Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

A guide for respiratory physiotherapy postgraduate education: presentation of the harmonised curriculum

Thierry Troosters, Daniel Langer, Chris Burtin, Michelle Chatwin, Enrico M. Clini, Margareta Emtner, Rik Gosselink, Kathleen Grant, Deniz Inal-Ince, Agnieszka Lewko, Eleanor Main, Beatrice Oberwaldner, Nathalie Tabin, Fabio Pitta
European Respiratory Journal 2019 53: 1900320; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00320-2019
Thierry Troosters
1Dept of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Langer
1Dept of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Burtin
2REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Chatwin
3Academic and Clinical Dept of Sleep and Breathing and NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrico M. Clini
4Dept Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena Reggio Emilia and University Hospital of Modena Policlinico, Modena, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Enrico M. Clini
Margareta Emtner
5Depts of Neuroscience and Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rik Gosselink
1Dept of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Grant
6Dept of Cardio-respiratory Physiotherapy, Vaud University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deniz Inal-Ince
7Dept of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agnieszka Lewko
8Dept of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St. George's University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eleanor Main
9Physiotherapy Dept, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beatrice Oberwaldner
10Postgraduate School, Medical University, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Tabin
11Education Dept, European Respiratory Society, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Pitta
12Dept of Physiotherapy, Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy (LFIP) State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The ERS respiratory physiotherapy curriculum sets a new standard for postgraduate respiratory physiotherapy education. It was developed to promote evidence-based practice and physical skills for the respiratory physiotherapist. http://bit.ly/2LwJ0mb

Harmonising education is one of the most important challenges to ensure mobility of healthcare professionals across countries and regions of the world. While patients are affected by the same diseases, the healthcare systems in which they are cared for are very different and the healthcare providers within these systems are trained very differently. Health education in many countries is largely based on tradition. This is true for most medical specialities, as well as for physical therapy education [1], including respiratory physiotherapy. The responsibilities and the degree of professional and academic training vary widely across countries and regions [2]. While all educational programmes are probably fit for purpose within a given healthcare system, the variability in knowledge, skills and attitudes makes mobility and cross-certification difficult, if not impossible. In addition, the growing body of evidence for respiratory physiotherapy [3] makes it all the more important to foresee a framework for postgraduate training that prepares the workforce for the future [4]. For a global organisation, such as the European Respiratory Society (ERS), it also challenging to design postgraduate education that matches the level of knowledge and skills of all members. The ERS has a long tradition of providing such frameworks for harmonised education and training in respiratory medicine [5]. Figure 1 provides an overview of all available curricula and certified training programmes.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Overview of the portfolio of curricula and certified training programmes which have been developed by the ERS or are underway. See www.ersnet.org/professional-development/ers-curriculum-design-a-summary-of-projects for more information and relevant publications. EBUS: endobronchial ultrasound.

The design of a European (or global) curriculum for respiratory physiotherapy provides a platform for educational tracks to match specific educational programmes to the current consensus of what is expected from a trained respiratory physiotherapist. It also makes suggestions as to how the knowledge, skills and attitudes can be obtained, and at which level they should be examined. Importantly, this curriculum also provides third parties (chest physicians, general practitioners, nurses, thoracic surgeons, intensivists, funders and patients) with a comprehensive description of what they can expect from a trained respiratory physiotherapist.

Physiotherapy is becoming more and more specialised. In several countries respiratory physiotherapy is a recognised subspecialty of physiotherapy. In Belgium, for example, six particular competencies are recognised today [6] and this list is growing. These include a particular competency in manual therapy, paediatric conditions, and respiratory physiotherapy. In the USA, nine specialties are recognised by the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). Therefore, it is no surprise that other branches of physical therapy have undertaken similar efforts to provide a standard set of expected knowledge, skills and attitudes. In the speciality of orthopaedic manipulative therapy such a curriculum (or standard) has existed since 1977 [7]. The APTA recognises a “cardiopulmonary physical therapist”, and has a residency programme in accredited centres [8], as well as a formal exam for accreditation as a cardiorespiratory physical therapist.

