Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Insights into ventilation–gas exchange coupling in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

J. Alberto Neder, Roberta P. Ramos, Jaquelina S. Ota-Arakaki, Eloara M.V. Ferreira, Daniel M. Hirai, Priscila A. Sperandio, Maria Clara N. Alencar, Flavio F. Arbex, Danilo C. Berton, Christine D'Arsigny, Denis E. O'Donnell
European Respiratory Journal 2016 48: 252-254; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01948-2015
J. Alberto Neder
1Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
2Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nederalb@gmail.com
Roberta P. Ramos
1Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
3Pulmonary Vascular Group, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jaquelina S. Ota-Arakaki
1Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
3Pulmonary Vascular Group, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eloara M.V. Ferreira
1Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
3Pulmonary Vascular Group, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel M. Hirai
1Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
2Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Priscila A. Sperandio
1Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Clara N. Alencar
1Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Flavio F. Arbex
1Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit, Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danilo C. Berton
4Respiratory Division, Dept of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine D'Arsigny
2Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denis E. O'Donnell
2Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Dept of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Increased “wasted” ventilation and heightened neural drive explains excess exercise ventilation in CTEPH http://ow.ly/Z4YBc

To the Editor:

Exercise intolerance due to excessive ventilation and dyspnoea are fundamental clinical features of patients with pulmonary vascular diseases [1]. Among these diseases, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is associated with the largest increase in exercise ventilation [2]. Understanding the mechanism(s) underlying excess exercise ventilation in CTEPH is clinically relevant when designing evidence-based therapeutic and rehabilitative strategies to improve patients' symptoms and quality of life.

Excess exercise ventilation in CTEPH has been traditionally ascribed to increased “wasted” ventilation, i.e. hypoperfusion of well-ventilated alveoli. In fact, the physiological dead space fraction of tidal volume (VD/VT ratio) at peak exercise not only predicts CTEPH after pulmonary embolism [3] but also improves after clinical [4] and surgical [5] treatment. As the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PETCO2) diminishes when ventilation is excessive relative to perfusion [6], increased VD/VT has been mechanistically linked to inordinately low PETCO2 in CTEPH [7]. A PETCO2 lower than arterial (a) carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) (i.e. a positive P(a-ET)CO2 gradient) [6] also suggests impaired pulmonary perfusion as a potential explanation for low exercise PETCO2in these patients [8].

Surprisingly, however, seminal studies comparing lung absorption of multiple inert gases showed no or a limited increase in VD/VT despite marked pulmonary arterial obstruction [9]. This prompts an alternative (or complementary) explanation for a low exercise PETCO2 in CTEPH: reduced alveolar PCO2 (hyperventilation) [10]. In fact, heightened neural drive has been found in pulmonary vascular diseases secondary to increased chemosensitivity [11] and/or higher afferent stimuli from “central” baro- and mechano-receptors [12]. Thus, alveolar hyperventilation under the stress of exercise may also explain the relatively lower PETCO2 in CTEPH. A hyperbolic correlation between increasing minute ventilation (V′E)/carbon dioxide production (V′CO2) and decreasing arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) in CTEPH is also suggestive of heightened neural drive and consistent with the alveolar equation [13].

There is another intriguing feature of the PETCO2 response that brings additional uncertainty about the meaning of a low exercise PETCO2 in CTEPH. Similar to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) [9], PETCO2 paradoxically increases (instead of further decreasing as in normal subjects) as soon as CTEPH patients enter the recovery phase. In this context, evaluation of PaCO2 (or arterialised capillary (PcCO2) as its surrogate) [8] and P(c-ET)CO2 across the exercise-to-recovery transition might shed light on the mechanisms underlying the PETCO2 behaviour during recovery in CTEPH. Thus, we reasoned that during recovery: 1) if PcCO2 remains stable or further decreases despite higher PETCO2, a narrower P(c-ET)CO2 would suggest improved VD/VT (scenario 1); 2) conversely, if PcCO2 and PETCO2 increase proportionally leading to stable P(c-ET)CO2, lower neural drive would explain higher PETCO2 (scenario 2); 3) but if a narrower P(c-ET)CO2 develops as a consequence of PcCO2, increasing less than PETCO2, improved VD/VT plus lower neural drive would explain a higher PETCO2 (scenario 3).

