Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Occupational exposure to organic solvents: a risk factor for pulmonary veno-occlusive disease

David Montani, Edmund M. Lau, Alexis Descatha, Xavier Jaïs, Laurent Savale, Pascal Andujar, Lynda Bensefa-Colas, Barbara Girerd, Inès Zendah, Jerome Le Pavec, Andrei Seferian, Frédéric Perros, Peter Dorfmüller, Elie Fadel, Florent Soubrier, Oliver Sitbon, Gérald Simonneau, Marc Humbert
European Respiratory Journal 2015 46: 1721-1731; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00814-2015
David Montani
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
11Both authors contributed equally to this work
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.montani@bct.aphp.fr
Edmund M. Lau
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
11Both authors contributed equally to this work
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexis Descatha
4AP-HP UVSQ, Occupational Health Unit/Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, UMS 011-UMR 1168, University Hospital of Poincaré, Garches, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xavier Jaïs
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Savale
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pascal Andujar
5CHI Créteil, Service de Pneumologie et Pathologie professionnelle, Creteil, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynda Bensefa-Colas
6Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, EA 4064, Laboratoire Santé Publique et Environnement, Occupational Diseases Dept, University Hospital of Centre of Paris COCHIN, AP-HP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Girerd
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inès Zendah
7Hôpital Abderrahmène Mami des Maladies Thoraciques, Paviilon I, Tunis, Tunisia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerome Le Pavec
9Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et Vasculaire, Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrei Seferian
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frédéric Perros
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Dorfmüller
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
8Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elie Fadel
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
9Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et Vasculaire, Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Florent Soubrier
10 UMR_S956, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Oncogénétique et Angiogénétique Moléculaire, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Sitbon
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gérald Simonneau
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Humbert
1Université Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
2AP-HP, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire Sévère, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU) Thorax Innovation (TORINO), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
3UMR_S999, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) en Recherche sur le Médicament et l'Innovation Thérapeutique (LERMIT), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marc Humbert
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare form of pulmonary hypertension characterised by predominant remodelling of pulmonary venules. Bi-allelic mutations in the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α kinase 4 (EIF2AK4) gene were recently described as the major cause of heritable PVOD, but risk factors associated with PVOD remain poorly understood. Occupational exposures have been proposed as a potential risk factor for PVOD, but epidemiological studies are lacking.

A case–control study was conducted in consecutive PVOD (cases, n=33) and pulmonary arterial hypertension patients (controls, n=65). Occupational exposure was evaluated via questionnaire interview with blinded assessments using an expert consensus approach and a job exposure matrix (JEM).

Using the expert consensus approach, PVOD was significantly associated with occupational exposure to organic solvents (adjusted OR 12.8, 95% CI 2.7–60.8), with trichloroethylene being the main agent implicated (adjusted OR 8.2, 95% CI 1.4–49.4). JEM analysis independently confirmed the association between PVOD and trichloroethylene exposure. Absence of significant trichloroethylene exposure was associated with a younger age of disease (54.8±21.4 years, p=0.037) and a high prevalence of harbouring bi-allelic EIF2AK4 mutations (41.7% versus 0%, p=0.015).

Occupational exposure to organic solvents may represent a novel risk factor for PVOD. Genetic background and environmental exposure appear to influence the phenotypic expression of the disease.

Abstract

Occupational exposure to organic solvents is a novel risk factor for pulmonary veno-occlusive disease http://ow.ly/StFsk

Introduction

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare form of pulmonary hypertension (PH) characterised by progressive occlusion of pulmonary veins by fibrous tissue and intimal thickening, with preferential involvement of venules and small veins within the lobular septa [1, 2]. In the current PH classification, PVOD and pulmonary capillary haemangiomatosis (PCH) are classified together as a unified entity as Group 1′ PVOD/PCH, as both conditions share overlapping clinical, histopathological and genetic features, and are considered to represent spectrums of a common disorder [3, 4].

The pathogenesis and risk factors associated with the development of PVOD remain poorly understood. Recently, autosomal recessive bi-allelic mutations in the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α kinase 4 (EIF2AK4) gene have been identified as the major genetic cause of PVOD/PCH [5, 6]. EIF2AK4 bi-allelic mutations were identified in all patients with heritable forms of PVOD from the French PH Network and, interestingly, ∼25% of apparently sporadic cases of PVOD were also found to carry bi-allelic EIF2AK4 mutations.

