Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

ERS/TSANZ Task Force Statement on the management of reproduction and pregnancy in women with airways diseases

Peter G. Middleton, Elisabeth J. Gade, Cristina Aguilera, Lucy MacKillop, Brenda M. Button, Courtney Coleman, Barbara Johnson, Charlotte Albrechtsen, Frank Edenborough, David Rigau, Peter G. Gibson, Vibeke Backer
European Respiratory Journal 2020 55: 1901208; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01208-2019
Peter G. Middleton
1CF Research Group, Ludwig Engel Centre for Respiratory Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter G. Middleton
  • For correspondence: peter.middleton@sydney.edu.au
Elisabeth J. Gade
2Dept of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Aguilera
3Dept of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy MacKillop
4Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nuffield Dept of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brenda M. Button
5Dept of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Courtney Coleman
6European Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Johnson
6European Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte Albrechtsen
7Dept of Anaesthetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Edenborough
8Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Rigau
9Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter G. Gibson
10Centre for Asthma and Respiratory Diseases, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter G. Gibson
Vibeke Backer
11Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet and Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vibeke Backer
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This European Respiratory Society/Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand statement outlines a review of the literature and expert opinion concerning the management of reproduction and pregnancy in women with airways diseases: asthma, cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis. Many women with these diseases are now living into reproductive age, with some developing moderate-to-severe impairment of lung function in early adulthood. The statement covers aspects of fertility, management during pregnancy, effects of drugs, issues during delivery and the post-partum period, and patients’ views about family planning, pregnancy and parenthood. The statement summarises current knowledge and proposes topics for future research, but does not make specific clinical recommendations.

Abstract

Good management of women with airways diseases before, during and after pregnancy is an important area of respiratory medicine, affecting both the mother and child: a statement from the ERS and TSANZ http://bit.ly/2mMwvGZ

Introduction

Outline

This statement outlines a review of the literature and expert opinion concerning the management of reproduction and pregnancy in women with airways diseases. The statement represents the first collaboration of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) to develop such documents.

The statement covers airways diseases: asthma, cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis. Many women with these diseases are now living into reproductive age, with some developing moderate-to-severe impairment of lung function in early adulthood. The statement covers aspects of fertility, management during pregnancy, effects of drugs, and issues during delivery and the post-partum period. Patients' views about family planning, pregnancy and parenthood obtained through an online survey are discussed and summarised.

The statement summarises current knowledge, but does not make specific clinical recommendations. Topics for future research are proposed.

The statement does not discuss the physiological changes occurring in pregnancy, such as the changes in airway physiology, resting ventilation and sleep, which have been summarised elsewhere [1]. The statement does not cover other forms of lung disease, such as pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, gastro-oesophageal reflux-related lung disease or issues with nicotine consumption.

Methods

This ERS/TSANZ Task Force was composed of respiratory physicians, obstetricians, general practitioners, allied health staff and women with airways diseases. The Task Force received support from ERS methodologists. The European Lung Foundation, in collaboration with patient volunteers, designed an online survey to better understand women's views when living with an airways disease. All co-authors critically revised and approved the final statement and completed conflict of interest forms.

The present ERS/TSANZ statement combines an evidence-based approach with the clinical expertise of the Task Force members, based on both literature search and face-to-face meetings. Literature was searched using MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases, limited to 1995 onwards and English language. An outline of the literature search strategy (1995–2017) is given in the supplementary material. A repeat literature search was undertaken in November 2018 to include the latest publications.

All references from the literature searches were examined by the two co-chairs (P.M. and V.B.), after which a selection of papers was given to the Task Force members who selected the relevant literature. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The selection was based on the population (pregnant women with asthma, CF or bronchiectasis) and the effects of these diseases on risks of pregnancy-associated complications and miscarriages, breastfeeding, nutritional considerations, lung function, long-term maternal outcomes, and management considerations during pregnancy. There are very few randomised control trials (limited to the management of pregnancy in women with asthma), so the evidence consisted of observational studies (prospective or retrospective), cross-sectional surveys and case series. Other guidelines have also recently been published, which may be helpful to the reader [2]. The current Task Force builds on these other guidelines; however, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) document [2] only concerns intra-partum care, whereas the current document limits the disease groups (i.e. asthma, CF and bronchiectasis), but covers issues before, during and after pregnancy.

The document aims to provide an overview of the literature and current evidence, and does not provide a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis for each topic or recommendations for clinical practice.

Reproduction and conception issues in women with airways disease

Many chronic respiratory diseases commence early in life and so are present in young adult women trying to conceive. There is sparse research in this field, although impaired fertility has been found in women with asthma [3]. For CF, the rapidly changing clinical status in young adult women [4] complicates comparison of older studies with more current literature, and for bronchiectasis, there are little data available.

Fertility in asthma patients

Different studies have found varied associations between the presence of asthma and subfertility in women [3, 5, 6]. More recent studies have suggested that asthma negatively influences fertility with increased time to pregnancy and reduced birth rate [3, 6]. The time to pregnancy in women with asthma increases with maternal age and use of fertility treatment increases especially in those over 35 years of age [3], which may suggest that the severity of the disease or the duration of exposure to low-grade inflammation has a negative influence on fertility.

Epidemiological data attempting to clarify the relative effects of asthma medications and underlying asthma severity on fertility is inconclusive. Gade et al. [3] found an association between untreated asthma (defined as no regular inhalers) and time to pregnancy, as well as between use of daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and longer time to pregnancy, although it was not possible to differentiate between asthma severity per se and the level of treatment [3]. However, this was not found in a subsequent clinical study [7]. Recently, interesting data from the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) study have shown that women with self-reported asthma only using short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) had prolonged time to pregnancy and reduced fertility [6], yet those with self-reported asthma who were prescribed ICS had no reduction in fertility. This suggests that undertreatment of asthma with systemic inflammation may reduce fertility [6]. Given this data, women with asthma should be informed of the risk of reduced fertility especially if not on maintenance ICS therapy and particularly above 35 years of age [7, 8].

Fertility in CF and bronchiectasis

The life expectancy of people with CF has been increasing due to improved treatments [4, 9], which has resulted in an increasing number of men and women with CF living into adulthood and wanting to have children. In both cases, it is recommended that the partner is tested for cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations to allow appropriate discussions regarding prenatal testing and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis [10, 11].

It is well known that most men with CF (95%) are infertile because of blockage or absence of the vas deferens, which requires in vitro fertilisation (IVF) intervention for pregnancy [10]. In contrast, although CFTR is expressed in the cervix [12] and the water content of cervical mucous does not show the normal menstrual cycle variation, the fallopian tubes remain patent in the majority of adult women with CF [13]. Fertility in women with CF can be worsened by poor nutrition leading to irregular ovulation or secondary amenorrhoea. A recent multinational survey showed that 35% of women with CF experienced subfertility compared with 5–15% in the general population [14]. Older age and pancreatic insufficiency were associated with subfertility, while lung function and body mass index were not associated with subfertility. CF-related diabetes (CFRD) was present in 16% of women with normal fertility and 23% of the subfertile group (p=0.02), and those with CFRD were significantly less likely to attempt conception. In cases of reduced fertility, IVF may be necessary [14]. Recently, a French registry study of women with CF who reported a pregnancy between 2001 and 2012 found that 14 out of 29 women with pre-gestational diabetes reported medically assisted conception compared with 51 out of 160 women without CFRD (p=0.06) [15].

In women with CFRD it is expected that good glycaemic control will improve the ability to conceive and reduce the risk of miscarriage and congenital malformations, as found in pre-conception care for non-CF women with diabetes [16]. Gestational diabetes is common, so current guidelines recommend an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) should be performed in all women with CF before pregnancy and repeated during pregnancy [17–19].

In contrast to the knowledge concerning fertility issues in asthma and CF, little is known about these issues in bronchiectasis due to other causes. In general, most clinicians will manage fertility using a similar approach of maximising lung function and nutrition, and minimising chronic infection.

Airways medications summary applicable to all sections

Continued use of inhaled therapies is critical to the management of airways disease during pregnancy. This section presents tables outlining the commonly used medications for different airways diseases and their impact on the uterus, the fetus and during breastfeeding. No systematic review of the literature was performed; the references were selected by a clinical pharmacologist with expertise in the field based on their relevance and product information from regulatory agencies.

For full details concerning an individual medication, product information is available through the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) [20], European Medicines Agency [21] and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [22]. The TGA rates all medications for use during pregnancy and lactation with categories based on perceived risks. It should be noted that the FDA's new Pregnancy and Lactation Labelling Rule removes pregnancy letter categories (A, B, C, D and X), and advocates for communicating information on the benefits and risks of using a drug during pregnancy and lactation [22]. It is included here for completeness. The TGA and FDA categories are summarised in table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Summary of Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Food and Drug Administration [FDA] categories

Considerations from the Task Force

Tables 2–5 present the Task Force summaries for airways medications [23–81]. Please note the summaries are not based on randomised controlled trials.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Bronchodilators [23–30]

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists [24, 25, 28, 32, 33]

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Other agents

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5

Cystic fibrosis (CF) and bronchiectasis

  • Compatible. In general, this option is considered the drug of first choice, which should be tolerated during pregnancy and/or breastfeeding, as there is sufficient anecdotal evidence through use during human pregnancies that the embryo/fetal risk is very low or nonexistent.

  • Probably safe. In general, there is limited trial experience during human pregnancy (or during breastfeeding), but the characteristics of the drug and/or drugs in the same class suggest low risk.