We therefore measured PcCO2 (arterialised ear lobe blood), P(c-ET)CO2 and plasma lactate 1 min before peak incremental exercise, at peak and in recovery at every minute up to the fifth minute of unloaded cycling. Responses from 10 patients (age 54–78 years, five males, mean±se pulmonary arterial pressure 51.5±9.7 mmHg, pulmonary wedge pressure 9.2±3.4 mmHg, stable segmental perfusion defects after 6 months of anticoagulation) were contrasted with those from eight age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. As expected, patients had a lower peak oxygen uptake, V′CO2 and arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) (p<0.05). Lactate corrected for peak work rate was higher in patients (0.14±0.05 versus 0.08±0.04 mEq·L−1·W−1; p<0.01). These findings were associated with lower peak PETCO2 and positive P(c-ET)CO2 (figure 1b).

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

a) Ventilation, carbon dioxide (CO2) output, b) capillary carbon dioxide tension (PcCO2) and capillary end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PETCO2), and c) their differences during exercise and recovery in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and healthy controls. Data are presented as mean±se. *: p<0.05 for inter-group comparisons at a given time-point.

In line with our previous observations, whereas recovery PETCO2 consistently increased throughout recovery in patients, it remained lower than peak exercise in controls (figure 1b). This increased PETCO2 was associated with a faster decline in V′E compared with V′CO2 in patients; conversely, V′E recovered at a slower rate than V′CO2 in controls (figure 1a). Lactate remained similarly increased in both groups; conversely, SpO2 was lower in patients up to the third minute of recovery (91.1±3.5% versus 96.4±2.0%; p<0.05). In controls, PcCO2 further decreased up to the second minute and remained stable thereafter, i.e. a negative P(c-ET)CO2 was found for most of recovery. In patients, PcCO2 increased throughout recovery; however, as it increased less than PETCO2, P(c-ET)CO2 systematically decreased in CTEPH (figure 1c). Under the logical assumption that recovery reversed the abnormalities seen during exercise, scenario 3 seems in line with the suggestions of Delcroix et al. [10] and Naeije and van de Borne [11] that both high VD/VT and heightened neural drive are related to excess exercise ventilation in CTEPH.

As pointed out by the late eminent physiologist Brian J. Whipp, the transition between different rates of metabolic demand (e.g. exercise–recovery) provides a unique window to understand the complexities linking tissue gas exchange to pulmonary ventilation [14]. Thus, when V′CO2 slowly decreased after exercise in our patients, V′E did not lag behind as in normal subjects. Conversely, V′E decreased consistently faster than V′CO2 in patients (figure 1a). The sudden decrease in V′E and resulting elevation in PcCO2 (figure 1b) suggest an abrupt reduction in neural drive in these patients. Sluggish muscle gas exchange kinetics due to a slower rate of phosphocreatine replenishment and/or slower cardiocirculatory dynamics during recovery may have contributed to a more protracted V′CO2 in patients [14]. It is also conceivable that carbon dioxide released during exercise has been slowly washed-out from carbon dioxide reservoirs, which are likely to be larger in chronically hypocapnic patients [15]. In fact, resting PaCO2 and exercise-induced decrements in PcCO2 were closely related to V′CO2 kinetics in patients (r=0.85 and r=0.88, respectively; p<0.001). Although additional studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanism(s), it is clear that V′E did not “wait” for V′CO2, which resulted in post-exercise decreases in the V′E/V′CO2 ratio, thereby contributing to increase PETCO2 in CTEPH.

Another key finding relates to a P(c-ET)CO2 decrease after exercise in patients, which seems consistent with post-exercise improvement in VD, likely to be secondary to enhanced pulmonary perfusion and ventilation/perfusion matching [6, 7]. Zhai et al. [13] found that while V′E/V′CO2 (assumed as an index of VD/VT behaviour) for a given PaCO2 was increased in CTEPH compared with PAH, the difference disappeared when V′E/V′CO2 was expressed as a function of PETCO2. This suggests a greater contribution of increased VD to the excessive exercise ventilation (and low PETCO2) in CTEPH compared with PAH during exercise.