Apart from genetic predisposition, other risk factors have also been identified to be associated with PVOD [7]. These include smoking [8], chemotherapeutic agents (particularly alkylating agents) [9, 10] and connective tissue diseases [11]. Indeed, pulmonary venous involvement is frequently observed in PH associated with connective tissue diseases [12–14] and as many as 60% of patients with systemic sclerosis-associated pre-capillary PH may display clinical features consistent with PVOD [13].

Chemical exposure has previously been proposed to be a potential aetiological factor, with case reports suggesting the development of PVOD following various occupational exposures [1, 11]. Accordingly, we have also observed from our clinical experience that some PVOD patients report an occupational history of significant exposure to chemicals such as organic solvents. Furthermore, numerous epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between exposure to organic solvents and systemic sclerosis [15–17]. Given the above considerations and the aforementioned high frequency of venular involvement in systemic sclerosis-associated pre-capillary PH, we speculated whether occupational exposure to organic solvents might also be relevant in PVOD.

The aim of the present study was to perform a case–control study to evaluate the association between PVOD and occupational exposure to chemicals, particularly organic solvents. Moreover, we were interested to assess whether genetic factors had a modifying effect on this potential association.

Methods

Study population

This was a case–control study conducted at the National Reference Centre for Severe Pulmonary Hypertension, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. Between September 2008 and February 2010, patients above the age of 18 with a diagnosis of PVOD (cases) and idiopathic, anorexigen-induced or heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (controls) were eligible for study participation. To avoid selection bias, consecutive consenting patients with a diagnosis of PVOD or PAH who presented to the outpatient clinic for routine follow-up assessment were invited to participate.

The diagnosis of PAH was made according to current guidelines [18] and all patients had confirmed pre-capillary PH at diagnostic right heart catheterisation. The diagnosis of PVOD was established according to the following criteria and only patients with either confirmed or highly probable PVOD were recruited. Patients were considered to have confirmed PVOD if a histological specimen (from either lung biopsy, explanted lung or post mortem examination) was consistent with PVOD or they were carriers of bi-allelic mutations in the EFI2AK4 gene. Patients were also deemed to have confirmed PVOD if they presented with highly probable PVOD and developed pulmonary oedema following the initiation of specific PAH therapy. Highly probable PVOD was considered to be present if patients fulfilled at least two of the following three criteria: 1) two or more characteristic radiological signs of PVOD (septal lines, centrilobular ground glass opacities, enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes) on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest, 2) diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide to alveolar volume ratio (DLCO/VA) <55% or resting arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) on room air <65 mmHg or 3) presence of alveolar haemorrhage on bronchoalveolar lavage (Golde score >80 or haemosiderin-laden macrophages >30%). As ante mortem diagnosis of PVOD with lung biopsy is not usually feasible due to the presence of severe PH, we have previously demonstrated that a noninvasive diagnostic approach based on the above criteria is highly specific for PVOD [1, 8]. Exclusion criteria for both cases and controls included a history of connective tissue disease, portal hypertension, HIV infection, congenital heart disease and thromboembolic disease.

Clinical characteristics of all study subjects, including baseline demographic information, pulmonary haemodynamics, New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and lung function testing, were retrieved from the Registry of the French PH Network. This Registry was established in accordance with French bioethics laws (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés) and all patients gave informed consent.

Genetic analysis

Genetic counselling and testing were proposed to both PVOD and PAH patients. PAH and PVOD patients were screened for point mutations and large rearrangements of the bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) gene, the main predisposing factor for heritable PAH. Patients with confirmed or highly probable PVOD were also screened for EIF2AK4 mutations. In the French Referral Centre, BMPR2 mutation testing has been conducted since 2003 and EIF2AK4 mutation testing began in 2013 following the first report of bi-allelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene as a cause of heritable PVOD. Eight PVOD patients died before DNA collection was possible for EIF2AK4 testing. Genetic analyses of BMPR2 and EIF2AK4 genes were performed as previously described [5, 19]. All patients undergoing genetic testing provided written informed consent.

