Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure and metabolic profile in women with sleep apnoea

Francisco Campos-Rodriguez, Monica Gonzalez-Martinez, Angeles Sanchez-Armengol, Bernabe Jurado-Gamez, Jose Cordero-Guevara, Nuria Reyes-Nuñez, Maria F. Troncoso, Araceli Abad-Fernandez, Joaquin Teran-Santos, Julian Caballero-Rodriguez, Mercedes Martin-Romero, Ana Encabo-Motiño, Lirios Sacristan-Bou, Javier Navarro-Esteva, Maria Somoza-Gonzalez, Juan F. Masa, Maria A. Sanchez-Quiroga, Beatriz Jara-Chinarro, Belen Orosa-Bertol, Miguel A. Martinez-Garcia on behalf of the Spanish Sleep Network
European Respiratory Journal 2017 50: 1700257; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00257-2017

Abstract

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces blood pressure levels in hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, the role of CPAP in blood pressure and the metabolic profile in women has not yet been assessed. In this study we investigated the effect of CPAP on blood pressure levels and the glucose and lipid profile in women with moderate-to-severe OSA.

A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 307 women diagnosed with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnoea–hypopnoea index ≥15 events·h–1) in 19 Spanish Sleep Units. Women were randomised to CPAP (n=151) or conservative treatment (n=156) for 12 weeks. Changes in office blood pressure measures as well as in the glucose and lipid profile were assessed in both groups.

Compared with the control group, the CPAP group achieved a significantly greater decrease in diastolic blood pressure (−2.04 mmHg, 95% CI −4.02– −0.05; p=0.045), and a nonsignificantly greater decrease in systolic blood pressure (−1.54 mmHg, 95% CI −4.58–1.51; p=0.32) and mean blood pressure (−1.90 mmHg, 95% CI −4.0–0.31; p=0.084). CPAP therapy did not change any of the metabolic variables assessed.

In women with moderate-to-severe OSA, 12 weeks of CPAP therapy improved blood pressure, especially diastolic blood pressure, but did not change the metabolic profile, compared with conservative treatment.

Abstract

CPAP reduces blood pressure levels, but does not change the metabolic profile in women with sleep apnoea http://ow.ly/sW9h30bgbAy

Introduction

Although obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common disorder in women, with prevalence rates of 6–20% [1, 2], there is little evidence about the effects of treatment on the cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes of this sleep disorder in women. This may be because OSA has largely been considered a “male” disorder [3], thereby reducing the research on this topic in the female population. Accordingly, the growing evidence obtained in males has been applied to females, taking for granted that the response to OSA treatment would be similar in the two sexes. However, we know that OSA differs between men and women in terms of prevalence, pathophysiology, severity, polysomnography findings and clinical presentation [4–9], and previous population- and clinic-based studies have found that the female phenotype of OSA is strongly associated with age, obesity and hypertension, but not with excessive daytime sleepiness [2, 10].

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic OSA. High-quality evidence based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has demonstrated that CPAP reduces blood pressure [11–13]. Recent data suggest that it may also improve the glucose and lipid profile [14, 15]. These studies failed to examine sex differences, however, and they were conducted in either exclusively or predominantly male cohorts. Consequently, it remains unclear whether these positive effects of CPAP therapy can be translated to women or whether this population behaves and responds to treatment in a different way from males.

As hypertension may be a therapeutic target for CPAP therapy in female patients with OSA, in the present study we investigated the effect of CPAP on office blood pressure measures, as well as on the glucose and lipid profile of women diagnosed with moderate-to-severe OSA.

Methods

Design, settings and participants

This study is part of a larger study, designed to address the effect of CPAP on different clinical outcomes, in a population exclusively composed of women (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02047071). The effect of CPAP on quality of life, the primary end-point of this trial, has been reported [16]. The present study deals with the secondary end-points: the effect on blood pressure levels and the metabolic profile.

We conducted a multicentre, open-label, RCT of parallel groups with final blind evaluation. Participants were enrolled in 19 Spanish Sleep Units between February 2014 and February 2015. The study was approved by the ethics committee of each participating centre. All the participants provided informed signed consent.

