Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Volatolomics of breath as an emerging frontier in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Morad K. Nakhleh, Hossam Haick, Marc Humbert, Sylvia Cohen-Kaminsky
European Respiratory Journal 2017 49: 1601897; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01897-2016
Morad K. Nakhleh
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
2AP-HP, DHU TORINO, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, France
3Inserm UMR_S 999, LabEx LERMIT, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mnakhleh@gmail.com
Hossam Haick
4Dept of Chemical Engineering and Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute, Technion–IIT, Haifa, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Humbert
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
2AP-HP, DHU TORINO, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, France
3Inserm UMR_S 999, LabEx LERMIT, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sylvia Cohen-Kaminsky
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
2AP-HP, DHU TORINO, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris, France
3Inserm UMR_S 999, LabEx LERMIT, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence in support of the significant improvement in survival rates and clinical outcomes when pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is diagnosed at early stages. Nevertheless, it remains a major clinical challenge and the outcomes are dependent on invasive right heart catheterisation.

Resulting from pathophysiological processes and detectable in exhaled breath, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been proposed as noninvasive biomarkers for PAH. Studies have confirmed significant alterations of the exhaled VOCs among PAH patients when compared to controls and/or patients with other respiratory diseases. This suggests exhaled breath analysis as a potential noninvasive medical application in the field of PAH.

In this article, we review and discuss the progress made so far in the field of exhaled volatolomics (the omics of VOCs) as a potential noninvasive diagnostics of PAH. In addition, we propose a model including possible biochemical pathways on the level of the remodelled artery, in which specific VOCs could be detectable in exhaled breath during the early phases of PAH. We debate the different analytical approaches used and recommend a diagram including a “bottom–top” strategy, from basic to translational studies, required for promoting the field.

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds: exhaled volatolomics analysis for noninvasive early diagnosis of PAH http://ow.ly/4R6Q306A0zJ

Pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive cardiopulmonary disease characterised by extensive occlusion of small to mid-sized pulmonary arterioles. The gradual increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) leads to the development of high resistance, leading eventually to right-sided heart failure and death [1–3]. PAH is a subset of precapillary group 1 pulmonary hypertension, defined by a resting mPAP ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (Ppaw) ≤15 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >3 Wood units at right heart catheterisation [2, 4]. In Europe, prevalence of PAH ranges between 15 and 60 subjects per million population, and the annual incidence is 5–10 cases per million [1, 5]. When untreated, the mean survival is 2.8 years [2, 3, 6].

Vascular lesions associated with PAH are complex and take in all layers of the vessel wall. Cellular hypertrophy, hyperplasia, local inflammation, overproliferation and resistance to apoptosis, endothelial to mesenchymal cell transition, exaggerated migration and accumulation of extracellular matrix components in PAH are well documented, yet other essential pathomechanisms remain unclear [7–9]. Although a wide range of therapeutic agents have been established for the management of PAH, they fail to fully improve symptoms and survival. PAH remains an incurable disease, and lung transplantation continues to be the main treatment in severe cases [2, 6].

Importance of early detection

PAH is often diagnosed by right heart catheterisation at its advanced stages [10, 11], and is associated with high early mortality, despite therapeutic intervention [3, 12–14]. Although accumulating evidence supports that significant improvement in survival rates and clinical outcomes is achieved when PAH is diagnosed at early stages [3, 15], it continues to be challenging [12, 16–18]. This is mainly due to the clinically silent or unspecific early phase, as well as due to the controversy between haemodynamics and functionality [19]. Despite advances in the available tools for assessment of PAH, including Doppler echocardiography and lung function and exercise tests, their predictive value remains questionable. Biomarkers, such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP have been correlated with haemodynamics and mortality in PAH; however, their sensitivity can be low and is affected by kidney function [19]. On the whole, the primary definitive diagnosis is frequently delayed for as long as 2 years from the appearance of early symptoms, which also represents a significant challenge [20]. Accumulating evidence suggests that systematic testing, i.e. screening for PAH in high-risk populations, would promote early diagnosis and intervention, offering an opportunity to improve patient outcomes. Therefore, there is an unmet and urgent need for reliable noninvasive biomarkers for the early detection of PAH [19–21].

Exhaled volatolome as biomarkers

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), produced constantly by physiological processes, are detectable at low concentrations in exhaled breath [22–26]. Pathophysiological processes affect their production and lead to changes in the VOC profile of exhaled breath, referred to as the exhaled volatolome. Thus, identification and quantification of the exhaled volatolome could provide informative noninvasive biomarkers [22–34]. Due to their proximity to the blood–air barrier, recognisable and easily detectable shifts in the exhaled volatolome are to be expected in respiratory diseases [24, 31, 35–40]. In these cases, VOCs do not circulate in the peripheral blood system, from which they might be metabolised or stored in fat compartments; rather, they are expressed almost immediately in exhaled breath, accompanying the pathophysiology [24, 31, 35]. Significant shifts in the exhaled volatolome have been reported in many respiratory diseases, including lung cancer [24, 25, 28, 31, 33], tuberculosis [41, 42], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [43, 44], asthma [45], pulmonary embolism [46], pneumonia and cystic fibrosis [47, 48].