Occupational exposure questionnaire

Each subject's work history was determined by means of a standardised occupational questionnaire conducted by an experienced interviewer. The questionnaire was designed by a PH physician (D.M.) together with an occupational medicine physician (A.D.). Each job lasting for a period of at least 3 months was recorded, and details included the job title, activity sector and associated tasks. Information on specific job tasks included a complete description of the frequency and duration of the task, the use of protection devices, and direct or indirect exposure to chemicals, dusts, gases or fumes. Subjects were also asked to self-report whether they had specific work or leisure exposure to the following substances: any organic solvents, trichloroethylene, paints, varnish, glues, degreasing agents, plastic resins, detergents, disinfectants, cosmetic products, insecticides, herbicides, epoxy derivatives and silica.

Expert consensus assessment

In the primary analysis, an expert consensus approach was employed and three occupational medicine physicians (A.D., P.A. and L.B.) blinded to the case or control status of study subjects reviewed each questionnaire. For each job suspected to be associated with a specific exposure, the duration of exposure (number of years) was determined. Recent exposures (<10 years from date of diagnosis) were considered separately, considering plausible latency between exposure and disease development. Weighting factors were attributed for the intensity of exposure (low, intermediate or high level) and the frequency of exposure (sporadic, regular but not often (<25% of the working day) and often (≥25% of the working day)). A semi-quantitative exposure category was then built for the assessment of cumulative exposure level: 0, unexposed; 1, trivial; 2, moderate; 3, high. From this expert consensus approach, an exposure category of 2 or more was considered to be indicative of positive exposure.

Job exposure matrix assessment

A job exposure matrix (JEM) was also used to evaluate occupational exposures (Matgéné) [20, 21]. Both expert consensus assessment and JEM are commonly used to evaluate occupational exposures [20, 22, 23]. Therefore, these two independent assessment tools were used as complementary analyses to increase the robustness of any positive associations. For JEM analysis, occupations and activity sectors were coded according to the French “Professions et Categories Socioprofessionelles” (1994) and “Nomenclature d'Activités Francaise” (2000). Based on the individual occupation and activity sector, the JEM enables an estimation of cumulative exposure to specific solvent classes (trichloroethylene, white spirits, benzene and aliphatic petroleum solvents). For each solvent class, the JEM provides information on the probability, intensity and frequency of exposure associated with each job. From the JEM, scores was assigned for the probability, intensity and frequency of exposure (1, low; 2, moderate; 3, high). A cumulative exposure index score (CEI) was constructed from the JEM as follows: CEI=probability×intensity×frequency×duration (years). For example, a job considered to have a low probability (score 1), low intensity (score 1) and high frequency (score 3) of exposure to trichloroethylene with a duration of 5 years will have a CEI=1×1×3×5=15. A CEI >10 was considered to be indicative of positive exposure. CEI was calculated with and without adjusting for recent exposure (<10 years from diagnosis). The date of diagnosis was considered to be the date of diagnostic right heart catheterisation.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as mean±sd unless otherwise stated. Continuous variables were compared with independent sample t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Proportions were compared using Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Unconditional logistical regression analyses were performed to assess the association between occupation exposures and PVOD, with multivariate analysis adjusting for the presence of confounding factors. Statistical significance was inferred at p<0.05 and all analysis were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Patients

A total of 100 consecutive subjects were recruited (PVOD, n=34; PAH, n=66) and underwent detailed occupational exposure assessment. However, during the course of the study two patients with an initial classification of PVOD and PAH had alternative final diagnoses (systemic sclerosis, n=1 and portal hypertension, n=1, respectively), resulting in a total of 33 PVOD and 65 PAH patients included in the final analysis.

PVOD patients were older compared with PAH patients (60.4±18.1 versus 50.6±15.8 years, p=0.0072), and a bimodal age distribution was seen in the PVOD group with two apparent peaks occurring at the 20–30 and 70–80 years deciles (figure 1). The younger peak was predominantly represented by patients with heritable PVOD (n=5) harbouring bi-allelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene including a mean of age 26.1±3.6 years and a sex ratio (male:female) of 3:2. In contrast, the PAH group displayed a unimodal age distribution peaking at the 50–60 years decile.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Age distribution of a) pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD; n=33) and b) pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; n=65) patients. PVOD patients displayed a bimodal distribution with the first peak occurring at the 20–30 years decile and a later peak at the 70–80 years decile. The first peak corresponded mainly to patients with heritable PVOD carrying bi-allelic mutations in the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α kinase 4 (EIF2AK4) gene. In contrast, a unimodal age distribution peaking at the 50–60 years decile was observed in the PAH group.

