality) or retransplantation. CLAD was defined as a persistent (>3 months) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) decline of at least 20% compared to the mean of the two best post-operative FEV1 measurements obtained >3 weeks apart (follow-up until September 2018), in absence of another cause [4]. RAS was defined by an additional >10% decline in total lung capacity (TLC) and/or >20% drop in forced vital capacity (FVC) and evidence of persistent radiological opacities [3]. CLAD-free survival was defined as the time between transplant and the initial onset of >20% FEV1 decline.

Survival sub-analysis

A sub-analysis was performed to define whether detection of late AFOP was an independent poor prognostic factor. Therefore, we compared CLAD-free and graft survival in late AFOP patients, patients without indication biopsy (i.e. a for-cause biopsy >90 days post-LTx), patients with an indication biopsy (n≥1) but with normal findings and patients with an indication biopsy (n≥1) with abnormal findings (i.e. presence of acute rejection or infection, but absence of AFOP) (patient characteristics are provided in table S3). Patients with graft survival of ≤90 days post-LTx were excluded for this survival sub-analysis because presence of an indication biopsy was de facto not assessable.

Data expression and ethical considerations

Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis; the relationship between AFOP, RAS and DSAs was analysed using Fisher's exact test. BAL and peripheral blood counts were compared using Mann–Whitney test. Adjusted CLAD-free and graft survival analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for native lung disease (emphysema, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis or other), age at transplant, sex, type of transplant, episodes of acute rejection, episodes of lymphocytic bronchiolitis, histological evidence of infection and CMV infection, epoch (year of LTx) and occurrence of de novo persistent DSAs. GraphPad statistical software (Prism, version 7.01, San Diego CA, USA) and SAS (SAS Institute, version 9.3, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee (S52174).

Results

The majority of all 468 included patients never displayed AFOP on diagnostic biopsies (n=414, 89%), whereas 24 (5%) patients presented with early new-onset AFOP; and 30 (6%) patients with late new-onset AFOP (figure 2). Patient characteristics are summarised in table 1 and an overview of histopathologic findings in diagnostic biopsies is provided in table 2. Treatment regimens of AFOP patients are described in the supplementary material.

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Histology of acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia (Haematoxylin–Eosin stain, ×20). Prominent loose intra-alveolar fibrin balls are present within the alveolar spaces (arrow) mixed with fibroblasts. Scale bar=50 μm.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient characteristics

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Histopathological and radiological findings

CLAD-free survival

CLAD-free survival was significantly lower in patients with late AFOP (median survival 2.42 years; p<0.0001) compared with patients without AFOP or patients with early AFOP (figure 3a). 85 (21%) patients without AFOP developed CLAD (RAS, n=14 (16%); BOS, n=71 (84%)), four (17%) patients with early AFOP developed CLAD (RAS, n=1 (25%); BOS, n=3 (75%)), and 19 (63%) patients with late AFOP developed CLAD (RAS, n=15 (79%); BOS, n=4 (21%)) (table 3). RAS was clinically diagnosed using a >10% TLC decline in 25 out of 30 (83%) RAS patients and >20% FVC decline in the remaining patients.

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

a) Kaplan–Meier curve illustrating chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival post-lung transplant (LTx). CLAD-free survival is significantly worse in patients with late acute fibrinous organising pneumonia (AFOP) compared with patients with early AFOP, or patients without AFOP (p<0.0001). b) Kaplan–Meier curve illustrating graft survival post-LTx. Graft survival is significantly worse in patients with late AFOP compared with patients with early AFOP or patients without AFOP (p<0.0001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) incidence and presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs)

Patients with late AFOP were more likely to develop RAS, compared with patients without AFOP (OR 28.57, 95% CI 11.34–67.88; p<0.0001). Interestingly, three patients with late AFOP progressed from a BOS to a RAS phenotype of CLAD shortly following the detection of late AFOP and were considered as RAS patients for further analysis. Median interval between clinical RAS diagnosis and detection of late AFOP was −16 days (IQR −72–14). In contrast, early AFOP demonstrated no significant correlation with later RAS development (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.11–7.19; p=0.58).