Changes in the spectrum and/or concentrations of exhaled VOCs could be due to a variety of abnormal processes, reflecting alterations in the biochemistry of the blood. Oxidative stress, inflammation, unbalanced enzymatic activity, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and other mechanisms are possible sources of disease-related VOCs [22–24, 28, 31, 32].

In PAH, changes in the exhaled volatolome could result from the pathophysiological process of remodelling that occurs at the level of the arterioles. However, compensatory mechanisms accompanying the development of PAH could be an additional source of volatolomic alterations. Anatomical and physiological changes in the lungs and heart and fluctuations in the pulmonary circulation could potentially create further alterations in the exhaled VOC profile and concentrations [8, 9]. Arterial remodelling in PAH, for example, is characterised by the overproliferation of endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. Excessive proliferation could result in local hypoxia, leading to anaerobic metabolism by the cells [31, 49]. In the glycolytic pathway of energy production, ketones and alcohols are excessively produced and ultimately excreted in the exhaled breath [50]. Alternatively, enhanced proliferation demands greater metabolism of cholesterol, during which isoprene, for instance, is formed along the mevalonic pathway of cholesterol synthesis in the cytosolic fraction [51]. Inflammation is another major hallmark of PAH. High levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in lung samples [52, 53], as well as increased numbers of macrophages in plexiform lesions and perivascular inflammation of PAH patients' lungs have been documented [54–57]. Increased inflammatory activity could result in excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to local peroxidation of lipids and fatty acids. For example, alkanes (cyclic saturated hydrocarbons) are by-products of the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids [22, 23, 31, 51].

Based on known pathomechanisms on the vascular level, as well as experimental models in the field of VOCs, we have put together a hypothetic model of vascular remodelling as a potential source of VOCs; this model is presented in figure 1.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Hypothetical schema of possible sources of volatile organic compounds at the level of a remodelled artery in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Excessive proliferation associated with local hypoxia would promote glycolysis as an energy source, leading to the production of ketones and alcohols. In addition, cell proliferation demands high cholesterol metabolism that induces higher levels of isoprene. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by inflammation leads to the oxidation of proteins and fatty acids, which release a wide range of hydrocarbons. EC: endothelial cell; SMC: smooth muscle cell.

Exhaled volatolome as biomarkers in PAH

The complex pathological mechanisms involved in PAH, as described earlier, could be a source of a wide range of volatile biomarkers in the breath. Several studies have already indicated the presence of alterations in breath volatolome in PAH patients; Mansoor et al. [58] compared the composition of exhaled breath condensate of 27 idiopathic (I)PAH patients with 30 healthy controls. Two VOCs were uniquely identified among the control group, and 10 other VOCs were uniquely expressed among the patients' samples. Of the four VOCs that were common to both groups, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-benzene was significantly lower in IPAH patients compared to the controls. Furthermore, the concentrations of six VOCs were correlated with mPAP, PVR or Ppaw. In a more qualitative approach, a pattern recognition algorithm was applied to the measured VOCs. The model discriminated between IPAH patients and controls with an accuracy of 75.4%. Although interesting, the identification of the statistically validated VOCs was based solely on a mass spectrometric analysis. This approach is lacking, due to a very similar spectrum of ionised fragments of several compounds, and therefore the results might not be reproducible. To overcome this obstacle, it is recommended that the identification is undertaken using the analysis of pure standards, confirming the identity of each VOC, as well as calibrating curves in order to estimate the absolute concentration of the VOCs, rather than the ion counts of each explored peak [22, 51]. On the other side, the IPAH group consisted of patients in advanced and severe stages of the disease (New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification 3 and 4), raising the crucial question of whether the reported differences in the volatolome would be valid at earlier stages of disease [58].

Cikach et al. [59] explored the exhaled volatolome of 31 PAH patients and 34 controls recruited in two phases (training and validation sets). Among the 21 VOCs explored, the concentrations of 2-nonene, 2-propanol, acetaldehyde, ammonia, ethanol and pentane were elevated in PAH patients compared with control subjects, whereas 1-decene and 1-octene were significantly lower in the same patients. Applying mathematical discriminant analysis to VOC concentrations, the model scored 86.1% accuracy in the training phase and 79.3% in the independent validation set. In addition, the concentration of exhaled ammonia was significantly associated with right atrial pressure and mixed venous oxygen saturation, after adjustment by age and sex, suggesting it as an independent breath biomarker for PAH. Conversely, blood ammonia levels were similar between the groups, and were not associated with breath concentration, nor any clinical feature. Thus, in the context of locally increased glutaminolysis [60] leading to hyperproliferative phenotype in PAH, the cells may generate more ammonia locally that is then expressed in exhaled breath, although not enough to affect whole blood concentration. These findings not only suggest a biomarker for the severity of PAH, but also attempt to link up the volatolome with the pathological mechanisms involved in PAH [59]. Nevertheless, ammonia has a major limitation as a disease-specific breath biomarker. This is because ammonia is reported as being raised in the exhaled breath of patients diagnosed with other diseases, including (but not only) kidney disease [61], inflammatory bowel diseases [62] and asthma [63], making it less reliable as a standalone test for PAH.

