Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children

Alyn H. Morice, Eva Millqvist, Kristina Bieksiene, Surinder S. Birring, Peter Dicpinigaitis, Christian Domingo Ribas, Michele Hilton Boon, Ahmad Kantar, Kefang Lai, Lorcan McGarvey, David Rigau, Imran Satia, Jacky Smith, Woo-Jung Song, Thomy Tonia, Jan W.K. van den Berg, Mirjam J.G. van Manen, Angela Zacharasiewicz
European Respiratory Journal 2020 55: 1901136; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01136-2019
Alyn H. Morice
1Respiratory Research Group, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: a.h.morice@hull.ac.uk
Eva Millqvist
2Dept of Internal Medicine/Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristina Bieksiene
3Dept of Pulmonology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Surinder S. Birring
4Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
5Dept of Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Dicpinigaitis
6Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Domingo Ribas
7Pulmonary Service, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí (Sabadell), Dept of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Hilton Boon
8MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michele Hilton Boon
Ahmad Kantar
9Pediatric Cough and Asthma Center, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi, University and Research Hospitals, Bergamo, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ahmad Kantar
Kefang Lai
10Dept of Clinical Research, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
21Representing the Chinese Thoracic Society
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorcan McGarvey
11Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Rigau
12Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Imran Satia
13Dept of Medicine, Division of Respirology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
14University of Manchester, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacky Smith
15University of Manchester, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Woo-Jung Song
16Airway Sensation and Cough Research Laboratory, Dept of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
22Representing the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Woo-Jung Song
Thomy Tonia
17Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan W.K. van den Berg
18Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Hoestpoli Isala hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mirjam J.G. van Manen
19Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Zacharasiewicz
20Dept of Pediatrics, Teaching Hospital of the University of Vienna, Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Cough assessment in adults. VAS: visual analogue scale; HARQ: Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire; ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; FeNO: exhaled nitric oxide fraction; LTRA: leukotriene receptor antagonist; PPI: proton-pump inhibitor; AAFB: alcohol and acid-fast bacilli; CT: computed tomography.

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Cough assessment flow chart for children. PBB: protracted bacterial bronchitis; ERS: European Respiratory Society; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids. #: how and when the cough started, time-course of cough, nature and quality of cough, symptoms associated with cough, triggers of cough, diurnal and nocturnal variations, cough associated with indoor and outdoor irritants; ¶: chest pain, history suggestive of inhaled foreign body, dyspnoea, exertional dyspnoea, haemoptysis, failure to thrive, feeding difficulties (including choking/vomiting), cardiac or neurodevelopmental abnormalities, recurrent sinopulmonary infections, immunodeficiency, epidemiological risk factors for exposure to tuberculosis, signs of respiratory distress, digital clubbing, chest wall deformity, auscultatory crackles, chest radiographic changes (other than perihilar changes); +: cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, immune deficiency, tuberculosis, aspiration syndromes, tracheobronchomalacia, somatic and tic cough, bronchiectasis, children's interstitial lung disease, upper airway syndrome, asthma, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough; §: testing for allergy is not to be routinely performed; it should be undertaken in the presence of features and signs of allergy.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Table of recommendations, strength and level of evidence, and supporting remarks

    Strength of recommendationLevel of evidenceValues and preferencesRemarks
    Question 1: should chest CT scan be routinely performed on chronic cough patients with normal chest radiograph and physician examination?
     Recommendation 1: we suggest that clinicians do not routinely perform a chest CT scan in patients with chronic cough who have a normal chest radiograph and physical examination.ConditionalVery lowThis recommendation places relatively higher value on the impact on patient management and outcomes including adverse events from radiation exposure. Lower value was given to diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

    In chronic cough patients with normal chest radiographs and physical examination, rates of any positive findings on chest CT scan varied widely in the literature. However, the task force members found that these abnormalities were unlikely to explain cough and may not influence management of the patients.

