Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Preventing and controlling tuberculosis among refugees in Europe: more needed for high-risk populations

Gerard de Vries, Job van Rest, Wieneke Meijer, Bert Wolters, Rob van Hest, Michael Kimerling
European Respiratory Journal 2016 48: 274-276; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00575-2016
Gerard de Vries
1KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands
2Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gerard.devries@kncvtbc.org
Job van Rest
1KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wieneke Meijer
3Dept of TB Control, Municipal Public Health Services Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bert Wolters
4Dept of TB Control, Municipal Public Health Services Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rob van Hest
4Dept of TB Control, Municipal Public Health Services Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
5Dept of TB Control, Municipal Public Health Services Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Kimerling
1KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Screening asylum seekers from high TB incidence countries for LTBI is recommended in low-incidence countries http://ow.ly/4nbKhU

From the authors:

We thank M. Dara and colleagues for their commentary on our article “Low yield of screening asylum seekers from countries with a tuberculosis (TB) incidence of <50 per 100 000 population” [1]. We agree that the current high influx of refugees from both low- and high-incidence countries into countries that already have a TB incidence <10 per 100 000 population, e.g. many European Union member states, brings up a number of new challenges.

We agree with M. Dara and colleagues that profiles of migrating populations differ, as determined for example by country of origin or reasons for migration, such as study, employment, family reunification or war. In the Netherlands, screening processes differ for recently arrived migrants and refugees and the effectiveness of these interventions is evaluated separately. Results of chest radiography screening of (regular) migrants were previously analysed for the period 2005–2010 [2]. Overall, 108 TB cases were diagnosed among 117 389 screened migrants, resulting in a TB prevalence of 92 per 100 000 screened persons (95% CI 75–109). Only seven cases were identified by screening of 31 218 migrants from countries with a TB incidence of <50 per 100 000, resulting in a TB prevalence of 22 per 100 000 screened persons (95% CI 9–46) and a number needed to screen (NNS) of 4460. We would like to reiterate that the Netherlands uses a threshold of 2000 for NNS, in order to limit exposure of healthy individuals to radiation. The low yield among (regular) migrants from countries with a TB incidence of <50 per 100 000 led to the advice to the Ministry of Health to limit screening to migrants from countries with an estimated TB incidence of >50 per 100 000 population. This has been in effect since January 1, 2015. Our current evaluation of screening asylum seekers (January 2011–September 2015) from countries with a TB incidence of <50 per 100 000 had similar results, i.e. a TB prevalence of 26 per 100 000 screened persons (95% CI 14–45) and a NNS of 3787, and the same consideration led to the advice to the Ministry of Health to stop screening. We agree that our results cannot be automatically extrapolated to other countries and would be interested to read other countries' experiences. However, our results are not unexpected in asylum seekers from countries with traditionally a low TB incidence. Even if their circumstances dramatically change and they are staying in densely populated camps, there will initially still be few cases that transmit the disease.

The second issue raised by M. Dara and colleagues is latent TB infection (LTBI). We agree that for low-incidence countries moving towards pre-elimination, apart from early case-finding and adequate treatment, LTBI screening is a further and complementary intervention to reduce TB incidence [3]. Especially individuals at the highest risk of developing the disease, such as contacts of pulmonary TB patients and those with clinical risk factors such as HIV, anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment, dialysis, organ or haematological transplantation and silicosis, should benefit from LTBI screening and preventive treatment [4]. In our opinion, low-incidence countries considering LTBI screening of certain groups of migrants and asylum seekers should target this intervention to persons from high-incidence countries according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [4], WHO country incidence estimates [5] or based on information from their national surveillance systems. We recently described the TB situation among the two largest groups of asylum seekers in the Netherlands over the period January 2013–September 2015 [6]. Among Syrian asylum seekers, TB prevalence was 22 per 100 000 screened persons at arrival and TB incidence was 19 per 100 000 in the first year after arrival, in agreement with WHO estimates for Syria. Among Eritrean/Ethiopian asylum seekers, TB prevalence was 283 per 100 000 screened persons at arrival and TB incidence was 1394 per 100 000 in the first year after arrival, highly inconsistent with the WHO estimates for Eritrea of 78 per 100 000 population in 2014. 78% of the Eritrean/Ethiopian asylum seekers (n=3295) in 2014 arrived in the second quarter and by September 30, 2015, 0.3% (11 cases) were diagnosed with TB at screening upon arrival; 1.6% developed TB in the first year after arrival (54 cases) and 0.3% so far in the second year after arrival (11 cases), in total 2.3% of this cohort. We hypothesised that, apart from high transmission rates and occasional HIV seropositivity, poor nutrition and stress may have contributed to this very high TB rate. This study shows clearly that we should prioritise and offer LTBI screening and preventive treatment to such high-risk populations.

It is unrealistic to expect TB control programmes in low-incidence countries to receive much more funding when the incidence is declining. In the Netherlands, over recent years, several chest radiography screening programmes have become more targeted to improve effectiveness, mainly based upon evaluation of yield, i.e. prevalence rates. Now, <50% of the prison population is screened and screening of migrants and asylum seekers from countries with a TB incidence of <50 per 100 000 has been stopped or will be stopped. Another example is chest radiography screening of drug users and homeless persons, which was replaced by LTBI screening in Amsterdam and stopped after controlling the outbreak in Rotterdam [7]. The challenge in the Netherlands and other low-incidence countries is to redirect the TB programme and resources from screening for active disease towards targeted LTBI screening to optimise epidemiological impact.