Graft survival

Graft survival was significantly lower in patients who developed late AFOP (median survival 4.39 years; p<0.0001) compared with patients without AFOP or patients with early AFOP (figure 3b). Graft loss occurred in 74 (18%) patients without AFOP (death, n=67; retransplantation, n=7) and in two (8%) patients with early AFOP (death, n=1; retransplantation, n=1). Graft loss was noted in 17 (57%) late AFOP patients (death, n=13; retransplantation, n=4), mostly due to CLAD (n=15, specifically RAS, n=13), humoral rejection (n=1) or sepsis (n=1).

Histopathological findings in explant lungs

Explant lung biopsies of 11 (65%) out of 17 late fibrin/organising pneumonia patients with graft loss were available. Interstitial fibrotic changes, consistent with RAS, were present in 10 (91%) out of 11 patients. A non-specific interstitial pattern of fibrosis was present in three (27%) out of 11 patients, AFOP in three (27%) out of 11 patients, and pleuroparenchymal fibro-elastosis in four (36%) out of 11 patients. In addition, bronchiolitis obliterans lesions were detected in 10 (91%) out of 11 patients. Histopathologic findings in early AFOP explant lungs (n=2) are described in the supplementary material.

Radiological findings

Chest computed tomography imaging was available at AFOP diagnosis for all 54 AFOP patients (table 2). Late AFOP patients presented with radiological opacities in 27 (90%) out of 30 patients, mostly diffusely present in 23 (77%) patients. Late AFOP patients had significantly more air trapping and fewer pleural effusions compared to early AFOP patients (p=0.006 and p=0.01, respectively).

Presence of DSAs

Occurrence of persistent de novo DSAs was more prevalent in patients with late AFOP (n=11, 37%) compared with patients without AFOP (n=45, 11%) or patients with early AFOP (n=2, 8%) (p=0.024) (table 3). Late AFOP was significantly associated with the presence of DSAs (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.17–10.60; p=0.0004), compared with patients without AFOP. Occurrence of DSAs in patients with late AFOP did not significantly impact graft survival (p=0.058), compared with patients with late AFOP without DSAs. Similarly, detection of DSAs had no impact on CLAD-free survival in late AFOP patients (p=0.15). Early AFOP showed no correlation with the presence of DSAs (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.17–2.98; p>0.99).

BAL and peripheral blood

BAL fluid differential cell counts were obtained in 19 (79%) out of 24 patients with early AFOP and in 23 (77%) out of 30 patients with late AFOP. BAL eosinophilia was significantly higher in patients with late AFOP (median 0.5%, IQR 0–5.20), compared with patients with early AFOP (median 0% IQR 0–0.40) (p=0.043). Seven (23%) patients with late AFOP had a concomitant BAL eosinophilia of >2% (i.e. the upper limit of normal in our laboratory), whereas only one (2%) patient with early AFOP had a BAL eosinophilia of >2% (p=0.054). Analysis of BAL fluid revealed no difference in infection rates (p=0.74; details in supplementary material).

Blood leukocyte differentiation was available for 18 (75%) out of 24 patients with early AFOP and 29 (97%) out of 30 patients with late AFOP. Blood eosinophilia was significantly higher in patients with late AFOP (median 100 cells·µL−1; IQR 0–200) compared with patients with early AFOP (median 0 cells·µL−1; IQR 0–100) (p=0.045). Other BAL and peripheral blood measurements did not significantly differ between both groups (table S1).

Adjusted and survival sub-analysis

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that detection of late AFOP was an independent risk factor for both CLAD-free survival (HR 3.11, 95% CI 1.76–5.27; p<0.0001) and graft survival (HR 3.03, 95% CI 1.71–5.36; p=0.0001) (table S2). In addition, survival sub-analysis revealed that detection of late AFOP portended a significantly lower CLAD-free and graft survival compared with patients with an abnormal indication biopsy, but without AFOP (p=0.035; p=0.0003; respectively) (figure 4). (patient characteristics and information on indication biopsies are provided in tables S3 and S4). A visual representation of the relation between the time to new-onset AFOP, detection of DSAs, CLAD-free and graft survival is provided in figures S1 and S2. CLAD-free and graft survival analysis applying different cut-offs for early versus late AFOP (i.e. 3 m, 6 m, 9 m, 12 m, 18 m, 24 m) is provided in figures S3 and S4, all confirming the inferior outcome of late AFOP.

