Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Safety of research bronchoscopy in asthma and COPD

Patrick Mallia, Maria-Belen Trujillo-Torralbo, Jhaideep Dhariwal, David Jackson, Simon Message, Joseph Footitt, Sebastian Johnston
European Respiratory Journal 2016 48: PA1396; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA1396
Patrick Mallia
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria-Belen Trujillo-Torralbo
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jhaideep Dhariwal
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Jackson
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Message
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Footitt
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Johnston
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: Fibre-optic bronchoscopy (FOB) is a research tool in asthma and COPD with a good safety record in stable patients. There is no data regarding adverse events for FOB in patients with asthma/COPD exacerbations.

Aims: To evaluate the safety of FOB in subjects participating in experimental rhinovirus infection studies.

Methods: We reviewed the records of these subjects from a single centre since 2000. Subjects had FOB at baseline and convalescence (stable) and during the virus-induced exacerbation (infection) with biopsies, brushings and BAL.

Results: The clinical characteristics of the subjects are in Table 1 . There were no adverse events in the asthma studies and 3 in the COPD studies. Two subjects developed lower respiratory tract infections requiring antibiotics. In 1 subject (non-smoker) this occurred at the infection FOB and the subject was withdrawn. In the other subject (COPD) this occurred at the baseline FOB and he continued in the study and had 2 other uneventful FOB. One subject (smoker) had FOB terminated due to hypoxia.

COPD studiesAsthma studies
Non-smokers (N=19)Smokers (N=29)COPD N=35Controls (N=40)Asthma (N=50)
Total bronchoscopies386862109110
Stable1940435950
Infection1928195060
Age58.95 (±1.59)52.10 (±1.41)59.51 (±1.11)28.30 (±1.65)31.60 (±1.54)
Sex M:F9:1017:1222:1323:1716:21
Smoking history/33.41 (±1.77)43.74 (±3.33)//
FEV1 (litres)3.06 (±0.22)3.27 (±0.124)2.05 (±0.085)
FEV1 %106 (±3.79)102 (±2.48)67.46 (±1.82)102.9 (±1.8)91.30 (±2.23)
SABA only (%)//35/24 (48)
ICS////26 (52)
Mean ICS (BDP equivalent)////519 (±107.5)

Clinical Characteristics of Study Subjects

Conclusions: The incidence of adverse events in research FOB in asthma and COPD exacerbations is low.

  • Bronchoscopy
  • Asthma - mechanism
  • Nursing care
  • Copyright ©the authors 2016
Previous
Back to top
Vol 48 Issue suppl 60 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety of research bronchoscopy in asthma and COPD
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Safety of research bronchoscopy in asthma and COPD
Patrick Mallia, Maria-Belen Trujillo-Torralbo, Jhaideep Dhariwal, David Jackson, Simon Message, Joseph Footitt, Sebastian Johnston
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) PA1396; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA1396

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Safety of research bronchoscopy in asthma and COPD
Patrick Mallia, Maria-Belen Trujillo-Torralbo, Jhaideep Dhariwal, David Jackson, Simon Message, Joseph Footitt, Sebastian Johnston
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) PA1396; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.PA1396
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Ascertaining baseline knowledge of oxygen therapy and respiratory failure
  • Respiratory nurse specialists prioritise experiences of living with COPD differently from patients with COPD and their carers
  • Exploring the need for the development of a recreational day room for inpatients with respiratory and tuberculosis conditions
Show more 9.3 Nurses

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society