The Dutch National TB Control Plan 2016–2020 recommends targeting LTBI screening to child migrants and child asylum seekers and to persons from countries with a TB incidence >200 per 100 000 [8]. In the latter case, initial LTBI screening will replace the follow-up chest radiography screening that is still carried out in the Netherlands at regular intervals. The National TB Control Plan also advises evaluation of the implementation, impact and cost-effectiveness of LTBI screening of these groups of migrants and asylum seekers before scaling it up to other migrant groups. The efficiency of TB and LTBI screening of migrants and asylum seekers, as well as of other TB control interventions, will be the subject of a meeting planned in 2018 between the Ministry of Health and various stakeholders to discuss “allocative efficiency”, as was recommended by the last country review [9].

LTBI management in well-defined groups is an essential component of TB elimination plans [3]. Implementation of LTBI screening and preventive treatment is not yet fully implemented in European low-incidence countries and needs to be scaled up [10]. Thus, it is recommended for European countries to work more intensively, prepare consolidated plans and ensure available resources to move towards elimination [10].

In conclusion, we agree with M. Dara and colleagues, that “more is needed”, such as LTBI screening of migrants and asylum seekers, but only for those with a high risk of TB. Moreover, low-incidence countries will benefit most from progress made in high TB incidence countries and thus, instead of overspending large amounts of money to prevent a few cases among migrants and asylum seekers with relatively low risk of TB, we recommend supporting TB control in high-incidence countries.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received March 20, 2016.
  • Accepted April 18, 2016.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2016

References

  1. ↵
    1. de Vries G,
    2. van Rest J,
    3. Meijer W, et al.
    Low yield of screening asylum seekers from countries with a tuberculosis incidence of <50 per 100 000 population. Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1870–1872.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. van Rest JF,
    2. Erkens CGM,
    3. de Vries G
    . Evaluatie tuberculosescreening immigranten. Resultaten binnenkomst- en vervolgscreening op tuberculose van immigranten in de jaren 2005 t/m 2010. [Evaluation of tuberculosis screening of immigrants. Results of entry and follow-up tuberculosis screening of immigrants 2005–2010]. The Hague, KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, 2012. www.kncvtbc.org/uploaded/2016/01/evaluatie_tuberculosescreening_immigranten_2005-2010.pdf
  3. ↵
    1. Lönnroth K,
    2. Migliori GB,
    3. Abubakar I, et al.
    Towards tuberculosis elimination: an action framework for low-incidence countries. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 928–952.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Getahun H,
    2. Matteelli A,
    3. Abubakar I, et al.
    Management of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: WHO guidelines for low tuberculosis burden countries. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 1563–1576.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2015. WHO/HTM/TB/2015.22. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2015. www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/gtbr15_main_text.pdf
  6. ↵
    1. de Vries G,
    2. Gerritsen RF,
    3. van Burg JL, et al.
    Tuberculose bij asielzoekers in Nederland: descriptief onderzoek onder de 2 grootste groepen asielzoekers [Tuberculosis among asylum-seekers in the Netherlands: a descriptive study among the two largest groups of asylum-seekers]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2016; 160: D51.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. van Hest R,
    2. de Vries G
    . Active tuberculosis case-finding among drug users and homeless persons: after the outbreak. Eur Respir J 2016; 48: 269–271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. de Vries G,
    2. Riesmeijer R
    . National Tuberculosis Control Plan 2016–2020. Towards Elimination. Bilthoven, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 2016. www.kncvtbc.org/uploaded/2016/04/National-Tuberculosis-Control-Plan-2016-2020.-Towards-elimination.pdf
  9. ↵
    World Health Organization, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Report of the Joint WHO and ECDC Programme Review of the National TB Control Programme in the Netherlands. 30 September–4 October 2013. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2014. www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/255354/Report-of-the-joint-WHO-and-ECDC-programme-review-of-the-national-TB-control-programme-in-the-Netherlands.pdf
  10. ↵
    1. D'Ambrosio L,
    2. Dara M,
    3. Tadolini M, et al.
    Tuberculosis elimination: theory and practice in Europe. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1410–1420.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 48 Issue 1 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 48 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preventing and controlling tuberculosis among refugees in Europe: more needed for high-risk populations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Preventing and controlling tuberculosis among refugees in Europe: more needed for high-risk populations
Gerard de Vries, Job van Rest, Wieneke Meijer, Bert Wolters, Rob van Hest, Michael Kimerling
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2016, 48 (1) 274-276; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00575-2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Preventing and controlling tuberculosis among refugees in Europe: more needed for high-risk populations
Gerard de Vries, Job van Rest, Wieneke Meijer, Bert Wolters, Rob van Hest, Michael Kimerling
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2016, 48 (1) 274-276; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00575-2016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory infections and tuberculosis
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Airway immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in COPD patients
  • Wider access to rifapentine-based regimens is needed for TB care globally
  • Screening for PVOD in heterozygous EIF2AK4 variant carriers
Show more Agora

Correspondence

  • Clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis in India
  • Reply: Clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis in India
  • Risk factors for disease progression in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis
Show more Correspondence

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society