Women aged 18–75 years referred for suspicion of OSA and diagnosed with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥15 events·h–1) were eligible for the study. Participants were enrolled on the basis of the presence of moderate-to-severe OSA and irrespective of cardiovascular comorbidities. Exclusion criteria are detailed in the supplementary material.

Procedures

Sleep study

Every woman underwent a diagnostic sleep study by means of an unattended, home respiratory polygraphy, using a device validated against polysomnography, and following the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery Guidelines for OSA diagnosis and treatment [17]. A detailed description of the recording montage and sleep scoring procedures is given in the supplementary material.

Baseline visit

After OSA diagnosis, the participants completed a standardised protocol that included the following variables: age, menopausal status, anthropometric measures (body mass index (BMI), neck circumference and waist-to-hip ratio), smoking habit, physical activity, subjective sleep duration, subjective sleepiness measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [18], cardiovascular risk factors and medication, and clinical complaints related to OSA.

Office blood pressure and metabolic measurements

Office blood pressure was measured with a sphygmomanometer, in the early morning, while the patient was seated for at least 5 min in a quiet environment. Blood pressure was measured three times at intervals of 5 min. For this study, the average of the second and third measures was used. Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were assessed. Mean blood pressure was calculated as 1/3(systolic blood pressure)+2/3(diastolic blood pressure) [19].

Blood samples were collected after an overnight fast to measure glucose and lipid metabolism, which included glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c (%)), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (mg·dL−1), cholesterol subtypes (high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and triglycerides (mg·dL−1).

Both blood pressure and the metabolic profile were measured at the baseline visit and after 12 weeks of follow-up.

Randomisation and intervention

Women with AHI ≥15 events·h–1 were randomised to either CPAP or conservative treatment by using a computer-generated list of random numbers in the coordinating centre and stratified by centre.

All the women received dietary and sleep hygiene counselling. The participants were advised not to change their cardiovascular medication throughout the follow-up, except if dictated by clinical needs.

For those women randomised to CPAP therapy, the optimal pressure was titrated on a second night, using an auto CPAP device, according to a previous validation by the Spanish Sleep Network (see supplementary material) [20].

The women were reviewed at 4 and 12 weeks. At every medical appointment, objective adherence to CPAP and side-effects (for the CPAP group), changes in treatment, and re-evaluation of the exclusion criteria were assessed. At the last medical appointment, the blood pressure and metabolic measurements were repeated.

Study end-points

The end-points addressed in the present study correspond to the secondary end-points of the larger study and include changes in office blood pressure measurements, as well as changes in the glucose and lipid profile at 12 weeks compared with baseline, in the CPAP versus control group.

Statistical analysis

For more information on statistical analysis, see the supplementary material. Results are expressed as mean±sd or median (first–third quartile) for continuous variables and number of patients with percentages for categorical variables.

The intergroup comparisons of the changes in blood pressure measures and the glucose and lipid profile were assessed by analysis of covariance with adjustments for baseline values, age, BMI and specific medication use. The analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

A sample size of 307 women (151 allocated to CPAP and 156 to conservative treatment) was calculated for the primary end-point of the original study (quality of life), but also for enough power to analyse other secondary end-points. Thus, this sample size would enable us to detect a change of at least 2 mmHg in blood pressure measures between the CPAP and control group, with an α error of 0.05 and a power of 80% (at least 140 participants would be needed in each group). This change of 2 mmHg is the average blood pressure reduction reported in meta-analyses which analysed RCTs in predominantly hypertensive male cohorts [12, 13, 21–23], and it is considered by international guidelines the expected decrease achieved by CPAP in men with OSA and simple hypertension [24, 25]. This sample size would also allow us to detect a change of at least 0.5% in HbA1c between groups, with an α error of 0.05 and a power of 80% (at least 110 participants would be needed in each group) [26].

Two-tailed p-values <0.05 were considered significant. SPSS Statistics version 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data processing and analysis.

