Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Costly comorbidities of COPD: the ignored side of the coin?

Job F.M. van Boven
European Respiratory Journal 2017 50: 1700917; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00917-2017
Job F.M. van Boven
1Dept of General Practice, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
2Unit of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, Dept of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: j.f.m.van.boven@rug.nl
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Comorbidities more costly than COPD itself: multimorbidity requires change in healthcare practice and financing! http://ow.ly/2fSU30cAGTI

Correct, the alliteration in this editorial's title is not a co-incidence! Ironically, COPD and comorbidity both start with two identical letters and previously in this journal it has even been suggested twice that COPD could also stand for “COmorbidity with Pulmonary Disease” [1, 2]. However, after having been the only notorious couple for a long time, from now on they will have to face some fierce competition from a new rising kid on the “co”-block: costs.

In the past decade, it has become increasingly clear that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and its comorbidities are almost inseparable, like Blackbeard and his crew of Caribbean pirates, or Hippolyta and her Amazons. Several underlying biological mechanisms and clinical explanations have been suggested to explain this co-existence of multiple diseases besides COPD, including the role of shared risk factors (e.g. tobacco, lifestyle, genetics), chronic systemic inflammation, hypoxia and oxidative stress [3, 4]. It is therefore no surprise that holistic treatment approaches have been widely advocated with a key role for general practitioners and geriatricians [3, 5]. Yet, COPD guidelines lagged somewhat behind, with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) providing more explicit guidance on managing some individual comorbidities from 2011 onwards [6]. Even in the latest version [7], it is merely recommended to treat comorbidities as there is no COPD, with no guidance provided on how to organise multimorbidity care. Moreover, most COPD treatment evidence still comes from restricted and controlled COPD trials without significant comorbidity [7]. Real-life data consistently reveal that it is highly relevant to take comorbidities into account from a clinical perspective. Indeed, several previous studies showed their impact on mortality [8, 9], exacerbations [10] and hospitalisations [11]. Far less attention has however been paid to the health economic, system and policy implications of the comorbidities of COPD.

In this issue of the European Respiratory Journal, the study of Chen et al. [12] highlights the substantial financial burden of comorbidity when taking COPD as index disease. In short, Canadian administrative data (1996–2012) from >250 000 people were used to compare healthcare utilisation and related costs for 16 disease categories in patients with and without COPD. It was found that the excess costs in patients with COPD amounted to €3668 per person-year of which only one quarter were attributable to COPD, 51% to comorbidities and 23% could not be allocated to a specific condition. Most costly comorbidities were circulatory diseases, other respiratory diseases, digestive disorders and psychiatric disorders. Are these new findings? Not really. Generally, these results are largely in line with previous work on this issue [13–15] and the comorbidities that are explicitly mentioned in GOLD [7]. This study is however the first that compares the impact of an extensive list of comorbidities to a non-COPD population and uses up to 15 years of follow-up. On the other hand, some noteworthy limitations of the study include the lack of data on COPD severity (e.g. lung function, patient-reported outcomes) and smoke exposure, and that diagnoses were based on claims only. These are all limitations common to administrative data [13], where it remains important to realise that claims data can be prone to under- and overreporting and misdiagnoses [16]. Although being an important part of the economic impact of COPD [17], indirect costs (such as work productivity, or relatives and caretakers care) were not taken into account. Lastly, when interpreting this Canadian study, we should be aware that the transferability of economic costs to other populations relate to differences in local risk factor distributions, healthcare practice, accessibility and other country-specific factors, such as health insurance coverage and reimbursement rules [18].

Despite these limitations, the study of Chen et al. [12] could be of particular value for health economics and policy. A systematic review of recent cost-effectiveness analyses of new pharmacological COPD treatments already recognised the lack of inclusion of comorbidities in current economic evaluations and recommends inclusion in future analyses [19]. To support these future studies, Chen et al. [12] provide very useful data. The inclusion of comorbidity costs seems thereby of particular relevance for interventions with expected extra-pulmonary effects such as those that focus on economic evaluations of pulmonary rehabilitation, smoking cessation, indoor and outdoor air pollution prevention or enhancing medication adherence [20, 21]. Consequently, trials that assess the effectiveness of these interventions need to include not only a broad heterogeneous population, but also a wider range of outcomes.

Looking beyond health economics, on a wider scope, the general messages from COPD comorbidity studies published over the past few years is clear: comorbidities are frequent, have substantial clinical and economic impact and require a holistic treatment approach. When extrapolating the term “comorbidity” to “all multimorbid patients (including those with COPD)” and taking into account the ageing world population, the issue becomes even more relevant. With multimorbidity defined as the presence of at least two long-term morbidities, about one quarter of the total population suffers from multimorbidity, with profound increases with age, but with absolute numbers higher in the under 65 age group [5]. Of note, multimorbidity is usually associated with increased hospitalisation risk, polypharmacy and non-adherence [22]. New National Institute For Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines and recent reviews provide some very useful guidance on the ideal contents of multimorbidity care “beyond the lungs” [23, 24], yet implementation in daily practice will be extremely challenging given the current organisation of care [25]. In my view, but also called for by others [26], some radical changes are first needed in the way that we look at study outcomes and value, practice and organise (respiratory) medicine, and finance our healthcare systems. Theoretically, the required shift from a single disease oriented approach towards a person centred generalist approach is a sine qua non condition. Hereby, we could think of investments in e-health, self-management and monitoring, larger multidisciplinary primary care teams of general practitioners, nurses, pharmacists and physiotherapists, longer primary care consultations, smaller practices, specialists working (or being consulted) in primary care or generalists working in secondary care. In practice, however, health systems are not fully equipped to deal with this shift and there remain numerous obstacles and questions that need to be answered: How do we make sure our staff is sufficiently skilled for managing multimorbidity? How do we identify “at risk” groups that are most likely to benefit? In systems mostly based on fee-for-service, codings and suitable reimbursement for chronic disease management are generally lacking. If bundled payments or population based fees do exist, this may stimulate integrated care, but who will coordinate this care? How do we evaluate economic benefits? All important issues that we are not going to solve as a respiratory community alone, but fundamental issues that should be a top priority for policy makers, healthcare funders and healthcare professionals alike.

