Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Safety of a new “all in one” 3D device for fiducial tumor marking: A pilot animal study

Bruno Escarguel, Javier Flandes, Jean Baptiste Paoli, Olivier Monnet, Julien Legodec, Clément Fournier, Jean Michel Vergnon
European Respiratory Journal 2016 48: PA4674; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA4674
Bruno Escarguel
1Interventional Pulmonology, Hopital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Javier Flandes
2Interventional Pulmonology, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Baptiste Paoli
1Interventional Pulmonology, Hopital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Monnet
1Interventional Pulmonology, Hopital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julien Legodec
1Interventional Pulmonology, Hopital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clément Fournier
3Clinic of Respiratory Diseases, Hopital Calmette, Lille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Michel Vergnon
4Interventional Pulmonology, Hopital Nord, Saint Etienne, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Malignant lung lesions are commonly treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy e.g. Cyberknife®. However, a common problem of existing markers is migration which requires placement of several devices (usually 3). The purpose of the study was to demonstrate feasibility of a new « All in 1 » shape memory (Novatech®) markers, with safety and efficacy as key points, in a porcine model.

METHODS: 55 devices with 3 different shapes were inserted in 8 Piétrain pigs, using flexible bronchoscopy under general anesthesia. Follow-up period: 4 weeks with CT scans analysis. The markers where launched in different peripheral sub-segments using a guide sheath under fluoroscopy control. Evaluation: Procedure time, ease of placement, blinded CT scan analyses for evaluation of migration, complications and histological analysis.

RESULTS: All 55 devices were easily inserted into the peripheral bronchi and visualized under fluoroscopy. The average procedure time was 5 min (+/- 2,6). During the 4 weeks clinical follow up and CT evaluation, no immediate or late complication occurred (pneumothorax, pneumonia, severe granulations or bleedings). Migration has been avoided by changing the design. The pathological investigations performed in the explanted lungs, at one month did not led to drastic alterations of the bronchio-alveolar structures at the site of implantation or distally.

CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot animal study the new « all in 1 » device for fiducial tumor marking was easy, quick and safe to use. It could be demonstrated that migration risk can be reduced with the right design and the lung functioning were not substantially affected by the device implantation.

  • Bronchoscopy
  • Lung cancer / Oncology
  • Thoracic oncology
  • Copyright ©the authors 2016
Previous
Back to top
Vol 48 Issue suppl 60 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety of a new “all in one” 3D device for fiducial tumor marking: A pilot animal study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Safety of a new “all in one” 3D device for fiducial tumor marking: A pilot animal study
Bruno Escarguel, Javier Flandes, Jean Baptiste Paoli, Olivier Monnet, Julien Legodec, Clément Fournier, Jean Michel Vergnon
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) PA4674; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA4674

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Safety of a new “all in one” 3D device for fiducial tumor marking: A pilot animal study
Bruno Escarguel, Javier Flandes, Jean Baptiste Paoli, Olivier Monnet, Julien Legodec, Clément Fournier, Jean Michel Vergnon
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) PA4674; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA4674
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Local anaesthetic thoracoscopy: Evaluation of a thoracoscopy service in east dorset
  • What factors influence the duration of pneumothorax drainage?
  • Descriptive analysis of thoracoscopic interventions in resource poor setting, Kandy, Sri Lanka
Show more 1.4 Interventional Pulmonology

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society