The ERS respiratory physiotherapy curriculum sets a new standard for post-graduate respiratory physiotherapy education [9]. It was developed to promote evidence-based practice and physical skills for the respiratory physiotherapist, but also incorporates the expectations of other healthcare professionals who were involved in the development. The syllabus and curriculum are tailored to the needs of physical therapists who completed their physical therapy training (or training in rehabilitation sciences) according to the standards set out by the World Confederation of Physical Therapy (WCPT) [10]. This is important as it is expected that all respiratory physiotherapists should comply with the general professional attitudes required from a trained physiotherapist at entry level. These attitudes encompass accountability, humanity, compassion/caring, cultural competence, ethical behaviour, integrity, personal and professional development, professional duty, social responsibility and advocacy, and teamwork [10].

Admittedly, the curriculum developed by the task force sets the bar high, both in terms of knowledge needs as well as with regards to the skills and attitudes required from a professional. Conscious of the high standards, the curriculum is modular, with a separate adult and paediatric track, and additional modules for intensive care. This choice was made in order to accommodate the clinical reality of subspecialised professionals who are often dealing with very specific patient populations and those that may only treat adult or paediatric patients.

Respiratory physiotherapists are professionals who collaborate within multidisciplinary teams and the success of their actions is often measured by the success of the whole team. The developed curriculum fits nicely with the “description of physical therapy” provided by the WCPT. This description highlights the competences of the physiotherapist in: 1) undertaking and evaluating the findings of examinations and assessments; 2) formulating a diagnosis, prognosis and treatment plan within their field of expertise; 3) providing consultation and determining when clients need to be referred to another professional; 4) implementing a physical therapy intervention; 5) determining the outcomes for such an intervention; and 6) making recommendations for self-management [10].

The present curriculum contains not only items that need to be “known” by respiratory physiotherapists, but also includes the skills and attitudes that can be expected from respiratory physiotherapists. In addition, suggested forms of teaching as well as methods for assessment are proposed. Though recognisably difficult, whenever possible suggestions are made for minimal clinical training or exposure. This may prove to be the “weak spot” of the present curriculum. While it is clear that clinical exposure is necessary to provide proper patient care, the exact quantity of that exposure is variable and hard to grasp. Nevertheless, whenever possible, based on educational experience and validated by the expert reviewers, a best guess was made for relevant clinical exposure. As it stands now, the proposed curriculum provides educators with a blueprint for teaching, skills training and practical training.

The curriculum is broad and spans the areas previously laid out in the syllabus [2]. The latter was developed with direct input from a large panel of worldwide experts. Similarly, both the adult and paediatric tracks of the curriculum have been subject to peer review to ensure acceptability and credibility. Upon publication, members of the ERS will be able to provide input to the curriculum as it is seen as a dynamic document that can, and should, be adapted over time.

In the document, all aspects of respiratory therapy are included. This does not mean that it is exclusively for respiratory physiotherapists. In different countries several healthcare professionals may have specific competencies. For example, this is the case for exercise training, noninvasive mechanical ventilation or mechanical ventilation. It is therefore important to align the local/regional requirements and local legal arrangements. In any case, physiotherapists have the competences to set-up fruitful interdisciplinary collaborations and this is also made clear throughout the document.

The next steps are to compare the content of the curriculum with existing educational programmes in different countries and to then subsequently align the educational opportunities of the ERS with the curriculum and establish accredited centres where practical skills training as well as clinical training can be performed. The leadership of ERS Group 9.2 (Physiotherapy) is committed to set out a pathway towards implementation and acceptance of the curriculum so that it can become an international standard for training in respiratory physiotherapy. Since accreditation of physiotherapists (as for other healthcare specialists) is organised at a country level, the ambition of ERS is not to provide a certificate for accreditation. Rather, the idea is to organise modules that individual members can use as part of their own portfolio to seek recognition as a respiratory physiotherapy specialist within their own accreditation environment, or in an environment they wish to transfer to as part of healthcare professionals' mobility.

The current syllabus and curriculum will provide a framework for international training in respiratory physiotherapy. It advises what knowledge, skills and attitudes need to be mastered by a respiratory physiotherapist. It also provides an indication for clinical training time, different forms of learning and examination. The syllabus and curriculum contain the elements around which an E-portfolio can be built, and it sets out a benchmark for endorsement of educational opportunities organised by others as well as the ERS. The expert group now invites the respiratory physiotherapy community to verify the proposed curriculum against their own. As this is a dynamic document, feedback is welcome. Furthermore, within the Group 9.2 (Physiotherapy) this project is now managed in order to exploit the curriculum to the benefit of all its members.