  • Possibly safe. This drug is considered for second-line use, if better-tested treatment options fail. Direct maternal benefit is thought likely to outweigh potential risk during pregnancy and/or breastfeeding, although exact risks are unknown.

  • Breastfeeding. Please note that all listed refer to use in full-term, healthy, exclusively breastfed babies from mothers taking a listed drug at the standard recommended dose(s) and duration(s).

In all cases, the clinician should compare the benefits and risks of each medication.

In conclusion, the use of any drugs during pregnancy and lactation needs to balance the maternal risk of therapy versus no therapy and the fetal risk of uncontrolled maternal disease with the risk of therapy on the newborn.

In women with asthma, inhaled medications have been used for many years without documentation of adverse effects on the fetus. In contrast, the effect of undertreated asthma resulting in a severe exacerbation with maternal hypoxia is well described to have adverse effects on the fetus.

Monoclonal antibodies are not likely to cross the placenta in sufficient quantities to cause fetal harm and should be continued during pregnancy if required for asthma control in the mother.

For women with bronchiectasis and CF, routine therapy with inhaled bronchodilators, corticosteroids antibiotics and mucolytics should continue to maintain maternal stability throughout pregnancy. Any risks associated with systemic antibiotics vary depending on the agent and selection should be based on clinical grounds for the mother balanced with risk to the fetus.

Pregnancy in women with asthma

Pregnancy occurs commonly in women with asthma [83, 84], although some studies have noted a reduced ability to conceive [6, 7]. Control of asthma triggers and comorbidities is recommended during pregnancy, including rhinitis [85], obesity [86] snoring and sleep disordered breathing [87], cigarette smoking [88], and viral infection [89]. Vaccination against influenza is recommended. Self-management education for asthma is also recommended, with improvements in skills and knowledge following education in pregnant women with asthma [90, 91].

Natural history of pregnancy in women with asthma

Asthma severity can change during pregnancy [92], with a later retrospective cohort of 1087 pregnancies showing 36% had improved asthma symptoms, 41% had unchanged symptoms and 23% had worsened symptoms during pregnancy [93]. Previous data suggested that during pregnancy asthma was unchanged in 33% and asthma was improved in 28% [94]. This has led to the concept that “one-third improve, one-third are unchanged and one-third experience increased asthma symptoms” [93, 95, 96]. In a recent study of 92 women, the proportion who deteriorated was smaller than this one-third hypothesis [97]. Prospective studies have shown a higher frequency of asthma exacerbations among those with more severe underlying disease. In general, the first trimester and the last month of pregnancy are relatively free of exacerbations. During the second and third trimesters increased asthma symptoms and need for medications is common [96, 98].

The change during pregnancy might be related to specific phenotypes, such as allergic or eosinophilic phenotypes, with rhinitis as an indicator of atopy associated with worsening asthma during pregnancy [85]. Asthma exacerbations in overweight or obese women during pregnancy are twice as frequent as in healthy weight women with asthma [86].

Miscarriage, premature delivery and other obstetric complications associated with asthma

International guidelines on the management of asthma during pregnancy are consistent in their main recommendations [99, 100]. Most recommend monthly monitoring of symptoms due to the unpredictable course of asthma during pregnancy, which should include both obstetric care providers and a multidisciplinary respiratory team. A qualitative study reported that Australian midwives lacked confidence and certainty about their role in asthma management during pregnancy [101]. Barriers to midwife involvement included a lack of knowledge about asthma during pregnancy, lack of time and a lack of referral pathways to asthma specialists [101].

Maternal asthma is associated with reduced fetal growth (low birthweight) due to a combination of pre-term delivery and intra-uterine growth restriction (small for dates). Following pregnancies with a moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbation, there is an increased risk of pre-term birth, low birthweight [102, 103] and small for gestational age [104]. A meta-analysis of 13 studies found a 46% increased risk of low birthweight compared with women without asthma [102]. Maternal asthma is associated with increased risks of pre-eclampsia [102], gestational diabetes [105], caesarean section [105], perinatal mortality (driven by neonatal death) [27] and neonatal hospitalisation at birth [27].

Active asthma management during pregnancy was found to lessen the increased risk of pre-term birth [102], neonatal hospitalisation [27] and gestational diabetes [105]. Exhaled nitric oxide fraction-guided management was reported to reduce asthma exacerbations [83], reduce neonatal hospitalisation [83], reduce infant bronchiolitis [106], and reduce the later development of childhood wheeze and asthma [106]. There is a small but statistically significant increased risk of congenital malformations (relative risk 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21) in women with asthma [27]. This increased risk does not appear to be associated with maintenance asthma medication, with large studies demonstrating the relative safety of ICS use in relation to congenital malformations [107, 108].

Exercise, nutrition, asthma and pregnancy

At present the recommendations for pregnant women with asthma are based on those for the general population [109]. Maternal exercise during pregnancy is beneficial for reducing the incidence of low fetal birthweight and is likely to be important for pregnancy in overweight or obese women [110].

Most pregnant women with asthma have vitamin D levels <75 nmol·L−1 throughout gestation, which are associated with a greater risk of adverse respiratory outcomes in the infants. Those women with lower levels of vitamin D are at higher risk of having infants who later develop childhood asthma [111]. Vitamin D exposure during fetal development influences the immune system of the neonate, which can contribute to protection from asthma-related outcomes in early life [112].

Breastfeeding

A systematic review of observational studies on breastfeeding shows that breastfeeding is effective at preventing allergy in infants, with the most pronounced effect in infants at higher risk of allergy, when breastfed for at least 4 months [113]. However, longer follow-up studies of older children and adults found no protective effect against atopy and asthma, suggesting that the protective effect of breastfeeding delays rather than prevents development of atopy and asthma [114].

Summary

Most cohort studies demonstrate that asthma is associated with adverse outcomes during pregnancy that are related to poor asthma control, especially acute exacerbations. Some of these adverse outcomes can be reduced by good asthma management. More randomised controlled trials of pregnant women with asthma will strengthen the recommendations [115].

Pregnancy in women with CF

One of the fundamental components of care is that all people with CF should be managed in a multidisciplinary clinic on a long-term basis. Fertility and pregnancy issues should be discussed at an appropriate time before pregnancy is contemplated to optimise follow-up and treatment [17, 116]. As noted in the earlier section on reproduction and conception issues, the prevalence of subfertility among women with CF (35%) is higher than in the general population (5–15%). Older age and pancreatic insufficiency are associated with subfertility in women with CF [14]. The partner should be offered testing for CFTR mutations during the pre-conception workup. In general, those women with good respiratory and nutritional status can achieve conception and maintain pregnancy to term.

Natural history of pregnancy in women with CF

While the older literature outlines increased risks of pregnancy-associated complications and miscarriages, this may have reflected worse nutrition and lung function in previous series. Since the initial case report in 1960 of a pregnancy in a woman with CF [117] with delivery of a viable fetus, it was soon noted that maintenance of the mother's health pre- and post-delivery was crucial. During the 1970s, Cohen et al. [118] collected data from 129 pregnancies among 100 women with a mean age of 20.7 years. Medical abortion was undertaken in 19% with an additional 5% having a spontaneous miscarriage. Maternal mortality in this original series was 12% within 6 months of delivery and 18% within 2 years. More recent studies have shown similar levels of medical abortions, but better maternal survival [119].

Case series of women with CF have shown increased risk of miscarriages [120], both early and mid-pregnancy, with the chance of live birth reduced in mothers with worse lung function. For that reason, some authors have suggested that a pre-pregnancy forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) >60% predicted should be present before pregnancy is undertaken [121], while others suggest a cut-off of FEV1 >70% predicted [122] and others have shown that those women with CF with an FEV1 >80% predicted have better outcomes [123]. Clearly risks are lower in those with better lung function pre-pregnancy, but there have been successful pregnancies in women with FEV1 <40% predicted [119, 124]. As maternal and fetal risks are increased in those with lower pre-conception FEV1, pregnancy in a woman with CF and advanced lung disease can be difficult to manage.

Pre-existing CFRD is an important consideration during pregnancy. A recent analysis of the French CF Registry compared outcomes of pregnancy in women with CF with and without pre-gestational diabetes, noting that women with CFRD were older at the time of first pregnancy (29 versus 26 years; p=0.05) and had worse lung function (FEV1 50% versus 67% predicted; p=0.03) [15]. There was an increased rate of caesarean section in diabetic women compared with nondiabetic women (48% versus 21%; p=0.005) [15]. However, there was no significant impact on fetal growth or pre-term delivery and there was no difference in long-term outcomes in the two groups [15].

Risks to the fetus

While there has long been an increase in the risk of miscarriages in women with CF having pregnancies, earlier studies did not demonstrate any difference in congenital anomalies [17, 116]. However, a recent population study of pregnancies in California between 2005 and 2008 compared the outcomes of pregnancies from mothers with CF versus those of the general population. They reported a significant increased risk of congenital anomalies (14.3% versus 6.4%; p<0.005) [120].

Long-term maternal outcomes

Overall, the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation National Patient Registry demonstrated that women with CF who reported a pregnancy showed no reduction in overall survival compared with age-matched women with CF who did not report a pregnancy [124]. Data from the Epidemiologic Study of Cystic Fibrosis (ESCF) showed that pregnancy and motherhood were not associated with accelerated loss of lung function, but were linked to more pulmonary exacerbations and increased clinic visits [125]. However, a single-centre review has shown that following pregnancy, of 15 women with FEV1 <50% predicted, seven died within 8 years of delivery [126].