Results

571 women were referred to the participating centres for suspicion of OSA. Of these, 264 were excluded, mainly because they had AHI <15 events·h–1, and 307 were finally randomised to the CPAP (n=151) and control (n=156) groups (figure 1). Only five women in each group did not complete the follow-up.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Flowchart of the study. OSA: severe obstructive sleep apnoea; AHI: apnoea–hypopnoea index; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; ITT: intention-to-treat.

The general baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable, except for age and BMI (table 1). Women in the CPAP group were older and slightly less obese than those in the control group, but there were no differences in other anthropometric features, baseline blood pressure values, glucose and lipid parameters, number and type of antihypertensive medication, and number of lipid-lowering and oral antidiabetic drugs (tables 1 and 2). At the end of the follow-up, no significant change in weight was observed in either the CPAP or control groups. Adherence data are detailed in the supplementary material.

View this table:
TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics of the women included in the study

View this table:
TABLE 2

Baseline use of antihypertensive, antidiabetic and lipid-lowering medication in randomised patients

Only 96 women (31.2%) satisfied the hypertension criteria (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) at entry. Similarly, the proportion of women with HbA1c ≥6.5% was low (41 women (13.3%)). There were no differences between the CPAP and control group with regard to baseline prevalence of hypertension (p=0.512), diabetes mellitus (p=0.597) or hypercholesterolaemia (p=0.477).

Effect of CPAP therapy on blood pressure measurements

In the intention-to-treat analysis, after 12 weeks of follow-up, the CPAP group achieved a significantly greater decrease in diastolic blood pressure (−2.04 mmHg, 95% CI −4.02– −0.05; p=0.045), and a nonsignificantly greater decrease in systolic blood pressure (−1.54 mmHg, 95% CI −4.58–1.51; p=0.321) and mean blood pressure (−1.90 mmHg, 95% CI −4.0–0.31; p=0.084), compared with the control group (table 3 and figure 2). The results of the per-protocol analysis did not significantly differ from those of the intention-to-treat analysis (supplementary table E1 and figure 2).

View this table:
TABLE 3

Changes in blood pressure measurements between randomised groups in the intention-to-treat analysis

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on blood pressure measurements. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; MBP: mean blood pressure. Adjusted treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals (adjusted by baseline values, age, body mass index and antihypertensive medication) of CPAP versus conservative treatment at the end of follow-up compared with baseline. Intention-to-treat analysis: SBP −1.54 mmHg (95% CI −4.58–1.51; p=0.32), DBP −2.04 mmHg (95% CI −4.02– −0.05; p=0.045) and MBP −1.90 mmHg (95% CI −4.0–0.31; p=0.084). Per-protocol analysis: SBP −1.67 mmHg (95% CI −5.12–1.79; p=0.34), DBP −2.61 mmHg (95% CI −4.84– −0.37; p=0.022) and MBP −2.32 mmHg (95% CI −4.75–0.10; p=0.061).

The decrease observed in blood pressure values was greater in certain subgroups of women, although in most cases it did not reach statistical significance (figure 3). In the subgroup of 96 women who showed high systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure at baseline, CPAP reduced systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure by 1.90, 2.56, and 2.20 mmHg, respectively, compared with the control group. In the subgroup of 173 women with severe OSA (AHI ≥30 events·h–1), CPAP achieved decreases of 2.98, 2.50 and 2.68 mmHg in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean blood pressure, respectively, compared with the control group. The greatest changes were found in the group of sleepy women (n=142), in whom CPAP reduced the blood pressure measures by >3 mmHg compared with the control group, including a significant reduction of −3.26 mmHg (95% CI −6.28– −0.23; p=0.035) in diastolic blood pressure.

FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on blood pressure measurements in the subgroups of women with high blood pressure, severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and excessive daytime sleepiness. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; MBP: mean blood pressure. Adjusted treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals (adjusted by baseline values, age, body mass index and antihypertensive medication) of CPAP versus conservative treatment at the end of follow-up compared with baseline in the intention-to-treat analysis. Women with excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score >10): SBP −3.11 mmHg (95% CI −7.84–1.62; p=0.195), DBP −3.26 mmHg (95% CI −6.28– −0.23; p=0.035) and MBP −3.30 mmHg (95% CI −6.62–0.01; p=0.051). Women with severe OSA (apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥30 events·h–1): SBP mmHg −2.98 (95% CI −6.92–0.97; p=0.138), DBP −2.5 mmHg (95% CI −5.18–0.18; p=0.067) and MBP −2.68 mmHg (95% CI −5.54–0.17; p=0.066). Women with high blood pressure (SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg): SBP −1.90 mmHg (95% CI −7.70–3.91; p=0.51), DBP −2.56 mmHg (95% CI −6.02–0.90; p=0.145) and MBP −2.2 mmHg (95% CI −5.30–0.20; p=0.180).

Effect of CPAP therapy on the glucose and lipid profile

12 weeks of CPAP therapy did not change any of the metabolic variables assessed, including fasting glucose, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, cholesterol subtypes or triglycerides, compared with the conservative treatment group. The results were similar in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses (table 4, and supplementary figures E1 and E2).

View this table:
TABLE 4

Changes in glucose and lipid profile between randomised groups in the intention-to-treat analysis

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first RCT to address the effect of CPAP therapy on the blood pressure values and metabolic profile in a large cohort of women with moderate-to-severe OSA. We have found that, compared with conservative treatment, 12 weeks of CPAP therapy reduces blood pressure measures, especially diastolic blood pressure, and that this decrease is within the range reported in other large RCTs conducted in predominantly male hypertensive cohorts. Moreover, this improvement may be larger in some subgroups of women, particularly those with daytime sleepiness. 12 weeks of CPAP therapy did not, however, change the glucose and lipid profile of this sample.

Although there is growing and compelling evidence that shows a beneficial effect of CPAP on blood pressure in hypertensive patients with OSA, all this research was conducted in predominantly or exclusively male cohorts where women were underrepresented [11, 13]. One very recent meta-analysis of seven studies with a total of 794 patients reported that all the trials predominantly recruited male patients, with a mean percentage of 74% male [12]. Similarly, the effect of CPAP on glucose and lipid metabolism has also been assessed in cohorts in which women usually accounted for <30–40% of the whole sample [14, 27–30]. Given that OSA differs between women and men, it cannot be taken for granted that the findings obtained in males can be translated to women. In fact, women may have a different cardiovascular risk profile to men, as suggested by studies which have observed that women had more OSA-related endothelial dysfunction [31, 32], higher levels of high-sensitivity troponin T and a higher risk of incident heart failure or death than men [33].

In our study we observed that 12 weeks of CPAP therapy improves diastolic blood pressure, and to a lesser extent mean blood pressure and systolic blood pressure, compared with conservative treatment of OSA. Although only diastolic blood pressure achieved a statistically significant decrease, the reductions of 1.54–2.04 mmHg in blood pressure values fall within the range of 1.5–2.5 mmHg reported in most meta-analyses of RCTs conducted in hypertensive male cohorts [12, 13, 21–23]. Remarkably, these reductions were achieved even though our cohort mainly comprised nonhypertensive patients. In fact, when we analysed a subgroup of participants that satisfied hypertension criteria at entry, the reductions achieved in all blood pressure measurements were larger (1.90–2.56 mmHg) than those observed for the whole group, although they did not reach statistical significance, due, at least in part, to the loss of power associated with the smaller sample size. Even though the reductions achieved in our sample may be considered modest, international guidelines have pointed out that reductions in blood pressure levels of ∼2–3 mmHg have a clinically significant benefit, and are associated with a 4–8% reduction in future stroke and coronary heart disease risk [34, 35].

Several studies have reported that in addition to patients with high blood pressure values, CPAP might be more effective in those with more severe OSA [13, 22, 25]. When we separately assessed a subgroup of 173 women with AHI ≥30 events·h–1, the effect of CPAP on blood pressure values was stronger, achieving decreases of 2.5–2.98 mmHg in blood pressure measurements, compared with conservative treatment. Although these improvements did not reach statistical significance, they suggest that women with more severe OSA may be a target in whom CPAP can be particularly effective.

