Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Outdoor second-hand cigarette smoke significantly affects air quality

Ario Alberto Ruprecht, Cinzia De Marco, Paolo Pozzi, Roberto Mazza, Elena Munarini, Adriano Di Paco, Paolo Paredi, Giovanni Invernizzi, Roberto Boffi
European Respiratory Journal 2016 48: 918-920; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00064-2016
Ario Alberto Ruprecht
1Tobacco Control Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
2Italian College GPs (SIMG), Milan, Italy
6Both authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cinzia De Marco
1Tobacco Control Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
6Both authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Pozzi
1Tobacco Control Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
3Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Azienda Sociosanitaria Territoriale Lariana, Cantù, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: paolo.pozzi@asst-lariana.it
Roberto Mazza
1Tobacco Control Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Munarini
1Tobacco Control Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adriano Di Paco
4Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Weaning Center, Auxilium Vitae, Volterra, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Paredi
5Airway Disease Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giovanni Invernizzi
1Tobacco Control Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
2Italian College GPs (SIMG), Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Boffi
1Tobacco Control Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Air quality is worse in a pedestrian area frequented by smokers compared with a high-traffic zone http://ow.ly/DMW83007Xmo

To the Editor:

Second-hand smoke (SHS) may be significantly elevated outdoors and when adjacent to smoking areas [1, 2]. This is of concern as SHS exposure is linked to adverse health outcomes, including respiratory disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and lung cancer [3–5]. Exposure to cancer-causing chemicals in outdoor areas is likely to occur in the presence of cigarette smoke [6], and worryingly, short periods of exposure to SHS are related to detectable levels of carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines in nonsmoking subjects [7].

A growing number of American cities have adopted policies that restrict tobacco smoking in outdoor locations such as parks. However, more lenient restrictions apply in Japan, where designated smoking areas have been created in streets where smoking is banned [6].

The contribution of SHS to environmental pollution in comparison with vehicular traffic has not yet been investigated. Pedestrian only streets, which are often narrow and lined by high buildings, particularly in European historic towns, are visited by large numbers of smokers. This architectural feature creates so-called “street canyons”, characterised by limited natural air exchange where the presence of smokers may potentially generate large quantities of SHS.

In this study, to investigate the contribution of SHS to outdoor air quality, we compared the environmental pollution of a high-traffic area to that of a “street canyon” by measuring particulate matter (particles with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 1 μm (PM1), 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and 10 μm (PM10)) and vapour nicotine levels.

We hypothesised that the presence of smokers in restricted pedestrian areas may potentially generate large quantities of SHS, resulting in a deterioration of the outdoor air quality. A pedestrian-only area (Via Fiorichiari) in the city of Milan, Italy, with a high number of outdoor restaurants and bars, and the parallel high-traffic area of similar architectural design (Via Pontaccio) were set as location of the experiment. The two streets are about 60 m apart and connected at either end by two 7.5 m large streets. Both present a “street canyon” configuration as described earlier.

A gravimetrically pre-calibrated, laser-operated real-time portable aerosol analyser (Aerocet 531, MetOne Instruments, Grants Pass, OR, USA) was used to measure PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 levels. One instrument was installed 1.5 m from the ground on a balcony in the pedestrian area, while the other one was stationed in the adjacent high traffic street, with a vehicular traffic of 700–1000 vehicles per hour (counted directly).

Although no air pollution monitoring stations were available at a suitable distance, our PM analysers were gravimetrically calibrated to improve accuracy using the Beta Attenuation Monitor model BAM-102 of MetOne Instruments as a reference, with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) equivalence certificate number EQPM-0798-122 and TÜV-Report 936/21205333/A for PM10. Meorological conditions were very stable (absence of rain) with the temperature ranging from 22°C to 31°C. Relative humidity ranged from 18% to 83% and wind speed from 0 to 7 km·h−1.

Outdoor nicotine vapour phase was measured by using passive samplers (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA), following the validated method of Hammond [8] with a detection limit of <0.02 µg·m−3, the filters were then analysed using a gas chromatography method.

