Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Comparison of breath VOCs collected from controls, healthy smokers, smokers with COPD, and ex-smokers with COPD at two sites

Arne Gaida, Christoph Nell, Olaf Holz, Sven Schuchardt, Rembert Koczulla, Jens Hohlfeld
European Respiratory Journal 2015 46: PA2091; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.PA2091
Arne Gaida
1Clinical Airway Research, Fraunhofer ITEM, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Nell
2Pneumology, Philipps-University Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (UGMLC), Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olaf Holz
1Clinical Airway Research, Fraunhofer ITEM, Hannover, Germany
3Member of the German Center for Lung Research, (BREATH), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Schuchardt
4Bio- and Environmental Analytics, Fraunhofer ITEM, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rembert Koczulla
2Pneumology, Philipps-University Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (UGMLC), Marburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Hohlfeld
1Clinical Airway Research, Fraunhofer ITEM, Hannover, Germany
3Member of the German Center for Lung Research, (BREATH), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

In this ongoing two-center collaboration study (Marburg, Hannover, German Center for Lung Research) we aim to include sufficiently high numbers of patients and controls (total 240, >70% completed) to identify specific COPD related VOC biomarker signals that are independent of the influence of study site.

Tenax adsorption tubes were conditioned in Hannover and shipped to Marburg. Breath collection was performed using identical sampling devices (inhalation via A2 filter and exhalation (flow control) into a stainless steel reservoir), but different mouth pieces. 3L of breath were continuously drawn onto 2 adsorption tubes. Currently data for 53 commonly observed substances is available. Of these 13 VOCs were excluded due to significant differences between study sites.

Including data of 72 samples from healthy non-smokers and COPD ex-smokers from both sites the stepwise inclusion of variables resulted in a model with 4 VOCs that discriminated 83.0% of subjects correctly. In the cross-validation process 77.8% of subjects were correctly identified. Including the 41 healthy smokers and smokers with COPD the model correctly identified only 68.3% of the subjects and the cross-validation value was 61.0%.

Excluding site specific VOCs we were able to identify a VOC pattern of 4 substances that appear to be related to COPD. The model to discriminate COPD patients from controls showed a better performance in the non-smoking groups. Despite lower subject numbers in the actively smoking groups, this result emphasizes that it is important to carefully control for active smoking when searching for COPD related VOC patterns.

  • COPD - diagnosis
  • Biomarkers
  • Inflammation
  • Copyright ©ERS 2015
Previous
Back to top
Vol 46 Issue suppl 59 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of breath VOCs collected from controls, healthy smokers, smokers with COPD, and ex-smokers with COPD at two sites
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of breath VOCs collected from controls, healthy smokers, smokers with COPD, and ex-smokers with COPD at two sites
Arne Gaida, Christoph Nell, Olaf Holz, Sven Schuchardt, Rembert Koczulla, Jens Hohlfeld
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2015, 46 (suppl 59) PA2091; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.PA2091

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparison of breath VOCs collected from controls, healthy smokers, smokers with COPD, and ex-smokers with COPD at two sites
Arne Gaida, Christoph Nell, Olaf Holz, Sven Schuchardt, Rembert Koczulla, Jens Hohlfeld
European Respiratory Journal Sep 2015, 46 (suppl 59) PA2091; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.PA2091
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Alternate overlap syndrome: Association of asthma with obstructive sleep apnea
  • Mathematical model to predict the risk of future exacerbations in non-smoking patients with COPD
  • Prevalence of COPD in heroin smokers screened at substance misuse clinics
Show more 5.2 Monitoring Airway Disease

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society