There are multiple cases of women colonised with Burkholderia species, in particular the Burkholderia cepacia complex, who have had poor outcomes following pregnancy [127, 128]. Tanser et al. [129] noted a particularly difficult combination of poor lung function (FEV1 <50% predicted) with B. cepacia colonisation where maternal mortality was high. At present, there is little information concerning pregnancy in women colonised with mycobacterial species, but many of the drugs used to treat these organisms are not recommended for use during pregnancy.

CFTR modulators

With the recent introduction of ivacaftor and lumacaftor as CFTR modulators, there have been a number of reports of these agents being used during pregnancy and during breastfeeding [56, 58, 130, 131]. To date, there have been no reports of abnormalities associated with these agents, but the relative benefits of remaining on CFTR modulator therapy before, during and after pregnancy would need to be balanced against any theoretical risks.

Suggestions for management during pregnancy

Women with CF who are pregnant should be reviewed in a multidisciplinary CF clinic at least monthly for the first and second trimesters, increasing to every 2 weeks or more frequently as necessary. It is recommended that more frequent follow-up during pregnancy be undertaken in those with more severe disease. As many women with CF can develop gestational diabetes and require insulin, the European Cystic Fibrosis Society recommends that an OGTT should be performed pre-pregnancy and repeated at 20 weeks, and again at 28 weeks if necessary [17]. The US [18] and Australian guidelines [19] suggest an OGTT should be performed pre-pregnancy and at 12–16 and 24–28 weeks gestation in all women with CF.

Nutritional considerations

Women with CF are expected to gain an overall 10–12 kg during pregnancy, as would the general obstetric population [17]. Fat-soluble vitamins and other supplements should continue during pregnancy in order to maintain normal levels of all vitamins [17]. In addition to folate and iron supplements as recommended for all pregnant women, calorie supplements may also be required to provide sufficient energy intake to allow for normal weight gain during pregnancy.

Increased intensity of maintenance treatments to maintain stability during pregnancy

During pregnancy the ongoing routine care of the CF adult needs to be encouraged. As reflux increases during pregnancy [17], adjustments to physiotherapy regimens may be necessary. Many women change their daily routine to have more frequent smaller meals and time their physiotherapy before meals to minimise reflux. A high degree of individualisation is required as there are no studies confirming the “best option”.

Loss of lung function

In general, it is expected that women with CF will transiently lose lung function to a similar level as other pregnant women. However, there are very few studies outlining the relative drop in lung function for women with CF with differing levels of lung function pre-conception. Many studies have compared pregnancy outcomes against pre-pregnancy lung function. In general, higher values of FEV1 pre-pregnancy are associated with better outcomes and complete return of lung function after pregnancy [123]. Importantly, long-term lung function in the group of women with CF who have had a pregnancy is similar to those who have not been pregnant [125].

Physiotherapy issues: exercise, airway clearance and pelvic floor

Regular airway clearance and exercise should be an established routine before pregnancy and maintained through pregnancy, with modification as necessary, including avoiding contact sports [132, 133]. Although there are no trials comparing physiotherapy interventions in pregnant women with CF, options include the active cycle of breathing technique, autogenic drainage, positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy, oscillating PEP and intrapulmonary percussive ventilation including the MetaNeb device [134]. Therapy may need to be adjusted as the fetus grows.

Upright sitting is often the most comfortable position for airway clearance during pregnancy, and instruction to maintain a neutral lumbar spine during airway clearance for optimal bladder control and prevention of back problems may be necessary [134]. Left and right side lying, horizontal or head up may be more effective positions in some women, but most clinicians avoid the supine horizontal position, especially during the second and third trimesters to minimise pressure from the gravid uterus on the inferior vena cava, which may decrease venous return and cardiac output.

The growing fetus results in upward pressure on the diaphragm and downward pressure on the pelvic floor. Particularly during the third trimester, increased stress on the pelvic floor may result in urinary leakage, especially during coughing. In most clinics, women with CF are taught effective pelvic floor strength and endurance exercises with referral to a physiotherapist experienced in this area.

Post-transplant: is this a second chance?

An important paper from Gyi et al. [135] in 2006 outlined 10 CF lung transplant recipients who became pregnant. There were nine live births and one therapeutic abortion. Five of the nine births were premature. Four women died of rejection within 3 years of pregnancy. More recently, a retrospective review of pregnancies reported to the US National Transplant Registry detailed 30 pregnancies in 21 women post-transplant [136]. They described 18 live deliveries at an average gestation of 34 weeks, with a weight of 2.2 kg. There were 11 complications including two neonatal deaths in the offspring and five of the 21 mothers died during follow-up. In summary, these studies have shown that pregnancy in lung transplant recipients is “feasible, but should still be regarded as a risky undertaking” [135].

Summary

In contrast to the literature concerning randomised trials of management of pregnancy in women with asthma, most studies in women with CF considering pregnancy are observational, without any prospective evaluation of any particular therapies. The increasing number of women with CF who have relatively preserved lung function and nutrition achieving adulthood means that there is an ever-growing number of women considering pregnancy. Management during pregnancy is generally optimised by cooperation of the CF multidisciplinary team in conjunction with the obstetric team and most established adult CF centres have close links with their local obstetric colleagues using “high-risk pregnancy clinics” to coordinate the complex management required.

Pregnancy in women with bronchiectasis

Natural history of pregnancy

In contrast to other airways diseases, the natural history of pregnancy in women with bronchiectasis is much less documented. One of the early case series described three women with idiopathic bronchiectasis who successfully completed term pregnancies [137]. Women with primary ciliary dyskinesia are often subfertile, but not completely infertile, as there are case reports of natural pregnancies [138]. Women with bronchiectasis secondary to other diseases such as immunodeficiency will require consideration of both their primary underlying disease as well as their bronchiectasis when contemplating pregnancy.

Miscarriage rates

Although women with asthma have a slightly increased risk of miscarriage, the risks in women with bronchiectasis are at present unknown. Further studies are now necessary to document whether there is an increased risk of miscarriage in women with established lung disease and whether the different causes of bronchiectasis have different risks during pregnancy. Extrapolating from other airways diseases, it would be expected that all pregnancy-related problems would be increased, reflecting the lack of respiratory reserve dependent on lung function.

Suggestions for follow-up

As there is little literature available, management during pregnancy must be made on clinical acumen. Overall, it is expected that increased clinic visits would be necessary in the second and third trimesters as respiratory compromise from the growing fetus limits airway clearance.

Exercise and nutrition

Clinical experience suggests that exercise and nutritional requirements for optimisation of lung function during pregnancy would be similar to those of CF, except with regard to pancreatic dysfunction. Maintenance of regular moderate intensity exercise and good nutrition throughout pregnancy would be recommended, in keeping with the general population [132].

Physiotherapy

Similar to the issues for women with CF, the growing fetus will impact on the respiratory system and pelvic floor. Optimal airway clearance should continue throughout pregnancy to prevent sputum retention. Modification to airway clearance techniques and physical exercise will be required as pregnancy progresses. No specific programmes for women with bronchiectasis are available in the literature, so most physiotherapists would tailor their therapy to reflect the management of women with CF who become pregnant. Management of the pelvic floor to prevent urinary leakage especially during airway clearance techniques and coughing will most likely require similar interventions as outlined in the section on pregnancy in women with CF.

Management of birth in women with airways diseases

Introduction

Labour is often divided into three stages. The first stage of labour involves the gradual shortening and dilatation of the cervix up to 10 cm. This process may take up to 36 h in the primipara and is shorter in those who have previously had children. The second stage of labour involves the descent of the fetus through the birth canal and delivery, which may take between 30 min and 2 h. The third stage of labour comprises the delivery of the placenta, which may take up to 1 h if not induced.

Labour

During labour, the resting hyperventilation of pregnancy increases further. This still exceeds the increased oxygen demand of labour and delivery, so most healthy women will not have hypoxia or hypercapnia. However, pain and anxiety can lead to rapid shallow breathing and a decrease in alveolar gas exchange. As expected, hypoxia, hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis occur more readily in women with more severe pulmonary disease [139].

There are no published studies specifically addressing intra-partum management in women with respiratory disease. Most applicable guidelines suggest evaluation prior to pregnancy or in early pregnancy, to develop a detailed and individualised management plan for birth, including place and mode of delivery, appropriate monitoring during delivery (e.g. arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry), provision of necessary pulmonary interventions (e.g. inhalers for asthma, physiotherapy for CF and supplemental oxygen as required), and invasive and noninvasive monitoring during and after birth [17, 100]. Adequate pain relief during labour is a high priority for women with CF and other chronic suppurative lung diseases, with a normal vaginal delivery being highly desirable in order to minimise post-delivery complications [140].

Obstetric considerations

As noted in the section on pregnancy in women with asthma, some studies have shown an association between asthma and increased caesarean section rate [141–144], but this may be due to planned caesarean section or an increased rate of induction of labour rather than due to any direct effect of asthma. Moreover, there are no trials to address whether there is any clinical benefit of caesarean section versus vaginal birth in women with respiratory disease. Advantages of natural vaginal delivery include quicker recovery in those with bronchiectasis or CF and some studies suggested that children born by caesarean section in mothers with asthma may have an increased risk of subsequent asthma [145], while other studies did not [146].

Most guidelines suggest that the decision for caesarean section should be made for obstetric indications [17, 147]. However, modification of the birth plan in women with significant airways disease may be required [2]. This may include elective delivery to ensure specialist staff are available, modifications to the second stage of labour to ensure the expulsive phase of labour is not prolonged, adequate analgesia and oxygen as required, and avoidance of general anaesthetic if possible. In women with CF, adequate maintenance of hydration, nutrition and blood glucose control also need to be considered [17].