Mazzone et al. [64] enrolled 20 PAH patients as a control group to test the feasibility of a colorimetric sensor array for volatolome collective assessment to diagnose lung cancer. The results indicated that the collective breath volatolome of lung cancer patients differed from PAH, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, COPD and healthy controls. Once trained, the sensor array could discriminate between the diseases with a sensitivity of 73.3% and a specificity of 72.4%. The results were not influenced by sex, age, histology or smoking history [64]. Although innovative and easy to perform, in this qualitative approach the specific altered VOCs cannot be identified.

We have previously published a proof-of-concept in which an array of nanotechnology-based sensors for collective breath volatolome analysis was useful to detect and classify PAH. Using a different approach for breath analysis, we relied on the collective profile rather than specific alterations in the VOC concentrations in exhaled breath. Mimicking the sense of smell, an array of nonselective gas sensors was used to analyse breath samples of 22 PAH patients and 23 healthy controls. The signals obtained from the sensors after exposure were significantly different between samples from the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic-based classifier was obtained, discriminating between the samples with an accuracy of 92%. A second classifier was established to identify heritable PAH patients with mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) gene. The classifier successfully classified heritable PAH (n=7) compared to IPAH (n=15), scoring an overall accuracy of 87%. A third model indicated a correlation between the signals obtained from the sensor array and the severity of the patient's disease. With 91% accuracy, the samples were rated according to the NYHA classification, comparing the less severe cases (classes 1 and 2) and severe cases (class ≥3) [65]. Besides showing the high potential of qualitative breath analysis using nanosensor arrays to diagnose PAH, we showed that the breath volatolome is different in the mild stages than in more severe phase of the disease; the results also suggest that the pathological mechanisms of idiopathic and heritable PAH differ, as indicated by distinct breath volatolomes. However, the sample size in this case was relatively small, and further validation is required with an independent cohort [65]. Complementary quantitative gas chromatrography linked with mass spectometric analysis of 45 breath samples following the initial study confirmed significant differences in the concentrations of 10 breath VOCs associated with PAH, and subgroups that included the BMPR2 gene mutation PAH [66]. Currently, a clinical trial for validation (and expansion) is ongoing, with a goal of recruiting 400 volunteers, including IPAH patients, heritable PAH patients, high-risk subjects without PAH (asymptomatic relatives of familial PAH cases carrying a BMPR2 mutation) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02782026)

Together, these studies support the possibility that exhaled breath biomarkers could serve as a medical application in the detection and management of PAH.

Are exogenous VOCs actively involved in PAH?

Quite unexpectedly, when screening the VOCs already reported in association with PAH, it became apparent that some of the compounds identified were of exogenous origin. 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-benzene, furan, tetrahydro-2,2,4,4-tetramethyl, benzaldehyde, N-ethyl-benzenamine, benzothiazole and others are not endogenously formed [58, 59, 66]. These compounds are considered pollutants, possibly due to exposure to cigarette smoke, air pollution and radiation [31]. Possibly, their high volatility and reactivity allow these compounds to leak into the cytoplasm of respiratory cells, leading to undesired and adverse effects, including peroxidative damage to enzymes and DNA. The accumulative damage of prolonged exposure is assumed to initiate and/or contribute to the pathogenesis of lung cancer [31].

Vascular remodelling in PAH shares analogous features with carcinogenesis. Pulmonary vascular lesions in PAH patients have cancer-like characteristics [7]. Resistance to cell death, a hyperproliferative phenotype, deregulation of cellular energetics, angiogenesis and tumour-promoting inflammation are common hallmarks of PAH and lung cancer [7]. Therefore, it is reasonable to link the adverse effects of inhalation of pollutant VOCs to the initiation/progression of PAH. Montani et al. [67] ran a case–control study in which they put to the test the possible association of occupational exposure to organic solvents and the risk of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD). In 33 PVOD and 65 PAH cases, PVOD was significantly associated with occupational exposure to organic solvents, particularly trichloroethylene (TCE) with an adjusted odds ratio of 8.2. For example, mice exposed to TCE developed lung injuries accompanied by increased oxidative stress, which is known to be involved in vascular remodelling [68, 69]. This suggests that volatile compounds from exogenous sources could directly contribute to the pathophysiology of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.

Reproducibility and analytical approaches in breath volatolomics

One particular controversy found in published data is the wide variance and mismatch of results from different studies. For instance, in one case, the authors report that some of the VOCs were exclusively expressed by PAH patients, whereas others have shown that both patients and controls share the same profile of exhaled VOCs, but with differences in their concentrations [58, 59, 66]. In addition, the number and identity of the VOCs associated with PAH vary in the different studies. In all, it raises the question of the repeatability and reproducibility of breath analysis in general, and in PAH in particular. Nevertheless, this could be explained by different breath sampling procedures and analytical methods. Different sampling procedures and pre-concentration methods could result in the “capture” of different spectra of the expressed breath volatolomes [22]. In addition, each of the analytical instruments has a different sensitivity and limit of detection, and the small size and heterogeneity of the patient groups could preclude obtaining robust VOC biomarkers. Despite these differences, the overall take-home messages of the reports in the literature are similar, i.e. there are significant alterations in the breath volatolome in PAH.