Although some studies have reported that sleepy patients would achieve greater blood pressure reductions with CPAP [36], a large RCT of nonsleepy, hypertensive OSA patients demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in diastolic blood pressure and a nearly significant benefit in systolic blood pressure after 1 year of follow-up [37]. Furthermore, data from different meta-analyses have not shown excessive daytime sleepiness to be an independent predictor of CPAP efficacy in hypertensive patients [13, 22, 23]. Interestingly, although the association between excessive daytime sleepiness and OSA in women is controversial [38, 39], in our study sleepy women were the subgroup in which we found the largest blood pressure reductions, with >3 mmHg in all blood pressure values, reaching statistical significance for diastolic blood pressure. Whether the presence of excessive daytime sleepiness in women is a marker of better response to CPAP needs to be confirmed in prospective studies.

The role of CPAP in glucose metabolism in OSA patients is controversial, but recent data suggest that either very high adherence or long follow-up periods are essential to show any benefit. Martinez-Ceron et al. [14] have shown that 6 months, but not 3 months of CPAP treatment significantly reduced HbA1c levels in 50 patients with OSA, type 2 diabetes mellitus and baseline HbA1c ≥6.5% compared with conservative therapy. Pamidi et al. [28] randomised 39 participants with OSA and pre-diabetes to receive either 8 h nightly CPAP or oral placebo for 2 weeks, and found that CPAP treatment improved glucose metabolism compared with placebo. However, a recent multicentre study in 298 participants with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 6.5–8.5%) and OSA who were randomised to CPAP or usual care for 6 months did not find any improvement in HbA1c levels, even when analyses were restricted to those with poorer baseline glycaemic control, more severe sleep apnoea or those who were adherent to CPAP [27]. In our study we did not observe any changes in either group in HbA1c or insulin resistance measured by HOMA-IR, which suggests a lack of effect of CPAP therapy on the glycaemic profile of nonselected OSA women. We cannot rule out, however, that the low prevalence of women with high HbA1c at entry (only 13.3% had values >6.5%), the short follow-up of only 3 months and the merely average CPAP adherence in our series may have influenced the final results.

Several studies report conflicting results regarding the role of CPAP in the lipid metabolism. One study that analysed 613 OSA patients who were not taking lipid-lowering medications observed no effect of CPAP on 2-year fasting lipid changes [30]. Chirinos et al. [40] randomised 181 OSA patients to receive treatment with CPAP, weight loss intervention or CPAP plus weight loss intervention. After 24 weeks of follow-up, the group receiving CPAP alone did not show any improvement in cholesterol or triglyceride levels, whereas those assigned to weight loss or the combined interventions had reductions in serum triglyceride levels, but not in cholesterol levels. Concurrent with the aforementioned evidence, we did not observe that 3 months of CPAP therapy had any effect on lipid metabolism in women with moderate-to-severe OSA compared with conservative treatment.

Our study has some limitations. First, we analysed a nonselected sample of women in whom the enrolment criterion was moderate-to-severe OSA, regardless of comorbidities. As a result, most women had normal baseline blood pressure, glucose and lipid values, so, although our sample size has enough power to demonstrate reductions in blood pressure and HbA1c measurements, it is less likely to achieve significant improvements in patients with baseline values within the normal range, due to a possible floor effect. Second, the follow-up period of 3 months may have been insufficient to achieve improvements in some of the variables assessed, particularly the metabolic profile. However, a longer follow-up could have provoked ethical issues, since active treatment was withheld from patients in the control group. Third, the use of office instead of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, which is the recommended method for blood pressure monitoring in OSA patients, has disadvantages. Office blood pressure is usually higher than ambulatory blood pressure, may lead to white-coat hypertension and precludes the assessment of day/night patterns of blood pressure, which may bias the results taking into account that the impact of CPAP on blood pressure in OSA patients is more pronounced during sleep than during wakefulness [24]. Nevertheless, office blood pressure measurements have been associated with many cardiovascular outcomes in large epidemiological and intervention studies, and in daily clinical practice it is more easily available than ambulatory blood pressure. Fourth, comorbid insomnia with short sleep duration is a common finding in women and may exert additive effects on blood pressure in OSA patients. Unfortunately, we did not assess this item in our study. Nevertheless, since this is a randomised trial, it should be expected that any effect of insomnia would have been balanced in both groups.