The use of prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour or oxytocin (for augmentation of the second and third stages) has not been associated with worsening lung function or asthma exacerbation [148]. However, a recent case report outlined a woman with severe bronchiectasis (FEV1 32% predicted) who developed acute hypoxaemia when given oxytocin for uterine contraction [149]. As the hypoxaemia was resistant to supplemental oxygen it was suggested that the oxytocin had increased shunting through the damaged lung. We could find no studies to assess active versus physiological management of the third stage of labour in women with respiratory disease; however, the NICE guidelines advocate an active third stage of labour for women as it is associated with a lower risk of post-partum haemorrhage and/or blood transfusion [150]. As discussed in the following, several of the uterotonics used for post-partum haemorrhage have significant adverse effects on the respiratory system; ergotamine may cause bronchospasm, particularly in association with general anaesthesia [151], so oxytocin is the uterotonic of choice for the active third stage of labour.

Anaesthetic considerations

Pre-delivery evaluation and multidisciplinary planning is the cornerstone in managing pregnant women with respiratory disease. Adequate pain relief will reduce anxiety and maternal stress. Early epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics (with or without opioids) for labour pain is the preferred method. Lumbar epidural analgesia can be extended into safe and proper anaesthesia in the case of an emergency caesarean section, thereby avoiding the need for airway management. Systemic opioids can provide moderate pain relief, but will suppress cough, suppress ventilation and may induce bowel obstruction especially in women with CF. A cautiously titrated epidural for analgesia is generally preferred [152].

Respiratory considerations

Exacerbations of asthma are uncommon during labour [98]. It is generally accepted that usual asthma medications should be continued during childbirth [147]. Inhaled or parenteral β-agonists have been used as a tocolytic in women with threatened pre-term labour [153] or uterine hyperstimulation, but there is no published evidence that inhaled β-agonists used for asthma treatment affect the course of labour. In women receiving oral steroids (7.5 mg daily for at least 2 weeks) there is a potential risk of maternal hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis suppression, which has led to the widespread practice of giving “stress dose” hydrocortisone intravenously during active labour and during caesarean section [147]. For women with more severe disease, assisted ventilation strategies may be considered with appropriate intensive care unit backup. In women with established bronchiectasis, positive end-expiratory pressure may assist by splinting open smaller airways to prevent dynamic airway closure and hence better mobilisation of secretions.

Role of physiotherapy

Pain, shortness of breath and low oxygen saturation during labour are reported in some healthy women during parturition. Women with chronic airways disease would be expected to experience these symptoms at an increased frequency or severity during labour, although this has not yet been documented. Oxygen therapy should be provided to maintain normal saturations as per standard care. Bronchodilator therapy and assistance with sputum clearance may be required by some women during labour.

Summary

There is little evidence at present to guide management decisions in the intra-partum period. Most disease-specific guidelines offer recommendations based on low-grade evidence or consensus opinion. Caesarean section appears to be more common in this population, likely for multifactorial reasons. Active management of the third stage of labour may be considered using oxytocin without ergotamine in women with lung disease.

Post-partum considerations

Introduction

The post-partum period is a particularly vulnerable time for the medically unwell woman, with risks of cardio-respiratory decompensation, infection, sepsis and haemorrhage. Guidelines advocate that the birth management plan includes the first few days post-partum, with recommendations on the location for post-delivery care in the maternity unit or respiratory/high dependency unit balancing the individual needs of the woman and her baby.

Obstetric considerations

Post-partum haemorrhage, defined as ≥500 mL of bleeding within 24 h of birth, occurs in 2.5–5% of women post-delivery. While observational studies have suggested that there is no increase in post-partum haemorrhage in women with lung disease, a meta-analysis showed that there were significant increases in both ante-partum and post-partum haemorrhage [105].

Prostaglandin F2a used to treat post-partum haemorrhage due to uterine atony may cause bronchoconstriction [151]. Although not associated with clinical exacerbations [143], it is recommended not to be used in women with asthma [2]. Ergometrine may also cause bronchospasm particularly in association with general anaesthetics [151]. Women on long-term systemic corticosteroids have an increased risk of poor wound healing and infection, which is especially important after caesarean section in those with suppurative lung disease who require daily airway clearance to maintain health. As the risk of post-partum venous thromboembolic disease is increased in those with immobility [154], it is important that women are mobilised or thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin may need to be considered.

Anaesthetic considerations

Optimal post-partum analgesia allows early mobilisation with minimal side-effects. Pain should be assessed and managed in a multimodal way. The respiratory depressant effect of opioids and suppression of cough are particularly important in women with respiratory diseases. The level of care and monitoring post-partum should be considered in a multidisciplinary setting balancing both obstetric and airway risks for the mother with any risks for the newborn.

Respiratory considerations

Some older studies have noted an increased risk of post-partum asthma exacerbation in women having caesarean sections [143], but this group was generally not taking ICSs. For CF and bronchiectasis, the outcomes are less well known.

Physiotherapy in the postnatal period

Physical support for the mother is important after birth to allow sufficient time to inhale medications, perform airway clearance therapy and exercise to prevent exacerbations. These factors are more important after caesarean section, especially in those with underlying airways disease (see previous sections).

Breastfeeding issues

Breastfeeding is universally advocated in international maternity guidelines. However, for some women with significant airways disease, nutritional, pharmacological and other factors need to be considered. Medications commonly used in women with airways disease and their evidence for use during breastfeeding are described in tables 2–5.

It is generally accepted that the composition of salts and proteins in the breast milk from a woman with CF are within normal limits [155]. As breastfeeding increases maternal protein, calcium and overall caloric requirements by ∼500 kcal·day−1, an individualised approach is necessary especially for women with CF. These concerns should be balanced with the beneficial effects of breastfeeding overall (see tables 2–5).

Summary

While there is little evidence to guide management decisions in the immediate post-partum period and most disease-specific guidelines offer recommendations based on low-grade evidence or consensus opinion, post-partum haemorrhage may be increased in women with asthma and medications used for the management of post-partum haemorrhage may affect the respiratory system. Close collaboration between the obstetric and respiratory teams is necessary to optimise management.

Patients' views about family planning, pregnancy and parenthood

The European Lung Foundation, in collaboration with patient volunteers, designed an online survey to better understand women's views about conception, pregnancy and childbirth when living with an airways disease. The survey was open to women from 26 countries with a variety of lung conditions, but this summary only examines the views of those with asthma (n=162), CF (n=154) and bronchiectasis (n=15). Respondents included those who had never been pregnant (n=132), those who were currently pregnant (n=18) and those who had been pregnant in the past (n=181).

Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire-based survey outlining how important they considered the impact of their lung condition on fertility, pregnancy and the ability to parent. Responses varied across conditions and between those who had been or were currently pregnant and those who had never been pregnant. Relatively few respondents with asthma (25%) considered their asthma of importance for fertility, whereas many respondents with CF and bronchiectasis found their disease of importance for fertility (78% and 73%, respectively). For pregnancy itself, 54% of respondents with asthma rated their condition as important compared with 85% of respondents with CF and 63% of respondents with bronchiectasis. The ability to parent with their lung condition was considered important or very important for 32% of respondents with asthma, 92% of respondents with CF and 73% of respondents with bronchiectasis. Across the three conditions, those who had never been pregnant described fertility, pregnancy and the ability to parent as more of a problem due to their condition. This may reflect some women who have chosen not to have children due to their condition and, in particular, those who were motivated to complete an online survey.

Furthermore, respondents were invited to add free-text answers relating to the following questions:

  • 1) What support they would have found beneficial.

  • 2) Further information they would have liked.

  • 3) Whether their lung condition influenced their decision to have children.

  • 4) Standards of care during their pregnancy.

Asthma

The decision to get pregnant was not influenced by having asthma and many women felt that it did not affect their pregnancy adversely. Some were very concerned about their asthma worsening during pregnancy or were worried about their ability to take care of their current offspring. Respondents were not confident that they could recognise the signs of asthma deterioration. Those women with a respiratory specialist valued having this input and many of those without a respiratory specialist would have liked to have seen one while pregnant. Many felt that primary care was not able to answer all questions about continuing medications and their effects on the offspring while pregnant and breastfeeding. Women accessed information from patient organisations and felt that asthma was often not adequately addressed during their pregnancy. Furthermore, options concerning birth and postnatal care were not adequately covered in all cases.

Cystic fibrosis

Women with CF are very aware of the difficulty in getting pregnant, the need for genetic testing and the impact of pregnancy on their health. Many respondents reported not getting pregnant due to fears of their child having CF and the impact on the health of the offspring. Some felt the risk of not being well enough to care for their child or potentially dying before their child was an adult was too big a chance to take. Some were worried that they would regret not trying to have children but felt conflicted due to these concerns. Many women reported that they could not afford fertility treatments, and some felt the length of time needed to get genetic tests and find a maternity unit that understands CF should be flagged with patients earlier. Some women felt surrogacy was their best chance of becoming a parent, although this is not available in all countries. Many women felt that having CF would be an issue for adoption. Many women felt that too much emphasis was placed on pregnancy and not enough priority was given to being a parent while living with CF. Women described the impact of having a child on their health, which was similar to the experience of the respondents with bronchiectasis described below.

Those who were or had been pregnant acknowledged that their pregnancy was not without worry, but that they were very motivated to have a child. Some reported having their children early due to concerns about their life expectancy. Several women stated that due to the impact of their first child on their health, they had chosen not to have another child. Women reported that they would appreciate networking with other mothers living with CF to discuss the practical issues of parenting. A recent online survey in Australia using closed-group moderated discussions showed that women with CF desired more information about childbearing, expressing concern about the safety of their CF medications during pregnancy [156].