In general, the search for uniquely expressed exhaled VOCs in a given disease has not yet been successful. Indeed, none of the recorded VOCs alone could assist in diagnosis [27, 33, 70–77]. For example, a large portion of the proposed breath biomarkers that have been suggested for PAH were also associated with other diseases, one such case being ammonia. This suggests that when two or more diseases share common pathological mechanisms, a similar range of exhaled VOCs could be affected. Conversely, the concentrations of part of the VOCs could be affected by more than one type of pathophysiology. Therefore, in a complex disease such as PAH involving multiple pathophysiological processes and several systems/organs, it is unlikely to find unique breath VOCs (absent in nonpatient controls and/or other diseases). Therefore, the collective volatolome assessment is potentially more realistic as a future medical application in the detection of PAH. As already reported, an intelligent artificial olfactory system consisting of arrays of nanotechnology-based sensors could be trained for the detection and classification of PAH [65, 66]. Learning from the mammalian sense of smell, cross-reactive (nonselective) sensors are used for the collective sensing of the VOC spectrum in breath [24, 29, 32, 78, 79]. Combined with pattern recognition algorithms, the collective, yet specific, breath-signature associated with PAH could be determined. Depending less on the concentration of each VOC, the collective analysis is more robust and resistant to possible confounding factors [24, 29, 32, 78, 79].

Perspective: volatolomics of the remodelled artery for early diagnosis

So far, all studies have explored volatolomic alterations (quantitatively and/or qualitatively) of PAH patients with established and advanced disease [58, 59, 64, 66]. At this stage of the disease, a variety of anatomical as well as physiological changes occur at the level of the lungs, heart, immune/inflammatory system and circulation [8, 9]. These compensatory and/or secondary mechanisms could also affect the exhaled volatolome. Therefore, it is unlikely that the overall changes in the volatolome described are representative of the early phases of PAH, i.e. the primary pathological mechanisms, at the vascular level. Furthermore, exhaled VOCs could be affected by unrelated mechanisms, medications, comorbidities and haemodynamic and cardiac effects [80, 81]. Therefore, it is doubtful that the VOCs that have been reported could assist in the early detection of PAH.

Arterial remodelling in the very early stages of PAH involves several molecular and cellular pathways that could affect the specific spectra of VOCs. This silent or vague phase can last up to 4 years before a formal diagnosis is made [20]. Therefore, we propose that the identification and targeting of these VOCs should be the first step towards early noninvasive diagnosis of PAH. To succeed in this challenge, we suggest two complementary approaches. First, clinical evaluation to further explore the volatolomic changes in PAH and its subsets, with a focus on high-risk subjects without known PAH (for example, familial cases of BMPR2 mutations). Periodic clinical, biological and volatolome assessment of this group could help to correlate the development of the disease with volatolomic changes, at its early phases. Once the disease is initiated leading to early haemodynamic consequences, the search should focus on the changes in exhaled breath volatolome prior to the symptomatic phase (figure 2).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Schematic diagram of the suggested “bottom–top” experimental flowchart towards designated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) diagnostics, based on exhaled volatolome analysis. An ex vivo phase to explore and determine volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at the vascular level as early-phase biomarkers accompanied by clinical studies to determine volatolome changes in exhaled breath of PAH patients. After identification of target VOCs found in early phases of the vascular phase and in the exhaled breath, a translational phase is required to establish a designated breath analyser for the early diagnosis of PAH.

Additionally, basic biological experiments run in parallel are needed, in which VOCs emitted directly by vascular cells, involved in the remodelling process, should be identified and investigated. To this end, lung specimens, for example from PAH patients after lung transplantation, could serve to establish microvascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell cultures. VOCs emitted by those cells could be identified and analysed quantitatively. Ex vivo in-culture expression of these VOCs is essentially linked to some pathological mechanisms at the vascular cell level, while unrelated to the haemodynamics or to other secondary mechanism associated with advanced stage PAH. Therefore, these VOCs could potentially represent “pure” vascular remodelling-specific biomarkers. We must also pinpoint the importance of the association between the production of specific VOCs and known or suspected metabolic pathways in PAH. Exposure of healthy vascular cells to stimuli, such as inflammation, hypoxia, ROS, excessive proliferation state/resistance to apoptosis and others could tell us how much the vascular cell volatolome is affected by each pathological process and the balance between them (figure 2).