Compared with PAH, a higher male:female ratio was found in the PVOD group (4.5 versus 0.4, p<0.001). PVOD patients also had a higher prevalence of significant smoking history of >5 pack-years (78.8% versus 32.3%, p<0.001) as well as higher cumulative smoking exposure (33.0±24.7 versus 8.0±14.3 pack-years, p<0.0001). The association between PVOD and smoking remained significant after adjustment for age and sex.

PVOD patients presented with more severe functional impairment as evidenced by lower 6MWD (226±166 versus 353±137 m, p=0.0002) and higher NYHA FC (p=0.082), despite less severe haemodynamic impairment at diagnosis compared with PAH patients. Table 1 summarises the baseline characteristics of the study population.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics of study population

Expert consensus assessment of occupational exposure

From the primary expert consensus assessment, a significant occupational history of exposure was elicited in 72.7% of PVOD patients compared with 27.7% of PAH patients (p<0.001). When analysis was stratified by male sex only, the association between occupation exposure and PVOD remained significant (74.1% versus 25.9%, p=0.016) (figure 2a and b). Of the PVOD patients with a significant exposure history, the most common occupational exposures included any organic solvents (79.2%), including trichloroethylene (58.3%), degreasing agents (29.2%), paints (25.0%) and varnish/glue (25%) (figure 3).

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Proportion of patients with a significant history of occupational exposures. a) Compared with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a higher proportion of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) patients had a documented history of occupational exposures (PAH, n=65; PVOD, n=33). b) The relationship remained significant when analysis was stratified by male sex only (PAH, n=20; PVOD, n=27).

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Main occupational exposures identified by blinded expert consensus assessment in pulmonary veno-occlusive disease patients (n=24). TCE: trichloroethylene.

Table 2 summarises the association between exposure to specific agents and PVOD. Following adjustment for age, sex and smoking history, both organic solvents and trichloroethylene exposure remained significantly associated with PVOD (adjusted OR for organic solvents 12.8, 95% CI 2.7–60.8; p=0.001 and adjusted OR for trichloroethylene 8.2, 95% CI 1.4–49.4; p=0.022). The median latency between first exposure to trichloroethylene and PVOD diagnosis was 48 years (interquartile range (IQR) 39–52) with a median exposure duration of 17 years (IQR 9–33). The most common occupations resulting in trichloroethylene exposure included metal workers, mechanics and repairers, building painters, and cleaners.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Expert consensus assessment of common occupational exposures

Job exposure matrix assessment

Table 3 summarises the association between PVOD and exposure to four groups of solvents (trichloroethylene, white spirits, benzene and petroleum solvents) using the JEM approach. Trichloroethylene was the only solvent that was significantly associated with PVOD, with and without adjustment for recent exposure (adjusted OR 9.8, 95% CI 1.5–62.3 and 6.4, 95% 1.3–30.4, respectively; both p<0.05). The agreement between expert consensus assessment and JEM assessment of exposure to trichloroethylene had a κ-value of 0.61.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Association between pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) and different solvent classes using the job exposure matrix

Relationship between EIF2AK4 mutation and occupational exposure

Genetic results were available in 88 (89.8%) patients within the entire study cohort (EIF2AK4 mutations screening in 75.8% of the PVOD group and BMPR2 status in 96.9% of the PAH group). Five out of 25 (20.0%) PVOD patients carried bi-allelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene, of which two had a familial history of PVOD. No PVOD patients tested positive for the BMPR2 mutation. For the PAH group, 16 out of 63 (25.4%) harboured heterozygous mutation in the BMPR2 gene (table 1).

As trichloroethylene was the main aetiological agent associated with PVOD identified from both the expert consensus and JEM assessments, we explored whether there were any phenotypic differences in PVOD patients with and without a history of significant exposure to trichloroethylene. PVOD patients who were not significantly exposed to trichloroethylene were younger (54.8±21.4 versus 67.9±8.1 years, p=0.037) and, importantly, they were more likely to harbour EIF2AK4 mutations (41.7% versus 0%, p=0.015). No significant differences in haemodynamics or functional capacity were seen between the trichloroethylene exposed and nonexposed groups. Table 4 summarises the characteristics of PVOD patients stratified by exposure to trichloroethylene.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Characteristics of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) patients with and without significant exposure to trichloroethylene#

Pathologic assessment of PVOD patients with occupational exposure

Histologic specimens were available for analysis in seven PVOD patients, including one patient with a history of positive exposure to trichloroethylene. This patient demonstrated venular, capillary and arterial lesions that were typical of PVOD, undistinguishable from idiopathic or heritable PVOD (figure 4).