Bronchiectasis

Overall, women reported that they did not give their condition much thought and were more focused on getting pregnant. However, some did report that they would not have more children due to the impact on their lungs. They described feeling “well looked after” with involvement and coordination between their respiratory and obstetrics teams. Some emphasised the impact as a parent with a chronic lung condition of having a small child who brings illnesses into the home. They felt that there should be more support about how to manage this issue. Women also related that the strain of caring for a newborn was very difficult given their condition and felt that further support for mothers with bronchiectasis was needed to mitigate these difficulties.

Summary

The patients’ perspective concerning conception, pregnancy and the postnatal period differs markedly between the three conditions. Those with asthma and bronchiectasis often do not consider their condition when deciding whether to try to conceive, in contrast to the protracted decisions for those with CF. While respondents with asthma reported not having access to respiratory professionals during their pregnancy, those with bronchiectasis did not have this problem. For CF, the issue raised was often the difficulty finding obstetric specialists who had experience of dealing with pregnancy in women with CF and the length of time taken for genetic testing and fertility treatments. In general, women with chronic airways disease felt that they were not adequately prepared for the postnatal period and parenthood in general.

Conclusions

This statement outlines the current level of knowledge concerning the management of women with asthma, CF and bronchiectasis before, during and after pregnancy. In general, for pregnancy-related issues in women with airways diseases there are very few randomised controlled trials, so the evidence consists of cross-sectional surveys, case series and post hoc analysis of other trials. However, recent longitudinal cohort studies are starting to address issues of clinical management in women with asthma, reflecting difficulties for women with asthma to conceive and maintain lung function during pregnancy and parturition. For CF and bronchiectasis there are few trials in this important area, so the data relate to considered opinion. For women with bronchiectasis, conception is less an issue than the post-partum issue of maternal respiratory infections. In women with CF, there are well-described conception difficulties together with the post-partum infection problem.

Tables 2–5 on drugs and their risks provide a summary for both respiratory and obstetric teams to rapidly refer to data concerning multiple drugs in different situations, but for more detailed information concerning a particular medication, the appropriate governmental listing should be consulted.

Patients’ perspectives reveal that better guidance and involvement of respiratory physicians would reduce some of the concerns of women with asthma during pregnancy, while the majority of women with CF preferred management by a dedicated multidisciplinary team.

Lastly, this Task Force has summarised issues concerning pregnancy in women with airways disease, but has not addressed the offspring of these pregnancies and the future risk of disease in these offspring.

Recommendations for future research/questions

General issues

  • 1) What are the fertility issues for women with airways diseases and what biomarkers can be determined for reduced fertility?

  • 2) What are the relative outcomes of pregnancy for women with different airways diseases?

  • 3) What is the best way to optimise treatment in women with airways diseases?

  • 4) What factors can predict risk of bad outcomes (miscarriage, stillbirth, poor obstetric outcomes)?

Obstetric issues

  • 5) What pain relief options during birth are optimal for women with airways disease?

  • 6) What uterotonics should be avoided in the third stage of labour?

  • 7) What is the optimal dose of “stress dose” hydrocortisone to cover labour and caesarean section?

Future issues

  • 8) What are the future risks to the mother with airways disease after pregnancy?

  • 9) What are the future risks (if any) for children born to mothers with different airways diseases?

  • 10) What is the best way to minimise these risks to the offspring?

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary material: appendix 1 ERJ-01208-2019.SUPPLEMENT

Shareable PDF

Supplementary Material

This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

Shareable PDF ERJ-01208-2019.Shareable

Acknowledgements

The online survey was performed in collaboration with Marta Almagro, Annette Posthumus, Betty Frankemölle, Kenneth Hilliyard, Katie Gathercole, Hilde de Keyser, Jasmine Parkinson, Gill Hollis and Jill Pateman (European Lung Foundation). Respondents came from Andorra, Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Columbia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Lichtenstein, Luxemburg, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, United Arab Emirates, UK and USA.

Footnotes

  • This document was endorsed by the ERS Executive Committee on 10 September, 2019, and by the European Cystic Fibrosis Society on 11 July, 2019, and Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand on 24 September 2019.

  • This article has supplementary material available from erj.ersjournals.com

  • Support statement: This work was supported by the European Respiratory Society (grant: TF-2016-23) and the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Conflict of interest: P.G. Middleton has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: E.J. Gade has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Aguilera has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: L. Mackillop reports grants from NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, personal fees from Sensyne Health plc, outside the submitted work; and was a member of the UK's NICE guideline committee for Intrapartum Care for High Risk Women which included a section on women with asthma.

  • Conflict of interest: B.M. Button has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Coleman is an employee of the European Lung Foundation.

  • Conflict of interest: B. Johnson is an employee of the European Lung Foundation.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Albrechtsen has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: F. Edenborough has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Rigau acts a European Respiratory Society methodologist.

  • Conflict of interest: P.G. Gibson reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Sanofi, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: V. Backer has nothing to disclose.

  • Received June 19, 2019.
  • Accepted August 30, 2019.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2020
https://www.ersjournals.com/user-licence