Although animal models could be informative at this phase, very challenging aspects should be first addressed in order to benefit from such studies, as follows. 1) Animal models for pulmonary hypertension are mostly developed in small animals (induced in rats or mice using monocrotaline (MCT), exposure to hypoxia or Sugen-hypoxia) [82]. Thus, it is extremely challenging to collect a sufficient volume of exhaled breath (>500 mL per animal per test), taking into account their tidal volume [77]. 2) It remains unclear how much the mentioned models represent the actual disease occurring in humans, particularly in terms of chronological events and poor phenotyping [82, 83]. For example, the MCT model would produce features of severe pulmonary hypertension and heart failure within 3 weeks; however, due to MCT cytotoxicity it could also affect other unrelated organs. The MCT model is also suggested to cause pulmonary interstitial oedema, myocarditis and hepatic veno-occlusive disease that are not characteristics of human pulmonary hypertension [84]. As a consequence, these additional pathomechanisms would probably result in further unspecific volatolomic changes that could be mistakenly associated with pulmonary hypertension. Therefore, it would be very challenging to correlate the volatolomic changes in PAH patients and these animal models.

Overall, early-phase PAH volatile biomarkers could be identified and targeted for exhaled breath diagnostics in the future. It might help to find the origin of each of the VOCs, and possibly provide knowledge on the exact mechanisms leading to each of the volatolomic changes. Thus, monitoring these VOCs could be useful for PAH patient management, follow-up and monitoring.

Volatolomics in secondary PAH/pulmonary hypertension

It is admitted that IPAH is usually diagnosed in its advanced stages, due to the unclear and unspecific clinical presentation of its earliest stages. As already suggested in the literature, a noninvasive screening test would be very useful in these cases [19]. Therefore, a breath analysis based test could be a safe, easy to perform, rapid and repeatable screening tool that physicians could use as an indicator in the vague early phases. Therefore, in this context, focusing on the heritable group with BMPR2 mutation and their relatives would be a simplified strategy to determine the early volatolomic changes associated with PAH. As reported, 20–30% of this population will eventually develop PAH [85], and therefore periodic breath tests for this group could be a key factor in monitoring volatolomic alterations as soon as the arterial remodelling begins, indicating the need for right heart catheterisation.

As for more complex cases, such as PAH associated with connective tissue disease or HIV infection, or pulmonary hypertension secondary to heart disease or COPD, the basic research approach should be different. It is anticipated that due to the complexity of the pathophysiological process and comorbidities, the volatolomic patterns would be more complicated to understand. It remains unclear how the exhaled VOC profile would look, in the presence of two diseases (COPD and pulmonary hypertension, for example), since a portion of the VOCs could be affected by molecular pathways involved in each of the two diseases. Volatolomic changes associated with (“pure”) COPD, for example, have been already published [43, 86], thus it will be necessary to evaluate subjects with secondary pulmonary hypertension, in a group of COPD patients, in order to pinpoint the specific volatolomic changes associated with the combination of both diseases. In fact, it is reasonable to anticipate that in these cases a third and specific volatolomic pattern would be found; representing the pathomechanism involved in both diseases, and would be useful for the classification of this specific group of patients. We suggest this strategy to be tested and evaluated for the classification, rather than detection, of pulmonary hypertension or PAH complex subclassifications.

Concluding remarks

With right heart catheterisation as the gold-standard diagnostic method, PAH is usually diagnosed in its advanced stages, negatively affecting clinical outcomes and survival rates. The exhaled volatolome is a database of information regarding cellular and molecular activity, and represents a unique window onto the pathological and metabolic pathways involved in PAH. Exhaled biomarkers could be useful in early diagnostics of PAH as noninvasive procedure. However, major basic and translational research is still required to determine the exhaled VOCs linked with the very early stages of the diseases before developing and training a simple breath analyser designated for early detection of PAH.

Disclosures

Supplementary Material

M. Humbert ERJ-01897-2016_Humbert

Footnotes

  • Support statement: M.K. Nakhleh acknowledges the International Associated Laboratory Inserm-Technion and the European Respiratory Society Long-Term PAH for the post-doctoral grants and support.

    The authors thank Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP, Contrat Local d'Interface 2014 to S. Cohen-Kaminsky) and Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Thorax Innovation (DHU TORINO) for financial support.

  • Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com

  • Received September 27, 2016.
  • Accepted November 15, 2016.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2017