In conclusion, this study assessed, for the first time, the effect of CPAP therapy on several cardiometabolic variables in unselected women with moderate-to-severe OSA. We found that 12 weeks of CPAP therapy improves diastolic blood pressure measurements compared with conservative treatment. The magnitude of this improvement is similar to that found in many male samples. Some subgroups of patients, such as those with high blood pressure values, severe OSA and subjective excessive daytime sleepiness, may achieve larger reductions in blood pressure levels. Furthermore, 12 weeks of CPAP did not change the glucose or lipid profile of women with moderate-to-severe OSA. Given that OSA differs in men and women, and that a different cardiovascular risk profile cannot be ruled out, more research is needed to clarify the role of treatment in OSA-related cardiovascular risk in women.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary material ERJ-00257-2017_Supplement

Figure E1. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on the glucose metabolism. Adjusted treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (adjusted by baseline values, age, body mass index, and antidiabetic medication) of continuous positive airway pressure versus conservative treatment at the end of follow-up compared with baseline. Intention-to-treat analysis (closed dots): Fasting glucose -1.45 (95%CI -4.75 to 1.84; p=0.387), Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 0.07 (95%CI -0.01 to 0.14; p=0.096), Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA) -0.05 (95%CI -0.86 to 0.76; p=0.90). Per-protocol analysis (open dots): Fasting glucose -0.53 (95%CI -4.27 to 3.22; p=0.78), Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 0.07 (95%CI -0.01 to 0.15; p=0.10), Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA) 0.09 (95%CI -0.85 to 1.03; p=0.85). ERJ-00257-2017_Figure_E1

Figure E2. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on the lipid metabolism. Adjusted treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (adjusted by baseline values, age, body mass index, and lipid lowering medication) of continuous positive airway pressure versus conservative treatment at the end of follow-up compared with baseline. ERJ-00257-2017_Figure_E2

Acknowledgements

The Spanish Sleep Network is composed of the following individuals: Carlos Queipo-Corona (Respiratory Dept, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain), Carmen Carmona-Bernal (Medical-Surgical Unit of Respiratory Diseases, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain), Nuria Feu-Collado (Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain), Juan Santos-Morano (Respiratory Dept, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Sevilla, Spain), Paula Rodriguez-Rodriguez (Respiratory Dept, Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain), Irene Cano-Pumarega (Respiratory Dept, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain), Maria L. Alonso-Alvarez (Respiratory Dept, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain), Beatriz Galvez-Martinez (Respiratory Dept, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain), Nuria Reina-Marfil (Respiratory Dept, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain), Maria J. Selma (Respiratory Dept, Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain), Lucia L. Quintana-Hidalgo (Laboratory Dept, Hospital Dr Negrin, Gran Canaria, Spain), Antonia Llunell-Casanovas (Respiratory Dept, Consorcio Sanitario de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain), Jaime Corral (Respiratory Dept, Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara, Caceres, Spain) and Andrea Crespo Sedano (Respiratory Dept, Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain).

Author contributions: Conception and design: F. Campos-Rodriguez, M.A. Martinez-Garcia. Acquisition and interpretation of data: F. Campos-Rodriguez, M.A. Martinez-Garcia, M. Gonzalez-Martinez, A. Sanchez-Armengol, B. Jurado-Gamez, N. Reyes-Nuñez, M.F. Troncoso, A. Abad-Fernandez, J. Teran-Santos, J. Caballero-Rodriguez, M. Martin-Romero, A. Encabo-Motiño, L. Sacristan-Bou, J. Navarro-Esteva, M. Somoza-Gonzalez, J.F. Masa, M.A. Sanchez-Quiroga, B. Jara-Chinarro, B. Orosa-Bertol. Statistical analysis of the data: J. Cordero-Guevara. Drafting of manuscript or critical revision of major intellectual content: all authors. Final approval of the version to be published: all authors.

Footnotes

  • This article has supplementary material available from erj.ersjournals.com

  • This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with identifier number NCT02047071.