References

  1. ↵
    1. Edwards N,
    2. Middleton PG,
    3. Blyton DM, et al.
    Sleep disordered breathing and pregnancy. Thorax 2002; 57: 555–558. doi:10.1136/thorax.57.6.555
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care for women with existing medical conditions or obstetric complications and their babies. NG121. 2019. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng121 Date last accessed: October 19, 2019.
  3. ↵
    1. Gade EJ,
    2. Thomsen SF,
    3. Lindenberg S, et al.
    Asthma affects time to pregnancy and fertility: a register-based twin study. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1077–1085. doi:10.1183/09031936.00148713
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Burgel PR,
    2. Bellis G,
    3. Olesen HV, et al.
    Future trends in cystic fibrosis demography in 34 European countries. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 133–141. doi:10.1183/09031936.00196314
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Tata LJ,
    2. Hubbard RB,
    3. McKeever TM, et al.
    Fertility rates in women with asthma, eczema, and hay fever: a general population-based cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165: 1023–1030. doi:10.1093/aje/kwk092
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Grzeskowiak LE,
    2. Smithers LG,
    3. Grieger JA, et al.
    Asthma treatment impacts time to pregnancy: evidence from the international SCOPE study. Eur Respir J 2018; 51: 1702035. doi:10.1183/13993003.02035-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Gade EJ,
    2. Thomsen SF,
    3. Lindenberg S, et al.
    Fertility outcomes in asthma: a clinical study of 245 women with unexplained infertility. Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1144–1151. doi:10.1183/13993003.01389-2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Vejen Hansen A,
    2. Ali Z,
    3. Malchau SS, et al.
    Fertility treatment among women with asthma: a case–control study of 3689 women with live births. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1800597. doi:10.1183/13993003.00597-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. MacKenzie T,
    2. Gifford AH,
    3. Sabadosa KA, et al.
    Longevity of patients with cystic fibrosis in 2000 to 2010 and beyond: survival analysis of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation patient registry. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161: 233–241. doi:10.7326/M13-0636
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. de Souza DAS,
    2. Faucz FR,
    3. Pereira-Ferrari L, et al.
    Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens as an atypical form of cystic fibrosis: reproductive implications and genetic counseling. Andrology 2018; 6: 127–135. doi:10.1111/andr.12450
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Aittomaki K,
    2. Wennerholm UB,
    3. Bergh C, et al.
    Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: should ICSI patients have genetic testing before treatment? A practical proposition to help patient information. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 472–476. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh100
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Tizzano EF,
    2. Buchwald M
    . CFTR expression and organ damage in cystic fibrosis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 305–308. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-123-4-199508150-00009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Edenborough FP
    . Women with cystic fibrosis and their potential for reproduction. Thorax 2001; 56: 649–655. doi:10.1136/thorax.56.8.649
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Shteinberg M,
    2. Lulu AB,
    3. Downey DG, et al.
    Failure to conceive in women with CF is associated with pancreatic insufficiency and advancing age. J Cyst Fibros 2019; 18: 525–529. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2018.10.009
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Reynaud Q,
    2. Poupon-Bourdy S,
    3. Rabilloud M, et al.
    Pregnancy outcome in women with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96: 1223–1227. doi:10.1111/aogs.13185
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Kitzmiller JL,
    2. Gavin LA,
    3. Gin GD, et al.
    Preconception care of diabetes. Glycemic control prevents congenital anomalies. JAMA 1991; 265: 731–736. doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460060063025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Edenborough FP,
    2. Borgo G,
    3. Knoop C, et al.
    Guidelines for the management of pregnancy in women with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2008; 7: Suppl. 1, S2–32. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2007.10.001
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Moran A,
    2. Brunzell C,
    3. Cohen RC, et al.
    Clinical care guidelines for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and a clinical practice guideline of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, endorsed by the Pediatric Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 2697–2708. doi:10.2337/dc10-1768
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Middleton PG,
    2. Wagenaar M,
    3. Matson AG, et al.
    Australian standards of care for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. Respirology 2014; 19: 185–192. doi:10.1111/resp.12227
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods: product name and formulation details. 2019. www.tga.gov.au/artg Date last accessed: March 1, 2019.
  21. ↵
    European Medicines Agency. Medicines. 2019. www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines Date last accessed: March 1, 2019.
  22. ↵
    Food and Drug Administration. Labeling information for drug products. 2019. www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/labeling-information-drug-products Date last accessed: March 1, 2019.
  23. ↵
    National Library of Medicine. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed). 2019. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK501200 Date last accessed: March 1, 2019.
  24. ↵
    1. Briggs GG,
    2. Freeman RK,
    3. Yaffe SL
    . Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk. 10th Edn. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer Health, 2015.
  25. ↵
    1. Schaefer C,
    2. Peters PWJ,
    3. Miller RK
    . Drugs During Pregnancy and Lactation: Treatment Options and Risk Assessment. 3rd Edn. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 2015.
    1. Eltonsy S,
    2. Forget A,
    3. Blais L
    . Beta2-agonists use during pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2011; 91: 937–947. doi:10.1002/bdra.22850
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Murphy VE,
    2. Wang G,
    3. Namazy JA, et al.
    The risk of congenital malformations, perinatal mortality and neonatal hospitalisation among pregnant women with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 120: 812–822. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12224
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Van Zutphen AR,
    2. Bell EM,
    3. Browne ML, et al.
    Maternal asthma medication use during pregnancy and risk of congenital heart defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2015; 103: 951–961. doi:10.1002/bdra.23437
    OpenUrl
    1. Garne E,
    2. Vinkel Hansen A,
    3. Morris J, et al.
    Risk of congenital anomalies after exposure to asthma medication in the first trimester of pregnancy – a cohort linkage study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 123: 1609–1618. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14026
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Gilchrist DM,
    2. Friedman JM,
    3. Werker D
    . Life-threatening status asthmaticus at 12.5 weeks gestation: report of a normal pregnancy outcome. Chest 1991; 100: 285–286. doi:10.1378/chest.100.1.285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Yeh TF,
    2. Pildes RS
    . Transplacental aminophylline toxicity in a neonate. Lancet 1977; 309: 910.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Norjavaara E,
    2. de Verdier MG
    . Normal pregnancy outcomes in a population-based study including 2968 pregnant women exposed to budesonide. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111: 736–742. doi:10.1067/mai.2003.1340
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Rahimi R,
    2. Nikfar S,
    3. Abdollahi M
    . Meta-analysis finds use of inhaled corticosteroids during pregnancy safe: a systematic meta-analysis review. Hum Exp Toxicol 2006; 25: 447–452. doi:10.1191/0960327106het647oa
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Blais L,
    2. Beauchesne MF,
    3. Lemiere C, et al.
    High doses of inhaled corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital malformations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124: 1229–1234. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Katz VL,
    2. Thorp JM Jr.,
    3. Bowes WA Jr.
    . Severe symmetric intrauterine growth retardation associated with the topical use of triamcinolone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 396–397. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(90)90394-M
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Chi CC,
    2. Mayon-White RT,
    3. Wojnarowska FT
    . Safety of topical corticosteroids in pregnancy: a population-based cohort study. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131: 884–891. doi:10.1038/jid.2010.392
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Czeizel AE,
    2. Rockenbauer M
    . Population-based case-control study of teratogenic potential of corticosteroids. Teratology 1997; 56: 335–340. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199711)56:5<335::AID-TERA7>3.0.CO;2-W
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Park-Wyllie L,
    2. Mazzotta P,
    3. Pastuszak A, et al.
    Birth defects after maternal exposure to corticosteroids: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Teratology 2000; 62: 385–392. doi:10.1002/1096-9926(200012)62:6<385::AID-TERA5>3.0.CO;2-Z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Schatz M,
    2. Zeiger RS,
    3. Harden K, et al.
    The safety of asthma and allergy medications during pregnancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 100: 301–306. doi:10.1016/S0091-6749(97)70241-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bakhireva LN,
    2. Jones KL,
    3. Schatz M, et al.
    Asthma medication use in pregnancy and fetal growth. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 116: 503–509. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Sarkar M,
    2. Koren G,
    3. Kalra S, et al.
    Montelukast use during pregnancy: a multicentre, prospective, comparative study of infant outcomes. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 65: 1259–1264. doi:10.1007/s00228-009-0713-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cavero-Carbonell C,
    2. Vinkel-Hansen A,
    3. Rabanque-Hernandez MJ, et al.
    Fetal exposure to montelukast and congenital anomalies: a population based study in Denmark. Birth Defects Res 2017; 109: 452–459. 10.1002/bdra.23621.
    OpenUrl
    1. Datta P,
    2. Rewers-Felkins K,
    3. Baker T, et al.
    Transfer of montelukast into human milk during lactation. Breastfeed Med 2017; 12: 54–57. doi:10.1089/bfm.2016.0162
    OpenUrl
    1. Heinonen OP,
    2. Slone D,
    3. Shapiro S
    . Birth Defects and Drugs in Pregnancy. Littleton, Publishing Sciences Group, 1977.
    1. Diav-Citrin O,
    2. Shechtman S,
    3. Aharonovich A, et al.
    Pregnancy outcome after gestational exposure to loratadine or antihistamines: a prospective controlled cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111: 1239–1243. doi:10.1067/mai.2003.1499
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Weber-Schoendorfer C,
    2. Schaefer C
    . The safety of cetirizine during pregnancy. A prospective observational cohort study. Reprod Toxicol 2008; 26: 19–23. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.05.053
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Schwarz EB,
    2. Moretti ME,
    3. Nayak S, et al.
    Risk of hypospadias in offspring of women using loratadine during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Saf 2008; 31: 775–788. doi:10.2165/00002018-200831090-00006
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Gilboa SM,
    2. Strickland MJ,
    3. Olshan AF, et al.
    Use of antihistamine medications during early pregnancy and isolated major malformations. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2009; 85: 137–150. doi:10.1002/bdra.20513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lind JN,
    2. Tinker SC,
    3. Broussard CS, et al.
    Maternal medication and herbal use and risk for hypospadias: data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2007. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2013; 22: 783–793. doi:10.1002/pds.3448
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Li Q,
    2. Mitchell AA,
    3. Werler MM, et al.
    Assessment of antihistamine use in early pregnancy and birth defects. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2013; 1: 666–674. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2013.07.008
    OpenUrl
    1. Golembesky A,
    2. Cooney M,
    3. Boev R, et al.
    Safety of cetirizine in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 38: 940–945. doi:10.1080/01443615.2018.1441271
    OpenUrl
    1. Zierler S,
    2. Purohit D
    . Prenatal antihistamine exposure and retrolental fibroplasia. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123: 192–196. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114214
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hirashima J,
    2. Hojo M,
    3. Iikura M, et al.
    [A case of an asthma patient receiving omalizumab during pregnancy]. Arerugi 2012; 61: 1683–1687.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kupryś-Lipińska I,
    2. Tworek D,
    3. Kuna P
    . Omalizumab in pregnant women treated due to severe asthma: two case reports of good outcomes of pregnancies. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2014; 31: 104–107.
    OpenUrl
    1. Namazy J,
    2. Cabana MD,
    3. Scheuerle AE, et al.
    The Xolair Pregnancy Registry (EXPECT): the safety of omalizumab use during pregnancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 135: 407–412. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.025
