Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACT: Breathe free: Open source development of a breath sampler by a consortium of breath researchers

Simon Kitchen, Alasdair Edge, Rob Smith, Paul Thomas, Stephen Fowler, Salman Siddiqui, Marc van der Schee
European Respiratory Journal 2015 46: PA3987; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.PA3987
Simon Kitchen
1Engineering, Owlstone Medical, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alasdair Edge
1Engineering, Owlstone Medical, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rob Smith
1Engineering, Owlstone Medical, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Thomas
2Analytical Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Fowler
3Respiratory and Allergy Research Group, Manchester University, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Salman Siddiqui
4Respiratory Medicine, University of Leicster, Leicster, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc van der Schee
5Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Centre University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: There is emerging evidence for the use of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in pulmonary disease. A major challenge in the field of breath metabolomics is lack of standardised capturing of breath VOCs (ERS taskforce). Hardware differences between groups prevent pooling of data and adequate comparison between analytical techniques.

Methods: The Breathe Free Consortium (www.breathe-free.org) aims to solve this by combining the expertise of over 70 breath researchers with that of engineers and industrial designers in an open source development platform for a breath sampler.

Results: Forum discussions resulted in a design that is flexible to match the requirements for a wide range of conditions. The current functional prototype allows sampling of nasal, oral, bronchial, alveolar and mixed breath through pressure and CO2 gating. Fig 1. displays functioning of the device during 5 breath cycles: the blue line indicating CO2%, red indicating exhalation/inhalation pressure and the green line indicating pump activity (pressure gated).

Conclusion: The Consortium will be able to present the fully functional Breathe Free Sampler at the ERS in September. This can set a widely accepted standard for breath sampling that is freely available. The resulting pooling of datasets and comparison of different analytical techniques will strongly facilitate the integration of breath analysis into clinical practice.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

  • Breath test
  • Biomarkers
  • Airway management
  • Copyright ©ERS 2015
Previous
Back to top
Vol 46 Issue suppl 59 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACT: Breathe free: Open source development of a breath sampler by a consortium of breath researchers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACT: Breathe free: Open source development of a breath sampler by a consortium of breath researchers
Simon Kitchen, Alasdair Edge, Rob Smith, Paul Thomas, Stephen Fowler, Salman Siddiqui, Marc van der Schee
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2015, 46 (suppl 59) PA3987; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.PA3987

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACT: Breathe free: Open source development of a breath sampler by a consortium of breath researchers
Simon Kitchen, Alasdair Edge, Rob Smith, Paul Thomas, Stephen Fowler, Salman Siddiqui, Marc van der Schee
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2015, 46 (suppl 59) PA3987; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.PA3987
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Should pseudomonas aeruginosa be the main target in bronchiectasis?
  • X-Tab: Non-interventional study to assess patient-related mid-term outcomes of omalizumab therapy in severe allergic asthmatic patients
  • Clinical Impact of Gensini score in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Show more 5.2 Monitoring Airway Disease

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society