References

  1. ↵
    1. Awdish R,
    2. Cajigas H
    . Definition, epidemiology and registries of pulmonary hypertension. Heart Fail Rev 2016; 21: 223–228.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Galiè N,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Vachiery JL, et al.
    2015 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 903–975.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Sitbon O,
    3. Yaïci A, et al.
    Survival in incident and prevalent cohorts of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 549–555.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Simonneau G,
    2. Gatzoulis MA,
    3. Adatia I, et al.
    Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: Suppl. 25, D34–D41.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Peacock AJ,
    2. Murphy NF,
    3. McMurray JJ, et al.
    An epidemiological study of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 104–109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Montani D,
    2. Chaumais MC,
    3. Guignabert C, et al.
    Targeted therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pharmacol Ther 2014; 141: 172–191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Guignabert C,
    2. Tu L,
    3. Le Hiress M, et al.
    Pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension: lessons from cancer. Eur Respir Rev 2013; 22: 543–551.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Rabinovitch M,
    2. Guignabert C,
    3. Humbert M, et al.
    Inflammation and immunity in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Res 2014; 115: 165–175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Vonk-Noordegraaf A,
    2. Haddad F,
    3. Chin KM, et al.
    Right heart adaptation to pulmonary arterial hypertension: physiology and pathobiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: Suppl. 25, D22–D33.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Launay D,
    2. Sitbon O,
    3. Hachulla E, et al.
    Survival in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 1940–1946.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Thenappan T,
    2. Ryan JJ,
    3. Archer SL
    . Evolving epidemiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 707–709.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Sitbon O,
    3. Chaouat A, et al.
    Survival in patients with idiopathic, familial, and anorexigen-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Circulation 2010; 122: 156–163.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Thenappan T,
    2. Shah SJ,
    3. Rich S, et al.
    Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 1079–1087.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Montani D,
    3. Souza R
    . Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: time to combine markers. Chest 2011; 139: 1263–1264.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. O'Callaghan DS,
    2. Humbert M
    . A critical analysis of survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir Rev 2012; 21: 218–222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Benza RL,
    2. Miller DP,
    3. Gomberg-Maitland M, et al.
    Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL). Circulation 2010; 122: 164–172.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Condliffe R,
    2. Kiely DG,
    3. Peacock AJ, et al.
    Connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern treatment era. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179: 151–157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Yaici A,
    3. de Groote P, et al.
    Screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis: clinical characteristics at diagnosis and long-term survival. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63: 3522–3530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Lau EMT,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Celermajer DS
    . Early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015; 12: 143–155.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Strange G,
    2. Gabbay E,
    3. Kermeen F, et al.
    Time from symptoms to definitive diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: the delay study. Pulm Circ 2013; 3: 89–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Coghlan JG,
    3. Khanna D
    . Early detection and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir Rev 2012; 21: 306–312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Amann A,
    2. Miekisch W,
    3. Pleil J, et al.
    Methodological issues of sample collection and analysis of exhaled breath. In: Horvath I and De Jongste JC, eds. Exhaled Biomarkers. Eur Respir Monogr 2010; 49: 96–114.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Buszewski B,
    2. Kesy M,
    3. Ligor T, et al.
    Human exhaled air analytics: biomarkers of diseases. Biomed Chromatogr 2007; 21: 553–566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Haick H,
    2. Broza YY,
    3. Mochalski P, et al.
    Assessment, origin, and implementation of breath volatile cancer markers. Chem Soc Rev 2014; 43: 1423–1449.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Phillips M,
    2. Gleeson K,
    3. Hughes JMB, et al.
    Volatile organic compounds in breath as markers of lung cancer: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 1999; 353: 1930–1933.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Martinez-Lozano Sinues P,
    2. Zenobi R,
    3. Kohler M
    . Analysis of the exhalome: a diagnostic tool of the future. Chest 2013; 144: 746–749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Amal H,
    2. Leja M,
    3. Funka K, et al.
    Detection of precancerous gastric lesions and gastric cancer through exhaled breath. Gut 2016; 65: 400–407.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Amann A,
    2. Corradi M,
    3. Mazzone P, et al.
    Lung cancer biomarkers in exhaled breath. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2011; 11: 207–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Broza YY,
    2. Mochalski P,
    3. Ruzsanyi V, et al.
    Hybrid volatolomics and disease detection. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2015; 54: 11036–11048.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Haick H
    . Chemical sensors based on molecularly modified metallic nanoparticles. J Phys D Appl Phys 2007; 40: 7173–7186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Hakim M,
    2. Broza YY,
    3. Barash O, et al.
    Volatile organic compounds of lung cancer and possible biochemical pathways. Chem Rev 2012; 112: 5949–5966.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Nakhleh M,
    2. Broza Y,
    3. Haick H
    . Monolayer-capped gold nanoparticles for disease detection from breath. Nanomedicne 2014; 9: 1991–2002.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Peled N,
    2. Hakim M,
    3. Bunn PA Jr., et al.
    Non-invasive breath analysis of pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7: 1528–1533.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Martinez-Lozano Sinues P,
    2. Kohler M,