Cigarette consumption was estimated by assuming that each pedestrian walking into the area with a lit cigarette over a time span of an hour between 11.00 h and midnight represented one cigarette smoked. At the same time, the frequency of smokers seated at patios was evaluated using the mean of six consecutive counts performed every 10 min.

Data were analysed using Graph Pad Prism 5.03 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). All results were expressed as mean±sem. Comparisons between groups were made using two-way ANOVA. The cumulative effect of traffic and smoking on PM was expressed as the area under the curve (AUC). A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between the number of smokers and the environmental PM.

Even though PM1 concentration levels were similar in the two streets during the morning hours (figure 1a), in the evening between 18:00 h and midnight, PM1 was significantly elevated in the pedestrian area compared with the high traffic street (2.1±0.03 versus 1.00±0.03 µg·m−3; p<0.01) (figure 1a and d). These findings were confirmed by a larger AUC for PM1 in the pedestrian area (AUC of 7.34 arbitrary units (AU)) compared with the high traffic street (1.07 AU) (figure 1d).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Comparison of particulate matter concentrations at different times of the day for particles with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of a) 1 μm (PM1), b) 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and c) 10 μm (PM10) and their corresponding time courses with the number of cigarettes smoked (d–f) in a pedestrian only area compared with a high vehicular traffic area.

PM2.5 (figure 1b and e) and PM10 (figure 1c and f) were also more elevated in the evening in the pedestrian area compared with the high traffic street (15.2±1.1 versus 67.2±8.9 µg·m−3 and 13.00±1.1 versus 59.70±5.5 µg·m−3, respectively; both p<0.05). The AUC confirmed the presence of higher levels of pollution in the pedestrian area both for PM2.5 (AUC of 69.33 AU and 64.45 AU for the pedestrian and traffic areas, respectively) (figure 1e) and PM10 (AUC of 291.8 AU and 271.1 AU, respectively) (figure 1f). Interestingly, after midnight, as the restaurants and bars closed, PM2.5 and PM10 were significantly elevated in the high traffic street compared with the pedestrian area (figure 1b and c).

In summary, our data show that during evening hours air quality was worse in the pedestrian area compared with a high-traffic zone, and correlated with the number of cigarette smoked outdoors. Higher particulate matter levels in a pedestrian area were unexpected and are of concern.

An increment of 15 µg·m−3 or more for PM2.5 levels, as measured in the pedestrian area in this study, is sufficient to generate a downgrade of one step in the air quality index, from “good” to “moderate” or from “moderate” to “unhealthy for sensitive groups”, according to the US EPA standards [9]. Therefore, the magnitude of differences we observed is of medical interest.

The “street canyon” architecture of the streets we studied, which favours particulate matter stagnation due to reduced ventilation is likely to have contributed to our experimental findings; our results may not apply to streets with a different layout.

Because particulate matter levels were different in the two areas only during the evening hours, when a large number of smokers crowded into the pedestrian area, we assumed that cigarette smoke contributed to this finding; this hypothesis was reinforced by the strong correlation of particulate matter with the number of cigarettes smoked by the pedestrians (r=0.76, p<0.05 and r=0.8, p<0.03 for PM1 and PM2.5, respectively), and by the presence of vapour nicotine in the pedestrian (0.07 µg·m−3) but not in the vehicular area. Furthermore, a causative negative effect of SHS on air quality is confirmed by the reversal to poorer air quality in the high traffic road after midnight, when the restaurants and bars closed and there were no smokers the street.

In particular weather conditions outdoor SHS may rival indoor concentrations [10], creating an environment for the exposure to so-called smoking microplumes [11]. A 3 h exposure to outdoor SHS is sufficient to allow the uptake of some tobacco derived carcinogens like nitrosamines [7]; this may well occur in a pedestrian area.

The World Health Organization recommends a no smoking policy in outdoor settings wherever a SHS hazard is possible [12] and the scientific debate over a complete outdoor smoking ban is ongoing [13, 14]. In view of the public health implications of our results, implementing a smoking ban that includes outdoor SHS may be required to protect citizens from the dangers of SHS.