    For those patients without a clear diagnosis or a chronic cough that is refractory to treatment of associated conditions, a high-resolution CT scan of the chest may identify subtle interstitial lung disease not visible on chest radiographs, e.g. pulmonary fibrosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis and bronchiectasis, or areas of mucus plugging, which may prompt the need for bronchoscopy for clearance, lavage and culture. However, whether these subtle changes are the cause of the cough or a consequence of an underlying condition, such as recurrent aspiration, is unknown.

    There is a concern about potential cancer risk from CT radiation exposure [89]. According to an estimation study [88], a projected number of future cancers that could be related to chest CT scans performed in the US was 4100 (95% uncertainty limits 1900–8100) cases from 7 100 000 scans, and the estimated rates were higher in children and females.

    Question 2: should FeNO/blood eosinophils be used to predict treatment response to corticosteroids/antileukotrienes in chronic cough?
     Recommendation 2: research recommendation.Very lowThis recommendation places a relatively higher value on predictability for the treatment response and the impact on the treatment decision. Lower value was given to diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
    • There is a need for convenient, safe, and practical tests for detecting and predicting anti-inflammatory treatment responses in chronic cough. In randomised controlled trials of patients with different respiratory conditions, FeNO or blood eosinophil levels were positively associated with anti-inflammatory treatment responses [133–135]. However, there is no high-quality evidence to guide the use of FeNO or blood eosinophil counts as treatment response predictors in patients with chronic cough. In addition, there are still no optimal cut-off levels determined for the use in chronic cough populations.

    Question 3: should anti-asthmatic drugs (anti-inflammatory or bronchodilator drugs) be used to treat patients with chronic cough?
     Recommendation 3a: we suggest a short-term ICS trial (2–4 weeks) in adult patients with chronic cough.ConditionalLowThis recommendation is based on the higher value of the clinical benefits from ICS in some patients with asthmatic cough (or airway eosinophilic inflammation) and lower value of adverse events.

    Asthmatic cough (CVA and eosinophilic bronchitis) is a frequent phenotype of chronic cough. Evidence for ongoing airway eosinophilic inflammation can be collected by performing differential cell counts on samples from sputum induction or bronchoalveolar lavage; however, these tests are not available at most clinics. Moreover, there is no high-quality evidence for the routine use of FeNO or blood eosinophil counts in patients with chronic cough (as recommendation 2). Therefore, empirical therapy for asthmatic cough may be considered.

    In the literature, there is a heterogeneity in the efficacy of ICS in adult patients with chronic cough. The variability in the treatment response is probably primarily related to patient characteristics, particularly eosinophilic inflammation.

    Available evidence suggests that a high dose of ICS might be more effective than a low-to-moderate dose regimen, as an empirical trial.

    A treatment response is usually seen within 2–4 weeks. Thus, the empirical trial should be stopped if there is no response within 2–4 weeks.

    The task force members were concerned about long-term overuse of ICS in the absence of evidence or treatment response. In addition, they were concerned about pneumonia in relation to fluticasone use in patients comorbid with COPD.

     Recommendation 3b: we suggest a short-term ICS trial (2–4 weeks) in children with chronic dry cough.ConditionalLowThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefits from ICS in some patients with asthmatic cough (or eosinophilic inflammation) and a lower value of adverse events.

    Overall remarks are the same as those in adults.

    The empirical trial should be stopped if there is no response within 2–4 weeks.

     Recommendation 3c: we suggest a short-term antileukotriene trial (2–4 weeks) in adults with chronic cough, particularly in those with asthmatic cough.ConditionalLowThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefits from antileukotrienes in some patients with asthmatic cough (or airway eosinophilic inflammation) and a lower value of adverse events.

    Overall remarks are similar to those for ICS.

    Currently, clinical evidence is only available in specific subgroups of patients, such as CVA or atopic cough. Overall efficacy of leukotriene receptor antagonist in nonspecific chronic cough patients is uncertain.

    The empirical trial should be stopped if there is no response within 2–4 weeks.