FIGURE 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4

a) Kaplan–Meier curve illustrating chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival post-lung transplantation (LTx). b) Kaplan–Meier curve illustrating graft survival post-LTx. CLAD-free survival and graft survival are significantly worse in patients with late AFOP compared with patients with an indication biopsy with abnormality, patients with an indication biopsy without abnormality or patients without indication biopsy (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). Patients with a graft survival of ≤90 days post-LTx (n=18) were excluded because presence of an indication biopsy (i.e. a for-cause biopsy >90 days after transplantation) was de facto not assessable.

Discussion

We investigated the association between AFOP in diagnostic biopsies and different functional and clinical parameters in diagnostic biopsies in a large cohort of lung transplant patients. The main findings of this study are i) a lower CLAD-free and graft survival in patients with late AFOP, whereas early AFOP demonstrated no correlation with outcome; ii) a strong association between late AFOP and development of RAS; and iii) a link between late AFOP and DSAs.

Paraskeva et al. [6] previously demonstrated that detection of AFOP in lung transplant patients was invariably associated with poor outcome, and reported a median survival of only 101 days. Our findings do not completely support this observation, as detection of early new-onset AFOP had no effect on outcome in our patient cohort. Detection of late new-onset AFOP strongly correlated with poor outcome, and patients were at high risk of CLAD development, particularly RAS. The possible link between AFOP and RAS has previously been reported by our research group based on histopathological analysis of explant lungs, which revealed the presence of AFOP in approximately 50% of clinically identified RAS patients [7]. In contrast, Paraskeva et al. [6] did not observe histological changes consistent with AFOP in patients with a “RAS-like” clinical phenotype (but without TLC confirmation) [6].

We found that first detection of late AFOP roughly accompanied the clinical and radiological diagnosis of RAS, which might support the hypothesis that AFOP represents an early histopathological hallmark in the pathogenesis of RAS development, leading to rapid decline in respiratory function and death in case of a fulminant course, or to CLAD in patients surviving the acute onset.

Our results are in line with previous observations demonstrating an association between specific histopathological patterns (i.e. late new-onset DAD and organising pneumonia) and RAS development [8, 9]. We found no association between early AFOP and CLAD-free or graft survival; which indicates a time-dependent effect of AFOP onset on CLAD-free survival. Indeed, it seems that early AFOP mostly represents a transient process and resolves without excessive CLAD development. However, as early and late AFOP are histologically indistinguishable, the prognosis might be dependent on the underlying cause of AFOP.

AFOP has a typical patchy distribution and definite exclusion of AFOP might be difficult based on a small-sized TBB. In the context of a high clinical suspicion, a negative TBB may therefore prompt further investigation (e.g. additional TBB sampling). In addition, a definite diagnosis of AFOP based on a TBB can be challenging as other histological patterns (e.g. DAD, eosinophilic pneumonia) may resemble the histopathological changes seen in AFOP [5].

We found a significant association between late AFOP and the presence of persistent de novo DSAs. Interestingly, late AFOP patients exclusively developed DSAs against HLA type II DQ antigens. Persistent de novo DSAs, and specifically DSA-DQ antibodies, have been associated with a higher risk for CLAD and RAS in particular [11, 12]. The underlying pathophysiology and their potential role in the causative pathway of RAS remain unclear, but these results are in line with a previous report that demonstrated a link between antibody-mediated rejection and RAS [13]. Our current findings support this hypothesis and might point towards a pivotal role for intra-alveolar fibrin deposition. We previously postulated that microvascular injury, at least partly triggered by antibody mediated rejection, might be the initial event leading to capillary leakage and intra-alveolar fibrin deposition [7] (figure S5). In a next phase, there seems to be an inefficient clearing of intra-alveolar fibrin, which then forms loosely textured fibrin balls [14]. Next, fibroblasts might proliferate and infiltrate the fibrin balls, and result in the typical AFOP pattern. Ultimately, this fibrotic response might lead to a pattern of (sub)pleural and septal fibrosis, characteristic of RAS. In addition, as bronchiolitis obliterans lesions were found in the vast majority of available explant lungs from late AFOP patients, an unknown pathogenic link between AFOP and bronchiolitis obliterans lesions might be present.