Acknowledgements

We wish to dedicate this work to Giovanni Invernizzi who strongly contributed to this study before he passed away.

Footnotes

  • Support statement: This work has been supported by the 5×1000 mille contribution; we wish to thank all those citizens who decided to donate their 5×1000 to IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan.

  • Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com

  • Received July 30, 2015.
  • Accepted May 6, 2016.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2016

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sureda X,
    2. Martínez-Sánchez JM,
    3. López MJ, et al.
    Secondhand smoke levels in public building main entrances: outdoor and indoor PM2.5 assessment. Tob Control 2012; 21: 543–548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Boffi R,
    2. Ruprecht A,
    3. Mazza R, et al.
    A day at the European Respiratory Society Congress: passive smoking influences both outdoor and indoor air quality. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 862–863.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Loomis D,
    2. Grosse Y,
    3. Lauby-Secretan B, et al.
    The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution. Lancet Oncology 2013; 14: 1262–1263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kostikas K,
    2. Minas M,
    3. Nikolaou E, et al.
    Secondhand smoke exposure induces acutely airway acidification and oxidative stress. Respir Med 2013; 107: 172–179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Frazer K,
    2. Callinan JE,
    3. McHugh J, et al.
    Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2: CD005992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Cho H,
    2. Lee K,
    3. Hwang Y, et al.
    Outdoor tobacco smoke exposure at the perimeter of a tobacco-free university. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2014; 64: 863–866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. St Helen G,
    2. Bernert JT,
    3. Hall DB, et al.
    Exposure to secondhand smoke outside of a bar and a restaurant and tobacco exposure biomarkers in nonsmokers. Environ Health Perspect 2012; 120: 1010–1016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Hammond SK
    . Evaluating exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. In: Winegar EDLH, eds. Sampling and Analysis of Airborne Pollutants. Florida, CRC Press, 1993; pp. 319–337.
  8. ↵
    Congressional Research Service. Air Quality: EPA's 2013 changes to particulate matter (PM) standard. http://fas.org:8080/sgp/crs/misc/R42934.pdf Date last updated: December 23, 2015.
  9. ↵
    1. Sureda X,
    2. Fernández E,
    3. López MJ, et al.
    Secondhand tobacco smoke exposure in open and semi-open settings: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect 2013; 121: 766–773.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Acevedo-Bolton V,
    2. Ott WR,
    3. Cheng KC, et al.
    Controlled experiments measuring personal exposure to PM2.5 in close proximity to cigarette smoking. Indoor Air 2014; 24: 199–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2009: implementing smoke-free environments. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2009.
  12. ↵
    1. Potera C
    . Outdoor smoking areas: does the science support a ban? Environ Health Perspect 2013; 121: A229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Hyland A,
    2. Barnoya J,
    3. Corral JE
    . Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future. Tob Control 2012; 21: 154–161.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 48 Issue 3 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 48 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outdoor second-hand cigarette smoke significantly affects air quality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Outdoor second-hand cigarette smoke significantly affects air quality
Ario Alberto Ruprecht, Cinzia De Marco, Paolo Pozzi, Roberto Mazza, Elena Munarini, Adriano Di Paco, Paolo Paredi, Giovanni Invernizzi, Roberto Boffi
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (3) 918-920; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00064-2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Outdoor second-hand cigarette smoke significantly affects air quality
Ario Alberto Ruprecht, Cinzia De Marco, Paolo Pozzi, Roberto Mazza, Elena Munarini, Adriano Di Paco, Paolo Paredi, Giovanni Invernizzi, Roberto Boffi
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2016, 48 (3) 918-920; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00064-2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • COPD and smoking
  • Epidemiology, occupational and environmental lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Airway immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in COPD patients
  • Wider access to rifapentine-based regimens is needed for TB care globally
  • Screening for PVOD in heterozygous EIF2AK4 variant carriers
Show more Agora

Research letters

  • Translated impact on carbon footprint from choice of inhaled therapy
  • Radiographic score in TB and relationship to therapy and bacillary load
  • Single-inhaler triple versus dual bronchodilator therapy for GOLD “E” COPD patients
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society