Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Should gatifloxacin be included in the model list of essential medicines?

Chen-Yuan Chiang, Arnaud Trébucq, Alberto Piubello, Hans L. Rieder, Armand Van Deun
European Respiratory Journal 2018 51: 1702329; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02329-2017
Chen-Yuan Chiang
1International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
2Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Dept of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
3Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Dept of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cychiang@theunion.org
Arnaud Trébucq
1International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Piubello
1International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
4Damien Foundation, Niamey, Niger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans L. Rieder
5Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
6Tuberculosis Consultant Services, Kirchlindach, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Armand Van Deun
1International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
7Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Moxifloxacin may not be a valid alternative to gatifloxacin in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis http://ow.ly/uLby30hBItG

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the paper by Falzon et al. [1], which reported that gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin have been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for both longer and shortened regimens in the treatment of rifampicin-resistant (RR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB). Gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin belong to the latest generation of fluoroquinolones that have comparable early bactericidal and sterilising activity in the treatment of TB. Gatifloxacin has been used in the treatment of bacterial infections and MDR-TB [2]. Gatifloxacin was also used in a clinical trial (OFLOTUB) comparing a 4-month gatifloxacin-based regimen with the standard 6-month regimen for the treatment of rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary TB [3]. The gatifloxacin-based shortened treatment was highly effective, achieving >84% treatment success among MDR-TB patients in Bangladesh, Cameroon and Niger [2].

On May 4, 2006, Bristol Myers Squibb announced that it was withdrawing gatifloxacin from the market because an observational study reported that gatifloxacin was associated with dysglycaemia in the treatment of pneumonia among the elderly [2]. Consequently, moxifloxacin replaced gatifloxacin in the treatment of MDR-TB in observational studies [4] and in a clinical trial (STREAM) comparing a 9-month moxifloxacin-based regimen with WHO recommended 20–24-month regimens.

Noting that gatifloxacin was not included in the WHO Essential Medicines List (EML), the Global TB Programme and the Global Drug Facility submitted an application for gatifloxacin to be included in the updated EML as an alternative to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin [5], which is an essential step in making gatifloxacin available for the treatment of RR/MDR-TB. Unfortunately, gatifloxacin was not included in the 20th WHO EML or the sixth WHO EML for Children updated in March 2017, due mainly to opposition from two internationally renowned organisations [5]. Concerns raised included that 1) gatifloxacin may cause dysglycaemia, 2) other fluoroquinolones (for example, moxifloxacin) are safer alternatives and 3) there was no known quality-assured product from generic manufacturers. These were important concerns. However, we would like to respectfully point out that concerns about gatifloxacin in terms of safety and efficacy should be balanced against those about moxifloxacin, and that there remains uncertainty about gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in the treatment of MDR-TB.

First, moxifloxacin may not necessarily be safer than gatifloxacin. Park-Wyllie et al. [6] reported that gatifloxacin, but not moxifloxacin, was significantly associated with dysglycaemia [2]. This was not supported by findings from: 1) a recent study from Taiwan, which reported that moxifloxacin was associated with both hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia [7]; and 2) the OFLOTUB trial, which reported that the vast majority of the patients had normal blood glucose levels throughout the course of treatment, and that there was no significant difference in the risk of hyperglycaemia between the 4-month gatifloxacin-based regimen and the standard 6-month regimen [3]. It might be appropriate to indicate that both moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin may potentially cause dysglycaemia and close monitoring is needed in the use of either. Of note is that dysglycaemia was manageable and reversible in all cases treated with gatifloxacin in Bangladesh, Cameroon and Niger [2]. Another major issue was not mentioned: both moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin have been reported to be associated with ECG QT prolongation. The OFLOTUB study reported that a 4-month gatifloxacin-based regimen did not have a sizable risk of QT prolongation [8]. But the psychological fear of QT prolongation with moxifloxacin has resulted in the use of normal-dose moxifloxacin in a recent observational study on the shortened MDR regimen, which observed a higher frequency of treatment failure and acquisition of resistance to fluoroquinolones than was observed in Bangladesh using high-dose gatifloxacin [4].

