Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

The effect of 100% oxygen on tidal breathing parameters in preschool children

Rachel E. Foong, Alana J. Harper, Graham L. Hall, Kathryn A. Ramsey on behalf of AREST CF
European Respiratory Journal 2017 49: 1601959; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01959-2016
Rachel E. Foong
1Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia
2Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Rachel.Foong@telethonkids.org.au
Alana J. Harper
1Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia
2Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graham L. Hall
1Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia
2Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
3School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn A. Ramsey
1Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia
2Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
4Cystic Fibrosis Research and Treatment Centre, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Multiple breath nitrogen washout does not cause physiologically relevant breathing changes in preschool children http://ow.ly/xv9B30a0c7L

To the Editor:

The multiple-breath nitrogen washout (MBN2W) test assesses ventilation distribution by determining the number of functional residual capacity (FRC) lung turnovers required for tidal breathing of 100% oxygen to wash out resident nitrogen from the lungs [1]. In particular, the test has gained significant interest as a tool for monitoring disease progression and prognosis in children with lung disease, with a specific focus on cystic fibrosis (CF) due to its ability to discriminate between health and disease [2]. The use of 100% oxygen has become the preferred choice of inert gas in older children and adults. However, as discussed in the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society consensus statement, there are disadvantages and unknowns as to how patient age, sedation and sleep state may interact with 100% oxygen to alter breathing patterns [3]. It is known that 100% oxygen alters breathing patterns in infants [4, 5] and therefore this approach is not recommended in this age group; however, it is assumed that the effect of 100% oxygen on respiration is diminished beyond infancy [3], with no reported impact of 100% oxygen on breathing parameters in school-aged children [6]. It remains unknown whether hyperoxia affects tidal breathing in young children, as there are no published studies in this age range. This study aimed to determine whether breathing 100% oxygen altered tidal breathing parameters in healthy young children and young children with CF.

MBN2W tests were conducted in children with CF who were enrolled in the Australian Respiratory Early Surveillance Team for CF (AREST CF) surveillance programme and healthy children recruited from the community aged 3 to 6 years. Tests were performed (Exhalyzer D, Eco Medics AG, Duernten, Switzerland) according to international standards by using Spiroware software (version 3.1.8) [3]. Children performed at least 1 min of tidal breathing in room air (minimum of 20 tidal breaths) prior to breathing 100% oxygen as part of the MBN2W test through a mouthpiece and with a noseclip on.

Tidal breathing parameters including tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), minute ventilation (VʹE), mean tidal expiratory flow (MTEF) and mean tidal inspiratory flow (MTIF) were compared for air exposure and 100% oxygen exposure from the first MBN2W trial, as this was the first exposure to oxygen and priming effects of oxygen exposure were shown in infants [4]. Results from subsequent trials were also available for comparisons. The variability of tidal breathing within each test was measured by calculating the coefficient of variation of VT (CVVT). Small breaths of <3 mL·kg−1 were excluded [7]. Paired t-tests that compared tidal breathing parameters within children were performed by using SPSS Version 23 software (IBM SPSS Statistics, 2015) and the data reported as mean±sd.

MBN2W data were collected from 43 children (15 healthy, 28 with CF) with a mean (range) age of 5.2 years (healthy 5.4 (3.7–6.6) years; CF 5.2 (3.0–6.9) years; p=0.49). Of the 15 healthy children, nine had not performed MBN2W before (60%), whereas for children with CF only 21% (6/28) were MBW-naïve. There were no significant differences in height (healthy 110.6±7.7 cm; CF 110.1±8.5 cm; p=0.85) and weight (healthy 19.7±4.7 kg; CF 19.6±3.6 kg; p=0.90) between healthy children and those with CF. FRC was not different between groups (healthy 0.90±0.16; CF 0.88±0.21; p=0.71), but lung clearance index (LCI) was higher in children with CF than in healthy children (healthy 6.68±0.46; CF 8.12±1.56; p=0.001). Breath number was higher (∼5 breaths) when breathing 100% oxygen, due to the longer duration of nitrogen washout in children with CF.

Mean VT was 4.8% or 13.3 mL lower during tidal breathing of 100% oxygen than with room air (table 1). This decrease in VT was driven by a statistically significant 7% decrease in the VT of healthy children upon breathing 100% oxygen (p=0.04). 10 of the 15 healthy children decreased their VT, with three children exhibiting a decrease in VT of more than 20%. The VT during 100% oxygen breathing in children with CF did not significantly change from that in room air (table 1). The difference in VT for room air to 100% oxygen was only present for the first trial, and no difference was observed for subsequent trials. Variability of VT as determined by CVVT was not different for room air and 100% oxygen in any MBN2W trial in either group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Differences in tidal breathing parameters after breathing 100% oxygen.

Respiratory rate was unchanged during 100% oxygen exposure (p=0.16) (table 1), however VʹE was significantly decreased (p=0.001) by 8% in both healthy children (p=0.04) and children with CF (p=0.01). MTEF and MTIF were significantly lower during 100% oxygen exposure in healthy children (p<0.005) and children with CF (p=0.03) than in room air. Two healthy children (aged 5.9 and 5.3 years) and two children with CF (aged 3.4 and 4.3 years) had a reduction in MTEF of more than 60 mL·s−1(table 1), when breathing 100% oxygen compared with room air. VʹE, MTEF and MTIF remained lower for 100% oxygen than for room air in subsequent trials.

