Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Chronic breathlessness: re-thinking the symptom

Jane Macnaughton, Rebecca Oxley, Arthur Rose, Andrew Russell, James W. Dodd, Havi Carel
European Respiratory Journal 2018 51: 1702331; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02331-2017
Jane Macnaughton
1Centre for Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK
2Dept of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK
3Life of Breath Project, Durham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jane.macnaughton@durham.ac.uk
Rebecca Oxley
1Centre for Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK
2Dept of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK
3Life of Breath Project, Durham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur Rose
1Centre for Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK
3Life of Breath Project, Durham, UK
4Dept of English Studies, Durham University, Durham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Russell
3Life of Breath Project, Durham, UK
5Dept of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Dodd
6Academic Respiratory Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
7Respiratory Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
8Life of Breath Project, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Havi Carel
8Life of Breath Project, Bristol, UK
9Dept of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

People with breathlessness should be involved in renaming their condition as their experience can be influenced by clinical language http://ow.ly/ZKNj30hzUUM

To the Editor:

We wholly applaud the move by Johnson et al. [1] to improve awareness of breathlessness and to raise its profile as a subject for focussed clinical research. We consider their research and the ensuing proposal to recognise breathlessness via a new medical term, “chronic breathlessness syndrome”, as important and justified. We share their goal, which is to direct attention to this neglected, undertreated and under-researched symptom.

There are two important caveats to be made in response to this article, however. First, there is a need to involve those who live with chronic breathlessness and are thus “experts by experience” in discussions about the framework proposed here, rather than bringing them into the conversation once consensus has been achieved. Second, further medicalisation of breathlessness via the term “syndrome” may not be the best way forward. Research into patients' experience of breathlessness shows that the ways in which breathlessness is spoken about (medicalised and otherwise) not only reflect their experiences but also helps to shape how breathlessness is lived [2–6].

O.K. Faull and colleagues, in their response to Johnson et al. [1], comment on the individuality of responses to breathlessness that rely on prior experiences and bodily awareness (interoception). Context and culture play an important role in shaping the understanding and perception of breathlessness [2–4, 6]. For example, among African American communities across the USA, the last words of Eric Garner, “I can't breathe”, as he suffocated in a tussle with police officers, have become a slogan for the Black Lives Matter movement and a metaphor for the lives of those living under other kinds of oppression [2]. Başoğlu [7] suggests that asphyxiation is the most traumatic form of torture and that persistent breathlessness because of an underlying medical condition may be even worse due to the duration of the suffering involved.

Sufferers of respiratory illness vary in relation to the intensity, affect, ideation and meaning they attribute to their breathlessness [3–6]. It affects every aspect of the life of a breathless person in ways that description of it as a medical symptom cannot capture in full [8]. There is a need to legitimise a range of attitudes towards breathlessness in order for them to inform the clinical encounter. Collecting such experiences under the umbrella term “syndrome” may not be sufficient to enable full expression of the variability and multiple meanings of the experience of breathlessness, and may carry unexpected cognitive and affective “baggage” that detracts from its utility as a proxy for experience.

In view of the highly contextualised experience of breathlessness, it is critical to think about whose views are part of the debate. Discussions with experts by experience and first-person reports of experiences of breathlessness [3, 5] have revealed how powerful language and context are in determining how people with breathlessness think about and experience their problem [4, 6], and how this influences what they might do. Words such as “pulmonary” and “rehabilitation”, for example, may negatively impact upon the uptake of one of the most effective interventions for breathlessness [6].

There is a further stage necessary in the research process of Johnson et al. [1] in order to validate the claim made in the paper that “a recognised syndrome would […] give permission for patients to discuss their ongoing breathlessness with their clinicians”. As Johnson et al. [1] suggest, patients and their families need to be involved in the discussion, but they should be able to critique the framework suggested by the paper, rather than be presented with it as a fait accompli. Otherwise there is a danger that the words “chronic” and “syndrome” will drive people with breathlessness further underground, in part because they have not been involved in the process of describing their own condition [9]. We encourage Johnson et al. [1] to take this research on to its next logical stage, that of developing a truly consensual terminology that considers the critical role language, metaphor and meaning play in both living with and treating breathlessness. This could be done using the Delphi technique within a more participatory paradigm [10]. Such an approach offers the chance of empowering patients and caregivers in ways that would result in real changes to both their experience and treatment.

Disclosures

Supplementary Material

H. Carel ERJ-02331-2017_Carel

J.W. Dodd ERJ-02331-2017_Dodd

J. Macnaughton ERJ-02331-2017_MacNaughton

R. Oxley ERJ-02331-2017_Oxley

A. Rose ERJ-02331-2017_Rose

A. Russell ERJ-02331-2017_Russell

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com

  • Received November 12, 2017.
  • Accepted November 23, 2017.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2018

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0

References

  1. ↵
    1. Johnson MJ,
    2. Yorke J,
    3. Hansen-Flaschen J, et al.
    Towards an expert consensus to delineate a clinical syndrome of chronic breathlessness. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1602277.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Rose A
    . Tim Winton's pneumatic materialism. Interventions 2017; in press.
  3. ↵
    1. Carel H
    . Phenomenology of Illness. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016.
  4. ↵
    1. Oxley R,
    2. Macnaughton J
    . Inspiring change: humanities and social science insights into the experience and management of breathlessness. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2016; 10: 256–261.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Carel H
    . Illness: the cry of the flesh. 2nd Edn. Durham, Acumen, 2013.
  6. ↵
    1. Oxley R
    . Lost in Translation? Exploring the Language of Breathlessness. Life of Breath blog. https://lifeofbreath.org/2017/09/lost-in-translation-exploring-the-language-of-breathlessness/ Date last accessed: November 6, 2017. Date last updated: September 1, 2017.
  7. ↵
    1. Başoğlu M
    . Effective management of breathlessness: a review of potential human rights issues. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1602099.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Hayen A,
    2. Herigstad M,
    3. Pattinson KTS
    . Understanding dyspnea as a complex individual experience. Maturitas 2013; 76: 45–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kidd IJ,
    2. Carel H
    . Epistemic injustice and illness. J Appl Philos 2016; 34: 172–190.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Kezar A,
    2. Maxey D
    . The Delphi technique: an untapped approach of participatory research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2016; 19: 143–160.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 51 Issue 1 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 51 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chronic breathlessness: re-thinking the symptom
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Chronic breathlessness: re-thinking the symptom
Jane Macnaughton, Rebecca Oxley, Arthur Rose, Andrew Russell, James W. Dodd, Havi Carel
European Respiratory Journal Jan 2018, 51 (1) 1702331; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02331-2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Chronic breathlessness: re-thinking the symptom
Jane Macnaughton, Rebecca Oxley, Arthur Rose, Andrew Russell, James W. Dodd, Havi Carel
European Respiratory Journal Jan 2018, 51 (1) 1702331; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02331-2017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Carbon footprint of respiratory treatments
  • ERS/ATS standards on lung function test interpretation: some limitations
  • Reply: ERS/ATS standards on lung function test interpretation: some limitations
Show more Agora

Correspondence

  • ERS/ATS standards on lung function test interpretation: some limitations
  • Reply: ERS/ATS standards on lung function test interpretation: some limitations
  • Refined risk stratification in PAH and timing of lung transplantation
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society