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Kaminski R,
    2. Nazareth D
    . A successful uncomplicated CF pregnancy while remaining on Ivacaftor. J Cyst Fibros 2016; 15: 133–134. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2015.11.013
    OpenUrl
    1. Ladores S,
    2. Kazmerski TM,
    3. Rowe SM
    . A case report of pregnancy during use of targeted therapeutics for cystic fibrosis. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2017; 46: 72–77. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.011
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Trimble A,
    2. McKinzie C,
    3. Terrell M, et al.
    Measured fetal and neonatal exposure to Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor during pregnancy and while breastfeeding. J Cyst Fibros 2018; 17: 779–782. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2018.05.009
    OpenUrl
    1. Lin KJ,
    2. Mitchell AA,
    3. Yau WP, et al.
    Maternal exposure to amoxicillin and the risk of oral clefts. Epidemiology 2012; 23: 699–705. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e318258cb05
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kenyon S,
    2. Taylor DJ,
    3. Tarnow-Mordi WO, et al.
    ORACLE – antibiotics for preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: short-term and long-term outcomes. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2002; 91: 12–15. doi:10.1080/08035250260095735
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lund M,
    2. Pasternak B,
    3. Davidsen RB, et al.
    Use of macrolides in mother and child and risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2014; 348: g1908. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1908
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Loebstein R,
    2. Addis A,
    3. Ho E, et al.
    Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to fluoroquinolones: a multicenter prospective controlled study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 1336–1339. doi:10.1128/AAC.42.6.1336
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hernandez-Diaz S,
    2. Werler MM,
    3. Walker AM, et al.
    Folic acid antagonists during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1608–1614. doi:10.1056/NEJM200011303432204
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ford N,
    2. Shubber Z,
    3. Jao J, et al.
    Safety of cotrimoxazole in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 66: 512–521. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000211
    OpenUrl
    1. Hansen C,
    2. Andrade SE,
    3. Freiman H, et al.
    Trimethoprim-sulfonamide use during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital anomalies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016; 25: 170–178. doi:10.1002/pds.3919
    OpenUrl
    1. Kallen BA,
    2. Otterblad Olausson P,
    3. Danielsson BR
    . Is erythromycin therapy teratogenic in humans? Reprod Toxicol 2005; 20: 209–214. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.01.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Steen JS,
    2. Stainton-Ellis DM
    . Rifampicin in pregnancy. Lancet 1977; 2: 604–605. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(77)91447-7
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Czeizel AE,
    2. Rockenbauer M,
    3. Olsen J, et al.
    A population-based case-control study of the safety of oral anti-tuberculosis drug treatment during pregnancy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001; 5: 564–568.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Jones HC
    . Intrauterine ototoxicity. A case report and review of literature. J Natl Med Assoc 1973; 65: 201–203.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Reyes MP,
    2. Ostrea EM Jr.,
    3. Cabinian AE, et al.
    Vancomycin during pregnancy: does it cause hearing loss or nephrotoxicity in the infant? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 977–981. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(89)90766-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Mueller M,
    2. Balasegaram M,
    3. Koummuki Y, et al.
    A comparison of liposomal amphotericin B with sodium stibogluconate for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in pregnancy in Sudan. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58: 811–815. doi:10.1093/jac/dkl342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lopez-Rangel E,
    2. Van Allen MI
    . Prenatal exposure to fluconazole: an identifiable dysmorphic phenotype. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005; 73: 919–923. doi:10.1002/bdra.20189
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Aschenbrenner DS
    . The FDA reevaluates oral fluconazole use in pregnancy. Am J Nurs 2016; 116: 22. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000503292.82358.3c
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Pilmis B,
    2. Jullien V,
    3. Sobel J, et al.
    Antifungal drugs during pregnancy: an updated review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015; 70: 14–22. doi:10.1093/jac/dku355
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shoai Tehrani M,
    2. Sicre de Fontbrune F,
    3. Roth P, et al.
    Case report of exposure to voriconazole in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57: 1094–1095. doi:10.1128/AAC.00899-12
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. National Academy of Sciences. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, National Academies Press, 2001.
    1. Garbis H,
    2. Elefant E,
    3. Diav-Citrin O, et al.
    Pregnancy outcome after exposure to ranitidine and other H2-blockers. A collaborative study of the European Network of Teratology Information Services. Reprod Toxicol 2005; 19: 453–458. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.09.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Matok I,
    2. Gorodischer R,
    3. Koren G, et al.
    The safety of H2-blockers use during pregnancy. J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 50: 81–87. doi:10.1177/0091270009350483
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gill SK,
    2. O'Brien L,
    3. Einarson TR, et al.
    The safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1541–1545. doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.122
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kallen B
    . Delivery outcome after the use of acid-suppressing drugs in early pregnancy with special reference to omeprazole. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 877–881. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10233.x
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Anderka M,
    2. Mitchell AA,
    3. Louik C, et al.
    Medications used to treat nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012; 94: 22–30. doi:10.1002/bdra.22865
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Vargas FR,
    2. Schuler-Faccini L,
    3. Brunoni D, et al.
    Prenatal exposure to misoprostol and vascular disruption defects: a case-control study. Am J Med Genet 2000; 95: 302–306. doi:10.1002/1096-8628(20001211)95:4<302::AID-AJMG2>3.0.CO;2-B
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Powell H,
    2. Murphy VE,
    3. Taylor DR, et al.
    Management of asthma in pregnancy guided by measurement of fraction of exhaled nitric oxide: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 983–990. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60971-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Reddel HK,
    2. Bateman ED,
    3. Becker A, et al.
    A summary of the new GINA strategy: a roadmap to asthma control. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 622–639. doi:10.1183/13993003.00853-2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Powell H,
    2. Murphy VE,
    3. Hensley MJ, et al.
    Rhinitis in pregnant women with asthma is associated with poorer asthma control and quality of life. J Asthma 2015; 52: 1023–1030. doi:10.3109/02770903.2015.1054403
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Murphy VE,
    2. Jensen ME,
    3. Powell H, et al.
    Influence of maternal body mass index and macrophage activation on asthma exacerbations in pregnancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2017; 5: 981–987. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.040
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Williams MA,
    2. Gelaye B,
    3. Qiu C, et al.
    Habitual snoring and asthma comorbidity among pregnant women. J Asthma 2011; 48: 91–97. doi:10.3109/02770903.2010.535882
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Murphy VE,
    2. Clifton VL,
    3. Gibson PG
    . The effect of cigarette smoking on asthma control during exacerbations in pregnant women. Thorax 2010; 65: 739–744. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.124941
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Murphy VE,
    2. Powell H,
    3. Wark PAB, et al.
    A prospective study of respiratory viral infection in pregnant women with and without asthma. Chest 2013; 144: 420–427. doi:10.1378/chest.12-1956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Murphy VE,
    2. Gibson PG,
    3. Talbot PI, et al.
    Asthma self-management skills and the use of asthma education during pregnancy. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 435–441. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00135604
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Robijn AL,
    2. Jensen ME,
    3. Gibson PG, et al.
    Trends in asthma self-management skills and inhaled corticosteroid use during pregnancy and postpartum from 2004 to 2017. J Asthma 2019; 56: 594–602. doi:10.1080/02770903.2018.1471709
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Gluck JC,
    2. Gluck P
    . The effects of pregnancy on asthma: a prospective study. Ann Allergy 1976; 37: 164–168.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Gluck JC,
    2. Gluck PA
    . The effect of pregnancy on the course of asthma. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2006; 26: 63–80. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2005.10.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Schatz M,
    2. Harden K,
    3. Forsythe A, et al.
    The course of asthma during pregnancy, post partum, and with successive pregnancies: a prospective analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 81: 509–517. doi:10.1016/0091-6749(88)90187-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Gluck JC
    . The change of asthma course during pregnancy. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2004; 26: 171–180. doi:10.1385/CRIAI:26:3:171
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Gluck PA,
    2. Gluck JC
    . Asthma in women: special considerations. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006; 96: 635.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Grosso A,
    2. Locatelli F,
    3. Gini E, et al.
    The course of asthma during pregnancy in a recent, multicase–control study on respiratory health. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2018; 14: 16. doi:10.1186/s13223-018-0242-0
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Murphy VE,
    2. Clifton VL,
    3. Gibson PG
    . Asthma exacerbations during pregnancy: incidence and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thorax 2006; 61: 169–176. doi:10.1136/thx.2005.049718
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Bateman ED,
    2. Hurd SS,
    3. Barnes PJ, et al.
    Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 143–178. doi:10.1183/09031936.00138707
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. NAEPP Expert Panel Report. Managing asthma during pregnancy: recommendations for pharmacologic treatment – 2004 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115: 34–46. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.10.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. McLaughlin K,
    2. Kable A,
    3. Ebert L, et al.
    Midwives’ perception of their role in providing antenatal asthma management in Australia – a qualitative study. Midwifery 2016; 35: 11–16. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.016
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Murphy VE,
    2. Namazy JA,
    3. Powell H, et al.
    A meta-analysis of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 118: 1314–1323. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03055.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    1. Namazy JA,
    2. Murphy VE,
    3. Powell H, et al.
    Effects of asthma severity, exacerbations and oral corticosteroids on perinatal outcomes. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 1082–1090. doi:10.1183/09031936.00195111
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Murphy VE,
    2. Schatz M
    . Asthma in pregnancy: a hit for two. Eur Respir Rev 2014; 23: 64–68. doi:10.1183/09059180.00008313
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Wang G,
    2. Murphy VE,
    3. Namazy J, et al.
    The risk of maternal and placental complications in pregnant women with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 934–942. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.847080
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Morten M,
    2. Collison A,
    3. Murphy VE, et al.
    Managing Asthma in Pregnancy (MAP) trial: FENO levels and childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 142: 1765–1772. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.039.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Blais L,
    2. Beauchesne MF,
    3. Rey E, et al.
    Use of inhaled corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations among women with asthma. Thorax 2007; 62: 320–328. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.062950
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Eltonsy S,
    2. Forget A,
    3. Beauchesne MF, et al.
    Risk of congenital malformations for asthmatic pregnant women using a long-acting beta2-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid combination versus higher-dose inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 135: 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.051
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Huang L,
    2. Fan L,
    3. Ding P, et al.
    The mediating role of placenta in the relationship between maternal exercise during pregnancy and full-term low birth weight. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 1561–1567. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1319936
