It has been brought to our attention that a sentence regarding lung cancer detection rates in this article was ambiguous in its originally published form, appearing on page 220, section entitled “Low-dose CT screening detection rates”, second sentence:
“Detection rate of lung cancer ranged between 1.1–2% in baseline screening and false-positive rates of 90–96%.”
The authors wish to clarify the matter and point out that the sentence should more correctly read:
“Detection rate of lung cancer ranged between 1.1–2% in baseline screening and false-detection rates of 90–96%.”
Shareable PDF
Supplementary Material
This one-page PDF can be shared freely online.
Shareable PDF ERJ-51645-2013.Shareable
- Copyright ©ERS 2019