In conclusion, increased “wasted” ventilation (high VD/VT) is not the only explanation for excess exercise ventilation in CTEPH: heightened neural drive also contributes to these abnormalities. Interventions able to decrease both VD/VT and neural drive might prove particularly valuable in this patient population.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received November 21, 2015.
  • Accepted February 28, 2016.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2016

References

  1. ↵
    1. Mélot C,
    2. Naeije R
    . Pulmonary vascular diseases. Compr Physiol 2011; 1: 593–619.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Neder JA,
    2. Ramos RP,
    3. Ota-Arakaki JS, et al.
    Exercise intolerance in pulmonary arterial hypertension. The role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 604–612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. McCabe C,
    2. Deboeck G,
    3. Harvey I, et al.
    Inefficient exercise gas exchange identifies pulmonary hypertension in chronic thromboembolic obstruction following pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2013; 132: 659–665.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Claessen G,
    2. La Gerche A,
    3. Wielandts J-Y, et al.
    Exercise pathophysiology and sildenafil effects in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Heart Br Card Soc 2015; 101: 637–644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. van der Plas MN,
    2. Reesink HJ,
    3. Roos CM, et al.
    Pulmonary endarterectomy improves dyspnea by the relief of dead space ventilation. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 347–352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Hansen JE,
    2. Ulubay G,
    3. Chow BF, et al.
    Mixed-expired and end-tidal CO2 distinguish between ventilation and perfusion defects during exercise testing in patients with lung and heart diseases. Chest 2007; 132: 977–983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Yasunobu Y,
    2. Oudiz RJ,
    3. Sun X-G, et al.
    End-tidal PCO2 abnormality and exercise limitation in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2005; 127: 1637–1646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Scheidl SJ,
    2. Englisch C,
    3. Kovacs G, et al.
    Diagnosis of CTEPH versus IPAH using capillary to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradients. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 119–124.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Dantzker DR,
    2. Bower JS
    . Mechanisms of gas exchange abnormality in patients with chronic obliterative pulmonary vascular disease. J Clin Invest 1979; 64: 1050–1055.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Delcroix M,
    2. Vonk Noordegraaf A,
    3. Fadel E, et al.
    Vascular and right ventricular remodelling in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 224–232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Naeije R,
    2. van de Borne P
    . Clinical relevance of autonomic nervous system disturbances in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 792–794.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Theodore J,
    2. Robin ED,
    3. Morris AJ, et al.
    Augmented ventilatory response to exercise in pulmonary hypertension. Chest 1986; 89: 39–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Zhai Z,
    2. Murphy K,
    3. Tighe H, et al.
    Differences in ventilatory inefficiency between pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2011; 140: 1284–1291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Whipp BJ
    . The bioenergetic and gas exchange basis of exercise testing. Clin Chest Med 1994; 15: 173–192.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Ward SA,
    2. Whipp BJ,
    3. Koyal S, et al.
    Influence of body CO2 stores on ventilatory dynamics during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1983; 55: 742–749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 48 Issue 1 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 48 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Insights into ventilation–gas exchange coupling in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Insights into ventilation–gas exchange coupling in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
J. Alberto Neder, Roberta P. Ramos, Jaquelina S. Ota-Arakaki, Eloara M.V. Ferreira, Daniel M. Hirai, Priscila A. Sperandio, Maria Clara N. Alencar, Flavio F. Arbex, Danilo C. Berton, Christine D'Arsigny, Denis E. O'Donnell
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2016, 48 (1) 252-254; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01948-2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Insights into ventilation–gas exchange coupling in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
J. Alberto Neder, Roberta P. Ramos, Jaquelina S. Ota-Arakaki, Eloara M.V. Ferreira, Daniel M. Hirai, Priscila A. Sperandio, Maria Clara N. Alencar, Flavio F. Arbex, Danilo C. Berton, Christine D'Arsigny, Denis E. O'Donnell
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2016, 48 (1) 252-254; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01948-2015
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Agora

  • Airway immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in COPD patients
  • Wider access to rifapentine-based regimens is needed for TB care globally
  • Screening for PVOD in heterozygous EIF2AK4 variant carriers
Show more Agora

Research letters

  • Impact of depression and anxiety on exacerbation risk in bronchiectasis
  • Respiratory management of drowning-associated ARF
  • Mitochondrial DNA as biomarker of survival in RA-ILD
Show more Research letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society