The data shows that tidal breathing of 100% oxygen significantly altered VT, VʹE, MTEF and MTIF in young children. Decreased VT with 100% oxygen exposure was observed in healthy children but not those with CF. However, while the decrease in VT was statistically significant, the mean decrease was not more than 10% of the VT, which is the cut-off thought to be physiologically relevant. This postulated 10% cut-off was chosen as simulated lung volumes in children of 3–8 years using a lung model resulted in a 10% variation from known values [6, 8]. Six (of 43) children had a change in VT value that exceeded 10%, however there was no obvious effect of age or disease status in these individuals, and it is likely that the mean change in tidal breathing parameters was driven by a small number of individual children. There was no significant difference in the %CVVT value between room air and 100% oxygen, which suggests that variation in tidal breathing pattern was not a contributing factor to the change in tidal breathing parameters.

Studies of the effects of MBN2W in CF have been conducted in infants, including use of healthy infants as controls [4, 5]. Singer et al. [4] showed a decrease in VT value of 8.7%, 11% in VʹE and 14% in MTEF, whereas our study showed a decrease in VT value of 4.8%, 8.3% in VʹE and 8.4% in MTEF. Differences between CF and healthy infants were not compared although the VT decrease in CF was double that of the healthy infants (6.7 mL versus 2.7 mL). Similar to our study, the authors reported heterogeneous responses independent of age and disease. More recently, Jost et al. [6] compared changes in tidal breathing following MBN2W in healthy term-born and former preterm school-aged children (6–9 years), showing a small 3.5% decrease in VT. While the preterm children recorded a significantly larger decrease in VT value (8%) than did healthy children (0.7%) the study concluded that 100% oxygen had a minimal effect on tidal breathing.

A limitation of this study was that tidal breathing of room air was always performed prior to exposure to 100% oxygen, thus we cannot exclude an order effect. In particular, an order effect may have contributed to the higher VT value in healthy children since these children were recruited from the community and, unlike the children with CF, had no prior experience of performing lung function tests in a clinical setting. Children unfamiliar with the test may have had an initial artificial increase in VT value and, once settled into the test, reduced their VT during the 100% O2 exposure. Changes in VT influence LCI and FRC in infants [9], and unfortunately this study was not appropriately designed to test if LCI and FRC are altered by changes in breathing pattern in preschool children.

In summary, while changes in tidal breathing parameters were observed following breathing 100% oxygen, there is no evidence to suggest that these changes are physiologically relevant across the preschool age group. Further studies should randomly alter the order of room air and 100% oxygen exposure. Our data do not provide conclusive evidence that MBN2W test should not be performed in preschool children.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Caroline Gallagher and Jasmine Grdosic (both from the Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia) for assistance with patient recruitment and study measurements.

Footnotes

  • Support statement: This work was supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (Hall14AO). G.L. Hall and K.A. Ramsey are supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowships (APP102550 and APP1088389, respectively). Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received October 6, 2016.
  • Accepted March 5, 2017.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2017

References

  1. ↵
    1. Robinson PD,
    2. Goldman MD,
    3. Gustafsson PM
    . Inert gas washout: theoretical background and clinical utility in respiratory disease. Respiration 2009; 78: 339–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Subbarao P,
    2. Milla C,
    3. Aurora P, et al.
    Multiple-breath washout as a lung function test in cystic fibrosis. A Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Workshop Report. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 932–939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Robinson PD,
    2. Latzin P,
    3. Verbanck S, et al.
    Consensus statement for inert gas washout measurement using multiple- and single- breath tests. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 507–522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Singer F,
    2. Yammine S,
    3. Schmidt A, et al.
    Ventilatory response to nitrogen multiple-breath washout in infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014; 49: 342–347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Schibler A,
    2. Schneider M,
    3. Frey U, et al.
    Moment ratio analysis of multiple breath nitrogen washout in infants with lung disease. Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 1094–1101.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  6. ↵
    1. Jost K,
    2. Lenherr N,
    3. Singer F, et al.
    Changes in breathing pattern upon 100% oxygen in children at early school age. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2016; 228: 9–15.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Jensen R,
    2. Stanojevic S,
    3. Klingel M, et al.
    A systematic approach to multiple breath nitrogen washout test quality. PLOS ONE 2016; 11: e0157523.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Schmidt A,
    2. Yammine S,
    3. Proietti E, et al.
    Validation of multiple-breath washout equipment for infants and young children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015; 50: 607–614.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Schmalisch G,
    2. Wilitzki S,
    3. Bührer C, et al.
    The lung clearance index in young infants: impact of tidal volume and dead space. Physiol Meas 2015; 36: 1601–1613.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 49 Issue 6 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 49 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The effect of 100% oxygen on tidal breathing parameters in preschool children
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
The effect of 100% oxygen on tidal breathing parameters in preschool children
Rachel E. Foong, Alana J. Harper, Graham L. Hall, Kathryn A. Ramsey
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2017, 49 (6) 1601959; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01959-2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The effect of 100% oxygen on tidal breathing parameters in preschool children
Rachel E. Foong, Alana J. Harper, Graham L. Hall, Kathryn A. Ramsey
European Respiratory Journal Jun 2017, 49 (6) 1601959; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01959-2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Paediatric pulmonology
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Refined risk stratification in PAH and timing of lung transplantation
  • Outcomes of cirrhotic patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension
  • Diagnosis for cystic fibrosis with new generation sweat test
Show more Agora

Research letters

  • Outcomes of cirrhotic patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension
  • Diagnosis for cystic fibrosis with new generation sweat test
  • Association of blood trihalomethane concentrations with lung function
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society