Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Use of the Daily PROactive instrument to evaluate physical activity in patients with COPD: results from ACTIVATE

Judith Garcia Aymerich, Henrik Watz, Kai M Beeh, Pierluigi Paggiaro, Miguel Moya, Massimo Notari, Diana Jarreta, Esther Garcia Gil, Thierry Troosters
European Respiratory Journal 2017 50: PA4964; DOI: 10.1183/1393003.congress-2017.PA4964
Judith Garcia Aymerich
1Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; and CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henrik Watz
2Pulmonary Research Institute at LungClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kai M Beeh
3insaf – Respiratory Research Institute GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierluigi Paggiaro
4Department of Surgery, Medicine, Molecular Biology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miguel Moya
5AstraZeneca PLC, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Massimo Notari
6Menarini Farmaceutica Internazionale S.R.L., Firenze, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diana Jarreta
5AstraZeneca PLC, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esther Garcia Gil
5AstraZeneca PLC, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thierry Troosters
7Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Respiratory Division, University Hospital Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Rationale

The Daily PROactive Physical Activity in COPD (D-PPAC) instrument combines 7 questions and 2 activity-monitoring variables to assess physical activity in patients with COPD. However, a limited number of studies have so far used it as an outcome measure. The D-PPAC instrument was used in ACTIVATE (a Phase IV, randomized, placebo-controlled study; NCT02424344) to assess the effect of aclidinium/formoterol (AB/FF) on physical activity with and without behavioural intervention (BI). The primary outcome (lung hyperinflation) has been reported previously.

Methods: Patients with moderate/severe COPD received AB/FF 400/12 μg or placebo (PBO) BID (1:1) for 8 weeks. In Weeks 4–8, all patients received telecoaching BI. D-PPAC Total, Difficulty and Amount scores (all ranging from 0 to 100) were evaluated at Weeks 4 and 8.

Results: 267 patients were randomized. At Week 4, patients receiving AB/FF showed a significant increase from baseline in D-PPAC scores vs PBO, and the percentage of patients with clinically meaningful improvements in Total and Amount scores was significantly higher with AB/FF vs PBO (Table). At Week 8, the improvements in patients receiving AB/FF + BI were less marked than at Week 4 (AB/FF only); Total and Amount scores were modestly improved with PBO + BI (Table).

Conclusion: AB/FF 400/12 µg significantly improved D-PPAC scores vs PBO at Week 4. BI did not augment these improvements.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

  • Copyright ©the authors 2017
Previous
Back to top
Vol 50 Issue suppl 61 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of the Daily PROactive instrument to evaluate physical activity in patients with COPD: results from ACTIVATE
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Use of the Daily PROactive instrument to evaluate physical activity in patients with COPD: results from ACTIVATE
Judith Garcia Aymerich, Henrik Watz, Kai M Beeh, Pierluigi Paggiaro, Miguel Moya, Massimo Notari, Diana Jarreta, Esther Garcia Gil, Thierry Troosters
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2017, 50 (suppl 61) PA4964; DOI: 10.1183/1393003.congress-2017.PA4964

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Use of the Daily PROactive instrument to evaluate physical activity in patients with COPD: results from ACTIVATE
Judith Garcia Aymerich, Henrik Watz, Kai M Beeh, Pierluigi Paggiaro, Miguel Moya, Massimo Notari, Diana Jarreta, Esther Garcia Gil, Thierry Troosters
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2017, 50 (suppl 61) PA4964; DOI: 10.1183/1393003.congress-2017.PA4964
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Blood eosinophil (EOS) count, exacerbation rate and response to roflumilast in patients with severe COPD
  • Role of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD
  • Evaluation of roflumilast in COPD patients in a real-world European setting: results from the PROFILE EU study
Show more Clinical Problems COPD

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society