Acknowledgements

This task force was supported by the European Respiratory Society. The task force members want to thank all participants at the different stages of consultation throughout the process. We are also grateful to the ERS staff Sharon Mitchell and Alexandra Niculescu for their dedicated support in the development of the syllabus and curriculum.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: T. Troosters is a member of European Respiratory Society core management group.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Langer has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: C. Burtin has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Chatwin reports personal fees from Breas, Resmed, and Philips (lecturing fees), outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: E.M. Clini has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Emtner has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: R. Gosselink has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: K. Grant has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Inal-Ince has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Lewko has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: E. Main has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: B. Oberwaldner has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: N. Tabin is an employee of the European Respiratory Society.

  • Conflict of interest: F. Pitta has nothing to disclose.

  • Received February 14, 2019.
  • Accepted February 17, 2019.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2019
https://www.ersjournals.com/user-licence

References

  1. ↵
    1. Foo JS,
    2. Storr M,
    3. Maloney S
    . Registration factors that limit international mobility of people holding physiotherapy qualifications: a systematic review. Health Policy 2016; 120: 665–673.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Mitchell S,
    2. Pitta F,
    3. Troosters T
    . Standardised education and training for respiratory physiotherapists. Breathe 2013; 9: 171–174.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Denehy L,
    2. Granger CL,
    3. El-Ansary D, et al.
    Advances in cardiorespiratory physiotherapy and their clinical impact. Expert Rev Respir Med 2018; 12: 203–215.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Skinner EH,
    2. Williams CM,
    3. Haines TP
    . Embedding research culture and productivity in hospital physiotherapy departments: challenges and opportunities. Aust Health Rev 2015; 39: 312–314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Loddenkemper R,
    2. Séverin T,
    3. Eiselé JL, et al.
    HERMES: Good reasons for harmonising education and training in respiratory medicine. Eur Respir J 2006; 28: 470–471.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Federal Ministery of Health. Royal decree for particular competences for physical therapists. Royal decree 2014; p. 57908. http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/change_lg.pl?language=nl&la=N&cn=20140425G3&table_name=wet
  7. ↵
    1. Lonneman ME,
    2. Olson KABJ
    . The history of IFOMPT: paving the way to global leadership in OMPT excellence. J Man Manip Ther 2017; 25: 223–226.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Furze JA,
    2. Tichenor CJ,
    3. Fisher BE, et al.
    Physical therapy residency and fellowship education: reflections on the past, present, and future. Phys Ther 2016; 96: 949–960.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Troosters T,
    2. Tabin N,
    3. Langer D, et al.
    Introduction of the harmonised respiratory physiotherapy curriculum. Breathe 2019; 15: 110–115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    World Confederation of Physical Therapy (WCPT). Policy statement: description of physical therapy. 2015; pp. 1–9. https://www.wcpt.org/sites/wcpt.org/files/files/resources/policies/2017/PS_Description_of_physical_therapy_FINAL.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 53 Issue 6 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 53 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A guide for respiratory physiotherapy postgraduate education: presentation of the harmonised curriculum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
A guide for respiratory physiotherapy postgraduate education: presentation of the harmonised curriculum
Thierry Troosters, Daniel Langer, Chris Burtin, Michelle Chatwin, Enrico M. Clini, Margareta Emtner, Rik Gosselink, Kathleen Grant, Deniz Inal-Ince, Agnieszka Lewko, Eleanor Main, Beatrice Oberwaldner, Nathalie Tabin, Fabio Pitta
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2019, 53 (6) 1900320; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00320-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A guide for respiratory physiotherapy postgraduate education: presentation of the harmonised curriculum
Thierry Troosters, Daniel Langer, Chris Burtin, Michelle Chatwin, Enrico M. Clini, Margareta Emtner, Rik Gosselink, Kathleen Grant, Deniz Inal-Ince, Agnieszka Lewko, Eleanor Main, Beatrice Oberwaldner, Nathalie Tabin, Fabio Pitta
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2019, 53 (6) 1900320; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00320-2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • CFTR: a missing link between smoking and chronic airway diseases?
  • Update March 2022: ERS guidelines for management of hospitalised COVID-19 patients
  • Improving IGRA interpretation: are IP-10 and MIG the solution?
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society