Second, moxifloxacin may not necessarily be quite as efficacious as gatifloxacin even if both give excellent results for short-course MDR-TB regimens. A multi-country surveillance project reported that of the 282 ofloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, 7% were resistant to moxifloxacin but only 2% were resistant to gatifloxacin [9]. Another study has reported that the minimum inhibitory concentration distribution ratio of gatifloxacin to ofloxacin is higher than that of moxifloxacin to ofloxacin [10]. Meta-analyses of the effectiveness and safety of standardised shorter regimens for MDR-TB reported that moxifloxacin was not associated with hyperglycaemia. However, moxifloxacin was significantly associated with greater odds of failure/relapse compared to gatifloxacin [11].

Finally, there is interest among generic manufacturers to produce gatifloxacin for MDR-TB should countries show interest (personal communication; E. Jaramillo, Global TB Programme, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland). It might be easier to use gatifloxacin than moxifloxacin in resource-limited settings where the burden of MDR-TB is high but the capacity for monitoring and management of QT prolongation is limited, and monitoring plasma glucose is required with either medication anyway. Moxifloxacin may not necessarily be a valid alternative to gatifloxacin, and therefore we would like to call for support to endorse the inclusion of gatifloxacin in the WHO EML.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received November 11, 2017.
  • Accepted December 4, 2017.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2018

References

  1. ↵
    1. Falzon D,
    2. Schünemann HJ,
    3. Harausz E, et al.
    World Health Organization treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis, 2016 update. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1602308.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Chiang C-Y,
    2. Van Deun A,
    3. Rieder HL
    . Gatifloxacin for short, effective treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2016; 20: 1143–1147.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Merle CS,
    2. Fielding K,
    3. Sow OB, et al.
    A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1588–1598.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Trébucq A,
    2. Schwoebel V,
    3. Kashongwe Z, et al.
    Treatment outcome with a short MDR-TB regimen among patients with rifampicin-resistant TB in nine African countries. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2018; 22: 17–25.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    World Health Organization. Gatifloxacin – EML and EMLc. 21st Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines. www.who.int/selection_medicines/committees/expert/21/applications/gatifloxacin_ad/en/ Date last accessed: November 10, 2017.
  6. ↵
    1. Park-Wyllie LY,
    2. Juurlink DN,
    3. Kopp A.
    Outpatient gatifloxacin therapy and dysglycemia in older adults. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1352–1361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Chou HW,
    2. Wang JL,
    3. Chang CH, et al.
    Risk of severe dysglycemia among diabetic patients receiving levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or moxifloxacin in Taiwan. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57: 971–980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Olliaro PL,
    2. Merle C,
    3. Mthiyane T, et al.
    Effect on the QT interval of a gatifloxacin-containing regimen versus standard treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61: e01834–e01816.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Zignol M,
    2. Dean AS,
    3. Alikhanova N, et al.
    Population-based resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates to pyrazinamide and fluoroquinolones: results from a multicountry surveillance project. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16: 1185–1192.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Rigouts L,
    2. Coeck N,
    3. Gumusboga M, et al.
    Specific gyrA gene mutations predict poor treatment outcome in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71: 314–323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ahmad Khan F,
    2. Salim MAH,
    3. du Cros P, et al.
    Effectiveness and safety of standardized shorter regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: individual patient data and aggregate data meta-analyses. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700061.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 51 Issue 2 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 51 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should gatifloxacin be included in the model list of essential medicines?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Should gatifloxacin be included in the model list of essential medicines?
Chen-Yuan Chiang, Arnaud Trébucq, Alberto Piubello, Hans L. Rieder, Armand Van Deun
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2018, 51 (2) 1702329; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02329-2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Should gatifloxacin be included in the model list of essential medicines?
Chen-Yuan Chiang, Arnaud Trébucq, Alberto Piubello, Hans L. Rieder, Armand Van Deun
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2018, 51 (2) 1702329; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02329-2017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Rifapentine access in Europe: concerns over key TB treatment
  • P. aeruginosa membrane vesicles cause endothelial barrier failure
  • Mortality after admission with pneumonia higher than after admission with COPD exacerbation
Show more Agora

Correspondence

  • Extracorporeal life support as a bridge to lung transplantation strategy in anti-MDA5+ rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease is life-saving but with persistent difficulties at the bedside
  • Liver cancer in severe alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: Who is at risk?
  • Cancer risk in severe alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency - the importance of the early identification
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society