  • Support statement: This study was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, cofunded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and FEDER funds (PI13/00743), and a grant from the Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica SEPAR (039/2013). None of these institutions played any role in the objectives, methods, data analysis or conclusions of the study. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received February 4, 2017.
  • Accepted April 20, 2017.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Peppard PE,
    2. Young T,
    3. Barnet JH, et al.
    Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol 2013; 177: 1006–1014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Franklin KA,
    2. Sahlin C,
    3. Stenlund H, et al.
    Sleep apnoea is a common occurrence in females. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 610–615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Young T,
    2. Hutton R,
    3. Finn L, et al.
    The gender bias in sleep apnea diagnosis. Are women missed because they have different symptoms? Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 2445–2451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Redline S,
    2. Kump K,
    3. Tishler PV, et al.
    Gender differences in sleep disordered breathing in a community-based sample. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149: 722–726.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. O'Connor C,
    2. Thornley KS,
    3. Hanly PJ
    . Gender differences in the polysomnographic features of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 1465–1472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Shepertycky MR,
    2. Banno K,
    3. Kryger MH
    . Differences between men and women in the clinical presentation of patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep 2005; 28: 309–314.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Sforza E,
    2. Chouchou F,
    3. Collet P, et al.
    Sex differences in obstructive sleep apnoea in an elderly French population. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 1137–1143.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rowley JA,
    2. Zhou X,
    3. Vergine I, et al.
    Influence of gender on upper airway mechanics: upper airway resistance and Pcrit. J Appl Physiol 2001; 91: 2248–2254.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Quintana-Gallego E,
    2. Carmona-Bernal C,
    3. Capote F, et al.
    Gender differences in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a clinical study of 1166 patients. Respir Med 2004; 98: 984–989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gagnadoux F,
    2. Le Vaillant M,
    3. Paris A, et al.
    Relationship between OSA clinical phenotypes and CPAP treatment outcomes. Chest 2016; 149: 288–290.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Martínez-García M-A,
    2. Capote F,
    3. Campos-Rodríguez F, et al.
    Effect of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension: the HIPARCO randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 2407–2415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Hu X,
    2. Fan J,
    3. Chen S, et al.
    The role of continuous positive airway pressure in blood pressure control for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Hypertens 2015; 17: 215–222.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Fava C,
    2. Dorigoni S,
    3. Dalle Vedove F, et al.
    Effect of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with OSA/hypopnea a systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest 2014; 145: 762–771.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Martínez-Cerón E,
    2. Barquiel B,
    3. Bezos A-M, et al.
    Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on glycemic control in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes. A randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 476–485.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Nadeem R,
    2. Singh M,
    3. Nida M, et al.
    Effect of CPAP treatment for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome on lipid profile: a meta-regression analysis. J Clin Sleep Med 2014; 10: 1295–1302.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Campos-Rodriguez F,
    2. Queipo-Corona C,
    3. Carmona-Bernal C, et al.
    Continuous positive airway pressure improves quality of life in women with obstructive sleep apnea. A randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 1286–1294.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Lloberes P,
    2. Durán-Cantolla J,
    3. Martínez-García MÁ, et al.
    Diagnóstico y tratamiento del síndrome de apneas-hipopneas del sueño. [Diagnosis and treatment of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.] Arch Bronconeumol 2011; 47: 143–156.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Chiner E,
    2. Arriero JM,
    3. Signes-Costa J, et al.
    Validacion de la version espanola del test de somnolencia Epworth en pacientes con sindrome de apnea de sueno. [Validation of the Spanish version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in patients with a sleep apnea syndrome.] Arch Bronconeumol 1999; 35: 422–427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Sesso HD,
    2. Stampfer MJ,
    3. Rosner B, et al.
    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in men. Hypertension 2000; 36: 801–807.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Masa JF,
    2. Jiménez A,
    3. Durán J, et al.
