Abstract
Common influenza viruses are immobilised in fresh human airway mucus, probably by influenza-binding antibodies http://ow.ly/yxu0305bqh6
To the Editor:
Airway mucus is thought to serve as a dynamic filter that can trap respiratory viruses in the dense mucin network [1], and quickly eliminate them along with airway mucus from the respiratory tract. Nevertheless, viruses must penetrate airway mucus to infect the airway epithelium, and we and others have found that various viruses can readily penetrate physiological mucus gels [2–4]. We were particularly interested in whether airway mucus can serve as a barrier against influenza viruses, due to the prevalence and health burden of seasonal outbreaks. It has been suggested that airway mucus protects against influenza by presenting sialylated “decoys” on mucins that bind to influenza haemagglutinin and trap the virions in mucus. Alternatively, we have shown that antibodies in cervicovaginal mucus can trap viruses via multiple low-affinity Fc–mucin bonds between antibodies on the virus surface and mucins, akin to a Velcro patch [4]. To gain insight into how airway mucus might serve as a barrier against influenza, we characterised the mobility of influenza virions and virus-like particles (VLPs) in human airway mucus using real-time high-resolution multiple particle tracking.
We collected undiluted human airway mucus from the endotracheal tubes of healthy adult patients intubated for general anaesthesia during elective surgery [5] outside the typical flu season months. This mucus probably represents a mixture of mucus secreted locally in the trachea as well as mucus from the bronchi/bronchioles that has been transported by mucociliary clearance. Since wild-type influenza virions with an internal fluorophore are exceedingly challenging to prepare, we decided to measure the translational motions of wild-type H1N1 (influenza A/PR/8/34) and H3N2 (influenza A/Victoria/3/75) viruses fluorescently tagged with amine-reactive Alexa Fluor dye (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) which exhibited no appreciable affinity to mucins [6, 7]. We quantified virus motions using multiple particle tracking [8] and found that the movements of both H1N1 and H3N2 virions were strongly and uniformly hindered in most airway mucus specimens (figure 1a, online supplementary movies S1 and S2). Virions appeared as uniform punctate spots in airway mucus, indicating that they were trapped in airway mucus as individual virions rather than as agglutinates. Nearly all virions (>80% in all samples, on average ∼95%) moved less than their diameter (∼100 nm) over the course of 20-s movies, and virions were slowed ∼3000–4000-fold in airway mucus compared to theoretical speeds in water. In contrast, comparably sized latex nanoparticles coated with 2 kDa polyethylene glycol (PS-PEG) to minimise mucoadhesion [9, 10] exhibited rapid diffusion in the same airway mucus specimens (figure 1a, online supplementary movie S3; p<0.05), suggesting that influenza was trapped by adhesive interactions with mucins or other mucus components.
To investigate whether trapping of influenza in airway mucus can be attributed primarily to haemagglutinin binding to mucin-associated sialic acid, we prepared VLPs fluorescently labelled internally using HIV-1 GAG-mCherry capsid proteins in the core, and expressing both neuraminidase and haemagglutinin from H1N1 (influenza A/PR/8/34) (WT-Inf), or the same neuraminidase and haemagglutinin that has the sialic acid-binding domain deleted (ΔSAB-Inf) and hence cannot bind directly to mucins [11]. Interestingly, both WT-Inf and ΔSAB-Inf were trapped in airway mucus to a similar extent as H1N1 and H3N2, with roughly 98% of WT-Inf and 97% of ΔSAB-Inf immobilised in airway mucus and average diffusivities ∼1700- and ∼1100-fold lower than expected speeds in buffer, respectively (figure 1b, online supplementary movies S4 and S5). Virus trapping was not associated with steric obstruction or impaired neuraminidase function, as WT-Inf and ΔSAB-Inf VLPs both exhibited comparable size (measured using Nanosight; Malvern, Malvern, UK) and neuraminidase activity (assessed using NA-Fluor influenza neuraminidase assay kit; Life Technologies) as wild-type influenza (figure 1c). These results demonstrate that influenza virus can be trapped in human airway mucus without haemagglutinin binding to mucin sialic acids, and suggest that the inherent neuraminidase activity of influenza virus is insufficient to overcome physiological human airway mucus.