    3. Zenobi R
    . Human breath analysis may support the existence of individual metabolic phenotypes. PLoS One 2013; 8: e59909.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Haick H,
    2. Cohen-Kaminsky S
    . Detecting lung infections in breathprints: empty promise or next generation diagnosis of infections. Eur Respir J. 2015; 45: 21–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bean HD,
    2. Jiménez-Díaz J,
    3. Zhu J, et al.
    Breathprints of model murine bacterial lung infections are linked with immune response. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 181–190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bos LD,
    2. Weda H,
    3. Wang Y, et al.
    Exhaled breath metabolomics as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 188–197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sterk PJ,
    2. Fens N,
    3. Carpagnano GE
    . Wake-up call by breathomics in sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Greulich T,
    2. Hattesohl A,
    3. Grabisch A, et al.
    Detection of obstructive sleep apnoea by an electronic nose. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 145–155.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Wheelock CE,
    2. Goss VM,
    3. Balgoma D, et al.
    Application of ’omics technologies to biomarker discovery in inflammatory lung diseases. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 802–825.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Phillips M,
    2. Basa-Dalay V,
    3. Bothamley G, et al.
    Breath biomarkers of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 2010; 90: 145–151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Nakhleh MK,
    2. Jeries R,
    3. Gharra A, et al.
    Detecting active pulmonary tuberculosis by breath test using nanomaterial-based sensors. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1522–1525.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Allers M,
    2. Langejuergen J,
    3. Gaida A, et al.
    Measurement of exhaled volatile organic compounds from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using closed gas loop GC-IMS and GC-APCI-MS. J Breath Res 2016; 10: 026004.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Fens N,
    2. van der Schee MP,
    3. Brinkman P, et al.
    Exhaled breath analysis by electronic nose in airways disease. Established issues and key questions. Clin Exp Allergy 2013; 43: 705–715.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Grob NM,
    2. Laskowski D,
    3. Dweik RA
    . A technical report on exhaled nitric oxide measurement: asthma monitoring in athletes. J Breath Res 2008; 2: 37027.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Fens N,
    2. Douma RA,
    3. Sterk PJ, et al.
    Breathomics as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2831–2833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Smith D,
    2. Sovová K,
    3. Dryahina K, et al.
    Breath concentration of acetic acid vapour is elevated in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Breath Res 2016; 10: 021002.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. van Mastrigt E,
    2. Reyes-Reyes A,
    3. Brand K, et al.
    Exhaled breath profiling using broadband quantum cascade laser-based spectroscopy in healthy children and children with asthma and cystic fibrosis. J Breath Res 2016; 10: 026003.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Brown JM,
    2. Wilson WR
    . Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4: 437–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Audrain B,
    2. Farag MA,
    3. Ryu CM, et al.
    Role of bacterial volatile compounds in bacterial biology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2015; 39: 222–233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Miekisch W,
    2. Schubert JK,
    3. Noeldge-Schomburg GF
    . Diagnostic potential of breath analysis – focus on volatile organic compounds. Clin Chim Acta 2004; 347: 25–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Kherbeck N,
    2. Tamby MC,
    3. Bussone G, et al.
    The role of inflammation and autoimmunity in the pathophysiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2013; 44: 31–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Monti G,
    3. Brenot F, et al.
    Increased interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 serum concentrations in severe primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 1628–1631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Vaillancourt M,
    2. Ruffenach G,
    3. Meloche J, et al.
    Adaptation and remodelling of the pulmonary circulation in pulmonary hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2015; 31: 407–415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Savai R,
    2. Pullamsetti SS,
    3. Kolbe J, et al.
    Immune and inflammatory cell involvement in the pathology of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 897–908.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Tian W,
    2. Jiang X,
    3. Tamosiuniene R, et al.
    Blocking macrophage leukotriene b4 prevents endothelial injury and reverses pulmonary hypertension. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5: 200ra117.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Perros F,
    2. Dorfmüller P,
    3. Montani D, et al.
    Pulmonary lymphoid neogenesis in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 185: 311–321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Mansoor JK,
    2. Schelegle ES,
    3. Davis CE, et al.
    Analysis of volatile compounds in exhaled breath condensate in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. PLoS One 2014; 9: e95331.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Cikach FS Jr.,
    2. Tonelli AR,
    3. Barnes J, et al.
    Breath analysis in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2014; 145: 551–558.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Bertero T,
    2. Oldham WM,
    3. Cottrill KA, et al.
    Vascular stiffness mechanoactivates YAP/TAZ-dependent glutaminolysis to drive pulmonary hypertension. J Clin Invest 2016; 126: 3313–3335.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Davies SJ,
    2. Španěl P,
    3. Smith D
    . Breath analysis of ammonia, volatile organic compounds and deuterated water vapor in chronic kidney disease and during dialysis. Bioanalysis 2014; 6: 843–857.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Hicks LC,
    2. Huang J,
    3. Kumar S, et al.
    Analysis of exhaled breath volatile organic compounds in inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9: 731–737.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Tomasiak-Lozowska MM,
    2. Zietkowski Z,
    3. Przeslaw K, et al.
    Inflammatory markers and acid-base equilibrium in exhaled breath condensate of stable and unstable asthma patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2012; 159: 121–129.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Mazzone PJ,
    2. Hammel J,
    3. Dweik R, et al.
