Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Cost-effectiveness of adding novel or group 5 interventions to a background regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany

Daniel Wirth, Ramesh Dass, Robert Hettle
European Respiratory Journal 2016 48: PA2681; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA2681
Daniel Wirth
1Health Economics & Market Access, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Neuss, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramesh Dass
2Health Economics & Market Access, Janssen-Cilag Ltd, High Wycombe, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Hettle
3Health Economic Modelling Unit, Parexel Access, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term costs and effectiveness of adding the novel/group 5 drugs bedaquiline and linezolid to a background regimen (BR) of drugs for treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), from a German healthcare payer perspective.

Methods: A cohort-based Markov model was developed to simulate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of bedaquiline + BR or linezolid + BR versus BR alone in the treatment of MDR-TB, over a 10-year time horizon. Efficacy was evaluated in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years (LY), using inputs from the C208 clinical trial for bedaquiline and from a German observational study for linezolid. Cost data were obtained from German Drug Directory costs (€/2015), published literature, and expert opinion. A 3% yearly discount rate was applied. Sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results: The total discounted costs and QALYs per patient were €85,575 and 5.95 for bedaquiline + BR and €80,460 and 3.91 for linezolid + BR, compared with €60,962 and 3.68 for BR alone. Both bedaquiline and linezolid were therefore associated with higher QALYs and higher costs than BR alone, with ICERs of €22,238 for bedaquiline and €87,484 for linezolid, versus BR. In a fully incremental analysis, bedaquiline + BR was the most cost-effective option at thresholds >€22,000/QALY gained.

Conclusions: In Germany, the addition of bedaquiline or linezolid to BR would result in QALY gains over BR alone. Based on this analysis, bedaquiline is likely to be the most cost-effective drug for the treatment of MDR-TB when added to BR, at thresholds >€22,000/QALY.

  • Health policy
  • Tuberculosis - management
  • MDR-TB
  • Copyright ©the authors 2016
Previous
Back to top
Vol 48 Issue suppl 60 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cost-effectiveness of adding novel or group 5 interventions to a background regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cost-effectiveness of adding novel or group 5 interventions to a background regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany
Daniel Wirth, Ramesh Dass, Robert Hettle
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) PA2681; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA2681

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Cost-effectiveness of adding novel or group 5 interventions to a background regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany
Daniel Wirth, Ramesh Dass, Robert Hettle
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) PA2681; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA2681
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • The costs of MDR/XDR tuberculosis in Barcelona (Spain): Cases treated with DOTs/DOT plus in a specialized centre
  • Characteristics of tuberculosis (TB) in patients that died from TB in Poland
  • Malnutrition in tuberculosis: Value of fat- free mass and creatinine-height index assessment
Show more 10.2 Tuberculosis

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society