We observed higher eosinophil levels in blood and BAL samples in late AFOP patients, compared to early AFOP patients. However, we did not observe increased tissue eosinophilia in AFOP biopsies, in which case a concomitant infectious disease or eosinophilic pneumonia should be ruled out. We previously demonstrated that a BAL eosinophilia of ≥2% predisposed to later RAS development [15], as well as to lower survival after RAS diagnosis [16]. Eosinophils may play a role in the pathophysiology of CLAD, although the underlying mechanisms remain unknown.

Our study has several limitations. First, patient selection was performed retrospectively based on revision of the pathology report. Secondly, this study is based on data from single-centre patients and, although we report a large patient cohort, extrapolation of these results to draw general conclusions about lung transplant patients might be restricted. Thirdly, blood and BAL differential cell counts were not available for all patients with AFOP, due to technical difficulties obtaining adequate samples in clinically unstable patients. Furthermore, blood and BAL cell counts could not be compared with patients without AFOP, as no suitable reference time-point could be defined in patients without AFOP.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that late new-onset AFOP is associated with lower CLAD-free and graft survival, and more specifically development of RAS. We believe that these findings provide evidence that might suggest that AFOP is a key histopathological feature in the early pathogenesis of RAS. Further characterisation of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying AFOP and RAS development should contribute to a better understanding of the complex relation between AFOP and RAS.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary material ERJ-02292-2019.SUPPLEMENT

Shareable PDF

Supplementary Material

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-02292-2019.Shareable

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank “The Leuven Lung Transplant Group”: this includes the following important collaborators of our lung transplant programme who were directly involved in the care of our lung transplant recipients during the past years: Lieven J. Dupont, Jonas Yserbyt, Laurent Godinas, Anke Van Herck, Annelore Sacreas, Janne Kaes, Tobias Heigl, Sofie Ordies, Arne P. Neyrinck, Veronique Schaevers, Paul De Leyn, Dirk E. Van Raemdonck, Willy Coosemans, Philippe Nafteux, Herbert Decaluwé, Hans Van Veer, Lieven Depypere, Anna E. Frick, Laurens J. Ceulemans and Marie-Paule Emonds.

Footnotes

  • This article has supplementary material available from erj.ersjournals.com

  • Author contributions: Concept and design: A. Vanstapel, S.E. Verleden, B.M. Vanaudenaerde, G.M. Verleden and R. Vos; data analysis and interpretation: A. Vanstapel, S.E. Verleden, B. Weynand, E. Verbeken, L. De Sadeleer and R. Vos; drafting the manuscript for important intellectual content: A. Vanstapel, S.E. Verleden, B. Weynand, E. Verbeken, L. De Sadeleer, B.M. Vanaudenaerde, G.M. Verleden and R. Vos.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Vanstapel has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: S.E. Verleden has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: B. Weynand has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: E. Verbeken has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: L. De Sadeleer has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: B.M. Vanaudenaerde has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: G.M. Verleden has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: R. Vos has nothing to disclose.

  • Support statement: A. Vanstapel is sponsored by a fundamental research grant from the FWO (1102020N). S.E. Verleden is sponsored by a grant from the FWO (FWO12G8715N) and the KU Leuven (C24/18/073). B.M. Vanaudenaerde is funded by the KU Leuven (C24/050). R. Vos is supported by the FWO (senior clinical researcher) and by the Roche Research Grant from the Belgian Transplant Society. G.M. Verleden is supported by the Broere Charitable foundation. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received November 27, 2019.
  • Accepted April 16, 2020.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2020
https://www.ersjournals.com/user-licence