FIGURE 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4

Histology from lungs of a patient with pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) with positive history of exposure to trichloroethylene without bi-allelic eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α kinase 4 (EIF2AK4) mutations. a, b) Septal veins and pre-septal venules are obliterated by collagen-rich, loose fibrosis; the parenchyma is otherwise lacking important interstitial remodelling. c) Patchy foci of capillary haemangiomatosis are present on most samples, frequently in association with remodelled pulmonary vessels and microvessels (centre). d) Thickening of alveolar walls is due to a multiplication of capillaries; note the abundance of pigmented macrophages (siderophages) within the alveoli. Scale bars: a, b, d) 100 μm; c) 1000 μm.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study represents the largest series of PVOD patients to be reported and is the first to systemically evaluate occupational exposures as a potential risk factor for PVOD using detailed questionnaire interview. We identified an association between occupational exposure to organic solvents and PVOD, with trichloroethylene (a chlorinated solvent) being the main agent implicated in this association. This association was found using two independent methods of exposure assessment, i.e. expert consensus approach and JEM. Moreover, we found distinct phenotypic differences in PVOD patients with and without a history of exposure. Compared with PVOD patients with a history of exposure to trichloroethylene, unexposed patients were younger and had a higher prevalence of harbouring bi-allelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene. These findings offer novel insights into the risk factors and pathobiology of PVOD.

PVOD is a rare form of PH with an estimated annual incidence rate of ∼0.1–0.2 per million [1, 11]. The defining pathological feature of PVOD is the diffuse involvement of venules and septal veins in a vasculopathy characterised by intimal fibrosis resulting in luminal narrowing or obliteration [2]. The clinical presentation of PVOD can mimic PAH with insidious onset of breathlessness and signs of PH. Compared with PAH, the clinical course of PVOD is usually more aggressive and is characterised by poor response to PAH therapy. In fact, the use of pulmonary vasodilators can be associated with the development of life-threatening pulmonary oedema. Lung transplantation remains the preferred therapy for eligible PVOD patients [1].

Chlorinated organic solvents have been associated with numerous adverse health effects, including acute and chronic neurotoxicity, hepatitis, renal injury, dermatitis haematological effects, and lung cancer [24–26]. Furthermore, solvent exposure has been linked in epidemiological studies to the development of systemic sclerosis, a known cause of PVOD. Although conflicting results have been reported in the literature, a meta-analysis pooling data from 11 studies (1291 patients and 3435 controls) demonstrated a significant association between solvent exposure and systemic sclerosis with an increased OR of 1.8 (95% CI 1.2–2.5; p=0.002) [27]. Furthermore, a previous study by Niertart et al. [16] found that trichloroethylene was a particular risk factor for systemic sclerosis in male patients, especially in those with serological evidence of topoisomerase 1 antibodies. Pre-capillary PH is a lethal complication of systemic sclerosis with a lifetime risk of ∼10% [28]. Although most cases of pre-capillary PH in systemic sclerosis are attributed as PAH, emerging evidence suggests that pulmonary venous involvement presenting as PVOD is an under-recognised complication [13]. In addition, a recent study highlighted that the majority of patients with systemic sclerosis associated pre-capillary PH demonstrate characteristic radiological features of PVOD on chest HRCT [14]. It remains entirely speculative whether PVOD and systemic sclerosis might represent different spectrums of potential end-organ toxicities associated with organic solvent exposure.

The epidemiology and risk factors associated with the development of PVOD remain poorly understood. The largest series of PVOD patients published to date included only 24 patients [8]. Previous studies have indicated that exposure to toxins such as cigarette smoke and chemotherapeutic agents is associated with the development of PVOD [8, 9]. The association between smoking and PVOD was confirmed in this study. It is believed that pulmonary endothelial injury is perhaps the common inciting event that underlies the association between toxic exposures and PVOD. However, very little is known regarding the effects of solvents such as trichloroethylene on endothelial cell function. A study by Ou et al. [29] showed that in bovine coronary endothelial cells, trichloroethylene altered endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity and induced eNOS to shift from nitric oxide to superoxide anion generation. However, even if endothelial injury does represent a common mechanistic pathway of toxin exposures, it is unknown why there might be a predilection for pulmonary venular injury rather than arterial injury for these specific exposures.

