Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Is CRP-guided antibiotic treatment a safe way to reduce antibiotic use in severe hospitalised patients with exacerbations of COPD?

Henk-Jan Prins, Tjip S. van der Werf, Wim G. Boersma
European Respiratory Journal 2019 54: 1901597; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01597-2019
Henk-Jan Prins
1Dept Pulmonary Diseases, Northwest Hospital, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tjip S. van der Werf
2Dept of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wim G. Boersma
1Dept Pulmonary Diseases, Northwest Hospital, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Extract

We thank M. Miravitlles and colleagues for their interest in our work [1]. They express concern about our failure rate: 24% at 10 days, and 45% at day 30; they feel that 31% of patients of the C-reactive protein (CRP) group and 46% of patients of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy group treated with antibiotics for acute COPD exacerbation is low in this high-risk population of hospitalised patients. Although treatment failure is high in our study, it reflects the severity of our population. Indeed, the proportion of patients on antimicrobials is lower than the outpatient study population in a recently published trial from the UK [2]; however, our COPD population is more severe and consists of hospitalised patients. Their concern is safety: have we caused harm in our patients by withholding antimicrobial treatment? First, in our study population, there was no significant difference in failure rates at days 10 and 30 between the CRP and GOLD group, which strongly argues against their point that antimicrobial treatment might have prevented harmful events (table 1). Neither failure during admission, nor relapse was significantly different between both study arms. Indeed, relapses among patients with acute exacerbation of COPD admitted to hospital are common [3], especially among individuals with a low forced expiratory volume in 1 s, but antimicrobial treatment may not necessarily prevent this, in particular among those that had low inflammatory markers. Slow recovery and early relapse have also been associated with increased inflammation, e.g. reflected by persistently increased CRP, and in patients characterised by chronic bronchitis [4], but whether these individuals might benefit from antimicrobial treatment if their CRP is below a given threshold has not been addressed in clinical studies [5]. An earlier study suggested that patients with CRP >50 mg·L−1 benefit more from antibiotic treatment compared to patients with CRP below this threshold [6]. Second, they argue that perhaps the active study arm treated with co-amoxiclav as the primary antimicrobial agent might have been inadequate. Although antimicrobial susceptibility data have not been listed in our paper, Pseudomonas spp. or other high-risk pathogens were covered if retrieved from sputum, and patients known to have colonisation with high-risk pathogens were provided with tailored antimicrobial regimens.

Abstract

CRP-guided antibiotic treatment reduces antibiotic prescription in acute exacerbation without change in treatment failure http://bit.ly/33IweWG

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: H-J. Prins has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: T.S. van der Werf has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: W.G. Boersma reports grants from GSK and Foreest Medical School, during the conduct of the study.

  • Received August 10, 2019.
  • Accepted August 13, 2019.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2019
https://www.ersjournals.com/user-licence
View Full Text

ERS Members

myERS - ERS members : log in with your myERS username and password.

INDIVIDUALS

Log in Login as an individual user.

Forgot your username or password?

LIBRARY USERS

Log in through your institution

If your library has a subscription, you may already be logged in via your IP address. Otherwise you may be able to log in via one of the following routes.
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
If you think you should have access, please contact your librarian or email journals@ersnet.org

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 54 Issue 4 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 54 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is CRP-guided antibiotic treatment a safe way to reduce antibiotic use in severe hospitalised patients with exacerbations of COPD?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Is CRP-guided antibiotic treatment a safe way to reduce antibiotic use in severe hospitalised patients with exacerbations of COPD?
Henk-Jan Prins, Tjip S. van der Werf, Wim G. Boersma
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2019, 54 (4) 1901597; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01597-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Is CRP-guided antibiotic treatment a safe way to reduce antibiotic use in severe hospitalised patients with exacerbations of COPD?
Henk-Jan Prins, Tjip S. van der Werf, Wim G. Boersma
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2019, 54 (4) 1901597; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01597-2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Shareable PDF
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • CTEPH and totally implantable central venous access systems
  • Ivacaftor modifies cystic fibrosis neutrophil phenotype
  • Serum mitochondrial DNA predicts exacerbation and progression of IPF
Show more Agora

Correspondence

  • Non-animal models for COVID-19 lung research
  • User-life of ICS/LABA inhaler devices should be considered
  • Peripheral blood eosinophil counts in European and East Asian populations
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society