Tables
- TABLE 1
Diagnostic performance of various criteria for discriminating controls versus patients with PVD and LHD
Patients n mPAPmax+TPRmax# mPAP–COslope¶ ΔmPAP/ΔCO+ Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) All 169 0.93 (0.86–0.96) 1.0 (0.95–1.0) 0.72 (0.62–0.81) 0.88 (0.78–0.95) 0.94 (0.88–0.98) 0.87 (0.76–0.94) Diagnosis PVD 49 0.94 (0.84–0.98) 1.0 (0.95–1.0) 0.67 (0.52–0.80) 0.88 (0.78–0.95) 0.88 (0.75–0.95) 0.87 (0.76–0.94) LHD 52 0.92 (0.82–0.97) 1.0 (0.95–1.0) 0.77 (0.63–0.87) 0.88 (0.78–0.95) 1.0 (0.93–1.0) 0.87 (0.76–0.94) #: sensitivity and specificity values based on peak mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAPmax) >30 mmHg and peak total pulmonary resistance (TPRmax) >3 WU; ¶: sensitivity and specificity values based on the mPAP–cardiac output slope (mPAP–COslope) >3 WU; +: sensitivity and specificity values based on the ratio of mPAPmax minus resting mPAP over peak cardiac output minus resting cardiac output (ΔmPAP/ΔCO) >3 WU. PVD: pulmonary vascular disease; LHD: left heart disease.
Additional Files
Disclosures
Vol 48 Issue 1
Table of Contents
Diagnostic concordance of different criteria for exercise pulmonary hypertension in subjects with normal resting pulmonary artery pressure