    Alternative methods of titrating continuous positive airway pressure: a large multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 170: 1218–1224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Montesi SB,
    2. Edwards BA,
    3. Malhotra A, et al.
    The effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Sleep Med 2012; 8: 587–596.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Haentjens P,
    2. Van Meerhaeghe A,
    3. Moscariello A, et al.
    The impact of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: evidence from a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 757–764.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Bazzano LA,
    2. Khan Z,
    3. Reynolds K, et al.
    Effect of nocturnal nasal continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea. Hypertension 2007; 50: 417–423.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Mancia G,
    2. Fagard R,
    3. Narkiewicz K, et al.
    2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2013; 31: 1281–1357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Parati G,
    2. Lombardi C,
    3. Hedner J, et al.
    Recommendations for the management of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and hypertension. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 523–538.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Hassaballa HA,
    2. Tulaimat A,
    3. Herdegen JJ, et al.
    The effect of continuous positive airway pressure on glucose control in diabetic patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 2005; 9: 176–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Shaw JE,
    2. Punjabi NM,
    3. Naughton MT, et al.
    The effect of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 486–492.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Pamidi S,
    2. Wroblewski K,
    3. Stepien M, et al.
    Eight hours of nightly continuous positive airway pressure treatment of obstructive sleep apnea improves glucose metabolism in patients with prediabetes. A randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 192: 96–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lin M-T,
    2. Lin H-H,
    3. Lee P-L, et al.
    Beneficial effect of continuous positive airway pressure on lipid profiles in obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Sleep Breath 2015; 19: 809–817.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Keenan BT,
    2. Maislin G,
    3. Sunwoo BY, et al.
    Obstructive sleep apnoea treatment and fasting lipids: a comparative effectiveness study. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 405–414.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Faulx MD,
    2. Larkin EK,
    3. Hoit BD, et al.
    Sex influences endothelial function in sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep 2004; 27: 1113–1120.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Randby A,
    2. Namtvedt SK,
    3. Hrubos-Strøm H, et al.
    Sex-dependent impact of OSA on digital vascular function. Chest 2013; 144: 915–922.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Roca GQ,
    2. Redline S,
    3. Claggett B, et al.
    Sex-specific association of sleep apnea severity with subclinical myocardial injury, ventricular hypertrophy, and heart failure risk in a community-dwelling cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities-Sleep Heart Health Study. Circulation 2015; 132: 1329–1337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2014; 384: 591–598.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Chobanian AV,
    2. Bakris GL,
    3. Black HR, et al.
    The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–2572.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Robinson GV,
    2. Smith DM,
    3. Langford BA, et al.
    Continuous positive airway pressure does not reduce blood pressure in nonsleepy hypertensive OSA patients. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 1229–1235.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Barbé F,
    2. Durán-Cantolla J,
    3. Capote F, et al.
    Long-term effect of continuous positive airway pressure in hypertensive patients with sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 718–726.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Baldwin CM,
    2. Kapur VK,
    3. Holberg CJ, et al.
    Associations between gender and measures of daytime somnolence in the Sleep Heart Health Study. Sleep 2004; 27: 305–311.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Morrell MJ,
    2. Finn L,
    3. McMillan A, et al.
    The impact of ageing and sex on the association between sleepiness and sleep disordered breathing. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 386–393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Chirinos JA,
    2. Gurubhagavatula I,
    3. Teff K, et al.
    CPAP, weight loss, or both for obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2265–2275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Email
Print
Citation Tools

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure and metabolic profile in women with sleep apnoea
Francisco Campos-Rodriguez, Monica Gonzalez-Martinez, Angeles Sanchez-Armengol, Bernabe Jurado-Gamez, Jose Cordero-Guevara, Nuria Reyes-Nuñez, Maria F. Troncoso, Araceli Abad-Fernandez, Joaquin Teran-Santos, Julian Caballero-Rodriguez, Mercedes Martin-Romero, Ana Encabo-Motiño, Lirios Sacristan-Bou, Javier Navarro-Esteva, Maria Somoza-Gonzalez, Juan F. Masa, Maria A. Sanchez-Quiroga, Beatriz Jara-Chinarro, Belen Orosa-Bertol, Miguel A. Martinez-Garcia
European Respiratory Journal Aug 2017, 50 (2) 1700257; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00257-2017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To