    Diagnosis of lung cancer by the analysis of exhaled breath with a colorimetric sensor array. Thorax 2007; 62: 565–568.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Cohen-Kaminsky S,
    2. Nakhleh M,
    3. Perros F, et al.
    A proof of concept for the detection and classification of pulmonary arterial hypertension through breath analysis with a sensor array. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188: 756–759.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Nakhleh MK,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Fadel E, et al.
    Breath volatolome for the detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Crit Care Med 2016; 193: A7354.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Montani D,
    2. Lau EM,
    3. Descatha A, et al.
    Occupational exposure to organic solvents: a risk factor for pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 1721–1731.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Giovanetti A,
    2. Rossi L,
    3. Mancuso M, et al.
    Analysis of lung damage induced by trichloroethylene inhalation in mice fed diets with low, normal, and high copper content. Toxicol Pathol 1998; 26: 628–635.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dorfmüller P,
    2. Chaumais MC,
    3. Giannakouli M, et al.
    Increased oxidative stress and severe arterial remodeling induced by permanent high-flow challenge in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Respir Res 2011; 12: 119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Barash O,
    2. Peled N,
    3. Hirsch FR, et al.
    Sniffing the unique “odor print” of non-small-cell lung cancer with gold nanoparticles. Small 2009; 5: 2618–2624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. Barash O,
    2. Peled N,
    3. Tisch U, et al.
    Classification of lung cancer histology by gold nanoparticle sensors. Nanomedicine 2012; 8: 580–589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Peng G,
    2. Tisch U,
    3. Adams O, et al.
    Diagnosing lung cancer in exhaled breath using gold nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 2009; 4: 669–673.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hakim M,
    2. Billan S,
    3. Tisch U, et al.
    Diagnosis of head and neck cancer from exhaled breath. Br J Cancer 2011; 104: 1649–1655.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Nakhleh MK,
    2. Badarny S,
    3. Winer R, et al.
    Distinguishing idiopathic Parkinson's disease from other parkinsonian syndromes by breath test. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015; 21: 150–153.
    OpenUrl
    1. Tisch U,
    2. Aluf Y,
    3. Ionescu R, et al.
    Detection of asymptomatic nigrostriatal dopaminergic lesion in rats by exhaled air analysis using carbon nanotube sensors. ACS Chem Neurosci 2012; 3: 161–166.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Karban A,
    2. Nakhleh MK,
    3. Cancilla JC, et al.
    Programmed nanoparticles for tailoring the detection of inflammatory bowel diseases and irritable bowel syndrome disease via breathprint. Adv Healthc Mater 2016; 5: 2339–2344.
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Nakhleh MK,
    2. Amal H,
    3. Awad H, et al.
    Sensor arrays based on nanoparticles for early detection of kidney injury by breath samples. Nanomedicine 2014; 10: 1767–1776.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Konvalina G,
    2. Haick H
    . Sensors for breath testing: from nanomaterials to comprehensive disease detection. Acc Chem Res 2014; 47: 66–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    1. Vishinkin R,
    2. Haick H
    . Nanoscale sensor technologies for disease detection via volatolomics. Small 2015; 11: 6142–6164.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Sukul P,
    2. Schubert JK,
    3. Oertel P, et al.
    FEV manoeuvre induced changes in breath VOC compositions: an unconventional view on lung function tests. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 28029.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Sukul P,
    2. Trefz P,
    3. Kamysek S, et al.
    Instant effects of changing body positions on compositions of exhaled breath. J Breath Res 2015; 9: 047105.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Lawrie A
    . A report on the use of animal models and phenotyping methods in pulmonary hypertension research. Pulm Circ 2014; 4: 2–9.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Bonnet S,
    2. Provencher S,
    3. Guignabert C, et al.
    Translating research into improved patient care in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 20: [In press DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201607-1515PP].
  69. ↵
    1. Maarman G,
    2. Lecour S,
    3. Butrous G, et al.
    A comprehensive review: the evolution of animal models in pulmonary hypertension research; are we there yet? Pulm Circ 2013; 3: 739–756.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Morrell NW
    . Pulmonary hypertension due to BMPR2 mutation: a new paradigm for tissue remodeling? Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3: 680–686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Christiansen A,
    2. Davidsen JR,
    3. Titlestad I, et al.
    A systematic review of breath analysis and detection of volatile organic compounds in COPD. J Breath Res 2016; 10: 034002.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 49 Issue 2 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 49 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Volatolomics of breath as an emerging frontier in pulmonary arterial hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Volatolomics of breath as an emerging frontier in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Morad K. Nakhleh, Hossam Haick, Marc Humbert, Sylvia Cohen-Kaminsky
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2017, 49 (2) 1601897; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01897-2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Volatolomics of breath as an emerging frontier in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Morad K. Nakhleh, Hossam Haick, Marc Humbert, Sylvia Cohen-Kaminsky
European Respiratory Journal Feb 2017, 49 (2) 1601897; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01897-2016
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Pulmonary arterial hypertension
    • Importance of early detection
    • Exhaled volatolome as biomarkers
    • Exhaled volatolome as biomarkers in PAH
    • Are exogenous VOCs actively involved in PAH?
    • Reproducibility and analytical approaches in breath volatolomics
    • Perspective: volatolomics of the remodelled artery for early diagnosis
    • Volatolomics in secondary PAH/pulmonary hypertension
    • Concluding remarks
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and appraising outcome measures for severe asthma: a systematic review
  • Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in COPD
  • The paradox of immune checkpoint inhibition re-activating tuberculosis
Show more Review

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society