     Recommendation 3d: we suggest a short-term trial (2–4 weeks) of ICS and long-acting bronchodilator combination in adults with chronic cough and fixed airflow obstruction.ConditionalModerateThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefits from ICS and long-acting bronchodilator combination in some patients with COPD and a lower value of adverse events.

    There is a concern about pneumonia in relation to fluticasone use in patients comorbid with COPD. The empirical trial should be stopped if there is no response within 2–4 weeks.

    Question 4: should anti-acid drugs (PPIs and H2-antagonists) be used to treat patients with chronic cough?
     Recommendation 4: we suggest that clinicians do not routinely use anti-acid drugs in adult patients with chronic cough.ConditionalLowThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefits from anti-acid drugs only in some patients with acid reflux and a lower value of adverse events.

    Anti-acid drugs are unlikely to be useful in improving cough outcomes, unless patients have peptic symptoms or evidence of acid reflux.

    Clinical benefits from PPI over placebo on cough outcomes are not significant in patients without acid reflux and only modest in those with acid reflux. These agents effectively block gastric acid production and relieve acid-related symptoms, but have little effect on the number and volume of reflux events. Gastric acid does not appear to play a major role in the aetiology of chronic cough.

    PPIs are mostly considered to be well tolerated. However, there is a potential concern about increased risks of complications, such as pneumonia, iron deficiency, vitamin B2 deficiency, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea or bone fracture [118].

    Question 5: should drugs with promotility activity (reflux inhibitors, prokinetics and macrolides with promotility activity) be used to treat patients with chronic cough?
     Recommendation 5: there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of macrolide therapy in chronic cough. A 1-month trial of macrolides can be considered in the cough of chronic bronchitis refractory to other therapy, taking into account local guidelines on antimicrobial stewardship.ConditionalLowThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefits from drugs with promotility activity only in some patients with chronic bronchitis and lower value of adverse events.

    Current evidence only supports the use of azithromycin in patients with chronic bronchitis phenotype. However, mechanisms of azithromycin in improving cough outcomes are suggested to include prokinetic effects [136].

    Since oesophageal dysmotility is a frequent finding in chronic cough patients, promotility agents such as metoclopramide, domperidone and azithromycin might be considered, although the clinical trial evidence in cough is sparse.

    Question 6: Which cough neuromodulatory agents (pregabalin, gabapentin, tricyclics and opiates) should be used to treat patients with chronic cough?
     Recommendation 6a: we recommend a trial of low-dose morphine (5–10 mg twice daily) in adult patients with chronic refractory cough.StrongModerateThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefits and adverse events from opiates for chronic refractory cough.

    Agents acting directly on cough hypersensitivity rather than the treatable traits causing hypersensitivity is a promising strategy for future developments. Current agents have been shown to be effective, but the side-effect profile is significant and may be mitigated by the use of lower doses than that used to treat pain. Clinical experience suggests that only a proportion of patients (approximately half) respond to opiates. In responders, treatment response is very rapid and clear (usually seen in a week). Thus, discontinuation is recommended if there is no response in 1 or 2 weeks.

    Codeine is generally not recommended (except where it is the only available opiate) due to interindividual genetic variability in drug metabolism (CYP2D6) and consequent less predictable treatment response and side-effect profile, particularly in children.

     Recommendation 6b: we suggest a trial of gabapentin or pregabalin in adult patients with chronic refractory cough.ConditionalLowThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefits and adverse events from gabapentin in chronic refractory cough.
    • Clinical experience suggests the response rates of gabapentin and pregabalin are lower than that of opiates, and adverse events are more common. Common adverse effects are blurred vision, disorientation, dizziness, dry mouth, fatigue and nausea.