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Daly N,
    2. Farren M,
    3. McKeating A, et al.
    A medically supervised pregnancy exercise intervention in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: 1001–1010. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002267
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Jensen ME,
    2. Murphy VE,
    3. Gibson PG, et al.
    Vitamin D status in pregnant women with asthma and its association with adverse respiratory outcomes during infancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 32: 1820–1825. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1419176
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Hornsby E,
    2. Pfeffer PE,
    3. Laranjo N, et al.
    Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: effect on the neonatal immune system in a randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 141: 269–278. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.039
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. van Odijk J,
    2. Kull I,
    3. Borres MP, et al.
    Breastfeeding and allergic disease: a multidisciplinary review of the literature (1966–2001) on the mode of early feeding in infancy and its impact on later atopic manifestations. Allergy 2003; 58: 833–843. doi:10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00264.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Sears MR,
    2. Greene JM,
    3. Willan AR, et al.
    Long-term relation between breastfeeding and development of atopy and asthma in children and young adults: a longitudinal study. Lancet 2002; 360: 901–907. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11025-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. McLaughlin K,
    2. Foureur M,
    3. Jensen ME, et al.
    Review and appraisal of guidelines for the management of asthma during pregnancy. Women Birth 2018; 31: e349–e357. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.008
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Gilljam M,
    2. Antoniou M,
    3. Shin J, et al.
    Pregnancy in cystic fibrosis. Fetal and maternal outcome. Chest 2000; 118: 85–91. doi:10.1378/chest.118.1.85
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    1. Siegel B,
    2. Siegel S
    . Pregnancy and delivery in a patient with cystic fibrosis of the pancreas: report of a case. Obstet Gynecol 1960; 16: 438–440.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    1. Cohen LF,
    2. di Sant'Agnese PA,
    3. Friedlander J
    . Cystic fibrosis and pregnancy: a national survey. Lancet 1980; 316: 842–844. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(80)90183-X
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Edenborough FP,
    2. Mackenzie WE,
    3. Stableforth DE
    . The outcome of 72 pregnancies in 55 women with cystic fibrosis in the United Kingdom 1977–1996. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 254–261. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11697.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  72. ↵
    1. Jelin AC,
    2. Sharshiner R,
    3. Caughey AB
    . Maternal co-morbidities and neonatal outcomes associated with cystic fibrosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30: 4–7. doi:10.3109/14767058.2016.1161747
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Palmer J,
    2. Dillon-Baker C,
    3. Tecklin JS, et al.
    Pregnancy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Ann Intern Med 1983; 99: 596–600. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-99-5-596
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. Canny GJ
    . Pregnancy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Can Med Assoc J 1993; 149: 805–806.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Jankelson D,
    2. Robinson M,
    3. Parsons S, et al.
    Cystic fibrosis and pregnancy. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38: 180–184. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.tb02997.x
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    1. Goss CH,
    2. Rubenfeld GD,
    3. Otto K, et al.
    The effect of pregnancy on survival in women with cystic fibrosis. Chest 2003; 124: 1460–1468. doi:10.1378/chest.124.4.1460
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Schechter MS,
    2. Quittner AL,
    3. Konstan MW, et al.
    Long-term effects of pregnancy and motherhood on disease outcomes of women with cystic fibrosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013; 10: 213–219. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201211-108OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Thorpe-Beeston JG,
    2. Madge S,
    3. Gyi K, et al.
    The outcome of pregnancies in women with cystic fibrosis – single centre experience 1998–2011. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 120: 354–361. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12040
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Bose D,
    2. Yentis SM,
    3. Fauvel NJ
    . Caesarean section in a parturient with respiratory failure caused by cystic fibrosis. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 578–582. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1997.132-az0128.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. ↵
    1. Frangolias DD,
    2. Nakielna EM,
    3. Wilcox PG
    . Pregnancy and cystic fibrosis: a case-controlled study. Chest 1997; 111: 963–969. doi:10.1378/chest.111.4.963
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. ↵
    1. Tanser SJ,
    2. Hodson ME,
    3. Geddes DM
    . Case reports of death during pregnancy in patients with cystic fibrosis – three out of four patients were colonized with Burkholderia cepacia. Respir Med 2000; 94: 1004–1006. doi:10.1053/rmed.2000.0884
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Goss CH,
    2. VanDevanter DR
    . CFTR modulators and pregnancy: our work has only just begun. J Cyst Fibros 2016; 15: 6–7. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2015.12.019
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. Heltshe SL,
    2. Godfrey EM,
    3. Josephy T, et al.
    Pregnancy among cystic fibrosis women in the era of CFTR modulators. J Cyst Fibros 2017; 16: 687–694. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2017.01.008
    OpenUrl
  84. ↵
    UK Chief Medical Officer. Physical activity in pregnancy. 2016. www.gov.uk/government/publications/start-active-stay-active-infographics-on-physical-activity Date last accessed: October 19, 2019.
  85. ↵
    1. Button BM,
    2. Wilson C,
    3. Dentice R, et al.
    Physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis in Australia and New Zealand: a clinical practice guideline. Respirology 2016; 21: 656–667. doi:10.1111/resp.12764
    OpenUrl
  86. ↵
    1. Button B
    . Physiotherapy during pregnancy, labour and the post-natal period. 2018. https://www.ecfs.eu/sites/default/files/general-content-files/working-groups/IPG%20CF_Blue%20Booklet_7th%20edition%202019.pdf Date last accessed: October 19, 2019.
  87. ↵
    1. Gyi KM,
    2. Hodson ME,
    3. Yacoub MY
    . Pregnancy in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients: case series and review. J Cyst Fibros 2006; 5: 171–175. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2006.03.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. ↵
    1. Shaner J,
    2. Coscia LA,
    3. Constantinescu S, et al.
    Pregnancy after lung transplant. Prog Transplant 2012; 22: 134–140. doi:10.7182/pit2012285
    OpenUrl
  89. ↵
    1. Howie AD,
    2. Milne JA
    . Pregnancy in patients with bronchiectasis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 85: 197–200. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1978.tb10480.x
    OpenUrlPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Afzelius BA,
    2. Eliasson R
    . Male and female infertility problems in the immotile-cilia syndrome. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl 1983; 127: 144–147.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Elkus R,
    2. Popovich J Jr.
    . Respiratory physiology in pregnancy. Clin Chest Med 1992; 13: 555–565.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  92. ↵
    1. Johannesson M
    . Effects of pregnancy on health: certain aspects of importance for women with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2002; 1: 9–12. doi:10.1016/S1569-1993(01)00005-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Stenius-Aarniala B,
    2. Piirila P,
    3. Teramo K
    . Asthma and pregnancy: a prospective study of 198 pregnancies. Thorax 1988; 43: 12–18. doi:10.1136/thx.43.1.12
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dombrowski MP,
    2. Schatz M,
    3. Wise R, et al.
    Asthma and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 5–12. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000103994.75162.16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  94. ↵
    1. Mabie WC,
    2. Barton JR,
    3. Wasserstrum N, et al.
    Clinical observations on asthma in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Med 1992; 1: 45–50. doi:10.3109/14767059209161887
    OpenUrl
  95. ↵
    1. Lao TT,
    2. Huengsburg M
    . Labour and delivery in mothers with asthma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990; 35: 183–190. doi:10.1016/0028-2243(90)90160-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  96. ↵
    1. Kahr N,
    2. Naeser V,
    3. Stensballe LG, et al.
    Gene–environment interaction in atopic diseases: a population-based twin study of early-life exposures. Clin Respir J 2015; 9: 79–86. doi:10.1111/crj.12110
    OpenUrl
  97. ↵
    1. Juhn Y,
    2. Weaver A,
    3. Katusic S, et al.
    Mode of delivery at birth and development of asthma: a population-based cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 116: 510–516. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  98. ↵
    British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. British guideline on the management of asthma. 2016. www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/153/index.html Date last accessed: October 19, 2019.
  99. ↵
    1. Rooney Thompson M,
    2. Towers CV,
    3. Howard BC, et al.
    The use of prostaglandin E1 in peripartum patients with asthma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 392. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.042
    OpenUrl
  100. ↵
    1. Nandhakumar A,
    2. Silverman GL
    . Acute hypoxemia in a parturient with primary ciliary dyskinesia following the administration of intravenous oxytocin: a case report. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 1218–1221. doi:10.1007/s12630-013-0039-z
    OpenUrl
  101. ↵
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. CG190. 2014. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190 Date last accessed: October 19, 2019.
  102. ↵
    1. Schatz M
    . Asthma during pregnancy: interrelationships and management. Ann Allergy 1992; 68: 123–133.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  103. ↵
    1. Kuczkowski KM
    . Labor analgesia for the parturient with respiratory disease: what does an obstetrician need to know? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 272: 160–166. doi:10.1007/s00404-004-0703-1
    OpenUrlPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Caughey AB,
    2. Parer JT
    . Tocolysis with beta-adrenergic receptor agonists. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25: 248–255. doi:10.1053/sper.2001.27166
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  105. ↵
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium. Green-Top Guideline 37a. 2015. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg37a Date last accessed: October 19, 2019.
  106. ↵
    1. Shiffman ML,
    2. Seale TW,
    3. Flux M, et al.
    Breast-milk composition in women with cystic fibrosis: report of two cases and a review of the literature. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 49: 612–617.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  107. ↵
    1. Holton S,
    2. Fisher J,
    3. Button B, et al.
    Childbearing concerns, information needs and preferences of women with cystic fibrosis: an online discussion group. Sex Reprod Healthc 2019; 19: 31–35. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2018.11.004
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 55 Issue 2 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 55 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ERS/TSANZ Task Force Statement on the management of reproduction and pregnancy in women with airways diseases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
ERS/TSANZ Task Force Statement on the management of reproduction and pregnancy in women with airways diseases
Peter G. Middleton, Elisabeth J. Gade, Cristina Aguilera, Lucy MacKillop, Brenda M. Button, Courtney Coleman, Barbara Johnson, Charlotte Albrechtsen, Frank Edenborough, David Rigau, Peter G. Gibson, Vibeke Backer
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2020, 55 (2) 1901208; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01208-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
ERS/TSANZ Task Force Statement on the management of reproduction and pregnancy in women with airways diseases
Peter G. Middleton, Elisabeth J. Gade, Cristina Aguilera, Lucy MacKillop, Brenda M. Button, Courtney Coleman, Barbara Johnson, Charlotte Albrechtsen, Frank Edenborough, David Rigau, Peter G. Gibson, Vibeke Backer
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2020, 55 (2) 1901208; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01208-2019
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Reproduction and conception issues in women with airways disease
    • Airways medications summary applicable to all sections
    • Pregnancy in women with asthma
    • Pregnancy in women with CF
    • Pregnancy in women with bronchiectasis
    • Management of birth in women with airways diseases
    • Post-partum considerations
    • Patients' views about family planning, pregnancy and parenthood
    • Conclusions
    • Supplementary material
    • Shareable PDF
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • ERS statement on familial pulmonary fibrosis
  • ERS guideline on quality in lung cancer care
  • ERS/ESTS statement on the management of pleural infection in adults
Show more ERS Official Documents

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society