Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Exploring the impact of adding a respiratory dimension to the current EQ-5D descriptive system

Martine Hoogendoorn, Mark Oppe, Elly Stolk, Melinde Boland, Lucas Goossens, Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
European Respiratory Journal 2016 48: PA3959; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA3959
Martine Hoogendoorn
1Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Oppe
2EuroQol, EuroQol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elly Stolk
1Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melinde Boland
3Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucas Goossens
3Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
1Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
3Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: The EQ-5D is a generic health-related quality of life questionnaire often used to calculate QALYs in economic evaluations. Adding a respiratory dimension to the current 5 dimensions could improve its responsiveness to changes in patients with respiratory problems. We aimed to evaluate the impact of adding a respiratory dimension (i.e. a bolt-on) on EQ-5D utility values.

Methods: Regression- and principal component analyses identified two respiratory bolt-on candidate items: 1) breathing problems and 2) impact of shortness of breath on physical activities (levels: no/slight/moderate/severe/extreme problems or unable to do). Valuation interviews (>200) for each candidate bolt-on were performed with a representative sample from the Dutch general public using the composite time-trade off (TTO) method and a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Results: Observed mean TTO values for health states with a level 4 or 5 for the respiratory dimension were significantly lower compared to the same health states observed in the Dutch EQ-5D-5L study without respiratory dimension. Results of regression models showed that for the bolt-on candidate “impact of shortness of breath on physical activities” utility decrements were significant for level 3 (-0.055), level 4 (-0.087) and level 5 (-0.135). For the “breathing problems” bolt-on, the coefficients for the same levels were lower (-0.086, -0.219 and -0.327, respectively).

Conclusion: Addition of both respiratory bolt-ons to the EQ-5D-5L had a significant effect on the valuation of health states but the bolt-on dimension on “breathing problems” showed the greatest impact and therefore seems the most appropriate respiratory bolt-on dimension.

  • Quality of life
  • Treatments
  • Copyright ©the authors 2016
Previous
Back to top
Vol 48 Issue suppl 60 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploring the impact of adding a respiratory dimension to the current EQ-5D descriptive system
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Exploring the impact of adding a respiratory dimension to the current EQ-5D descriptive system
Martine Hoogendoorn, Mark Oppe, Elly Stolk, Melinde Boland, Lucas Goossens, Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) PA3959; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA3959

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Exploring the impact of adding a respiratory dimension to the current EQ-5D descriptive system
Martine Hoogendoorn, Mark Oppe, Elly Stolk, Melinde Boland, Lucas Goossens, Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) PA3959; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA3959
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • ICS and risk of pneumonia in Swedish COPD patients: The ARCTIC study
  • The relation between personality traits and health status of patients with COPD
  • Change in COPD cases having QoF reviews in KSS region, UK
Show more 1.6 General Practice and Primary Care

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society