Recently, bi-allelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene coding for a serine/threonine-protein kinase, also known as general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2), were found to be the major cause of heritable PVOD [5]. GCN2 is a member of a family of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 kinases that become activated in response to diverse cellular stresses. Upon amino acid starvation, GCN2 phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor 2, which leads to preferential synthesis of stress proteins [30]. It remains elusive on how loss-of-function mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene are related to pulmonary vascular remodelling and how GCN2 influences vascular homeostasis in different vascular compartments such as arteries or veins.

GCN2 appears important in protecting against liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride, a chlorinated industrial solvent related to trichloroethylene. GCN2 knockout mice (GCN2−/−) are more susceptible to acute and chronic liver toxicity induced by carbon tetrachloride and increased oxidative stress appears to be a potentially relevant mechanism [31]. GCN2−/− animals have lower levels of glutathionine peroxidase in the liver [32] and GCN2 activation has antioxidant effects on hepatocytes leading to a decrease in hydrogen peroxide levels [33]. It is of interest that mice exposed to trichloroethylene inhalation demonstrate lung injury with vacuolation of club cells and marked thickening of the capillary endothelium accompanied by a fall in reduced glutathionine content together with a concomitant increase in oxidised glutathionine, which are indicative of oxidative stress [34]. Oxidative stress is known to play a role in vascular remodelling, including PH [35, 36], and might represent an important mechanistic pathway for the development of PVOD. It remains unknown whether environmental exposures to toxins such as cigarette smoke or trichloroethylene have an effect of lung vascular GCN2 function and this should be explored further in animal studies.

Our present study also provides important insights into the potential interaction between gene and environment in the phenotypic manifestation of PVOD. One phenotype appears to be characterised by an older age of disease onset, positive exposure history and absence of EIF2AK4 mutations. In contrast, patients without a history of exposure are younger at diagnosis with a high prevalence of heritable disease. It should be emphasised that the absolute risk of developing PVOD associated with organic solvents and trichloroethylene exposure remains small, as these agents are widely used in many industrial sectors and PVOD remains a rare disease. Individual susceptibility must be important and it is known that polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP2E1) affect metabolism of trichloroethylene, possibly influencing susceptibility to trichloroethylene-induced toxicity in humans [37]. Finally, the long latency between initial exposure to trichloroethylene and the development of clinically overt PVOD among certain patients suggests that chronic and repeated exposure is probably necessary to induce significant pulmonary venous remodelling.

Study limitations

Although our study may be considered to be relatively small, PVOD is a rare disease and highly significant associations were found with organic solvents and trichloroethylene exposure, with the acknowledgement that confidence limits of odds ratios were wide due to our sample size. As with all case–control studies, assessment of exposure is subject to recall bias and does not provide any proof of causality between the exposure and disease. Reliable exposure assessment can also be challenging and several methods are available to estimate exposure retrospectively. Therefore, we utilised two separate methods (i.e. expert consensus approach and JEM) to assess occupational exposure in order to increase the robustness of our findings. Although the agreement between the two methods was moderate to good, this is consistent with published studies which have also demonstrated moderate agreement when different exposure assessment methodologies are employed [22, 23]. It should be viewed as reassuring that a positive association between trichloroethylene and PVOD was demonstrated using two independent assessment tools.

PAH patients were younger and had a higher proportion of females, which may bias towards a reduced probability of relevant occupational exposures. However, PVOD remained significantly associated with organic solvents and trichloroethylene after adjustment for age, sex and smoking history. The addition of a population-level control group may also strengthen the findings of our study. At present, no financial compensation has been proposed to exposed patients with PVOD in France and the study was conducted with the understanding that patients will not derive direct benefits from participation. Therefore, it is unlikely that financial motivation or secondary gain would have resulted in reporting bias.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that occupational exposure to organic solvent and trichloroethylene is associated with PVOD. Genetic background and environmental exposure appear to influence the phenotypic expression of the disease. Clinicians should obtain a detailed history of exposure to organic solvents, particularly trichloroethylene.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside the online version of this article at erj.ersjournals.com