Using whole-virus ELISA assays, we detected substantial quantities of endogenous IgG and IgA against influenza in airway mucus (data not shown), as well as against both WT-Inf and ΔSAB-Inf VLPs (figure 1d, e). This leaves open the possibility that influenza-specific antibodies in airway mucus may immobilise virions by cross-linking the antibody–virus complex to mucus constituents, such as mucins. We sought to measure virus and VLP mobility in airway mucus devoid of antibodies; however, we were not able to adequately remove Ig by dialysis, possibly due to membrane clogging, and mucus secretions isolated from air–liquid interface cultures of bronchial epithelial cells did not produce a sufficiently rigid matrix to immobilise mucoadhesive latex nanoparticles. We also attempted to “saturate” the mucus–antibody barrier by mixing >20-fold more unlabelled than labelled influenza viruses into airway mucus prior to adding labelled viruses, and still observed no discernible difference in the trapping of the labelled influenza viruses. Therefore, we investigated whether the lack of binding antibodies in mucus correlates to greater virus mobility by tracking HIV VLPs that were prepared similarly to the influenza VLP, but expressing HIV YU2 gp160. We found no detectable HIV-binding IgG or IgA in airway mucus (figure 1d, e), and HIV VLPs exhibited markedly greater diffusivity in airway mucus (figure 1b, online supplementary movie S6; p<0.05), with >45% of HIV VLPs classified as mobile and ∼10-fold higher ensemble effective diffusity than WT-Inf and ΔSAB-Inf. HIV VLP mobility was similar to that of PS-PEG in the same airway mucus samples (data not shown).
Together, these results demonstrate that influenza virus can be trapped in human airway mucus without binding to sialic acids on mucins, in good agreement with the evidence that human influenza viruses possess haemagglutinin that preferentially binds α2,6-linked sialic acids on the airway epithelium rather than α2,3-linked sialic acids on mucins [12, 13]. Trapping of influenza in human airway mucus can probably be attributed to the presence of influenza-binding antibodies that can cross-link individual virions to the mucus mesh network. Importantly, adhesive interactions between the array of pathogen-bound antibodies and mucus gel provide a universal strategy that enables the otherwise relatively nonadaptive and nonspecific biochemistry and microstructure of mucus secretions across different mucosal surfaces to be fortified with adaptive antibodies against an ever-changing spectrum of pathogens. Effective influenza vaccines remain elusive [14], and there is emerging evidence that systemic neutralising antibody titres may not correlate well with protective efficacy [15]. Our findings suggest that it may be important to assess vaccine efficacy based on the quantities of influenza-binding antibodies induced and secreted into mucus. Alternatively, in high-risk populations (e.g. teachers and healthcare workers), topical delivery of influenza-binding antibodies may help reduce the odds of becoming sick as well as the viral load reaching the airway epithelium.
Mucus is often viewed as a passive rather than dynamic and adaptive barrier against pathogens, and is consequently overlooked in most studies of mucosal infection. The consistent and extensive trapping of influenza in airway mucus collected from endotracheal tubes suggests that airway mucus can serve as an effective diffusional barrier against respiratory viruses, and influenza is unlikely to transmit efficiently in the trachea. Instead, we speculate that infections probably initiate in parts of the sinus and oral cavity least protected by mucus or most exposed to impinging virions, such as the soft palate [16]. It is also possible that viruses may infect in smaller conducting airways where airway mucus barrier properties may not be as robust. However, we have not yet characterised the barrier properties of mucus coating the lower airways (bronchi/bronchioles) with respect to the ability of influenza-binding antibodies to immobilise virions in mucus. In either scenario, once initial infection is established, viruses may spread to other parts of the airways via intercellular spreading [17].
Heterogeneity is a hallmark of the transport of nanosized entities in mucus, such as particles and viruses. Both donor–donor variation and intrasample variation in the mesh spacing (pore sizes) of the mucin network are possible due to differences in mucin or water content across samples or locally within a particular sample. Nevertheless, by using aliquots of the same samples to make direct comparisons between different conditions, we found that influenza viruses and VLPs were consistently trapped or slowed, while PS-PEG and HIV VLPs were significantly faster. Because we did not observe rapid influenza mobility in any of the airway mucus specimens, we cannot correlate a breakdown of the mucus barrier to potential elevated susceptibility to influenza infections. While influenza is a common infection, the number of people who are susceptible to and acquire influenza infection is relatively low at any moment in time; indeed, despite high rates of exposure and constantly evolving viral strains, seasonal influenza attack rates typically vary from only 5% to 20% [18, 19]. Future studies that greatly expand the sample pool to hundreds of airway mucus specimens may capture an adequate number of specimens from susceptible individuals to reveal potential differences in the barrier properties of airway mucus against influenza.
Supplementary material
Supplementary Material
Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.
movie S1 ERJ-01709-2016_Movie_S1
movie S2 ERJ-01709-2016_Movie_S2
movie S3 ERJ-01709-2016_Movie_S3
movie S4 ERJ-01709-2016_Movie_S4
movie S5 ERJ-01709-2016_Movie_S5
movie S6 ERJ-01709-2016_Movie_S6
Disclosures
Acknowledgements
We thank Christina Parker (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA) for technical assistance. Reagents were kindly provided by Suryaram Gummuluru (Boston University, Boston, MA, USA), Julie Nelson (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and Peter Palese (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA).
Footnotes
This article has supplementary material available from erj.ersjournals.com
Received: March 14 2016 | Accepted after revision: Oct 05 2016
Support statement: Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Open Funder Registry.
Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com
- Received March 14, 2016.
- Accepted October 5, 2016.
- Copyright ©ERS 2017