Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Minimal clinically important difference in 30 second sit-to-stand test after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD

Andrea Zanini, Ernesto Crisafulli, Michele D’Andria, Cristina Gregorini, Francesca Cherubino, Elisabetta Zampogna, Andrea Azzola, Antonio Spanevello, Alfredo Chetta
European Respiratory Journal 2018 52: OA5199; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.OA5199
Andrea Zanini
1Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Clinic of Rehabilitation, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Novaggio, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ernesto Crisafulli
2Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele D’Andria
3Division of General Medicine, Ospedale Malcantonese, Castelrotto, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Gregorini
3Division of General Medicine, Ospedale Malcantonese, Castelrotto, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca Cherubino
4Division of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Tradate, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabetta Zampogna
4Division of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Tradate, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Azzola
5Pulmonology Service, Department of Internal Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Spanevello
6Department of Medicine and Surgery, Respiratory Diseases, University of Insubria, Varese-Como, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfredo Chetta
2Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

The sit-to-stand test (STST) is a feasible alternative for measuring peripheral muscle strength of the lower limbs. Our aim was to evaluate, in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 30-second STST (30-STST) after pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).

Stable COPD inpatients undergoing 30-STST and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) before and after PR were included. Responsiveness to PR was determined by pre-to-post PR (∆) evaluation of 30-STST. The MCID was evaluated using an anchor-based method.

96 moderate-to-severe COPD patients were included. At baseline, 30-STST was significantly related to distance at 6MWT (6MWD) (r=0.65; p<0.0001), FVC (r=0.46; p<0.0001), PaCO2 (r=-0.42; p<0.0001), FEV1 (r=0.39; p<0.0001) and age (r=-0.31; p<0.01). After PR a significant improvement in 30-STST was observed (mean difference +2 repetitions; p<0.0001). ∆30-STST was positively related to ∆6MWD (r=0.61, p<0.0001), TDI (r=0.61, p<0.0001) and baseline RV (r=0.27, p<0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a ∆30-STST cut-off of 2 repetitions as the best discriminating value (area under curve: 0.892; p<0.001) to identify the MCID for ∆6MWD (30 meters).

In a multivariate logistic regression model, baseline MRC (Odds ratio 2.27; p=0.003) and RV/TLC (OR 1.05; p=0.040) predict the risk to have a value >2 repetitions ∆30-STST.

In COPD patients 30-STST is a sensitive tool to assess PR efficacy. A ∆30-STST of at least 2 repetitions represents the MCID, that may be predicted by dyspnea and lung hyperinflation.

Footnotes

Cite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2018 52: Suppl. 62, OA5199.

This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).

  • Copyright ©the authors 2018
Previous
Back to top
Vol 52 Issue suppl 62 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minimal clinically important difference in 30 second sit-to-stand test after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Minimal clinically important difference in 30 second sit-to-stand test after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD
Andrea Zanini, Ernesto Crisafulli, Michele D’Andria, Cristina Gregorini, Francesca Cherubino, Elisabetta Zampogna, Andrea Azzola, Antonio Spanevello, Alfredo Chetta
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2018, 52 (suppl 62) OA5199; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.OA5199

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Minimal clinically important difference in 30 second sit-to-stand test after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD
Andrea Zanini, Ernesto Crisafulli, Michele D’Andria, Cristina Gregorini, Francesca Cherubino, Elisabetta Zampogna, Andrea Azzola, Antonio Spanevello, Alfredo Chetta
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2018, 52 (suppl 62) OA5199; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.OA5199
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Process evaluation of the British Lung Foundation Active Steps service
  • Late Breaking Abstract - Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on major symptoms of long COVID (post-COVID-19 syndrome): preliminary results
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation and changes in respiratory muscles, aerobic capacity and quality of life in Colombian patients with Interstitial Lung Disease
Show more Rehabilitation and chronic care

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society