  • Received May 22, 2015.
  • Accepted August 27, 2015.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2015

References

  1. ↵
    1. Montani D,
    2. Price LC,
    3. Dorfmuller P, et al.
    Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 189–200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Pietra GG,
    2. Capron F,
    3. Stewart S, et al.
    Pathologic assessment of vasculopathies in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 25S–32S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Simonneau G,
    2. Gatzoulis MA,
    3. Adatia I, et al.
    Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: D34–D41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Lantuejoul S,
    2. Sheppard MN,
    3. Corrin B, et al.
    Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Am J Surgical Pathol 2006; 30: 850–857.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Eyries M,
    2. Montani D,
    3. Girerd B, et al.
    EIF2AK4 mutations cause pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, a recessive form of pulmonary hypertension. Nature Genet 2014; 46: 65–69.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Best DH,
    2. Sumner KL,
    3. Austin ED, et al.
    EIF2AK4 mutations in pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis. Chest 2014; 145: 231–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Galie N,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Vachiery J-L, et al.
    2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 903–975.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Montani D,
    2. Achouh L,
    3. Dorfmuller P, et al.
    Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease: clinical, functional, radiologic, and hemodynamic characteristics and outcome of 24 cases confirmed by histology. Medicine 2008; 87: 220–233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Ranchoux B,
    2. Gunther S,
    3. Quarck R, et al.
    Chemotherapy-induced pulmonary hypertension: role of alkylating agents. Am J Pathol 2015; 185: 356–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Perros F,
    2. Gunther S,
    3. Ranchoux B, et al.
    Mitomycin-induced pulmonary veno-occlusive disease: evidence from human disease and animal models. Circulation 2015; 132: 834–847.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Mandel J,
    2. Mark EJ,
    3. Hales CA
    . Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 1964–1973.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Johnson SR,
    2. Patsios D,
    3. Hwang DM, et al.
    Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and scleroderma associated pulmonary hypertension. J Rheum 2006; 33: 2347–2350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Dorfmuller P,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Perros F, et al.
    Fibrous remodeling of the pulmonary venous system in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue diseases. Humam Pathol 2007; 38: 893–902.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Gunther S,
    2. Jais X,
    3. Maitre S, et al.
    Computed tomography findings of pulmonary venoocclusive disease in scleroderma patients presenting with precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 2995–3005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Marie I,
    2. Gehanno JF,
    3. Bubenheim M, et al.
    Prospective study to evaluate the association between systemic sclerosis and occupational exposure and review of the literature. Autoimmun Rev 2014; 13: 151–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Nietert PJ,
    2. Sutherland SE,
    3. Silver RM, et al.
    Is occupational organic solvent exposure a risk factor for scleroderma? Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 1111–1118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Barragan-Martinez C,
    2. Speck-Hernandez CA,
    3. Montoya-Ortiz G, et al.
    Organic solvents as risk factor for autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One 2012; 7: e51506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Hoeper MM,
    2. Bogaard HJ,
    3. Condliffe R, et al.
    Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: D42–D50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Girerd B,
    2. Montani D,
    3. Coulet F, et al.
    Clinical outcomes of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients carrying an ACVRLl1 (ALK1) mutation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 851–861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Févotte J,
    2. Dananché B,
    3. Delabre L, et al.
    Matgéné: a program to develop job-exposure matrices in the general population in france. Ann Occup Hyg 2011; 55: 865–878.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Institut de Veille Sanitaire. Exp-pro: Outils d'aide à l’évaluation des expositions professionnelles [Exp-pro: tools for the evaluation of occupational exposures]. http://exppro.invs.sante.fr/exppro/accueil. Date last accessed: March 15, 2015.
  22. ↵
    1. Bourgkard E,
    2. Wild P,
    3. Gonzalez M, et al.
    Comparison of exposure assessment methods in a lung cancer case-control study: performance of a lifelong task-based questionnaire for asbestos and PAHs. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70: 884–891.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Offermans NS,
    2. Vermeulen R,
    3. Burdorf A, et al.
    Comparison of expert and job-exposure matrix-based retrospective exposure assessment of occupational carcinogens in the Netherlands cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69: 745–751.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Baker EL
