Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Predicting mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Which parameters should be used to determine eligibility for treatment? Analysis of a UK prospective cohort

Amy Taylor Gonzalez, Toby Maher
European Respiratory Journal 2016 48: OA282; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.OA282
Amy Taylor Gonzalez
1Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
2Interstial Lung Disease, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toby Maher
3National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Introduction: The burden of mortality from Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is significant (1), however treatment with Pirfenidone remains restricted to patients with an FVC of 50-80% by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2).

Aim: An analysis of established prognostic tools such as single lung function parameters, the Gender Age Physiology (GAP) index and Composite Physiologic Index (CPI) will be validated in a cohort of IPF patients to determine which parameter best predict mortality.

Method: 209 patients with IPF were enrolled in to a prospective cohort study at a UK tertiary centre. Baseline GAP Score, CPI, TLCO, FVC and FEV1 were analysed using Cox Regression and calculation of C-Statistic.

Results: Multivariate analysis demonstrated the C Statistic was highest for GAP (C=0.7596) then CPI (C=0.7559). However hazards ratio (HR) demonstrated the TLCO to be the only significant parameter in each model (p=<0.001).

Univariate analysis found Sex and Age, the distinguishing variables of GAP, to be poor predictors of mortality, C=0.5137 and C=0.5795 respectively. TLCO was the best predictor of mortality C=0.7518 followed by FVC (C=0.6765) and FEV1 (C=0.6522).

Conclusions: Evidence suggests TLCO can predict mortality more accurately.

Comorbidities such as emphysema and PHT can preserve lung volume whilst depreciating TLCO beyond that which can be attributed to fibrosis. IPF patients can therefore be ineligible for treatment with Pirfenidone on the NHS, with current NICE guidance, whilst having a higher risk of mortality. TLCO or CPI should be evaluated especially if there is evidence of emphysema or PHT.

  • Interstitial lung disease
  • Public health
  • Physiology
  • Copyright ©the authors 2016
Previous
Back to top
Vol 48 Issue suppl 60 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Which parameters should be used to determine eligibility for treatment? Analysis of a UK prospective cohort
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Predicting mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Which parameters should be used to determine eligibility for treatment? Analysis of a UK prospective cohort
Amy Taylor Gonzalez, Toby Maher
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) OA282; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.OA282

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Predicting mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Which parameters should be used to determine eligibility for treatment? Analysis of a UK prospective cohort
Amy Taylor Gonzalez, Toby Maher
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (suppl 60) OA282; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2016.OA282
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Capnovolumetry as a cooperation free method in the diagnosis and monitoring of COPD
  • Computer bronchophonography - Frequency analysis ofthe respiratory cycle
  • Effect of spirometry and bronchodilation test in eNO levels
Show more 9.1 Respiratory Function Technologists/Scientists

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society