    Question 7: should nonpharmacological therapy (cough control therapy) be used to treat patients with chronic cough?
     Recommendation 7: we suggest a trial of cough control therapy in adult patients with chronic cough.ConditionalModerateThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefits from cough control therapy in chronic refractory cough, but places lower value on adverse events.
    • Multi-component physiotherapy/speech and language therapy interventions may be considered for short-term improvement of health-related quality of life and cough frequency in patients with refractory chronic cough or who wish an alternative to drug treatment. However, this is a complex intervention that requires further study to determine which components are of value. Thus, experienced practitioners should undertake cough-directed physiotherapy and speech and language therapy intervention. The pool of individuals qualified for cough control therapy is currently lacking in many countries and should be increased.

    Question 8: should a trial of antibiotics be used in children with chronic wet cough with normal chest radiography, normal spirometry and no warning signs?
     Recommendation 8: we suggest a trial of antibiotics in children with chronic wet cough with normal chest radiographs, normal spirometry and no warning signs.ConditionalLowThis recommendation is based on a higher value of the clinical benefit from antibiotics in chronic wet cough, but a lower value of adverse events.

    Protracted bacterial bronchitis is a common treatable trait in children. Preferred antibacterial, dose and duration of therapy is unknown.

    Signs and symptoms suggestive of specific disease should always be investigated.

    CT: computed tomography; FeNO: exhaled nitric oxide fraction; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; PPI: proton-pump inhibitor; H2: histamine; CVA: cough variant asthma; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Supplementary Materials

    • Figures
    • Tables
    • Additional Files
    • Supplementary Material

      Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

      Supplementary material: part 1 ERJ-01136-2019.Supplement_1

      Supplementary material: part 2 ERJ-01136-2019.Supplement_2

    • Supplementary Material

      This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.

      Shareable PDF ERJ-01136-2019.Shareable

    Additional Files

    • Figures
    • Tables
    • Supplementary Materials
    • Russian translation

      • Cough_Guideline_RU.pdf
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 55 Issue 1 Table of Contents
    European Respiratory Journal: 55 (1)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children
    Alyn H. Morice, Eva Millqvist, Kristina Bieksiene, Surinder S. Birring, Peter Dicpinigaitis, Christian Domingo Ribas, Michele Hilton Boon, Ahmad Kantar, Kefang Lai, Lorcan McGarvey, David Rigau, Imran Satia, Jacky Smith, Woo-Jung Song, Thomy Tonia, Jan W.K. van den Berg, Mirjam J.G. van Manen, Angela Zacharasiewicz
    European Respiratory Journal Jan 2020, 55 (1) 1901136; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01136-2019

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children
    Alyn H. Morice, Eva Millqvist, Kristina Bieksiene, Surinder S. Birring, Peter Dicpinigaitis, Christian Domingo Ribas, Michele Hilton Boon, Ahmad Kantar, Kefang Lai, Lorcan McGarvey, David Rigau, Imran Satia, Jacky Smith, Woo-Jung Song, Thomy Tonia, Jan W.K. van den Berg, Mirjam J.G. van Manen, Angela Zacharasiewicz
    European Respiratory Journal Jan 2020, 55 (1) 1901136; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01136-2019
    Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Guideline scope and structure
      • Definition of chronic cough
      • Epidemiology
      • Impact on patients
      • Aetiology and mechanisms
      • Phenotypes of chronic cough
      • Chronic cough in children
      • Chronic refractory cough
      • Chronic cough in other diseases
      • Chronic cough, tobacco and nicotine
      • Assessing cough in the clinic
      • Further investigations to identify treatable traits in chronic cough
      • Treatment of chronic cough
      • Future directions and new drugs
      • Research gaps and recommendations for future studies
      • Supplementary material
      • Shareable PDF
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    ERS Official Documents

    • ERS statement on familial pulmonary fibrosis
    • ERS guideline on quality in lung cancer care
    • ERS/ESTS statement on the management of pleural infection in adults
    Show more ERS Official Documents

    ERS guidelines

    • ERS guideline on quality in lung cancer care
    • ERS guidelines on transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for diagnosis of ILD
    • ERS guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults
    Show more ERS guidelines

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society