    . A review of recent research on health effects of human occupational exposure to organic solvents. A critical review. J Occup Med 1994; 36: 1079–1092.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ruder AM,
    2. Yiin JH,
    3. Waters MA, et al.
    The upper midwest health study: gliomas and occupational exposure to chlorinated solvents. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70: 73–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Mattei F,
    2. Guida F,
    3. Matrat M, et al.
    Exposure to chlorinated solvents and lung cancer: results of the ICARE study. Occup Environ Med 2014; 71: 681–689.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Kettaneh A,
    2. Al Moufti O,
    3. Tiev KP, et al.
    Occupational exposure to solvents and gender-related risk of systemic sclerosis: a metaanalysis of case-control studies. J Rheum 2007; 34: 97–103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Hachulla E,
    2. Gressin V,
    3. Guillevin L, et al.
    Early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: a French nationwide prospective multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 3792–3800.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Ou Z,
    2. McCarver DG,
    3. Hines RN, et al.
    Trichloroethylene decreases heat shock protein 90 interactions with endothelial nitric oxide synthase: implications for endothelial cell proliferation. Toxicol Sci 2003; 73: 90–97.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Donnelly N,
    2. Gorman AM,
    3. Gupta S, et al.
    The EIF2alpha kinases: their structures and functions. Cell Mol Life Sci 2013; 70: 3493–3511.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Arriazu E,
    2. Ruiz de Galarreta M,
    3. Lopez-Zabalza MJ, et al.
    GCN2 kinase is a key regulator of fibrogenesis and acute and chronic liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride in mice. Lab Invest 2013; 93: 303–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Chaveroux C,
    2. Lambert-Langlais S,
    3. Parry L, et al.
    Identification of GCN2 as new redox regulator for oxidative stress prevention in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res 2011; 415: 120–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Arriazu E,
    2. Perez de Obanos MP,
    3. Lopez-Zabalza MJ, et al.
    Amino acid deprivation decreases intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species in hepatic stellate cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 2010; 26: 281–290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Giovanetti A,
    2. Rossi L,
    3. Mancuso M, et al.
    Analysis of lung damage induced by trichloroethylene inhalation in mice fed diets with low, normal, and high copper content. Toxicol Pathol 1998; 26: 628–635.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Dorfmuller P,
    2. Chaumais MC,
    3. Giannakouli M, et al.
    Increased oxidative stress and severe arterial remodeling induced by permanent high-flow challenge in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Respir Res 2011; 12: 119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Fortuno A,
    2. San Jose G,
    3. Moreno MU, et al.
    Oxidative stress and vascular remodelling. Exp Physiol 2005; 90: 457–462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Lipscomb JC,
    2. Garrett CM,
    3. Snawder JE
    . Cytochrome P450-dependent metabolism of trichloroethylene: interindividual differences in humans. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1997; 142: 311–318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 46 Issue 6 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Journal: 46 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Occupational exposure to organic solvents: a risk factor for pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Occupational exposure to organic solvents: a risk factor for pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
David Montani, Edmund M. Lau, Alexis Descatha, Xavier Jaïs, Laurent Savale, Pascal Andujar, Lynda Bensefa-Colas, Barbara Girerd, Inès Zendah, Jerome Le Pavec, Andrei Seferian, Frédéric Perros, Peter Dorfmüller, Elie Fadel, Florent Soubrier, Oliver Sitbon, Gérald Simonneau, Marc Humbert
European Respiratory Journal Dec 2015, 46 (6) 1721-1731; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00814-2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Occupational exposure to organic solvents: a risk factor for pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
David Montani, Edmund M. Lau, Alexis Descatha, Xavier Jaïs, Laurent Savale, Pascal Andujar, Lynda Bensefa-Colas, Barbara Girerd, Inès Zendah, Jerome Le Pavec, Andrei Seferian, Frédéric Perros, Peter Dorfmüller, Elie Fadel, Florent Soubrier, Oliver Sitbon, Gérald Simonneau, Marc Humbert
European Respiratory Journal Dec 2015, 46 (6) 1721-1731; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00814-2015
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • Epidemiology, occupational and environmental lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Original Articles

  • Ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax
  • Systematic assessment of respiratory health in illness susceptible athletes
  • Identifying early PAH biomarkers in systemic sclerosis
Show more Original Articles

Pulmonary vascular disease

  • Validation of a refined 4-stratum risk assessment score for PH
  • RA–RV interaction in pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Temporal trends in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Show more Pulmonary vascular disease

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society