Realising that multimorbidity is the norm and not the exception, there is an urgent need for integrated working, organising and financing at all levels of care. From a clinical perspective it has been emphasised over and over again to treat the patient and not the disease. Now, also from a health economic and system point of view, the time has come to flip the coin.

Disclosures

Supplementary Material

J.F.M. van Boven ERJ-00917-2017_van_Boven

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com

  • Received May 5, 2017.
  • Accepted May 9, 2017.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2017

References

  1. ↵
    1. Vanfleteren LE
    . Does COPD stand for “COmorbidity with Pulmonary Disease”? Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 14–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Sin DD
    . Should COPD stand for “comorbidity-related obstructive pulmonary disease”? Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 901–902.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Barnes PJ
    . Mechanisms of development of multimorbidity in the elderly. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 790–806.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Kent BD,
    2. Mitchell PD,
    3. McNicholas WT
    . Hypoxemia in patients with COPD: cause, effects, and disease progression. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2011; 6: 199–208.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Barnett K,
    2. Mercer SW,
    3. Norbury M, et al.
    Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012; 380: 37–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Vestbo J,
    2. Hurd SS,
    3. Agusti AA, et al.
    Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 347–365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Vogelmeier CF,
    2. Criner GJ,
    3. Martinez FJ, et al.
    Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report: GOLD Executive Summary. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1700214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Divo MJ,
    2. Cote C,
    3. de Torres JP, et al.
    Comorbidities and risk of mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 155–161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Almagro P,
    2. Cabrera FJ,
    3. Diez-Manglano J, et al.
    Comorbidome and short-term prognosis in hospitalised COPD patients: the ESMI study. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 850–853.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Westerik JA,
    2. Metting EI,
    3. van Boven JF, et al.
    Associations between chronic comorbidity and exacerbation risk in primary care patients with COPD. Respir Res 2017; 18: 31.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Van Boven JF,
    2. Román-Rodríguez M,
    3. Palmer JF, et al.
    Comorbidome, pattern, and impact of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome in real-life. Chest 2016; 149: 1011–1020.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chen W,
    2. FitzGerald JM,
    3. Sin DD, et al.
    Excess economic burden of comorbidities in COPD: a 15-year population-based study. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Mannino DM,
    2. Higuchi K,
    3. Yu TC, et al.
    Economic burden of COPD in the presence of comorbidities. Chest 2015; 148: 138–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lin PJ,
    2. Shaya FT,
    3. Scharf SM
    . Economic implications of comorbid conditions among Medicaid beneficiaries with COPD. Respir Med 2010; 104: 697–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Huber MB,
    2. Wacker ME,
    3. Vogelmeier CF, et al.
    Excess costs of comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. PloS One 2015; 10: e0123292.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Triest FJ,
    2. Franssen FM,
    3. Spruit MA, et al.
    Poor agreement between chart-based and objectively identified comorbidities of COPD. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 1492–1495.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Van Boven JF,
    2. Vegter S,
    3. van der Molen T, et al.
    COPD in the working age population: the economic impact on both patients and government. COPD 2013; 10: 629–639.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Vemer P,
    2. Rutten-van Mölken MP
    . Crossing borders: factors affecting differences in cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions between European countries. Value Health 2010; 13: 230–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Van der Schans S,
    2. Goossens LM,
    3. Boland MR, et al.
    Systematic review and quality appraisal of cost-effectiveness analyses of pharmacologic maintenance treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: methodological considerations and recommendations. Pharmacoeconomics 2017; 35: 43–63.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Van Boven JF,
    2. Ryan D,
    3. Eakin MN, et al.
    Enhancing respiratory medication adherence: the role of health care professionals and cost-effectiveness considerations. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2016; 4: 835–846.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Hoogendoorn M,
    2. Feenstra TL,
    3. Hoogenveen RT, et al.
    Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in patients with COPD. Thorax 2010; 65: 711–718.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Wolff JL,
    2. Starfield B,
    3. Anderson G
    . Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 2269–2276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NG56]. Multimorbidity: Clinical Assessment and Management. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-cgwave0704/documents Date last updated: September 2016.
  23. ↵
    1. Vanfleteren LE,
    2. Spruit MA,
    3. Wouters EF, et al.
    Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease beyond the lungs. Lancet Respir Med 2016; 4: 911–924.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Royal College of General Practitioners. Managing multi-morbidity in practice…what lessons can be learnt from the care of people with COPD and co-morbidities? Royal College of General Practitioners/National Health Service, 2013.
  25. ↵
    1. Salisbury C
    . Multimorbidity: redesigning health care for people who use it. Lancet 2012; 380: 7–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 50 Issue 1 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 50 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Costly comorbidities of COPD: the ignored side of the coin?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Costly comorbidities of COPD: the ignored side of the coin?
Job F.M. van Boven
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2017, 50 (1) 1700917; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00917-2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Costly comorbidities of COPD: the ignored side of the coin?
Job F.M. van Boven
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2017, 50 (1) 1700917; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00917-2017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Sing out for COPD!
  • Respiratory tract microbiome: from correlation to causation
  • Targeting the nasty nestin to shoot lung fibrosis
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society