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chambers DC,
    2. Yusen RD,
    3. Cherikh WS, et al.
    The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-fourth Adult Lung And Heart-Lung Transplantation Report 2017; Focus Theme: Allograft ischemic time. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 36: 1047–1059. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.016
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Meyer KC,
    2. Raghu G,
    3. Verleden GM, et al.
    An international ISHLT/ATS/ERS clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1479–1503. doi:10.1183/09031936.00107514
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Glanville AR,
    2. Verleden GM,
    3. Todd JL, et al.
    Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Definition and update of restrictive allograft syndrome: a consensus report from the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38: 483–492. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2019.03.008
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Verleden GM,
    2. Glanville AR,
    3. Lease ED, et al.
    Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Definition, diagnostic criteria, and approaches to treatment: a consensus report from the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38: 493–503. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2019.03.009
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Beasley MB,
    2. Franks TJ,
    3. Galvin JR, et al.
    Acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia: a histologic pattern of lung injury and possible variant of diffuse alveolar damage. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126: 1064–1070.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Paraskeva M,
    2. Mclean C,
    3. Ellis S, et al.
    Acute fibrinoid organizing pneumonia after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 1360–1368. doi:10.1164/rccm.201210-1831OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Thüsen JH VD,
    2. Vandermeulen E,
    3. Vos R, et al.
    The histomorphological spectrum of restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction and implications for prognosis. Mod Pathol 2018; 31: 780–790. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.180
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Sato M,
    2. Hwang DM,
    3. Ohmori-Matsuda K, et al.
    Revisiting the pathologic finding of diffuse alveolar damage after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012; 31: 354–363. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2011.12.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Shino MY,
    2. Weigt SS,
    3. Li N, et al.
    Impact of allograft injury time of onset on the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17: 1294–1303. doi:10.1111/ajt.14066
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Verleden GM,
    2. Vanaudenaerde BM,
    3. Dupont LJ, et al.
    Azithromycin reduces airway neutrophilia and interleukin-8 in patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 566–570. doi:10.1164/rccm.200601-071OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Verleden SE,
    2. Vanaudenaerde BM,
    3. Emonds MP, et al.
    Donor-specific and -nonspecific HLA antibodies and outcome post lung transplantation. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1701248. doi:10.1183/13993003.01248-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Tikkanen JM,
    2. Singer LG,
    3. Kim SJ, et al.
    De novo DQ donor-specific antibodies are associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 596–606. doi:10.1164/rccm.201509-1857OC
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Roux A,
    2. Bendib Le Lan I,
    3. Holifanjaniaina S, et al.
    Antibody-mediated rejection in lung transplantation: clinical outcomes and donor-specific antibody characteristics. Am J Transplant 2016; 16: 1216–1228. doi:10.1111/ajt.13589
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Jonigk D,
    2. Rath B,
    3. Borchert P, et al.
    Comparative analysis of morphological and molecular motifs in bronchiolitis obliterans and alveolar fibroelastosis after lung and stem cell transplantation. J Pathol Clin Res 2017; 3: 17–28. doi:10.1002/cjp2.60
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Verleden SE,
    2. Ruttens D,
    3. Vandermeulen E, et al.
    Elevated bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophilia correlates with poor outcome after lung transplantation. Transplantation 2014; 97: 83–89. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a6bae2
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Verleden SE,
    2. Ruttens D,
    3. Vandermeulen E, et al.
    Predictors of survival in restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016; 35: 1078–1084. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2016.03.022
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 56 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 56 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Late-onset “acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia” impairs long-term lung allograft function and survival
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Late-onset “acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia” impairs long-term lung allograft function and survival
Arno Vanstapel, Stijn E. Verleden, Birgit Weynand, Eric Verbeken, Laurens De Sadeleer, Bart M. Vanaudenaerde, Geert M. Verleden, Robin Vos
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (3) 1902292; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02292-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Late-onset “acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia” impairs long-term lung allograft function and survival
Arno Vanstapel, Stijn E. Verleden, Birgit Weynand, Eric Verbeken, Laurens De Sadeleer, Bart M. Vanaudenaerde, Geert M. Verleden, Robin Vos
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2020, 56 (3) 1902292; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02292-2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Supplementary material
    • Shareable PDF
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Interstitial and orphan lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Articles

  • Ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax
  • Systematic assessment of respiratory health in illness susceptible athletes
  • Identifying early PAH biomarkers in systemic sclerosis
Show more Original Articles

Lung transplantation

  • Donor-specific gene signatures in human lung transplants
  • P. aeruginosa eradication improves outcomes after lung transplantation
Show more Lung transplantation

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society